Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Land actors warn of looming violent conflicts due to escalating land grabbing in Sebei and Bugisu sub-regions.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

During the 9th National Land Awareness Week, a campaign aimed at educating communities on their land rights and promoting sustainable land use in Eastern Uganda, Land actors unveiled shocking realities. Local communities revealed that the issue of escalating land grabbing in Sebei and Bugisu was a potential trigger for violent conflict if left unresolved.

The 5-day-long activity, held under the theme “Promoting Land Rights and Sustainable Land Use for Inclusive and Sustainable Development,” created opportunities for engagement with farming communities, local governments, and customary landowners. However, the stories that emerged were filled with tales of dispossession, impunity, and betrayal, with influential individuals and state agencies involved in serious violations and abuses that have continued to fuel conflict, insecurity, and suffering in rural areas.

Lwanga Deborah Marie, who works with ActionAid International Uganda and is one of the experts who participated in the campaign, noted that it has become alarmingly easy for politically connected individuals to take land from impoverished communities.

“Many community members, the have-nots, are the majority. The haves are the minority. But there have been a lot of stories, a lot of testimonies coming in from the community regarding people with power, people with money, people with connections, coming in to displace the vast majority of the communities and go ahead to get titles, land titles to land on which community members are staying.”

In Kween district, sub-counties such as Ngenge, Ngiriki, and Chepsukunya were cited as hotspots. Experts warned that this unchecked pattern of elite-driven land grabbing could spark instability. “It is a ticking time bomb. If it is not addressed, there are fears it could cause bloodshed,” Deborah cautioned.

The experts also uncovered allegations of violent evictions by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), which has displaced ancestral communities in the name of conservation. Reports gathered during the campaign pointed to killings, injuries, destruction of crops, and illegal detentions carried out during UWA’s operations.

“We received reports of people shot at and killed, and those shot and injured. We actually met individuals with their stories and medical records regarding these UWA violations and the destruction of food crops,” Deborah recounted.

Such behavior is deemed inhumane and violates people’s human rights, as Deborah explained.

“And this violates not only the right to food but also the right to life. It violates the right to be free from cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. The situation is unacceptable. There have been reports of illegal detentions by UWA. These have been one of the troubling revelations during our interactions with community members,” she said.

One community in Kapkwata, commonly referred to as Rwanda village, was forced off its ancestral land to create space for the Kapkwata forest reserve. Since eviction, the residents have been living in what experts likened to an internally displaced persons’ camp—without toilets, health facilities, or farmland. Their demand, as experts relayed, is not charity but justice: an alternative land to rebuild their lives.

The activity also revealed a disturbing pattern of gender discrimination in land ownership. According to these experts, they noted that even when women contribute money toward purchasing land, they are not recognized as co-owners but merely as “witnesses.”

“The bigger picture of their rights being violated is their land rights,” Deborah explained. “We heard testimonies of women contributing money towards land purchases, but they didn’t appear as co-owners. They only appeared as witnesses.” Experts warned that these practices not only deny women economic security but also perpetuate cycles of marginalization across generations.

Byantalo Hassan Abdallah, an officer from the Ministry of Lands, acknowledged government shortcomings. He admitted that communities evicted by UWA have been waiting in vain for resettlement for years, despite repeated promises of assistance. “The government has promised several times to resettle them, but this has not come to pass,” he said.

While some displaced families have been moved to Bulambuli district under interventions by the Office of the Prime Minister, communities like Rwanda remain in limbo. But Byantalo says the government and the Ministry are working hard to resettle this community.

“During the discussions that we had on the ground, especially with the communities in Rwanda, they clearly stated to us that officials from the Ministry of Land and Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) came and visited them and told them they were trying to secure some piece of land on which these people are yet to be resettled. So, the government is not seated, the Ministry of Land is working with other government agencies and ministries.” Byantalo expressed

Other structural challenges were identified, including land registration costs, which continue to prevent people from accessing formal protection. The experts also pointed to dysfunctional Area Land Committees, many of whose members confessed ignorance of their roles, thereby worsening disputes instead of resolving them.

Experts involved in the campaign called for significant reforms and follow-ups. They urged the government to prioritize resettling displaced communities fairly and with dignity, making land registration more affordable and transparent, providing widespread education to dispel myths about customary titles, and training Area Land Committees to perform their roles effectively.

They also emphasized the need to protect women’s land rights and close gender gaps in ownership, while holding state agencies, such as UWA, accountable for human rights abuses.

Christine Nabunya, a lawyer and land rights advocate, summed up the call: “We need more empowerment and sensitization of communities. Most people believe they don’t have the right to land, especially women. That is really absurd.”

As the Awareness Week concluded with a roundtable discussion, the experts unanimously agreed: the land grabbing in Sebei and Bugisu is not just a matter of property; it’s a matter of justice, survival, and peace. The stark injustice of these land issues should stir a sense of moral outrage, compelling us to work towards a fair and equitable resolution.

If the escalating land grabbing, compounded by violent state-backed evictions, is not addressed, the region could be plunged into deeper conflict. For farming communities, land is not just an asset but the foundation of food security and livelihoods. Losing it, experts warn, means losing the future. This potential for deeper conflict should underscore the gravity of the situation.

“The communities are crying out not for aid, but for justice,” Deborah said. “If we fail to act, we risk a crisis that will be far costlier to solve.” The resilience of these communities in the face of such adversity is truly inspiring.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

New MPs to undergo orientation on land governance

Published

on

KAMPALA – Members of Uganda’s 12th Parliament are set to participate in a high-level orientation on land governance on 17th July 2026 at the Parliamentary Conference Hall, in a move aimed at strengthening legislators’ understanding of one of the country’s most complex and sensitive development issues.

The orientation, organised by the Uganda Parliamentarians Land Management Forum (UPLMF) in collaboration with the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development, will bring together Members of Parliament, government officials, development partners, technical experts and civil society organisations to discuss emerging land governance challenges and the role of Parliament in promoting equitable, transparent and sustainable land management. Land remains a critical national asset that underpins  agriculture, investment, infrastructure development, environmental conservation and social stability.

However, persistent challenges such as land conflicts, illegal evictions, insecure land tenure, weak land administration systems and limited public awareness continue to hindersocio-economic transformation. Parliament has consistently identified land governance as a priority area requiring stronger legislative oversight and policy implementation.

The orientation is expected to equip legislators with practical knowledge on Uganda’s land laws, the National Land Policy, customary and statutory land tenure systems, land administration institutions, and the rights and responsibilities of citizens. Special attention will also be given to gender-responsive land governance, dispute resolution mechanisms, and the importance of protecting vulnerable groups, including women and youth, in accessing and owning land.

Participants will engage with experts from government, academia, development partners and civil society, providing an opportunity to exchange experiences and identify policy interventions that can strengthen land governance across the country.

According Charles Opolot, the orientation comes at an important time as the new Parliament begins its legislative work. It is expected to prepare Members of Parliament to effectively debate land-related legislation, scrutinise government programmes, monitor implementation of land policies and respond to constituents’ concerns on land matters.

Charles Opolot, Advocacy and Partnership Manager with the forum, believes that well-informed legislators will contribute significantly to reducing land-related disputes, promoting responsible land administration and advancing inclusive national development.

The orientation has attracted support from development partners such as Oxfam, Pelum Uganda, Cordaid and Zoaamong others who committed to improving land governance and strengthening parliamentary engagement on land issues. It also reflects growing recognition that effective land governance is central to achieving sustainable development,  food security, environmental protection and economic growth.

As Uganda continues to experience increasing pressure on land arising from population growth, urbanisation and commercial investment, stakeholders hope that the orientation will strengthen Parliament’s capacity to champion policies that promote justice, transparency and equitable access to land for all Ugandans.

Source: pmldaily.com

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

African communities demand land rights amid mining expansion

Published

on

Salina Sanou, a Kenyan climate justice Activist (left) and Dr Melania Chiponda, Executive Director, Shine Collab, a global feminist movement of CSOs, CBOs, and Faith based groups.. follow proceedings at the ongoing Ecofeminism 2026 Convening taking place in Harare, Zimbabwe

Community leaders, legal advocates and grassroots organisations meeting in Harare at the ongoing African Ecofeminism Convening  have renewed calls for governments, mining companies and international financiers to respect community land rights as mining and large-scale development projects continue to displace families and threaten livelihoods.

Participants at the meeting shared first-hand experiences from Kenya, Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa and other African countries, highlighting how communities are losing ancestral land, facing forced relocations, and suffering from pollution, inadequate compensation and limited participation in decisions that directly affect their lives.

They stressed that communities should not be treated as obstacles to development but as rightful custodians of their land whose voices must be heard before any mining or infrastructure project is approved.

“We cannot continue to see communities paying the price for development while receiving little or no benefit,” Dr Melania Chiponda, Executive Director, Shine Collab, a global feminist movement of CSOs, community groups and Faith groups said during the discussions. “Development must respect people’s rights, culture and dignity. We are demanding that land compensation must in kind and not cash; land for land,” added Dr Chiponda.

Tricia Abwooli, a lawyer working for GreenFaith Africa in Uganda raised several urgent concerns, including forced displacement of families without meaningful consultation, loss of ancestral land, cultural heritage and traditional livelihoods and environmental pollution affecting community health, particularly women and children.

Abwooli noted the compensation packages that fail to account for long-term social, cultural and economic losses, weak enforcement of legal protections and limited access to justice and [lack of transparency around mining licences, geological information and development agreements.

The meeting highlighted examples of the Hanyanya community resistance and successful advocacy. Participants from Hanyanya Community in Bikita, Zimbabwe shared experiences where organised communities used research, documentation, legal action and peaceful mobilisation to delay harmful projects, negotiate improved compensation and secure commitments for schools, clinics and other essential services.

Tapiwa Gorejena,a movement legal advisor in Zimbabwe called for stronger legal action where governments and corporations fail to meet their obligations. Strategic litigation, class actions, administrative justice processes and international legal mechanisms were identified as important tools for protecting community rights.

A key message from the meeting was that affected communities must document evidence of land loss, environmental damage and human rights violations to strengthen future legal cases and advocacy efforts.

The discussions further emphasised the importance of cross-border solidarity among African communities facing similar challenges. Participants agreed that communities can learn from one another by sharing legal strategies, advocacy experiences and successful models for defending land rights.

Concerns were also raised about international investment agreements and development initiatives that often prioritise foreign commercial interests while excluding local communities from decision-making. Participants called for greater transparency, stronger accountability and legally binding commitments that protect African communities.

The meeting concluded with several immediate priorities, including strengthening community awareness of land and environmental rights, expanding access to legal support for affected communities and building stronger networks among grassroots organisations across Africa.

They also called for investigation of legal options for challenging harmful mining and development projects and exploring the establishment of community-led tribunals to ensure the voices of affected people are heard in national and international decision-making.

Community organisations reaffirmed that lasting development can only be achieved when local people are fully consulted, fairly compensated and empowered to participate in decisions affecting their land and future.

Source: kbc.co.ke

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

The untold struggle of community land right defenders in eastern DRC’s three-decade war.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

“My land is among the properties currently being used by rebels. I had purchased a plot right along Route 2, but an M23 officer is now renting it out to traders. He collects the fees for my own land while I suffer here in hiding. I cannot even call him, for fear of exposing myself to further danger.”

These are the words of a community land-right defender from North Kivu Province, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), living in hiding after becoming a target for defending community land rights.

According to the defender, defending land rights has come at an enormous cost. He has lost access to his property, his livelihood, and his freedom of movement. A piece of land he legally acquired is now under the control of others, and he remains unable to challenge their occupation because doing so could put his life at risk.

His story reflects a growing reality across eastern DRC, where decades of conflict have made land one of the most contested resources. As armed groups expand territorial control, communities say homes, farms, grazing areas, and commercial properties are being seized, leaving millions displaced and land rights defenders increasingly vulnerable.

Eastern DRC has endured armed conflict for more than three decades. The violence has involved government forces and multiple armed groups competing for political influence, territory, and control over valuable resources.

Since its resurgence in 2021, the March 23 Movement (M23), operating under the AFC/M23 coalition, has captured large areas of North and South Kivu, some of the country’s most strategic and resource-rich provinces.

According to the United Nations Group of Experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s July 2025 report, the control of large parts of North and South Kivu by AFC/M23 secured access to mineral-rich territories and fertile land, while increasing Rwanda’s influence in the DRC.

The report highlights the strategic importance of territorial control in the conflict, where access to natural resources, productive land, and key areas is closely linked to armed groups’ expansion and regional influence.

For communities living in these territories, territorial control has brought displacement, insecurity, and loss of ancestral land.

According to the United Nations, more than seven million people are internally displaced across the Democratic Republic of Congo, making it one of the world’s largest displacement crises.

Many displaced people who spoke to the Witness Radio team say that when fighting forces drive them from their homes, their property often becomes vulnerable to occupation.

“Many people are suffering in silence. Throughout the territory, homes, fields, and plots are being seized by force while people are being driven out so that others can settle in undisturbed. Rwandans are leaving their homes to occupy local owners’ properties. We are helpless and suffering in silence,” he said.

Another defender, whom Witness Radio identifies as Mwamba for security reasons, says his family’s struggle over land has lasted for generations and has been shaped by armed conflict.

Mwamba says his father, a traditional chief, farmer, and landowner in North Kivu, was targeted during the years of rebellion and that their family land, measuring approximately 240 hectares, was taken over.

Before the land was seized, the family ran a farm with livestock, including about 550 cattle, 250 sheep and goats, and 50 pigs.

According to Mwamba, the livestock were looted, houses were destroyed, and the farm was occupied by armed actors linked to the AFC/M23 movement during successive periods of conflict.

“My whole life, there has been conflict over our family’s property. Since the 1990s, we have never been able to use our land in peace,” he said.

The human cost has been greater than the economic losses, leading to the deaths of his family members. He recalls, “In 1997, my three older brothers were captured on the road and killed by the same group that had grabbed our land. When I later tried to organize my family to reclaim what belongs to us, I received death threats too. I had to flee because I believed I would be next.”

Today, his family lives in poverty while watching others profit from land they say has belonged to them for generations.

“All family members left to save their lives. The farm is still in their hands, and we cannot even approach it,” he said.

Also, human rights lawyer Ngoma, whose real name is withheld for safety reasons, says defending victims of land grabbing and other abuses became a threat to his own survival.

For more than a decade, Ngoma represented marginalized communities seeking justice for land seizures, killings, sexual violence, torture, and other abuses committed during the conflict.

But when M23 fighters took control of his area, his work put him in danger.

“I felt constantly at risk, to the point of receiving death threats from the very people against whom we were litigating. I faced numerous threats to my own safety and that of my family. I was forced to change my phone numbers, cut communication with people, and I could no longer move freely as a citizen,” he told Witness Radio in an exclusive interview.

Like many other human rights defenders, Ngoma eventually fled and went into hiding for safety, but the conflict and its far-reaching costs to victims remained. His departure disrupted his life and left many victims without legal representation when they needed it most. For communities whose land had been seized or whose relatives had been killed, lawyers and land defenders are often the only link to justice. When they are forced into exile or silence through threats and intimidation, victims are left with few avenues to challenge abuses, document violations, or pursue accountability.

“When the conflict escalated, that marked the beginning of my ordeal. My life was thrown into turmoil. I was forced to flee and constantly protect my family from possible attacks,” he added.

His experience reflects a wider pattern across eastern DRC, where attacks on lawyers, land defenders, and human rights activists have weakened community efforts to resist land dispossession and seek justice. As those documenting abuses are driven into hiding, armed groups tighten their control over contested territories, while many displaced families are left without the legal and human rights support needed to reclaim their land or defend their rights.

Residents say that when armed groups capture territory and civilians flee, abandoned properties can become vulnerable to occupation. Families who later attempt to return often face intimidation, threats, or the inability to reclaim their land.

Researchers widely agree that the conflict in eastern DRC has multiple overlapping drivers, including competition for political power, ethnic tensions, control of mineral resources, weak governance, and territorial control. Within this broader conflict, land remains a critical source of both livelihoods and strategic influence, making it a frequent point of contestation between armed groups and displaced communities.

Dr. Deborah S. Rogers, the International Outreach Coordinator for the coalition Mobilization for the Safeguarding of Congolese Sovereignty and Autonomy (MOSSAC), told Witness Radio that, in her view, Rwanda’s involvement in eastern DRC is closely linked to territorial expansion.

According to Dr. Rogers, Rwanda’s limited land area and growing population have increased the importance of securing additional territory. She argued that in areas under the control of the AFC/M23, civilians are frequently driven from their homes through violence and intimidation. When displaced families later attempt to return, she said, many discover that their land has already been occupied by people she identifies as Rwandans.

Human rights organizations have repeatedly raised concerns about attacks against those documenting abuses and supporting affected communities.

Between November 2025 and February 2026, several human rights defenders in North and South Kivu were reportedly targeted because of their work, according to the United Nations.

In January 2026, UN human rights experts expressed concern over allegations of attempted killings, kidnappings, torture, sexual violence, and death threats targeting defenders and their families.

The attacks have forced many defenders to choose between abandoning their work and risking their lives.

Despite years of displacement and violence, many affected families still hope to return to their ancestral lands.

“The land belongs to our families. We have lost so much, but we have not lost hope. One day, we believe justice will allow us to return,” Mwemba told our team.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates