Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Kaweeri Coffee evictees to wait again for justice as Mubende High court adjourns the retrial of their case.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Mubende -Uganda. When Nanyanzi Eva learned that the retrial of the case they had filed against Kaweri Coffee Company and the government of Uganda was finally scheduled for hearing, she thought a new dawn had come.

For years, Eva and her family had lived with the pain of losing land, which served as their sole source of livelihood. The court date was supposed to be a chance for her and others to reclaim not only what was taken from them but also the justice they had been denied for more than two decades.

“I am here to attend all the hearings because I hope this time round we can get justice after a long time of suffering,” she told the Witness Radio team on the first day of the session. Instead, the week ended in heartbreak. After listening to only nine witnesses over three days, the presiding judge adjourned the hearing to October 27 and 28, 2025. This delay was due to the complexity of the case and the need for thorough examination of each witness’s testimony. For the families who have waited 24 years for justice, it was yet another painful reminder of how slow and frustrating the legal process has become. The emotional toll of this delay on Eva and her family is immeasurable.

Despite the overwhelming odds, Eva, now 54, is one of hundreds who were violently evicted in August 2001 when bulldozers, escorted by armed soldiers and police, descended on four villages, including Kitemba, Luwunga, Kijunga, and Kiryamakobe in Mubende District. Yet, she remains resilient.

Her 10 acres of farmland, a foundation of her life, was flattened. Crops, property, and homes were destroyed on the fateful day.

“That land had been given to me by my late grandfather Ssentamu in the 1980s. Before the eviction, I was able to provide for my family and live a dignified life. But all that was taken in a single day,” she recalls, a sense of injustice palpable in her voice, evoking empathy from the audience.

Today, she lives on a small 100×25 ft plot in Kilawula village, which she toiled to buy after being evicted from her previous home. She is a widow, the caretaker of more than a dozen relatives, and survives by working on other people’s farms.

“It is not good to wish suffering on anyone, but whoever championed our eviction deserves to taste what we have endured. At my age, I am still struggling to keep my family afloat. We work in other people’s fields to survive,” she added.

Even attending court is a struggle. The High court sits more than 15 kilometers away from her home, and to raise transport money, she labors in neighboring plantations for as little as two euros and fifty cents a day. This means she has to toil for several days to save five euros, enough to cover transport to attend a one-day court session. The financial strain of this process is yet another injustice Eva and her family have to endure.

“The eviction crippled me, robbed me of everything. Obtaining money for court is another painful process. Imagine you lose everything and then have to sweat again to demand justice,” Eva said bitterly.

She was accompanied by her younger sister, Regina, who also testified as the ninth witness during the session on Wednesday. Like Eva, she is an evictee. Together, they walked out of court feeling betrayed not just by the government and the investor, but also by the justice system itself, their emotional burden heavier than ever.

“This case has caused suffering to many of us,” Regina said. “The investor is fully enjoying our land while we are left to beg. Why should we be silenced when we try to explain the background of our land ownership? The court should guide and listen, not mislead or cut us short. Too often, we are denied the time to tell the truth in full.” She added. The prolonged legal battle has not only caused financial strain but also emotional distress, as the families continue to fight for their rights and dignity. The emotional toll of this battle is significant, and the families are in desperate need of closure and justice.

The Kaweeri case is one of Uganda’s most infamous land disputes. It began in 2002, when over 2,000 residents sued the government of Uganda and Kaweeri Coffee Plantation Ltd, a subsidiary of the German coffee giant Neumann Kaffee Gruppe (NKG), over the brutal evictions.

In 2013, the High court ruled in favor of the communities, declaring the evictions unlawful and awarding them UGX 37 billion in compensation. But in 2015, the court of Appeal overturned the ruling and ordered a retrial.

That decision pushed the displaced families back into a prolonged legal battle. By 2019, the case was before Justice Henry Kaweesa, who recommended mediation. The government offered UGX 1.9 billion, an amount many considered a pittance compared to their losses. More than half of the evictees accepted the compensation offer because they were tired of waiting for it to be finalized. One hundred forty-three families refused, citing unfair compensation and lack of transparency. This disparity in compensation further highlights the injustice these families are facing.

It is these 143 families who remain in court today.

Initially, the case was filed as a representative suit, with five individuals serving as spokespeople for the entire group. But during the retrial, government and company attorneys objected, arguing that the five could not represent everyone. As a result, the court directed each of the 143 families to testify individually, an arrangement that has further delayed the case.

From August 25 to 27, 2025, the court heard testimony from eight witnesses, in addition to one who had previously testified before the court. The total number of witnesses became nine. But much of the testimonies, however, repeated what others had already said: stories of mistreatment, burning down houses, violent eviction, lost property, and unfair compensation.

Justice Tadeo Asiimwe expressed concern about the lengthy proceedings. The judge advised the parties to sit together and agree on how to handle the remaining witnesses, noting that the court had already reviewed the evidence and found it broadly similar across the different plaintiffs.

“Just sit together and tell me how you want to deal with the remaining witnesses. We have already sampled your evidence, and it is not different from that of the other claimants. The only difference is in the figures; one is claiming 1 million, another 400, and another 2 million. It is only the amounts that vary,” the judge said.

The judge further warned that the case could drag on for years if each individual’s testimony were heard in full. He further encouraged the parties to consider negotiations, stressing that those who are willing to accept the government’s compensation could do so through their lawyers or by finding a way to consolidate the remaining testimonies.

“The plaintiffs are free to continue with negotiations. Your lawyers are here; you can talk and make your own decisions. I will wait for you. Because it is excruciating to receive a judgment, and it makes you drop what you already have. You may be holding something, but then a judgment comes and says, Drop it. That is very painful,” the judge cautioned, urging parties to think carefully about their options, either taking the compensation given now or waiting for a court outcome, which may not be fair to the plaintiffs.

Compensation that has lost value.

Eva explains that in March 2002, her land and property were valued at only UGX 2 million. The valuation, carried out with the support of the former Mubende Resident District Commissioner (RDC) Perez Katamba and local leaders, left many feeling cheated.

“I was not even part of the valuation process. I just heard from my neighbors that they had been assessed. Later, officials came with papers and forced me to sign them. That was not fair participation,” she said, adding that, “One thing we want is for the money to be increased. Maybe 20 years ago it would have meant something, but not now. The cost of living is high, and money has lost value. We have not been equally treated as plaintiffs,” Eva insisted.

As the case drags into its third decade, frustration among the displaced families continues to grow. While Kaweri Coffee enjoys profits from its former lands, the original owners remain trapped in poverty, fighting for recognition in a justice system that seems designed to wear them down.

“We have waited patiently for 24 years,” Eva said. “All we ask is meaningful compensation, so that we too can live dignified lives, just like the investor who took over our land.”

The case was adjourned to October 27 and 28, leaving hundreds of families still waiting. Eva hopes the court will finally deliver a fair and meaningful decision, one that recognizes their decades-long suffering.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Ugandan Farmers Sue EACOP in London in Last Minute Effort to Stop Crude Oil Pipeline

Published

on

Local farmer Okumu Weke next to an EACOP route beacon in Nyamtai village, Kikuube District in western region of Uganda. Credit: Maina Waruru/IPS

NYAMTAI, Uganda, Apr 3 2026 (IPS) – Environmental activists and farmer groups opposed to the construction of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), the world’s longest heated oil pipeline, are mounting a last-ditch legal effort meant to stop its construction in a suit they plan to have filed in London, UK,  believing that it stands a chance to stop the controversial project despite being at the 78 percent completion stage.

The groups have engaged the services of the London law firm of Leigh Day, one of the UK’s leading environmental and public interest litigation firms, which in the past has won landmark compensation cases for northern Kenyan communities affected by unexploded UK military munitions, among others.

With the pipeline construction said to be nearly 80 percent complete, the groups believe their petition stands a good chance of success since EACOP is owned by a company registered at the Companies House in London – the EACOP Ltd.

This is despite the controversial 1,443 km pipeline, principally owned by TotalEnergies with a 62 percent stake, meant to evacuate crude from Western Uganda oilfields to the Indian port of Tanga in Tanzania, which has survived several suits filed in the region and in France and, despite the withdrawal of several would-be financiers, looks all set for completion later in the year, with the first oil exports due in October 2026.

Other owners of the pipeline are the governments of Uganda and Tanzania via the Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC – 15 percent) and the Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation (TPDC – 15 percent), and the Chinese multinational China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC – 8 percent).

The plaintiffs, who include project-affected persons (PAPs) from across Uganda, are buoyed by the support of the global campaign group Avaaz, which in February initiated a fundraising effort to help with costs of the suit, ahead of its expected commencement in May.

They claim that the pipeline will violate rights protected by the Ugandan Constitution, which gives every citizen the right to a clean and healthy environment.

The local farmers allege that the construction and operation of the pipeline will have a material impact on global temperatures with severe consequences both worldwide and in Uganda. Further, they alleged that the pipeline is in breach of EACOP Ltd’s own legal obligations under Uganda’s National Environment Act and National Climate Change Act.

Snaking through Uganda and Tanzania, it will tear through some of the planet’s “most wondrous ecosystems”, carving up elephant sanctuaries, protected forests, and more than 200 rivers.

In addition, the massive infrastructure, also the longest crude oil pipeline in Africa, will result in almost 400 million tonnes of emissions over its lifetime and have a major impact on climate change, they claim.

Besides, they argue that the emissions released by oil carried by the pipeline will ‘materially’ contribute to global warming and fear the impact this will have on them and their livelihoods, as well as on the environment and the health of Ugandans.

EACOP is expected to result in more than 372 million tonnes of CO₂e, or greenhouse gas, emissions—more than 58 times Uganda’s total annual emissions, they contend.

Uganda is particularly impacted by climate change, having already suffered from “record-breaking occurrences of floods, devastating and frequent droughts and erratic rainfall patterns”, according to a report sent by the Ugandan government to the UN, which will only increase as climate change worsens.

“The case is one of a growing number of legal claims seeking to hold global energy companies and infrastructure providers to account for the emissions resulting from their extraction of fossil fuels,” Leigh Day said in a statement.

“Our clients believe the EACOP pipeline will result in enormous damage to the global climate as well as severe damage to their local environment. The EACOP will lead to a huge amount of oil being burnt in a world where the UN has confirmed there are already far more fossil fuels slated for extraction than required if we are to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, said Leigh Day solicitor Joe Snape, who will represent the group.

The fact that the pipeline is operated and financed by a UK-registered company highlights the role UK corporates often have in fossil fuel extraction projects in the Global South, he added

He further noted, “Our clients are already living on the frontline of the climate crisis and argue this pipeline will only exacerbate the impact they, and other vulnerable communities around the world, experience on their lives and livelihoods. They are calling for the pipeline construction and operations to be halted to stop this damaging impact on the climate in Uganda and elsewhere around the world.”

While around a third (460 km) of the pipeline will run through the basin of Lake Victoria, Africa’s largest lake, local environmentalists  warn that a spill or leak could potentially result in catastrophic effects for the lake, which is a vital water resource in the region and a significant source for the River Nile.

The pipeline will also run through and disturb important habitats and nature reserves, including Murchison Falls National Park, the Taala Forest Reserve, and the Bugoma Forest. The pipeline will reportedly disturb around 2,000 square kilometres of protected habitats, impacting rare and endangered species that inhabit them, such as Eastern Chimpanzees and African Elephants.

For its part, Avaaz said its fundraising effort will support the “groundbreaking” court helping expose the environmental abuses and climate devastation that this project will cause. Further, it will help to defend land rights for Indigenous and frontline communities and “continue the quest to protect life on Earth.”

“With help from Avaaz members, communities in East Africa have already fought this project through regional courts — but their case was dismissed on a technicality. This new lawsuit in the UK is the last remaining path to stopping this monster pipeline. Legal experts believe it offers a far better shot at a fair, independent hearing — with a real possibility of success,” the campaign noted.

The group promised to “stage an epic media stunt” around the launch of the court case, increasing pressure on insurance companies to walk away from the project, and support families in Uganda and Tanzania who are fighting evictions, providing cash assistance for food, medicine and other basic necessities.

The USD 5.6 billion project was initiated in 2016 amid delays, resistance, and scrutiny. Over the past two years, EACOP has accelerated, with infrastructure taking shape along its route and at its two key oil fields: Tilenga, awarded to TotalEnergies, and Kingfisher, awarded to CNOOC.

IPS UN Bureau Report

Source: Inter Press Service News Agency

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Minister Cancels Contested 12-Square-Mile Land Title in Mubende

Published

on

Residents accuse local leaders and private actors of violent evictions and land grabbing, as the Lands minister intervenes, orders arrests, and revokes a disputed title he says was fraudulently acquired.

The State Minister for Lands, Sam Mayanja, has ordered the cancellation of a 12-square-mile land title in Buweekula South Constituency in Mubende District, declaring that the late Christopher Obeya illegally acquired the land.

The directive followed a stakeholders’ meeting and locus visit during which residents reported alleged impunity by a manager hired by Obeya’s estate, who is accused of overseeing violent evictions, including the shooting of a kibanja holder.

Hundreds of residents from Buweekula South told the minister they had lived on the land for decades but were forcefully evicted.

“We have lived on this land for decades, but we are being treated like strangers. Our homes were destroyed, and some of us were beaten when we resisted eviction,” said Frank Namanya, a resident.

The contested land, located at Block 375, Plot 3, measures 12 square miles and spans three villages—Kibuye Vuga, Njajaazi, and Gogonya. It was originally public land before the Uganda Land Commission issued a title to Erineo Kunobwa and Joseph Yumbe in 1987.

The title was later transferred in 1990 to Musose Mutabiingwa and Francis Katabalwa as tenants in common without being surrendered back to the commission, and was eventually transferred to Christopher Obeya in 2005.

Residents said that following Obeya’s death, his estate administrators hired Andrew Akandwanaho, who, together with private security personnel, allegedly carried out forceful evictions.

“The manager came with armed men and started evicting people violently. One of our people was shot dead for refusing to leave his land,” said Moses Kasumba, another resident.

Locals also accused Mubende District Chairperson Michael Muhereza Ntambi and Resident District Commissioner (RDC) Fred Nayebare Kyamuzigita of owning portions of the contested land, where they allegedly graze cattle, and of failing to address community concerns.

“Leaders who are supposed to protect us are instead using this land for their own benefit, and the district chairperson has cows on this land. They have ignored our cries for help,” Namanya added.

In response, Mayanja directed the District Police Commander in Mubende to arrest Andrew Akandwanaho over alleged unlawful evictions and the reported shooting.

“No one is above the law. I have directed the police to immediately arrest the manager responsible for these illegal evictions and the reported shooting,” Mayanja said.

He further ordered the cancellation of the land title held by the late Obeya, stating that it had been fraudulently obtained and that the land would revert to the Mubende District Land Board.

“This title was obtained fraudulently and cannot stand. The land reverts to the district for proper management in the interest of the rightful occupants,” he said.

The minister also expressed dissatisfaction with the district leadership, accusing them of possible involvement in land grabbing and warning of further action.

“If the district leadership is implicated in land grabbing, they must step aside. I will not hesitate to involve the State House Anti-Corruption Unit,” Mayanja warned.

He further claimed that the district chairperson had sought a private meeting with him under unclear circumstances.

“Why have you been calling me asking for a secret meeting with me?” Mayanja asked during the meeting, drawing reactions from residents.

RDC Kyamuzigita denied the allegations that he owns or grazes cattle on the disputed land.

“I have not even made five months in Mubende, and my cows are in Nyabushozi, so those are allegations,” he said.

He added that he would investigate claims regarding the district chairperson’s alleged involvement.

“Honourable Minister, I did not know whether the chairperson has cows on this land, and I am going to take action on that,” Kyamuzigita said.

Although the district chairperson was present at the meeting, Minister Mayanja denied him the opportunity to respond to the accusations before the residents.

Source: nilepost.co.ug

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Global Peasant Movement calls for action against escalating land grabs and repression.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

For more than eight years, the landscape of Kiryandongo district in western Uganda has undergone significant changes, shifting from being occupied by local farmers to a violent takeover by multinational companies.

What used to be small farms, homesteads, and community life is now dominated by endless stretches of sugarcane and grain plantations, disrupting local economies and social bonds. Families who once cultivated food and built futures now face displacement, dispossession, and uncertainty about their livelihoods and community cohesion.

“They found us living in peace. Now everything is broken: families, dreams, livelihoods. investors forcibly took away our land.” Benon Beryaija told Witness Radio, recalling the past.

Despite displacement, criminalization, and fear, some land defenders remain steadfast, inspiring the audience to value resilience and collective resistance.

Benon Beryaija, the chairperson of the Kiryandongo land eviction victims, is at the center of the resistance and continues to organize locals despite threats, arrests, and violence.

“The bigger group left, but we remain resolute. “We are defending what belongs to us; our land that was grabbed by multinationals. It is a very hard fight, and it is threatening my life. I have been arrested and tortured for defending my people.”

His experience reflects a broader pattern across Uganda and beyond, where land and environmental defenders increasingly face intimidation, legal harassment, and violence.

The situation in Kiryandongo mirrors a growing global crisis. A global coalition of small-scale farmers and rural movements has issued a strong call for international mobilization against land dispossession, state repression, and what it describes as a growing “neocolonial offensive” targeting rural communities worldwide.

In a statement released ahead of the International Day of Peasant Struggles on April 17, La Via Campesina warned that agribusiness expansion, militarisation, and restrictive trade policies are accelerating land grabs and undermining food sovereignty across continents.

Founded in 1993, La Via Campesina brings together millions of peasants, landless workers, Indigenous peoples, pastoralists, fishers, migrant farmworkers, and rural women and youth, all of whom advocate for food sovereignty and peasant agriculture.

The annual commemoration marks 30 years since the Eldorado do Carajás Massacre in Brazil, where military police killed 21 landless workers during a protest for agrarian reform. The movement says the anniversary is a reminder of “ongoing violence in our territories” and the continued impunity for crimes against land defenders.

Peasant movements warn that land grabbing is being accelerated by agribusiness expansion, extractive industries, and global financial interests often backed by foreign capital and state support.

“They do not come to restore democracy,” the statement reads. “They come to steal the land we cultivate,” accusing multinational corporations and governments of turning land and ecosystems into “speculative assets.”

Recent findings from the Food and Agriculture Organization, in collaboration with the International Land Coalition and CIRAD, reinforce these concerns. Their “Status of Land Tenure and Governance” report estimates that more than 1.1 billion people, about 23 percent of the global adult population, live under constant fear of losing their land or homes within the next five years.

The report identifies commercial pressures as a major driver of land insecurity, echoing concerns raised by peasant movements.

The statement also criticizes global trade systems, particularly agreements negotiated under the World Trade Organization, arguing that they favor multinational corporations at the expense of smallholder farmers.

La Via Campesina has called for agriculture to be removed entirely from WTO frameworks, saying free trade agreements undermine national sovereignty and expose local producers to unfair competition.

“We WARN that the capitalist and neocolonial offensive is not limited to direct violence: neoliberal trade policies are also deadly for rural life. Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), such as Mercosur’s with the European Union and others, are instruments of submission that dismantle national sovereignty to favor transnationals. We reject treating food as a commodity and trade as a weapon; we demand that tariffs be legitimate tools to protect small producers from dumping, not levers of geopolitical coercion wielded by empire.” The statement adds.

Beyond economic pressure, the group reveals what it calls the systematic criminalization of those defending land, water, and natural resources. Across Latin America, Africa, and Asia, activists are increasingly labeled as “terrorists,” arrested, or subjected to prolonged legal battles.

“The capitalist and colonial system that represses and dispossesses our peoples continues unabated to this day, enabling land grabbing, protecting the elites, and criminalizing those who fight for the land through laws and selective judicial processes and other forms of persecution.” The statement from the group mentioned

This trend is evident in many countries, including Uganda, where communities resisting land-based investments, including infrastructure, oil, and plantation projects, have faced arrests, intimidation, and shrinking civic space.

As April 17 approaches, La Via Campesina is calling for coordinated global action from protests and community dialogues to solidarity campaigns.

It is also urging governments to implement international frameworks such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to protect land rights and food sovereignty.

“There is no peace without justice. And no justice without resistance and collective action,” the movement sa

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter