Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Kaweeri Coffee evictees to wait again for justice as Mubende High court adjourns the retrial of their case.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Mubende -Uganda. When Nanyanzi Eva learned that the retrial of the case they had filed against Kaweri Coffee Company and the government of Uganda was finally scheduled for hearing, she thought a new dawn had come.

For years, Eva and her family had lived with the pain of losing land, which served as their sole source of livelihood. The court date was supposed to be a chance for her and others to reclaim not only what was taken from them but also the justice they had been denied for more than two decades.

“I am here to attend all the hearings because I hope this time round we can get justice after a long time of suffering,” she told the Witness Radio team on the first day of the session. Instead, the week ended in heartbreak. After listening to only nine witnesses over three days, the presiding judge adjourned the hearing to October 27 and 28, 2025. This delay was due to the complexity of the case and the need for thorough examination of each witness’s testimony. For the families who have waited 24 years for justice, it was yet another painful reminder of how slow and frustrating the legal process has become. The emotional toll of this delay on Eva and her family is immeasurable.

Despite the overwhelming odds, Eva, now 54, is one of hundreds who were violently evicted in August 2001 when bulldozers, escorted by armed soldiers and police, descended on four villages, including Kitemba, Luwunga, Kijunga, and Kiryamakobe in Mubende District. Yet, she remains resilient.

Her 10 acres of farmland, a foundation of her life, was flattened. Crops, property, and homes were destroyed on the fateful day.

“That land had been given to me by my late grandfather Ssentamu in the 1980s. Before the eviction, I was able to provide for my family and live a dignified life. But all that was taken in a single day,” she recalls, a sense of injustice palpable in her voice, evoking empathy from the audience.

Today, she lives on a small 100×25 ft plot in Kilawula village, which she toiled to buy after being evicted from her previous home. She is a widow, the caretaker of more than a dozen relatives, and survives by working on other people’s farms.

“It is not good to wish suffering on anyone, but whoever championed our eviction deserves to taste what we have endured. At my age, I am still struggling to keep my family afloat. We work in other people’s fields to survive,” she added.

Even attending court is a struggle. The High court sits more than 15 kilometers away from her home, and to raise transport money, she labors in neighboring plantations for as little as two euros and fifty cents a day. This means she has to toil for several days to save five euros, enough to cover transport to attend a one-day court session. The financial strain of this process is yet another injustice Eva and her family have to endure.

“The eviction crippled me, robbed me of everything. Obtaining money for court is another painful process. Imagine you lose everything and then have to sweat again to demand justice,” Eva said bitterly.

She was accompanied by her younger sister, Regina, who also testified as the ninth witness during the session on Wednesday. Like Eva, she is an evictee. Together, they walked out of court feeling betrayed not just by the government and the investor, but also by the justice system itself, their emotional burden heavier than ever.

“This case has caused suffering to many of us,” Regina said. “The investor is fully enjoying our land while we are left to beg. Why should we be silenced when we try to explain the background of our land ownership? The court should guide and listen, not mislead or cut us short. Too often, we are denied the time to tell the truth in full.” She added. The prolonged legal battle has not only caused financial strain but also emotional distress, as the families continue to fight for their rights and dignity. The emotional toll of this battle is significant, and the families are in desperate need of closure and justice.

The Kaweeri case is one of Uganda’s most infamous land disputes. It began in 2002, when over 2,000 residents sued the government of Uganda and Kaweeri Coffee Plantation Ltd, a subsidiary of the German coffee giant Neumann Kaffee Gruppe (NKG), over the brutal evictions.

In 2013, the High court ruled in favor of the communities, declaring the evictions unlawful and awarding them UGX 37 billion in compensation. But in 2015, the court of Appeal overturned the ruling and ordered a retrial.

That decision pushed the displaced families back into a prolonged legal battle. By 2019, the case was before Justice Henry Kaweesa, who recommended mediation. The government offered UGX 1.9 billion, an amount many considered a pittance compared to their losses. More than half of the evictees accepted the compensation offer because they were tired of waiting for it to be finalized. One hundred forty-three families refused, citing unfair compensation and lack of transparency. This disparity in compensation further highlights the injustice these families are facing.

It is these 143 families who remain in court today.

Initially, the case was filed as a representative suit, with five individuals serving as spokespeople for the entire group. But during the retrial, government and company attorneys objected, arguing that the five could not represent everyone. As a result, the court directed each of the 143 families to testify individually, an arrangement that has further delayed the case.

From August 25 to 27, 2025, the court heard testimony from eight witnesses, in addition to one who had previously testified before the court. The total number of witnesses became nine. But much of the testimonies, however, repeated what others had already said: stories of mistreatment, burning down houses, violent eviction, lost property, and unfair compensation.

Justice Tadeo Asiimwe expressed concern about the lengthy proceedings. The judge advised the parties to sit together and agree on how to handle the remaining witnesses, noting that the court had already reviewed the evidence and found it broadly similar across the different plaintiffs.

“Just sit together and tell me how you want to deal with the remaining witnesses. We have already sampled your evidence, and it is not different from that of the other claimants. The only difference is in the figures; one is claiming 1 million, another 400, and another 2 million. It is only the amounts that vary,” the judge said.

The judge further warned that the case could drag on for years if each individual’s testimony were heard in full. He further encouraged the parties to consider negotiations, stressing that those who are willing to accept the government’s compensation could do so through their lawyers or by finding a way to consolidate the remaining testimonies.

“The plaintiffs are free to continue with negotiations. Your lawyers are here; you can talk and make your own decisions. I will wait for you. Because it is excruciating to receive a judgment, and it makes you drop what you already have. You may be holding something, but then a judgment comes and says, Drop it. That is very painful,” the judge cautioned, urging parties to think carefully about their options, either taking the compensation given now or waiting for a court outcome, which may not be fair to the plaintiffs.

Compensation that has lost value.

Eva explains that in March 2002, her land and property were valued at only UGX 2 million. The valuation, carried out with the support of the former Mubende Resident District Commissioner (RDC) Perez Katamba and local leaders, left many feeling cheated.

“I was not even part of the valuation process. I just heard from my neighbors that they had been assessed. Later, officials came with papers and forced me to sign them. That was not fair participation,” she said, adding that, “One thing we want is for the money to be increased. Maybe 20 years ago it would have meant something, but not now. The cost of living is high, and money has lost value. We have not been equally treated as plaintiffs,” Eva insisted.

As the case drags into its third decade, frustration among the displaced families continues to grow. While Kaweri Coffee enjoys profits from its former lands, the original owners remain trapped in poverty, fighting for recognition in a justice system that seems designed to wear them down.

“We have waited patiently for 24 years,” Eva said. “All we ask is meaningful compensation, so that we too can live dignified lives, just like the investor who took over our land.”

The case was adjourned to October 27 and 28, leaving hundreds of families still waiting. Eva hopes the court will finally deliver a fair and meaningful decision, one that recognizes their decades-long suffering.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

African communities demand land rights amid mining expansion

Published

on

Salina Sanou, a Kenyan climate justice Activist (left) and Dr Melania Chiponda, Executive Director, Shine Collab, a global feminist movement of CSOs, CBOs, and Faith based groups.. follow proceedings at the ongoing Ecofeminism 2026 Convening taking place in Harare, Zimbabwe

Community leaders, legal advocates and grassroots organisations meeting in Harare at the ongoing African Ecofeminism Convening  have renewed calls for governments, mining companies and international financiers to respect community land rights as mining and large-scale development projects continue to displace families and threaten livelihoods.

Participants at the meeting shared first-hand experiences from Kenya, Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa and other African countries, highlighting how communities are losing ancestral land, facing forced relocations, and suffering from pollution, inadequate compensation and limited participation in decisions that directly affect their lives.

They stressed that communities should not be treated as obstacles to development but as rightful custodians of their land whose voices must be heard before any mining or infrastructure project is approved.

“We cannot continue to see communities paying the price for development while receiving little or no benefit,” Dr Melania Chiponda, Executive Director, Shine Collab, a global feminist movement of CSOs, community groups and Faith groups said during the discussions. “Development must respect people’s rights, culture and dignity. We are demanding that land compensation must in kind and not cash; land for land,” added Dr Chiponda.

Tricia Abwooli, a lawyer working for GreenFaith Africa in Uganda raised several urgent concerns, including forced displacement of families without meaningful consultation, loss of ancestral land, cultural heritage and traditional livelihoods and environmental pollution affecting community health, particularly women and children.

Abwooli noted the compensation packages that fail to account for long-term social, cultural and economic losses, weak enforcement of legal protections and limited access to justice and [lack of transparency around mining licences, geological information and development agreements.

The meeting highlighted examples of the Hanyanya community resistance and successful advocacy. Participants from Hanyanya Community in Bikita, Zimbabwe shared experiences where organised communities used research, documentation, legal action and peaceful mobilisation to delay harmful projects, negotiate improved compensation and secure commitments for schools, clinics and other essential services.

Tapiwa Gorejena,a movement legal advisor in Zimbabwe called for stronger legal action where governments and corporations fail to meet their obligations. Strategic litigation, class actions, administrative justice processes and international legal mechanisms were identified as important tools for protecting community rights.

A key message from the meeting was that affected communities must document evidence of land loss, environmental damage and human rights violations to strengthen future legal cases and advocacy efforts.

The discussions further emphasised the importance of cross-border solidarity among African communities facing similar challenges. Participants agreed that communities can learn from one another by sharing legal strategies, advocacy experiences and successful models for defending land rights.

Concerns were also raised about international investment agreements and development initiatives that often prioritise foreign commercial interests while excluding local communities from decision-making. Participants called for greater transparency, stronger accountability and legally binding commitments that protect African communities.

The meeting concluded with several immediate priorities, including strengthening community awareness of land and environmental rights, expanding access to legal support for affected communities and building stronger networks among grassroots organisations across Africa.

They also called for investigation of legal options for challenging harmful mining and development projects and exploring the establishment of community-led tribunals to ensure the voices of affected people are heard in national and international decision-making.

Community organisations reaffirmed that lasting development can only be achieved when local people are fully consulted, fairly compensated and empowered to participate in decisions affecting their land and future.

Source: kbc.co.ke

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

The untold struggle of community land right defenders in eastern DRC’s three-decade war.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

“My land is among the properties currently being used by rebels. I had purchased a plot right along Route 2, but an M23 officer is now renting it out to traders. He collects the fees for my own land while I suffer here in hiding. I cannot even call him, for fear of exposing myself to further danger.”

These are the words of a community land-right defender from North Kivu Province, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), living in hiding after becoming a target for defending community land rights.

According to the defender, defending land rights has come at an enormous cost. He has lost access to his property, his livelihood, and his freedom of movement. A piece of land he legally acquired is now under the control of others, and he remains unable to challenge their occupation because doing so could put his life at risk.

His story reflects a growing reality across eastern DRC, where decades of conflict have made land one of the most contested resources. As armed groups expand territorial control, communities say homes, farms, grazing areas, and commercial properties are being seized, leaving millions displaced and land rights defenders increasingly vulnerable.

Eastern DRC has endured armed conflict for more than three decades. The violence has involved government forces and multiple armed groups competing for political influence, territory, and control over valuable resources.

Since its resurgence in 2021, the March 23 Movement (M23), operating under the AFC/M23 coalition, has captured large areas of North and South Kivu, some of the country’s most strategic and resource-rich provinces.

According to the United Nations Group of Experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s July 2025 report, the control of large parts of North and South Kivu by AFC/M23 secured access to mineral-rich territories and fertile land, while increasing Rwanda’s influence in the DRC.

The report highlights the strategic importance of territorial control in the conflict, where access to natural resources, productive land, and key areas is closely linked to armed groups’ expansion and regional influence.

For communities living in these territories, territorial control has brought displacement, insecurity, and loss of ancestral land.

According to the United Nations, more than seven million people are internally displaced across the Democratic Republic of Congo, making it one of the world’s largest displacement crises.

Many displaced people who spoke to the Witness Radio team say that when fighting forces drive them from their homes, their property often becomes vulnerable to occupation.

“Many people are suffering in silence. Throughout the territory, homes, fields, and plots are being seized by force while people are being driven out so that others can settle in undisturbed. Rwandans are leaving their homes to occupy local owners’ properties. We are helpless and suffering in silence,” he said.

Another defender, whom Witness Radio identifies as Mwamba for security reasons, says his family’s struggle over land has lasted for generations and has been shaped by armed conflict.

Mwamba says his father, a traditional chief, farmer, and landowner in North Kivu, was targeted during the years of rebellion and that their family land, measuring approximately 240 hectares, was taken over.

Before the land was seized, the family ran a farm with livestock, including about 550 cattle, 250 sheep and goats, and 50 pigs.

According to Mwamba, the livestock were looted, houses were destroyed, and the farm was occupied by armed actors linked to the AFC/M23 movement during successive periods of conflict.

“My whole life, there has been conflict over our family’s property. Since the 1990s, we have never been able to use our land in peace,” he said.

The human cost has been greater than the economic losses, leading to the deaths of his family members. He recalls, “In 1997, my three older brothers were captured on the road and killed by the same group that had grabbed our land. When I later tried to organize my family to reclaim what belongs to us, I received death threats too. I had to flee because I believed I would be next.”

Today, his family lives in poverty while watching others profit from land they say has belonged to them for generations.

“All family members left to save their lives. The farm is still in their hands, and we cannot even approach it,” he said.

Also, human rights lawyer Ngoma, whose real name is withheld for safety reasons, says defending victims of land grabbing and other abuses became a threat to his own survival.

For more than a decade, Ngoma represented marginalized communities seeking justice for land seizures, killings, sexual violence, torture, and other abuses committed during the conflict.

But when M23 fighters took control of his area, his work put him in danger.

“I felt constantly at risk, to the point of receiving death threats from the very people against whom we were litigating. I faced numerous threats to my own safety and that of my family. I was forced to change my phone numbers, cut communication with people, and I could no longer move freely as a citizen,” he told Witness Radio in an exclusive interview.

Like many other human rights defenders, Ngoma eventually fled and went into hiding for safety, but the conflict and its far-reaching costs to victims remained. His departure disrupted his life and left many victims without legal representation when they needed it most. For communities whose land had been seized or whose relatives had been killed, lawyers and land defenders are often the only link to justice. When they are forced into exile or silence through threats and intimidation, victims are left with few avenues to challenge abuses, document violations, or pursue accountability.

“When the conflict escalated, that marked the beginning of my ordeal. My life was thrown into turmoil. I was forced to flee and constantly protect my family from possible attacks,” he added.

His experience reflects a wider pattern across eastern DRC, where attacks on lawyers, land defenders, and human rights activists have weakened community efforts to resist land dispossession and seek justice. As those documenting abuses are driven into hiding, armed groups tighten their control over contested territories, while many displaced families are left without the legal and human rights support needed to reclaim their land or defend their rights.

Residents say that when armed groups capture territory and civilians flee, abandoned properties can become vulnerable to occupation. Families who later attempt to return often face intimidation, threats, or the inability to reclaim their land.

Researchers widely agree that the conflict in eastern DRC has multiple overlapping drivers, including competition for political power, ethnic tensions, control of mineral resources, weak governance, and territorial control. Within this broader conflict, land remains a critical source of both livelihoods and strategic influence, making it a frequent point of contestation between armed groups and displaced communities.

Dr. Deborah S. Rogers, the International Outreach Coordinator for the coalition Mobilization for the Safeguarding of Congolese Sovereignty and Autonomy (MOSSAC), told Witness Radio that, in her view, Rwanda’s involvement in eastern DRC is closely linked to territorial expansion.

According to Dr. Rogers, Rwanda’s limited land area and growing population have increased the importance of securing additional territory. She argued that in areas under the control of the AFC/M23, civilians are frequently driven from their homes through violence and intimidation. When displaced families later attempt to return, she said, many discover that their land has already been occupied by people she identifies as Rwandans.

Human rights organizations have repeatedly raised concerns about attacks against those documenting abuses and supporting affected communities.

Between November 2025 and February 2026, several human rights defenders in North and South Kivu were reportedly targeted because of their work, according to the United Nations.

In January 2026, UN human rights experts expressed concern over allegations of attempted killings, kidnappings, torture, sexual violence, and death threats targeting defenders and their families.

The attacks have forced many defenders to choose between abandoning their work and risking their lives.

Despite years of displacement and violence, many affected families still hope to return to their ancestral lands.

“The land belongs to our families. We have lost so much, but we have not lost hope. One day, we believe justice will allow us to return,” Mwemba told our team.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Ugandan farmers take TotalEnergies’ pipeline to UK court

Published

on

Police apprehend a Ugandan activist during a protest against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) plans in Kampala, Uganda, on 15 September, 2023. © Reuters

Four Ugandan farmers filed a case against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) at the UK’s High Court on Tuesday, seeking to have Ugandan constitutional, environmental and climate law applied to EACOP Ltd, the UK-registered company financing the project

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates