Connect with us

NGO WORK

Agelimit bill debate: CSOs, Politicians count loses

Published

on

By Witnessradio.org Team

Politicians and civil society organizations are counting loses as police continues to foil rallies and meetings on the age-limit bill before parliament.

Despite clearance by parliament for MPs to consult their constituents on the bill, several meetings have been blocked including one organized by the parliamentary committee on Human rights and Uganda National NGO Forum.

Lubaga North MP Moses Kasibante whose meeting was foiled last week says they continue to lose money whenever their activities are stopped. “In Kasubi where we organized our first rally, the public address system was destroyed, people were injured in the scuffle, and this results into medical costs because you can’t dump them at the scene.” The legislator said.

He says what bothers him is the fact that the meetings and rallies that were allowed by parliament are blocked by police pitting government organizations against one another.

Kasibante is just one the many MPS that have tested the wrath of security agencies. Allan Ssewanyana who is the Makindye West representative says police officers led by Siraje Bakaleke rounded him up even before he could talk to his voters. “They just stormed the scene and started beating up people, many were arrested, I was myself roughed up and arrested…. This is so illegal.”  Said Ssewanyana adding that this has instilled a lot of fear in the masses and many now fear turning up for the meetings called. “This is a calculated move by government to fail us from reaching out to the people…”.

Other rallies that were foiled include those organized by Makindye East MP Ibrahim Kasozi in Kabalagala and Gaba where police led by the Kabalagala DPC, Mugerwa used teargas to disperse the crowds. Similarly other rally organized by Kira Municipality MP Ibrahim Ssemuju Nganda in Kireka was dispersed by police using teargas. Several rallies against the age limit bill have been held nationwide in Jinja, Rukungiri, Mbale,Karamoja, Mityana, and in the greater Masaka region among others.

Politicians are not the only ones affected here, a meeting organized by the NGO Forum and the parliamentary committee on Human rights was blocked at last minute due to lack of clearance from the police. The meeting that was organized at Muganzirwazza building for civil society organizations, politicians and members of parliament did not take off after police surrounded the area. Katwe DPC Frantile Lwamusaayi who led the operation said the organizers of the meeting had not sought police clearance. However according to the executive Director FIDA Uganda, Irene Ovonji, this was uncalled for and the police erred in stopping the meeting.

The coordinator of the meeting by the NGO Forum, Ceasar Mukasa says they had paid for the hall to have the meeting at Muganzirwazza and only informed at the last minute by the managers that they needed a clearance letter from police. “We paid full amount and got receipts but Namulondo investments that manages the building now says, we need clearance…this is all not very clear. We had already paid for the public address system, the food for the attendants of the workshop and all this is wasted, Namulondo has also refused to refund the money…” Mr. Mukasa said.

He however says they will not heed to government’s pressure blocking them from reaching out to the people and more meetings have been organized across the country in areas of Mbale, Mbarara,Jinja, and Gulu among others.

Efforts to speak to the management of Namulondo investments were futile after the marketing Manager, Ssenyonjo Allan promised to get back to us in vain.

NGO WORK

UN Experts Put Tanzanian Government on Notice – “Ensure Transparency and Respect for Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Ngorongoro”

Published

on

April 17, 2026 press release from the offices of eight UN Special Rapporteurs1 calls for the Tanzanian government to immediately publish the findings of two presidential commissions amid growing concerns over its eviction plans.
The communication echoes the Oakland Institute’s warning that these sham Presidential Commissions are being used to rubber-stamp eviction plans without the consent of the Indigenous community.
The strongly-worded communication from the UN Special Rapporteurs states that “these reports are of profound public interest and must be made available to the public without delay…Decisions affecting tens of thousands of Indigenous Peoples cannot be taken behind closed doors.” The experts furthermore urge “the Government to halt any actions that could lead to forced displacement, and engage in meaningful dialogue with affected communities,” while issuing a clear reminder that “Indigenous Peoples have a right to remain on their traditional lands if they so choose…Conservation efforts must not come at the expense of human rights.”
Impacted Maasai communities welcome this intervention from the UN Special Rapporteurs and reaffirm their commitment to defend their rights to remain on their ancestral lands.
To learn more about the struggle against Fortress Conservation, watch the interview: The Dark Side of “Conservation”
On Fox 5 DC Weekend Live, Julie Donaldson interviews Andy Currier, Oakland Institute’s Policy Analyst. Watch the discussion on fortress conservation and the human cost of climate solutions that displace Indigenous communities who best protect our biodiversity.

Watch the video

Source: oaklandinstitute.org

Continue Reading

NGO WORK

Two dead as Siaya protests against gold mining firm turn tragic

Published

on

Ikolomani residents protesting against eviction plan to pave space for British mining company Shanta Gold on November 12, 2025. Two people died in similar protests in Gem, Siaya County.  Isaac Wale | Nation Media Group

Two people were shot dead on Monday in Gem–Ramula, Siaya County, after villagers staged a protest over an alleged eviction they linked to Shanta Gold Kenya Limited.

Area police boss Charles Wafula confirmed the incident, stating that the victims were among a group alleged to have attacked a police post after the officers moved in to disperse the demonstrators.

According to Mr Wafula, the demonstrators, angered by what they described as an illegal resettlement by the company, stormed the station during the protest, prompting officers to intervene.

“The individuals had organised a demonstration but they did not notify the police. Our officers moved in to contain the situation, but the group began attacking both officers and Ramula Police Post, damaging several items, including vehicles,” Mr Wafula said.

However, a local rights organisation has sharply contested the police account, portraying the killings as unlawful and unprovoked.

In a statement, the Community Initiative Action Group Kenya said the two victims identified as Henry Otieno and Jack Omenda were part of a peaceful protest against what they termed a forced eviction from their ancestral land.

“The community had gathered peacefully to demonstrate against Shanta Gold Limited’s attempt to relocate them without their consent,” said the lobby’s Executive Director Chris Owalla.

The group further alleged that police officers opened fire without warning following a confrontation with residents at Ramula Market.

“Witnesses state there was an exchange between the community and police after which officers opened fire, killing Henry and Jack on the spot,” Mr Owalla said.

The rights group also accused senior police officers including Mr Wafula and Charles Emodo of Directorate of Criminal Investigation, of disregarding a court order that had halted evictions and mining operations in the area.

According to Mr Owalla, the Environment and Land Court in Siaya had, on February 5, 2026, issued conservatory orders barring any involuntary resettlement of residents in Ramula and its environs, pending the hearing of a petition.

The organisation is now calling for investigations by the Independent Policing Oversight Authority and the the Director of Public Prosecutions, alongside an independent autopsy on the victims.

Fear of evictions

The unrest is rooted in long-standing tensions over planned gold mining operations by Shanta Gold in the region. The company is seeking to establish a large-scale extraction project – one that residents fear could uproot communities and erode livelihoods carefully built over generations.

Similar scenes of unrest were reported in November 2025 in Ikolomani, where locals protested against possible relocations linked to the same company.

Shanta Gold has previously signalled its intention to invest in a multi-billion-shilling project in western Kenya, targeting high-grade gold deposits expected to yield significant output over several years.

Source: nation.africa

Continue Reading

NGO WORK

Tanzania: Commissions call for mass eviction of Indigenous Maasai from world-famous tourist destinations.

Published

on

Two presidential commissions have recommended the mass eviction of Maasai people from some of East Africa’s most iconic conservation areas and tourist destinations.

The commissions were established by Tanzania’s President Samia Suluhu Hassan following previous evictions of Maasai pastoralists from parts of the world-famous Serengeti ecosystem, and large-scale protests in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area in 2024.

Now, despite a global outcry at the earlier evictions, the two Commissions have:

  • Backed the previous evictions and called for them to continue, including in the UNESCO World Heritage Sites of Ngorongoro and neighboring Lake Natron.
  • Described the long-standing Maasai presence in the area as an “environmental pressure” that needs to be reduced.
  • Threatened local NGOs that support the Maasai, accusing them of “spreading misinformation or propaganda” because they “conflict with government interests.”
  • Called for the “relocation” of all “non-conservation activities” [in other words, Maasai occupancy of the land] outside the conservation areas.
  • Called for existing recognition of the Maasai people’s right to live in the Ngorongoro area to be removed.

An anonymous Maasai spokesperson said today: “We are blamed for environmental degradation while the unchecked expansion of tourism is ignored. Forced relocation, disguised as policy, has deprived our people of basic rights and dignity. We reject any continuation of these measures and condemn the Commission’s failure to reflect the voices, realities, and rights of our people.”

Still from a video showing the Maasai protesting the violent evictions from their ancestral lands, 2022.

The authorities maintain that these are “voluntary relocations.” However, the Maasai have overwhelmingly rejected being moved.

The Ngorongoro Conservation Area is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. When it was established, the ancestral right of the Maasai to live there with their cattle was explicitly acknowledged. But UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee has backed the so-called “voluntary relocations”, and UNESCO endorses the “fortress conservation” model that underpins Tanzania’s approach.

Survival International Director Caroline Pearce said today, “These commissions were a sham, a gimmick designed to give Tanzania’s violent persecution of the Maasai a veneer of respectability. It was widely predicted that they’d back further evictions: the whole saga just confirms that colonial-style fortress conservation is alive and well in Tanzania today, and enthusiastically endorsed by UNESCO.

“These recommendations give the green light to more evictions, in Ngorongoro and beyond. And while the Maasai are robbed of their lands and livelihood, the government, tour operators and so-called conservationists will enrich themselves from a landscape emptied of its original owners.”

Source: survivalinternational.org

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter