Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

The EAC Seed & Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, is a potential threat to smallholder farmers, as it aims to disengage them from the agriculture business, according to experts.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Agriculture, a cornerstone of livelihoods and economies throughout the East African Community (EAC), is now at a crossroads. The laws about seeds, once straightforward, have evolved into a complex web that now decides who controls food systems, how fair they are, and whether biodiversity and farmers’ rights are protected.

The draft Bill, as seen by Witness Radio, aims to provide for the coordination of evaluation, release, and registration of plant varieties among Partner States; to establish standard processes for seed certification and the protection of plant varieties within the Community; and to provide for related matters. According to its promoters, the Bill, based on Article 106 of the East African Community Treaty, aims to provide for seed certification, testing, and marketing, thereby facilitating and creating an enabling environment for private sector seed multiplication and distribution.

Advocates view it as a step toward regional integration, improved food security, and increased trade —a potential boon for the region. However, experts, civil society organizations (CSOs), and smallholder farmers believe the Bill contains many problems that could harm the very people who feed the majority of East Africans.

While the Bill may seem like a technical regulation, experts argue that it actually concerns control over food systems, farmers’ rights, and agricultural diversity. At a recent discussion hosted by civil society organizations and farmer groups in East Africa, panelists participated in a two-hour dialogue titled “The EAC Seed and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025: What is at Stake for Smallholder Farmers?” The event, organized by a Kenyan Seed Savers Network and its partners, highlighted concerns that the Bill favors commercial seed systems while neglecting those managed by farmers.

One of the most criticized aspects of the Bill is its reliance on the Distinct, Uniform, and Stable (DUS) criteria for seed release. Experts say these standards benefit uniform commercial seed varieties but often exclude diverse and adaptable indigenous or farmer-managed seeds. For instance, Tanzania’s Quality Declared Seed (QDS) system allows farmers to produce seeds without facing costly testing requirements. Dr. Peter Munyi, an advocate and agricultural legal expert, warns that if the EAC Bill is approved as it stands, such flexible systems could be compromised.

“It’s very dismissive of small-scale farmers and farmer seed systems because it has a very typical approach to the seed law of its variety release system, its certification system. The variety release requires seed to be consistent with DUS requirements, which are very expensive. Only commercial seed breeders or well-funded research institutions can really afford these tests.”

According to Dr. Munyi, this is a deliberate move to disengage smallholder farmers from the agricultural sector, despite their significant contribution to producing most of the World’s food. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)’s 2021 research, smallholder farmers account for more than 80 percent of the World’s food.

“The law is crafted in such a way that it locks smallholder farmers out of the seed system. When you require laboratory testing and multi-location trials, you’re effectively saying only big companies and donors can participate.”

The Seeds and Plant Varieties Bill closely mirrors a 2018 USAID-backed draft, which also faced criticism for advancing commercial interests at the expense of traditional systems.

“Both the 2018 Bill and the current Bill are discriminatory and inequitable in their approach because they don’t treat all farmers and all seed in the same way,” said Mariam Mayet, Executive Director of the African Center for Biodiversity.

She explained that the bias is intentional as the Bill aims to support commercial seed systems and create markets for multinational seed companies.

“It is not designed to strengthen food security or protect the rights of farmers who feed most of the population.” Mayet warned, adding that, “Once this Bill is passed, farmer-managed seed systems will be further criminalized and marginalized. This Bill takes that repression to a regional level.”

The Bill also introduces uncertainty around plant breeders’ rights. According to Dr. Kabanda David of the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), the draft law is vague on the scope of these rights. It does not explicitly guarantee farmers’ long-standing ability to save, reuse, exchange, or sell protected seeds. Without such exceptions, smallholder farmers could be criminalized for traditional practices.

The Seeds and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, may appear to be a step toward regional integration, but experts warn that it is dangerously skewed toward corporate seed systems. Left unchanged, it could deepen inequality, erode biodiversity, and undermine food sovereignty for millions of East Africans.

Experts, CSOs, and farmer groups insist that if the Bill is to proceed, it must provide explicit protections for farmers’ rights, including saving, exchanging, and selling seed, recognize and strengthen farmer-managed seed systems through a parallel legal framework or supportive policies, and guarantee meaningful participation of farmers and local communities in shaping seed regulations.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Govt orders fresh valuation of land for Rubanda iron ore project

Published

on

Prime Minister Robinah Nabbanja has ordered officials from the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development to repeat the valuation and compensation assessment for land acquired for an iron ore mining and processing project in Rubanda District following complaints that some affected residents were under-compensated.

Ms Nabbanja issued the directive on Wednesday while officiating at the handover of 60 acres of iron ore-rich land in Mufumba Village, Butare-Katojo Town Council, to Devki Steel Mills (U), which plans to mine and process iron ore in the area.

Some local leaders told the Prime Minister that several project-affected people were dissatisfied with the compensation they received, saying the money was insufficient to enable them to acquire alternative land for farming and settlement.

Ms Nabbanja later handed a land certificate to Devki Steel Mills (U) chairman Raval Narendra and directed the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development to expedite the company’s mining licence.

“I hereby order the officials from the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development that conducted this exercise to work with the local leaders and move house to house, piece of land to another and ensure that the raised concerns on under-valuation are fully addressed and everybody is satisfied,” Ms Nabbanja said.

“We don’t want to hear that our investor has land issues here and there because President Museveni was clear on this matter. After two weeks I will come back here to verify that everybody in this area is fully satisfied.”

Her directive followed complaints from Mufumba LC1 chairman Paulo Tibenderana and Rubanda District LCV chairman Stephen Kasyaba over the compensation process.

“Although people in this area are welcoming the investor, they claim that the money given to them is not enough to facilitate them acquire alternative pieces of land for their livelihoods,” Mr Kasyaba said.

He said the district council had already earmarked 52 acres where an iron ore processing plant could be constructed, as requested by President Museveni.

Mr Kasyaba also asked the government to consider compensating owners of land neighbouring the acquired project area to avoid disputes and other inconveniences associated with mining and crushing activities.

However, the ministry defended the valuation process.

The ministry’s chief government valuer, Gilbert Kermundu, said officials had consulted the Rubanda District Land Board, the 161 project-affected people and other residents before setting the compensation rate at Shs40 million per acre.

He said the rate took into account land scarcity in the area and that compensation was calculated according to the size of each affected person’s landholding.

“We paid the project affected people using this measure because individual land size was different as some people had less than 0.03 acres of land,” Mr Kermundu said.

He added that the affected residents were entitled to an additional 30 per cent of the compensation as disturbance allowance to facilitate their relocation.

“Kindly accept what the government has given you,” he said.

The ministry’s Under Secretary, Dr Emmanuel Mugunga, said about 99 per cent of the project-affected people had been compensated, questioning the basis of the complaints raised during the ceremony.

The compensation dispute comes as the government seeks to clear outstanding land issues and enable Devki Steel Mills to commence the planned mining and processing operations.

Mr Narendra appealed to the government to extend hydropower electricity to the project area to support the company’s operations.

He also pledged to employ local residents and support schools in neighbouring communities through education sponsorships and school feeding programmes.

Source: monitor.co.ug

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Death Of Witnesses Cited Among Causes Of Land Case Backlog

Published

on

The death of witnesses, illness and repeated adjournments are among the factors contributing to the backlog of land cases in Uganda, the Deputy Registrar of the Land Division has said.

His Worship Ronald Kayizzi said land cases accumulate in court for several reasons, including litigants filing multiple applications in a single matter, forcing judicial officers to adjourn cases and schedule them for later dates.

Appearing on Salam TV’s Judiciary Show hosted by Mariam Busingye, Kayizzi said the availability of witnesses was another major challenge affecting the timely disposal of cases.

He said some witnesses are elderly or sick, while others die before their cases are concluded, further complicating proceedings.

“Some witnesses are sick or elderly, and at times cases are delayed as court waits for witnesses who eventually die,” Kayizzi said.

He urged litigants to take their cases seriously and cooperate with their lawyers to minimise unnecessary delays.

Kayizzi also called on lawyers and judicial officers to manage their diaries properly and avoid fixing too many cases for hearing on the same day.

He further urged all parties expected to appear in court to make every effort to attend scheduled hearings, saying cooperation among litigants, lawyers and court officials is essential to reducing delays.

The comments come amid longstanding concerns over delays in the disposal of land disputes, which can leave parties waiting for years before their cases are concluded.

Kayizzi said better preparation by litigants and lawyers, proper scheduling by judicial officers and timely attendance by all parties could help courts reduce the backlog and improve access to justice.

source: nilepost.co.ug

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Sweeping investments are fueling widespread land grabbing and deepening rights violations across Uganda – Report.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio Team.

For 16 years, Sulait Behangana has fought to reclaim his land in Kassanda District, where he says he was forced out to make room for a tree plantation run by the UK-based New Forest Company (NFC). Once the proud owner of over 15 acres lush with coffee, bananas, and sugarcane, Behangana lost not just his fields but the foundation of his livelihood.

Now, Behangana survives by toiling on other people’s plantations, a stark contrast to the life he once knew.

“I was beaten during the eviction, and this caused lameness and weakness of my body. I have been reduced to a pauper; I have to dig in other people’s plantations to get what to eat,” Behangana told Witness Radio.

Behangana was one of 901 families uprooted to clear space for the Namwasa tree plantation, as detailed in a report chronicling seven cases of development-driven forced evictions in Uganda. In his community, families recount being pushed off their land without compensation or genuine resettlement. While a few received land, hundreds remain in limbo, still waiting for justice. Julius Ndagize, who leads the displaced households, says repeated mediation with New Forest Company has brought no resolution.

“We secured 500 acres of land in Kampindu Village, Kitumbi Sub-county after the first mediation to resettle those people. Of the 901 affected families, 453 were allocated land and resettled. However, 448 families haven’t been compensated to date,” Ndagize says.

The ordeal faced by families in Mubende echoes a broader pattern uncovered in a report titled Foreign Investment Drives Systematic Forced Land Evictions in Violation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, presented at the recent Africa Business and Human Rights Forum 2026.

The report details seven major cases where large-scale development projects and investments swept across Uganda, displacing communities. It examines the roles of government and security agencies, and the uphill battle victims face in seeking compensation and justice.

These cases span the Kaweri Coffee Plantation, Namwasa Forest Reserve, Formosa Three Planting Company, Agilis Partners, the Bunyoro Ranching Scheme in Kiryandongo, the Wadelai Irrigation Scheme, the Tilenga Project, the East African Crude Oil Pipeline, and conservation projects impacting the Batwa.

Witness Radio, ORRA, AFIEGO, FIAN-Uganda, BIRUDO, and BIDO, in collaboration with EDLC-NOVA, compiled the report. Drawing on community testimonies, court records, and grassroots documentation, the report claims these seven cases displaced 56,400 people. Even more striking, civil society monitoring suggests over 360,000 Ugandans may have been affected by forced evictions in the first half of 2024.

Mr. Jeff Wokulira Ssebaggala, Executive Director of Witness Radio, notes that while the cases span different investments and regions, affected communities’ stories share striking similarities. He points out that communities were frequently sidelined in decisions about their land, while those with political or financial clout often influenced the very processes that led to displacement.

“We noticed key agencies but also middlemen or government officials who are politically and financially connected,” Ssebaggala said, adding that such actors can be involved from the start, especially where communities live on land without formal tenure, making it easier to disregard their claims when the land is identified for investment or government use.

Ssebaggala explains that the roots of the problem stretch back to historical land decisions, when communities were left out of government planning and later discovered they were living on land earmarked for other uses.

“There are others whose land was gazetted to be a ranch by governments in the 1970s, but they were never consulted when the national exercise of planning was taking place,” he said.

He warns the stakes grow higher when communities resist these projects or question their removal.

“Those who stand against these projects are arrested, intimidated, or imprisoned. Communities regard land as everything because it defines their livelihood and heritage,” Ssebaggala said, adding that the report raised concerns about state institutions supporting investments rather than protecting affected communities.

The report reveals that women and young people were largely shut out of decision-making around land-based investments. Ssebaggala notes many projects moved forward without seeking communities’ voices or meaningful input, leaving those most reliant on the land excluded from choices shaping their destinies. As gender equality is concerned, the report shows an exclusion of women and youth in all these processes as projects really exist on their own without expressed opinion or contribution from the communities,” he said.

Examining these cases and the struggle for justice, lawyer Peter Arinaitwe, who represents land eviction victims, says affected communities face many obstacles: institutional backlogs, delays, and the heavy financial toll of legal battles that can drag on for years.

“We face judicial capture. Recently, we had the Chief Justice warning judges not to grant injunctions, stopping any investment project, and said that doing so amounts to prison,” Arinaitwe said.

Arinaitwe says Uganda has constitutional and legal protections for land rights, but these have not always protected communities on the ground. He cited cases involving the oil refinery and Kaweri Coffee Plantation, where communities pursued claims in court. Even when cases were decided and compensation awarded, legal processes continued to prolong disputes.ws because the constitutional provisions and protections exist in the book. Still, it’s a different story when it comes to practice,” he said.

For those stripped of their land, drawn-out court battles add another burden, forcing them to spend time and money seeking justice while struggling to rebuild their lives. Arinaitwe adds that the scars of eviction run deep, with psychological and emotional wounds lingering long after the land is gone.

“They are traumatized by the atrocities committed in the course of the eviction which go beyond the land and instead cause mental and emotional drain,” he said.

Participants from across Africa echoed Uganda’s concerns. Edmund Matotay described how Maasai communities in northern Tanzania now face mounting pressure as government interests in conservation, tourism, agriculture, and development clash with the pastoral way of life.

He said the Maasai depend on access to grazing land and that physical displacement therefore affects more than where people live. “The issue of physical displacement disrupts the way of life considering that Maasai people are typically nomads and pastoralists who depend on the grazing of the cows and cattle,” Matotai said.

He also reported intimidation of people supporting the communities, saying lawyers, faith leaders and others involved in defending land rights had faced threats and arrests. “There were a lot of intimidation issues, not only to the lawyers, to other actors, but also to the faith leaders who are leading some of the discussion around the area,” he said.

Back in Uganda, the report insists that stopping forced evictions is not the government’s burden alone. Companies profiting from land-based investments must also identify human rights risks before projects start, engage with affected communities, and create accessible ways to hear and resolve grievances.

Ssebaggala urges investors not to wait until communities are uprooted and legal battles erupt before tackling human rights issues. He calls for ongoing human rights due diligence throughout every stage of investment, and for companies to set up grievance mechanisms so affected people can voice concerns and seek solutions.

“Investors should integrate human rights due diligence across project cycles and also establish a grievance mechanism, policies, structures and awareness of these processes,” he said.

He also urges the government to put in place systems that verify free, prior, and informed consent, making human rights due diligence and environmental impact assessments mandatory before any land-based investment can proceed.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates