SPECIAL REPORTS AND PROJECTS
How Unwanted Witness – US Mission Kampala project is giving hope to fading freelance journalism in upcountry
Published
9 years agoon

Before the coming of Unwanted Witness – US Mission Kampala, countless journalists especially from Upcountry areas of Uganda suffered a lot due to the poor working conditions and limited working tools like computers, internet among others. This wanting condition almost prompted a section of journalists to forego their profession.
But guess what, Since Unwanted Witness moved in to facilitate the suffering journalists through offering them several trainings, free computers, Internet, life has not been the same and here are some of the many beneficiaries availing their breathtaking testimonies;
George William Mugwanya, the Mubende Journalists’ Association coordinator applauded the training saying that its impact is now being felt because members have improved on the quality of the content they produce.
“Just two months after the training, we have improved our content and we have a desk at our secretariat handling content before it is published on the website.” Said Mugwanya adding, “The training also contributed a lot to the field crew on what to consider most in the field on different story projects,”
He further added that “this partnership with Unwanted Witness, has transformed lives of journalists in which we now have limited expenditure on internet costs in internet cafés since we now have a full-time internet service at office, and as upcountry journalists this is a gateway to opportunities and to the outside world.”
Commenting about the contents of the training, Mugwanya said “the training took us through generating business ideas which gave us potential not to rely on the little salaries from media houses where we have unsecure employment, as many of us work without appointment letters and we are implementing it.”
Lastly, Mugwanya asserted that him being the coordinator at MJA-Uganda, he sees a solid association since their website is progressing thus assuring their respective partners that Unwanted Witness training did not go for trial rather a reality.
Also Christmas Rutaagi, a member of the association and participant said, “Internet has solved problems relating our safety and security while on Internet and spending much money on Internet cafés, which at times serves at a very low speed and unsecure.
He notes that the Internet and computer donations helped them to reduce security risks at cafes where they work on stories in an open space while everyone is seeing including those you’re writing about. “our [journalistic] work is so sensitive in nature, that we need privacy which cannot be got in any internet bureau, this alone has many risks in that security operatives keep moving in and out these facilities for spying purposes to know who’s using the Internet and in most cases its us the journalists ever in these cafes filing stories. ”
Harriet Nabbanja, a member of MJA, says that Internet has made work easier for her as a journalist in terms of bridging up communication gaps with journalists in the urban setting through networking because it made the exchange of information possible and quicker.
“Internet is not only just a source of information but I can use it to do my research rather than going to the library, and also use it to promote my business to reach the outside world. It has cut-down the need for travel and expenses in transport looking for information to produce a story.”
On the other hand, Ibrahim Kiggundu, head of IT department at MJA says, “The presence of a computer and full time internet at our office make it easier to have access to internet, and also, we are now having free internet. More so, I am now learning a lot of new things during my free time while using these donations because I am now grasping the best methods of attaching files using emails, using the social media platforms, and I don’t need to go to an internet cafe or use my cell phone. I have leant how to publish stories on our website and learning more new online security mechanisms now that I head the IT departments at the secretariat,”
Meanwhile, Wilfred Atenyi also a beneficiary applauded the training for equipping him with investigative skills.
“Sincerely, before the training, there was missing gaps on investigative journalism which I later discovered after various modules during the training,” said Atenyi.
“I have managed to attain skills in compiling reports before writing up a story even sharing stories with other reporters just in case a story may be dangerous to me at that very moment, in this case I have managed to understand that there is no story worth a journalist life.” He further stated.
Atenyi explained that “Currently, I can take time gathering enough information instead of giving half-backed reports on very important stories because I have now gone an extra mile in Internet usage since we now have it installed at our office premises throughout the day which has helped in affording us to get the information concerning different issues at a zero price.”
Since September 2016, Unwanted Witness-Uganda-a digital rights nongovernment organization with support from US Mission in Kampala rolled out its campaign to train upcountry journalists in e-media, e-business, human rights approach and investigative journalism.
Through its agenda ‘using technology to building an independent and sustaining freelance journalism in rural Uganda’ the organization’s officials partnered with ten media associations across the traditional regions of the country, trained them, donated them websites, full desktop computers kits, and internet routers.
All these, were aimed at improving the lives of up-country reporters through equipping them with the requisite skills to approach stories from human rights angle and making business sense using the digital tools at their disposal unlike the situation before Unwanted Witness’ intervention.
Prior, on average, upcountry reporters could spend at least Sh20,000 (about US $ 6) to put together a single story for him/her to earn maximum Shs14,000 (about US $4) worse still with limited or no working tools.
Related posts:

Activists express pessimism over government’s move to provide free Internet to Kampala and Entebbe dwellers
Accessing information still a problem in Uganda: civil society
Unwanted Witness raises red flag on government move to surrender ID data to private telecoms
Human Rights Defenders not safe in Uganda – Unwanted Witness report
You may like
SPECIAL REPORTS AND PROJECTS
‘Food and fossil fuel production causing $5bn of environmental damage an hour’
Published
2 weeks agoon
December 22, 2025
UN GEO report says ending this harm key to global transformation required ‘before collapse becomes inevitable’.
Related posts:

Activists storm TotalEnergies’ office ahead of G20 Summit, demand end to fossil fuel expansion in Africa
New billion-dollar loans to fossil fuel companies from SEB, Nordea and Danske Bank.
Fossil fuel opponents lobby Africans for support
Ecological land grab: food vs fuel vs forests
SPECIAL REPORTS AND PROJECTS
Britain, Netherlands withdraw $2.2 billion backing for Total-led Mozambique LNG
Published
3 weeks agoon
December 17, 2025
CONSTRUCTION HALTED IN 2021, BUT DUE TO RESTART
PROJECT CAN PROCEED WITHOUT UK, DUTCH FINANCING, TOTAL HAS SAID
CRITICISM FROM ENVIRONMENTAL, HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS
Related posts:

Uganda, Total sign crude oil pipeline deal
Witness Radio – Uganda, Community members from Mozambique and other organizations around the world say NO to more industrial tree plantations
NGOs file suit against Total over Uganda oil project
Agribusiness Company with financial support from UK, US and Netherlands is dispossessing thousands.
SPECIAL REPORTS AND PROJECTS
The secretive cabal of US polluters that is rewriting the EU’s human rights and climate law
Published
1 month agoon
December 5, 2025
Leaked documents reveal how a secretive alliance of eleven large multinational enterprises has worked to tear down the EU’s flagship human rights and climate law, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The mostly US-based coalition, which calls itself the Competitiveness Roundtable, has targeted all EU institutions, governments in Europe’s capitals, as well as the Trump administration and other non-EU governments to serve its own interests. With European lawmakers soon moving ahead to completely dilute the CSDDD at the expense of human rights and the climate, this research exposes the fragility of Europe’s democracy.
Key findings
- Leaked documents reveal how a secretive alliance of eleven companies, including Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Koch, Inc., has worked under the guise of a “Competitiveness Roundtable” to get the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) either scrapped or massively diluted.
- The companies, most of which are headquartered in the US and operate in the fossil fuel sector, aimed to “divide and conquer in the Council”, sideline “stubborn” European Commission departments, and push the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament “to side with the right-wing parties as much as possible”.
- Chevron and ExxonMobil were in charge of mobilising pressure against the CSDDD from non-EU countries. The Roundtable companies endeavoured to get the CSDDD high on the agenda of the US-EU trade negotiations and also worked on mobilising other countries against the CSDDD, in order to disguise the US influence.
- Roundtable companies paid the TEHA Group – a think tank – to write a research report and organise an event on EU competitiveness, which echoed the Roundtable’s position and cast doubt on the European Commission’s assessment of the economic impact of the CSDDD.
While Europeans were told that their governments were negotiating a landmark law to hold corporations accountable for human rights abuses and climate damage, a secretive alliance of US fossil fuel giants was working behind the scenes to destroy it. Collaborating under the innocent-sounding name ‘Competitiveness Roundtable’, eleven multinational enterprises have worked closely to eviscerate several EU sustainability laws, including the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). This Competitiveness Roundtable may be unknown, but its members are a who’s-who of polluting, mainly US, multinationals, including Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Dow. The group seems to have run rings around all branches of the EU and the Trump administration to get what they want: scrapping, or at least hugely diluting, the CSDDD.

Leaked documents obtained by SOMO reveal how, under the pretext of the now-near-magical concept of ‘competitiveness’, these companies plotted to hijack democratically adopted EU laws and strip them of all meaningful provisions, including those on climate transition plans, civil liability, and the scope of supply chains. EU officials appear not to have known who they were up against. But the documents obtained by SOMO show a high level of organisation and strategising with a clear facilitator: Teneo, a US public relations and consultancy company.
The documents indicate that many of the companies involved wanted to stay hidden from view. After all, if it were widely known that a secretive group of mostly American fossil fuel companies like Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Koch, Inc. was working as a coordinated organisation to dilute an EU climate and human rights law, that might raise questions and serious concern among the public and the policymakers they were targeting. Many of the companies in the Roundtable have never publicly spoken out against the CSDDD.
Big Oil’s ‘Competitiveness Roundtable’
The Competitiveness Roundtable is dominated by fossil fuel companies, including three Big Oil companies (ExxonMobil, Chevron, TotalEnergies) and three other companies with activities in the oil and gas sector (Koch, Inc., Honeywell, and Baker Hughes). Other members are Nyrstar (minerals and metals, a subsidiary of Trafigura Group); Dow, Inc. (chemicals); Enterprise Mobility (car rentals); and JPMorgan Chase (finance).
Teneo, the Roundtable’s coordinator, has a track record(opens in new window) of working with fossil fuel companies, including Chevron, Shell, and Trafigura, and was hired by the government of Azerbaijan to handle public relations(opens in new window) when it hosted the COP29 climate conference.
In February 2025, the European Commission published the Omnibus I proposal(opens in new window), which aims to “simplify” several EU sustainability laws, including the CSDDD. The documents obtained by SOMO reveal that the Roundtable companies, which have been meeting weekly since at least March 2025, worked on deep interventions within each of the three EU institutions to get the Omnibus I package to align exactly with their views. The EU institutions are expected to reach a final agreement on Omnibus I by the end of 2025.
The documents reveal that the Roundtable companies’ activities in the Parliament are far more significant than what is visible in the EU Transparency Register(opens in new window). Eight of the Roundtable’s lobbying meetings during the Strasbourg plenary sessions of May and June 2025, listed in the Transparency Register, show Teneo as the only attendee, thereby failing to disclose the names of other Roundtable companies that participated in these meetings. Another three meetings the Roundtable held were not found in the EU Transparency Register(opens in new window) at all.
“Divide and conquer” the Council
In the European Council, the Roundtable plotted to “divide and conquer” EU governments to get the climate article in the CSDDD deleted. In June 2025, during the final weeks of negotiations in the Council on the Omnibus I proposal, the Roundtable discussed lobbying EU government leaders to “intervene politically” to ensure its priorities were included in the Council’s negotiation mandate. Subsequently, German Chancellor Merz and French President Macron reportedly(opens in new window) personally intervened(opens in new window) in the Council’s political process, leading to a dramatic dilution(opens in new window) of the texts(opens in new window) negotiated in the months before the intervention. Several of the changes made to the texts strongly align with the Roundtable’s demands, including delaying and substantially weakening the climate obligations, scrapping EU civil liability provisions, and limiting the responsibility of companies to take responsibility for their supply chains (the ‘Tier 1’ restriction).

Competitiveness Roundtable meeting document, 11 July 2025.
Additionally, the documents reveal that the Roundtable is still aiming to drum up a “blocking minority” to overturn the Council’s negotiation mandate during the trilogue negotiations, which started in November 2025. By “tak[ing] advantage of the ‘weak’ Council negotiating mandate” and disagreements between EU Member States on “contentious articles”, the Competitiveness Roundtable companies hope to force the Danish Council presidency to give up on including any form of climate obligations in the CSDDD – despite EU Member States’ agreement on this in the June 2025 Council mandate(opens in new window) .
To implement the divide-and-conquer strategy, the Roundtable assigned specific companies to “establish rapporteurships” with different EU governments. TotalEnergies would target the French, Belgian, and Danish governments, and ExxonMobil would target Germany, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Romania.



Circumventing “stubborn” European Commission departments
The Roundtable also discussed working on “circumvent[ing]” two “stubborn” European Commission departments involved in the Omnibus political process, DG JUST and DG FISMA, which, in their view, were “unlikely to be willing to see our side of the story”. According to the documents, DG JUST opposed deleting the climate article and restricting the Directive’s scope to only very large enterprises. The Roundtable aimed to diminish the role of these departments by pressuring President Von der Leyen and Commissioners McGrath (DG JUST) and Albuquerque (DG FISMA) by “organising letters from Irish and German business groups” and using an event held by the European Roundtable for Industry to “target” Von der Leyen and McGrath.
Read full report: Somo.nl
Source: Somo
Related posts:

Victims of human rights violations in Uganda still waiting for redress
UN Human Rights Chief urges EU leaders to approve key business and human rights legislation
Business, UN, Govt & Civil Society urge EU to protect sustainability due diligence framework
Development financiers fuel human rights abuses – New Report
Land tenure security as an electoral issue: Museveni warns Kayunga land grabbers, reaffirms protection of sitting tenants.
COP30 : a further step towards a Just Transition in Africa
‘Food and fossil fuel production causing $5bn of environmental damage an hour’
Four hundred fifty victim families of the Oil Palm project in Buvuma are to receive compensation by this Friday – Witness Radio
Four hundred fifty victim families of the Oil Palm project in Buvuma are to receive compensation by this Friday – Witness Radio
Women’s groups demand equality in land tenure security to boost food production.
Tension as Project-Affected Persons demand to meet Uganda’s President over Oil Palm growing on their grabbed land.
Land commission starts updating govt land countrywide.
Innovative Finance from Canada projects positive impact on local communities.
Over 5000 Indigenous Communities evicted in Kiryandongo District
Petition To Land Inquiry Commission Over Human Rights In Kiryandongo District
Invisible victims of Uganda Land Grabs
Resource Center
- REPARATORY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE MUST BE AT THE CORE OF COP30, SAY GLOBAL LEADERS AND MOVEMENTS
- LAND GRABS AT GUNPOINT REPORT IN KIRYANDONGO DISTRICT
- THOSE OIL LIARS! THEY DESTROYED MY BUSINESS!
- RESEARCH BRIEF -TOURISM POTENTIAL OF GREATER MASAKA -MARCH 2025
- The Mouila Declaration of the Informal Alliance against the Expansion of Industrial Monocultures
- FORCED LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA TRENDS RIGHTS OF DEFENDERS IMPACT AND CALL FOR ACTION
- 12 KEY DEMANDS FROM CSOS TO WORLD LEADERS AT THE OPENING OF COP16 IN SAUDI ARABIA
- PRESENDIANTIAL DIRECTIVE BANNING ALL LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA
