WITNESS RADIO MILESTONES
Harvard’s Foreign Farmland Investment Mess
Published
8 years agoon

The university’s holdings in developing markets have proved to be more trouble than they’re worth.
Fourteen years ago, a Brazilian farmer named Ruthardo Grun says he was terrorized by armed thugs who shot at him, burned down his shack, and chased him from land he was preparing to farm. Little did he know his battle to get the property back would end up pitting him against a company controlled by the world’s richest school: Harvard University.
Over a decade, Harvard invested at least $1 billion in farmland, according to a just-released reportfrom the activist groups GRAIN, based in Barcelona, and the Network for Social Justice and Human Rights, based in Sao Paulo. The organizations came up with their estimate after a year-long investigation of tax returns and local property records, as well as on-the-ground interviews. Harvard’s holdings included vineyards in California, dairy farms in New Zealand, and operations producing cotton, soybeans, and sugar cane in countries such as Brazil, South Africa, Australia, Russia, and Ukraine, and totaled 854,000 hectares, though some assets have been sold.
In response to questions about its farmland holdings, Harvard says it considers the environmental and social implication of its endowment investments. The university said in a statement that it has “instituted a more proactive approach to working with managers of new and remaining assets—a partnership that provides more oversight and ensures that we can leave the land and community better than when we first invested.”
Narv Narvekar, the endowment’s chief executive officer hired from Columbia University in 2016 to overhaul operations, has retreated from direct investing. He’s spun out teams of managers overseeing assets from real estate to hedge funds, sending them to start their own businesses while investing with them. Yet Narvekar is still trying to hammer out the future of the troubled natural resources portfolio, even as he sells some investments, including the New Zealand dairy farm and a eucalyptus plantation in Uruguay.
Now, as a new school year begins, Harvard’s far-flung farmlands are facing criticism for, among other things, their impact on ancient burial grounds and impoverished populations. “Harvard’s farmland deals should be a cautionary tale for institutional investors,’’ writes Devlin Kuyek, a researcher at GRAIN, whose mission is to support small farmers and social movements in poorer countries.
Students, alumni, and environmentalists are targeting U.S. university endowments, saying their investing practices are often out of synch with schools’ professed values. These critics have pushed colleges to jettison stock in fossil fuel companies, private prisons, and companies that do business with Israel. Yale University’s investments in New Hampshire’s Great North Woods have drawn the school into disputes over clear-cutting and the development of a power line.

Harvard initially made hefty profits on its land investments, including by buying and selling New Zealand timberlands in the 2000s. But returns fell as emerging markets faltered, and much of the team spearheading the strategy left the endowment in 2015. Last year, Harvard wrote down its natural resources portfolio, which includes timber as well as farmland, by $1.1 billion, to $2.9 billion. Over the decade ended June 30, 2017, Harvard’s investment portfolio returned 4.4 percent a year, among the worst of its peers. In Brazil, in particular, the endowment’s holdings suffered from the country’s recent economic meltdown and political turmoil.
The report, titled “Harvard’s Billion-Dollar Farmland Fiasco,” shows why such investments are so risky. It highlights property Harvard bought in Australia through a company called Wealthcheck Funds Management. According to a government inquiry, the company harmed an Aboriginal burial site when it dug irrigation canals for a cotton farm. It also details conflicts between RussellStone Group, which managed the endowment’s farms in South Africa, and black families that were granted rights to some sites to graze cattle and access burial sites. Neither company returned calls or emails seeking comment.
But Brazil may be the most contentious of Harvard’s overseas adventures. A public prosecutor’s office in the northeastern state of Bahia, for instance, has said that it may sue to reclaim some of the 140,000-hectare farm owned by Harvard-backed Caracol Agropecuaria after finding that titles for about two-thirds of the property are invalid. In its most recent tax filing, Harvard valued its interest in Caracol at $87 million. Elsewhere in Bahia, villagers have protested the property titles of a farm that was in part sold to Harvard-backed Gordian Bioenergy, according to the report. The endowment has been seeking to end its relationship with Gordian, which is developing farms to produce both crops and energy, though it still controls assets it acquired through the company.

In the neighboring state of Piaui, a Harvard-controlled company called Sorotivo Agropecuaria has been battling with Grun and five other plaintiffs who say they lost their land in 2004. Earlier this year a judge dismissed the lawsuit and said Sorotivo could acquire a new title from the state for the 27,000-hectare farm it controls. However, in his decision he said that both the plaintiffs and Sorotivo practiced land-grabbing on title acquisitions. Accusations of land grabbing, which can date back decades, became epidemic as Brazil’s farm belt expanded and were often linked to speculators falsifying titles in order to steal and sell public property used by subsistence farmers.
The judge, Heliomar Rios Ferreira, says that the state agency from which the plaintiffs said they got their titles didn’t have any records of the grants. He also says Sorotivo improperly extended a boundary of its vast farm, though this was in an area unrelated to the lawsuit.
The plaintiffs’ lawyer says their property titles are legitimate and that they will appeal. Harvard controls Sorotivo through a Brazilian farming company called Insolo Agroindustrial, which didn’t return calls and emails seeking comment. A spokesman for Harvard declined to comment on the litigation.

While Grun relocated, people who for generations have made their home in the region known as the Cerrado are living with the consequences of the dispute. Eurotides Paulo da Silva resides in a village below Insolo’s vast farm, which stretches on for miles and miles and evokes a moonscape when it’s between harvest and seasonal plantings. His son works on the farm. But locals, who hunted and collected honey and medicinal plants on the plateaus, say their way of life has been hemmed in over the last decade with the arrival of industrial farms.
Silva produces a document dated from 1991 that he says shows his grandfather also owned land on the plateau. His cousin, Alberto Pereira da Silva, makes a similar claim, saying they never challenged the loss of the properties because they felt intimidated. Says the cousin: “We feel like we are trapped without a way out.” —With Lianne Milton
You may like
-
Six cattlemen opposed to the Tilenga oil project-related forced land eviction have been granted bail but will remain in prison…
-
Global agribusiness continues to displace rural communities
-
Court releases a tortured community land rights defender on bail
-
Breaking! Kiryandongo human rights situation is presented before the United Nations…
-
After being tortured by the army, the land rights defender is charged and remanded to prison
-
…….Special Report; abridged testimony……. ABDUCTION AND TORTURE: New methods used by multinationals and security agencies to grab land from the poor communities…
WITNESS RADIO MILESTONES
UNCCD COP17 kicks off in Mongolia, drawing nations together to tackle urgent issues of land, drought, and food security.
Published
19 hours agoon
August 17, 2026
By Witness Radio team
ULAANBAATAR, Mongolia – Over the next two weeks, the World’s spotlight is on Mongolia, where governments, environmental experts, civil society, pastoralists, and others unite for the 17th UNCCD COP to confront land degradation challenges.
The conference, starting today in Ulaanbaatar and running through August 28 under the banner “Restoring land, restoring hope,” brings delegates together to tackle land degradation, desertification, drought, sustainable land management, food security, and vital funding to revive damaged ecosystems.
This gathering comes at a critical moment as land degradation and drought threaten food supplies, water security, biodiversity, and the livelihoods of millions worldwide.
The UN Convention to Combat Desertification was established in response to land degradation, particularly in dry and drought-prone areas, and its consequences for communities and economies.
The Convention was adopted in Paris on 17 June 1994 and entered into force in December 1996. It is the first and only internationally legally binding framework to address desertification. It is based on participation, partnership, and decentralization, which form the backbone of Good Governance.
Mongolia welcomes COP17 while facing immense strain on its land and rangelands. Nearly 77 percent of its territory is degraded. Pastoralism remains the heartbeat of Mongolia’s economy and culture, making rangeland stewardship more crucial than ever.
Speaking at the opening press conference, UNCCD Executive Secretary Yasmine Fouad said Mongolia’s own experience makes it an important setting for discussions on land restoration and pastoralism.
“77% of the land of Mongolia is facing land degradation, and the economy here, with all the number of people, is really depending on the issue of rangeland,” Fouad said.
Ahead of the UNCCD event, Mongolia hosted a Pastoralism gathering. Fouad noted that the three-day global gathering brought together representatives from over 100 countries. It produced a Declaration outlining the needs and priorities of pastoralists worldwide, with a special focus on women.
“The interesting part is how seriously Mongolia took this by convening the Global Pastoralism Gathering over three days, bringing together representatives from more than 100 countries. They came out with a Declaration highlighting the needs and priorities of pastoralists around the world, with a special emphasis on women. This means that this COP, and the Convention itself, will continue to be a human-centered convention. It will continue to serve people, with women remaining at the top of that agenda.” Sher added.
According to Mongolia’s government, around 80 percent of the nation is pasture land, supporting about 60 million livestock. Finding harmony between agriculture and pastoralism is becoming more challenging.
Mongolia’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change, Sandag-Ochir Tsend, said deciding how much land to allocate to agriculture and how much to keep available for pastoralism is one of the country’s major challenges.
He explained that Mongolian herders traditionally move their livestock across different areas during the four seasons. This creates tensions over land allocation and use.
“Deciding how much land to use for agriculture and how much for rangeland is difficult. Because of this, agriculture and herding lifestyles cause conflicts,” Tsend added.
Tsend said COP17 offers an opportunity to reconsider land management amid soil degradation, climate change, and other pressures.
“We must change our approach to these issues, including government policy and finance. I see this conference as the start of a solution,” he added.
COP17’s significance stretches far beyond Mongolia, as land underpins global food production and freshwater resources and is deeply intertwined with biodiversity and climate.
Dr. Osama Ibrahim Faqeeha, Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Minister for Environment, Water and Agriculture and adviser to the COP16 presidency, said humanity’s dependence on land is much greater than is often recognized. He said about 95 percent of the World’s food comes from land, while 99.7 percent of human calories are ultimately derived from land.
“Our main focus is to raise global awareness about the importance of land. Our cities, forests, farms, food, and freshwater all depend on land, yet we have treated it as infinite. We have failed to understand the links between land, ocean, atmosphere, and climate. At COP16, we brought these connections together because degrading land undermines food and water security and drives biodiversity loss. About 60% of biodiversity loss is due to habitat loss, closely linked to land degradation,” Hon Faqeeha added.
UNCCD officials revealed that roughly 40 percent of the World’s land is degraded, impacting up to 2 billion hectares. Each year, another 100 million hectares of farms, forests, and rangelands degrade. Meanwhile, drought affects about 1.8 billion people, with farming communities bearing the brunt of the hardship.
Faqeeha called for a shift towards sustainable land management and faster restoration of degraded land.
“Many resource-related conflicts and migration are linked to drought. About 3.5 billion people are affected by land degradation, and 1.8 billion by drought. Farming communities bear eighty percent of drought impacts, and 85 percent of those affected live in low- and lower-middle-income countries. There is a significant social dimension.
“The task is huge. We cannot continue business as usual. The mission of this Convention is to transform land management. We need to shift to sustainable land management and accelerate restoration,” he added.
COP17 also arrives with unresolved issues carried over from the last UNCCD conference.
At COP16 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in December 2024, countries adopted resolutions and launched initiatives covering sustainable agricultural land management, food security, Indigenous peoples, civil society and drought. However, they failed to agree on a major drought decision or a multilateral agreement to address drought’s consequences.
In his welcome address to COP16 on December 2, 2024, UNCCD Secretary-General Ibrahim Thiaw had urged delegates to adopt a bold decision on drought, describing it as one of the most pervasive and disruptive environmental challenges.
The negotiations ended without this agreement, leaving the issue to be taken up at COP17 in Mongolia. Fouad told journalists that countries had already shown a willingness to return to the issue.
“The role of the COP17 presidency is to build consensus and facilitate discussion till a drought decision is gavelled,” she said.
She added that the secretariat hopes countries will agree on a drought decision that reflects the urgency and scale of the problem while providing the space and finance necessary for implementation.
Related posts:

COP16 in Riyadh: World Leaders Commit $12.15B to Combat Land Degradation and Drought
Restoring Our Land: Tackling Degradation for Climate Resilience, Food Security, and Sustainable Development at COP16
How unequal access to land by women endangers Uganda’s food security
World leaders are urging support for pastoral mobility as a crucial strategy to sustain rangelands and address intensifying challenges from climate change and land pressures.
WITNESS RADIO MILESTONES
Karamoja stands on the brink, with nearly half a million people gripped by acute hunger.
Published
1 week agoon
August 10, 2026
By the Witness Radio team.
Nearly half a million people in Uganda’s Karamoja sub-region are facing acute hunger as repeated climate shocks, poor harvests and environmental degradation continue to erode food production and livelihoods, according to the latest integrated food security phase classification (IPC) analysis.
The IPC assessment found that 473,000 people, nearly one in every three people assessed, experienced crisis (IPC phase 3) or worse levels of acute food insecurity between April and July 2026. Of these, about 41,000 people were classified in emergency (IPC phase 4), requiring urgent food assistance and livelihood support.
The assessment paints a grim picture: relentless dry spells, sudden floods, and waves of crop and livestock diseases have battered Karamoja, leaving families struggling to recover season after season. Soaring food prices and scarce quality farming supplies have only deepened the crisis.
The IPC also found that only 54.1 percent of households had food stocks at the time of the survey, with supplies in most districts expected to last for less than one month.
The assessment reveals that swarms of crop pests, outbreaks of livestock disease, and wildlife ravaging fields, combined with a shortage of quality seeds, have slashed agricultural yields and left countless families exposed and vulnerable.
In response to the findings, Oxfam sounded the alarm: families in Karamoja are racing through their dwindling food stores and scrambling for safe water. Prolonged drought and vanishing pastures now threaten the livestock that so many depend on for survival.
“People in Karamoja are not just running out of food; they are also running out of options. Climate shocks and long-standing inequalities, including low investment in education and water infrastructure, have steadily stripped away their ability to cope,” Said Francis Shanty Odokorach, Oxfam’s country director in Uganda.
The nutrition outlook is just as dire. The IPC foresees 122,100 children under five needing urgent treatment for acute malnutrition between March 2026 and February 2027, with 30,600 of them facing the most severe cases. An additional 8,000 pregnant and breastfeeding women are expected to need vital nutrition support during this time.
The assessment places Kaabong and Kotido districts in the critical phase of acute malnutrition, underscoring the depth of the crisis. In Kotido, relentless drought has left families desperately searching for enough to eat.
“The ground is all dry and bare. You can visibly see people, especially children, very hungry. Families have run out of food early and are now forced to skip meals. Livestock are also suffering from a lack of water and pasture,” Said Lokiru Musa Hassan, Oxfam project officer working in Napumpum sub-county.
Though the IPC predicts a slight reprieve during the August 2026 to February 2027 harvest, hope remains fragile. Around 352,000 people are still expected to endure crisis or worse, especially in Kaabong, Karenga, Kotido, and Moroto, where relentless climate shocks keep sabotaging recovery.
While acute malnutrition has dipped slightly since 2025, the IPC cautions that these hard-won gains could vanish with the next wave of extreme weather, disease, or funding gaps. Without ongoing aid and real investment in climate resilience, many families may fall even further into hunger.
To confront the crisis, Oxfam has announced a two-phase plan across five districts, delivering emergency food, cash, safe water, drought-resistant seeds, and livestock support. The organization also aims to boost climate-smart farming, water harvesting, livelihood recovery, and local early warning systems.
“This response must be shaped with communities, not simply delivered to them. Women, young people, older people and people with disabilities must be able to access assistance safely, provide feedback and influence the decisions that affect their lives,” Odokorach said.
With climate change tightening its grip on Uganda’s drylands, humanitarian agencies stress that emergency relief alone is not enough. Only lasting investments in resilient agriculture, water systems, and community-driven climate adaptation can help Karamoja escape the cycle of hunger.
Related posts:

Nationwide Analysis Finds Gulu, Jinja, Kasese Worst Affected By Hunger During Lockdown
Solar Powered Irrigation to combat change in Karamoja Region
Government body dispossessed 2000 people in Karamoja region
Minister to arrest land grabbers in Karamoja
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Uganda moves toward a Bamboo Policy to boost environmental conservation and green growth.
Published
7 months agoon
January 21, 2026
By Witness Radio team.
Uganda’s move to develop a national bamboo policy aims to boost environmental conservation and create green jobs, addressing the country’s urgent unemployment issues among the working class.
Bamboo is a critical tool in fighting climate change due to its rapid growth, high carbon sequestration capacity, and ability to produce 35% more oxygen than equivalent trees. As a fast-growing, renewable resource, it restores degraded land, provides sustainable materials that replace emission-intensive products like concrete, and offers a resilient, low-carbon bioenergy source.
Bamboo’s potential is outlined in the existing National Bamboo Strategy. Still, stakeholders stress that a formal policy involving entrepreneurs, farmers, and processors is essential to remove regulatory uncertainty and foster sector growth.
“The strategy is a good document, but it was developed largely through desk research. It did not fully involve entrepreneurs, farmers, and processors who are already working in the bamboo industry,” said Sjaak de Blois, chairman of Bamboo Uganda, encouraging stakeholders to see their role as vital.
The bamboo policy is currently at an early consultative stage, with no draft yet submitted to the cabinet or parliament. Recent consultations brought together representatives from eight government ministries, private-sector bamboo actors, and development partners to begin aligning the strategy with practical regulatory needs.
“What we have now is the starting point,” De Blois mentioned. “The next step is to take the strategy and make it more practical, more market-driven, and more Ugandan. The next step is to move from having a plan to adopting a policy.
Bamboo currently falls under several regulatory frameworks, with no single authority overseeing the sector. The policy push is being driven in part by Bamboo Uganda, a membership-based organization bringing together bamboo farmers and processors, among others. The organization aims to play a coordinating role similar to that historically played by the Uganda Coffee Development Authority in the coffee sector.
“If you want to make a sector meaningful for a country, you need coordination. Coffee became what it is because of an institution that aligned farmers, traders, exporters, and regulators. Bamboo needs the same kind of coordination.” He said.
The policy process is supported by the Belgian development agency, which is funding consultations and facilitating dialogue between the government and the private sector.
Industry players say the absence of clear regulations has constrained investment despite growing demand.
“At the moment, bamboo is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. As a farmer, you talk to forestry, as a charcoal producer, you talk to energy, as a builder, you talk to works. There is no single framework that enables the industry to function.” De Blois added.
Supporters of the policy argue that bamboo could play a significant role in environmental conservation. Bamboo grows rapidly, regenerates after harvesting, and can be harvested annually for decades, reducing pressure on natural forests.
According to Global Forest Watch (GFW), Uganda lost 1.2 million hectares of tree cover between 2001 and 2024, representing a 15% decline from the 2000 baseline. Bamboo has been identified as a key species for restoration.
“One acre of bamboo that is harvested sustainably can prevent the destruction of hundreds of acres of natural forest,” De Blois said. “If we get this right, bamboo can help reverse deforestation rather than contribute to it.”
Ms. Susan Kaikara, from the Ministry of Water and Environment, emphasized bamboo’s potential to drive Uganda’s green-growth agenda.
“Establishing a coherent national policy framework will strengthen coordination, inspire investment, and unlock bamboo’s full potential as a pillar of Uganda’s green economy,” she said.
Uganda’s charcoal market alone is estimated to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually, much of it supplied through unsustainable wood harvesting. Industry actors say certified bamboo charcoal plantations could offer a cleaner alternative.
“If they allow us to certify bamboo charcoal plantations, then we can get a trade license to compete or to work together with the existing market. We will reverse deforestation. We would enter an industry of about 500,000 hectares, creating smart, green jobs. We can digitalize them to make them attractive through bamboo agroforestry. So again, those things need a policy.” He adds.
Bamboo is also viewed as a climate-friendly crop due to its high capacity for carbon sequestration. Its rapid growth enables it to absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide, while its extensive root system improves soil structure and increases long-term carbon storage.
“When you look at carbon sequestration, bamboo offers several advantages. Residues from harvested bamboo can be converted into biochar, locking carbon into the soil for long periods. When you also see the sequestration per acre compared to many other trees, it is five or six times higher. So, we sequester a lot,” De Blois said
Stakeholders say that if the policy process progresses as planned, bamboo could emerge as one of Uganda’s key green growth sectors within the next decade.
“Policy making takes time. But what is important is that we have started the conversation with all the right ministries in the room. From here, it is about taking steady, practical steps.” He concluded.
Related posts:

As Uganda awaits the Energy Efficiency and Conservation law, plans to develop a five-year plan are underway.
REC25 & EXPO Ends with a call on Uganda to balance conservation and livelihood
Africa’s growth lies with smallholder farmers
Green Resources’ forestry projects are negatively impacting on local communities – donor
UNCCD COP17 kicks off in Mongolia, drawing nations together to tackle urgent issues of land, drought, and food security.
Minister Nabakooba wants special land title issuance halted
Govt targets land grabbers with first national public-land register
Experts rally the region to unite behind East Africa’s transformative Agroecology Bill.
Africa’s El Niño Economic Impact: $20B at Risk in 2026
Uganda is grappling with mounting land struggles as the needs of refugees collide with the rights and hopes of the communities that host them.
Researchers sound the alarm: Uganda’s oil development threatens the nation’s vital wetlands.
Who buys Rwanda’s smuggled coltan? The global journey of conflict coltan from DRC to the world’s electronics
Innovative Finance from Canada projects positive impact on local communities.
Over 5000 Indigenous Communities evicted in Kiryandongo District
Petition To Land Inquiry Commission Over Human Rights In Kiryandongo District
Invisible victims of Uganda Land Grabs
Resource Center
- CAN AFRICAN FOOD SYSTEMS THRIVE WITHOUT CHEMICAL FERTILISERS
- Land And Environment Rights In Uganda Experiences From Karamoja And Mid Western Sub Regions
- REPARATORY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE MUST BE AT THE CORE OF COP30, SAY GLOBAL LEADERS AND MOVEMENTS
- LAND GRABS AT GUNPOINT REPORT IN KIRYANDONGO DISTRICT
- THOSE OIL LIARS! THEY DESTROYED MY BUSINESS!
- RESEARCH BRIEF -TOURISM POTENTIAL OF GREATER MASAKA -MARCH 2025
- The Mouila Declaration of the Informal Alliance against the Expansion of Industrial Monocultures
- FORCED LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA TRENDS RIGHTS OF DEFENDERS IMPACT AND CALL FOR ACTION
Legal Framework
READ BY CATEGORY
Newsletter
Trending
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK2 weeks agoCommunities once resettled by President Museveni in Kiryandongo now find themselves losing their land to a sugarcane investor, accusing the Uganda Land Commission of granting a leasehold behind their backs.
-
NGO WORK2 weeks agoThe Great “Green” Heist: When Artificial Intelligence and Arms Dealers Seize the Minerals of the South
-
FARM NEWS2 weeks agoRising demand for cow dung pushes prices up
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoYouth activists detained as they boldly petition Parliament, demanding a future for Uganda free from oil dependency.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK7 days agoFour youth activists now face public nuisance charges after their arrest during a bold march toward Parliament.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK2 weeks agoNews: Kapapi Land dispute: Security investigate gunfire exch
-
WITNESS RADIO MILESTONES1 week agoKaramoja stands on the brink, with nearly half a million people gripped by acute hunger.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK6 days agoExperts rally the region to unite behind East Africa’s transformative Agroecology Bill.





