Connect with us

FARM NEWS

FAO boosts sunflower farmers in Kwania district

Published

on

After harvest, the farmers in their group sell their produce between sh1,200 and sh1,500 per kilogramme, to Mukwano Group.

FARMING

Although the general perception about northern Uganda after a 20-year-old Lord’s Resistance Army insurgence is that it is a helpless population, the reality is different.

Many took up commercial agriculture, which is changing their fortunes.

“We cannot leave our people to depend on handouts from charity organisations,” Martin Ameu, a country representative from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) in Uganda, says.

Agriculture being the mainstay of Uganda’s economy was the easiest way to help the region recover economically.

One association taking the lead in the region’s transformation is Mitip Farmers’ Group.

Christine Akello, one of the leaders of the groups, says after the insurgence, many of the people in Lira, Apac, Kwania and neighbouring districts, depended on handouts.

Her group took a lead to stamp out the dependence on handouts.

In 2015, Mitip group, in partnership with FAO, trained over 500 farmers in villages of Agweng, Ogur, Agur and Aromo in Lira district and Ongoceng and Aduku in Kwania district, on how to grow maize and sunflower profitably.

Effort paying off

Ketty Okello Otim, 67, one of the first beneficiaries of the training, cultivated sunflower on four acres and harvested 5,500kg in 2016.

“I got my first seedlings from Lira district and it is called Agsun-8251 sunflower because they got bigger heads and produce more seeds than other varieties,” Okello says.

She harvests 1,400- 1,500kg of sunflower seeds per acre every season.

Last year, Okello harvested 6,000kg of sunflower with every acre taking about 20kg of seed.

Over the years, through research, workshops and lessons from established sunflower farmers in the region and experts from FAO, Okello has learnt about the best varieties and practices, hence improving her returns.

She stores her harvest in silos that were donated to her by FAO.

Okello says her sunflower seed does not deteriorate while in storage, thus fetching a good price.

Previously, Okello used to cultivate groundnuts, but got low yields and low returns from the crop.

“I used to grow simsim and groundnuts, but they were affected by the weather, unlike sunflower,” Okello recounts.

She is one of the active women in the mostly women-dominated group

“I always want to get better yields than the men, to prove that women are also capable,” she says.

Using proceeds from sunflower, she has bought two cows, goats and ably caters for her children in school, following her husband’s death.

 Good price

After harvest, the farmers in their group sell their produce between sh1,200 and sh1,500 per kilogramme, to Mukwano Group.

This means that from the 5,000kg that Okello produces per season, she earns about sh11m.

“Compared to other crops, such as maize, this was a good harvest from just four acres,” she says.

In the same area, the average financial returns from an acre of maize is sh600,000.

Market

Okello and other sunflower farmers bulk their produce to Mukwano Group.

“We sell a kilogramme of dry sunflower seeds at sh1,500-sh1,700”.

The price on the open market sometimes depends on the location. Alfred Odur, who deals in sunflower business, says it is between sh3,000 and sh3,500.

Okello and other farmers grow the crop twice a year hence earning more compared to other crops.

According to Atim, there are fewer sunflower farmers in the region than are needed to meet the demand from oil companies.

Ameu said FAO had brought together farmers by forming groups from village level to the regional and that this has given them a common market and bargaining power.

Obura said farmers in the regional level sell their grains to South Sudan beside domestic market.

How farmers are benefiting

A total of 1,600 farmers belonging to 80 groups (each composed of at least 50% women members) have been trained on the use of improved post-harvest handling technologies for sunflower and maize.

The improved technologies piloted included 30 units of 500-litre plastic silos, 60 units of 750-litre metallic silos, two grain cocoons (hermetic plastic bags), one improved drying yard, tarpaulins, maize cribs and triple-layer hermetic bags.

Ameu said FAO aided over 30 silos each, estimated between sh500,000 and sh1m in the districts of Lira and Kwania, to help farmers access clean and quality seeds.

Ameu says trained farmers have not only learnt to produce clean and quality seeds, but also good practices of silos use marketing, environmental management and conservation, rain harvesting and farming, in a sustainable manner.

One of the basic technologies is the use of silos for seed multiplication.

 How COVID-19 has affected the sunflower business

Okello said COVID-19 is affecting their market; that farmers are not as active as they were before the pandemic.

“COVID-19 is continuing to affect us. Some of our members are not contributing as they were doing before because they thought the produce would not be on demand.

“The pandemic was a wake-up call for the need to transform our food systems to make them more efficient and sustainable.

Tackling food loss, waste and, particularly, postharvest loss reduction in Africa is essential to achieve that goal,” FAO assistant director-general and regional representative for Africa, Abebe Haile-Gabriel, said.

According to FAO analysts, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused consumers in many low-income countries to purchase only staple carbohydrates and nonperishables, resulting in perishable food often being wasted in markets.

Studies commissioned by FAO before the pandemic estimate that on-farm losses in the sub-Saharan Africa for fruits and vegetables are up to 50%, the highest in the world.

For cereals and pulses, the on-farm losses are up to 18%, equal highest in the world with parts of Asia.

Reducing food losses on farms and at harvest time, particularly in countries with high levels of food insecurity, can make great inroads towards food security and improved nutrition.

Such changes are a responsibility shared by governments, the private sector, civil society, development agencies, research and academic institutions and consumers.

How to grow sunflower

Isa Odongo, a farmer, explains that one should start with ploughing the shamba, until the soils are fine. A farmer then applies manure, especially chicken droppings or cow dung.

According to Odongo, he puts manure before planting and, after three weeks, she plants. The seeds are planted at a spacing of half a metre and in a straight line, to make weeding easy.

Sunflower takes four to five months to mature.

Sunflowers grow best on well-drained, high water-holding capacity soils with a nearly neutral pH of 6.5-7.5. A farmer can get their soil samples tested to establish the pH.

Fertiliser applications should be made based on a soil test to determine what quantities of nitrate-nitrogen and sulphate-sulphur, as well as phosphorus and potassium a farmer needs to apply.

Fertilisers should be placed beside and below the seed during planting.

Odongo also says sunflowers need to be placed in moisture, but not deeper than three inches, about 7.6 cm.

Simon Obura, an agricultural officer, said they teach the farmers to prevent diseases that are likely to attack their crops by using organic methods.

Organic farming is emphasised, which is cost-effective since it does not require one to apply herbicides and pesticides.

Farmers can also easily adapt organic farming because it is similar to traditional methods that involve bush furrowing and burning.

Atim, however, warns that sunflower requires care and frequent weeding, hence labour intensive, compared to other popular crops.

Sunflower takes four to five months to mature.

Sunflowers grow best Fertiliser applications should be made based on a soil test to determine what quantities of nitrate-nitrogen and sulphate-sulphur, as well as diseases that are likely to attack their crops by using organic methods.

Organic farming is emphasised, which is cost-effective since it does not require one to apply herbicides and pesticides.

Farmers can also easily adapt organic farming because it is similar to traditional methods that involve bush furrowing and burning.

Atim, however, warns that sunflower requires care and frequent weeding, hence labour intensive, compared to other popular crops.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FARM NEWS

Agro-chemicals killing Ugandans

Published

on

A smallholder tomato farmer in the northwestern Uganda region of West Nile sprays his half-acre tomato garden without adequate protection. Many farmers around the country interact with hazardous agro-chemicals without using adequate PPEs. COURTESY PHOTO/SASAKAWA AFRICA ASSOCIATION.

 A consortium of civil society organisations (CSOs) has in a Jan.05 statement shown concern about the continued wrong use of dangerous pesticides in the country.

Members of the concerned CSOs mainly work to promote sustainable agricultural trade, food safety and sovereignty, climate justice, biodiversity restoration, and human and environmental rights.

The activists say there are growing concerns about pesticide misuse, including improper application and storage, counterfeit products, insufficient training in use, and use of poorly maintained or totally inadequate spraying equipment.

The activists insist the agriculture ministry should deregister at least 55 agro-chemicals that it registered in 2023 well-knowing that the same pesticides, herbicides and insecticides are banned by the European Union, a major market of Uganda’s agricultural produce.

Glyphosate-based herbicides, in particular, have raised significant alarm due to their potential environmental and health risks. Globally, they have been linked to contamination of water sources, soil degradation, and potential carcinogenic effects on humans.

In Uganda, glyphosate which appears in brands such as Rounduo and Weed Master, is widely used, especially among large-scale commercial farms and in weed control.

Betty Rose Aguti, the Policy and Advocacy Specialist at Caritas-Uganda who also doubles as the National Coordinator of Uganda Farmers Common Voice Platform says Uganda’s smallholder farmers need to be guided on the danger posed by some agro-chemicals.

“No one is guiding them on what to do with the agro-chemicals. Nobody is telling the farmers which agro-chemicals to use in what type of soils or on which type of crops and thereafter, what period of time they should take before they harvest.

“We have scenarios where some of these farmers apply these agro-chemicals bare-chested with no face masks and other protective gear; these farmers are using agro-chemicals as though they are using ordinary water.”

“They spray their gardens as they converse with their children and wives. In the course of doing this, they are inhaling the chemicals and after some time, they fall victim to the toxicity of these agro-chemicals and end up flooding the Uganda Cancer Institute,” she says.

What are pesticides?

Pesticides are defined by UN agencies; the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO), as substances or mixture of substances of chemicals or biological ingredients intended for repelling, destroying or controlling any pest, or regulating plant growth.

These often include ingredients that modify pest behaviour or their physiology (insect repellents) or affect crops during production or storage (herbicide safeners and synergists, germination inhibitors), as well as insecticides, fungicides and herbicides.

However, according to the activists, most of the chemicals on the Ugandan market are quite hazardous to both human health and the environment and yet they continue being used inappropriately by Ugandan smallholder farmers.

An agro-chemicals dealer displays a wide array of brands of pesticides, herbicides and insecticides that are available in his shop in Kampala. INDEPENDENT/ALFRED OCHWO.

“We call upon the government of Uganda to regulate and ban all hazardous pesticides especially glyphosate and chlorpyriphos on the market in Uganda,” said Jane Nalunga, the Executive Director of the Uganda chapter of the Southern and Eastern Africa Trade Information and Negotiations Institute (SEATINI), a regional NGO that promotes pro-development trade, fiscal and investment-related poicies and processes.

Backbone of Uganda’s economy

The activists say Uganda’s agriculture sector is the mainstay of Uganda’s economy as it remains the main source of food, raw materials for industries, and employment of about 70% of Ugandans. The sector contributes about 24% to the country’s GDP.

“We cannot allow people with intellectual dishonesty to continue playing with the sector,” one of the activists said on Jan.5 during a press conference at the SEATINI-Uganda headquarters in Kampala. “We are aware that pesticides are significantly impacting health, biodiversity, socio-economic well-being, trade, and food security,” added Nalunga.

According to a 2020 World Health Organisation report, about 385 million cases of unintentional pesticide poisoning, including 11,000 deaths, mostly in low- and middle-income countries such as Uganda, are registered annually worldwide. According to UNICEF, pregnant and breastfeeding mothers, children under the age of five and the elderly are the most vulnerable to the effects of pesticides.

The activists say increased use of highly hazardous pesticides in Uganda is a threat to the right to adequate food, people’s livelihoods and farmers’ rights. They say pesticide runoff is reducing aquatic species diversity by 42% and threatening pollinators like bees. These insects are particularly critical for 75% of global crop production.

According to the European Environmental Agency, pesticides are intrinsically harmful to living organisms. When used outdoors, they can impact ecosystems even when they are intended to exclusively target a specific pest.

Herbert Kafeero, the Programme Manager at SEATINI-Uganda says the use of hazardous pesticides also has implications for trade. He says, in 2015, the government of Uganda imposed a self-ban on the export of agricultural produce to the EU because agro-chemical residues had been found in Uganda’s agricultural produce. “The self-ban was meant to address the challenges that were cited by the EU,” he says, “So we cannot ignore the fact that hazardous pesticides negatively impact the country’s trade and food security.”

He says, at the time, the government committed to retrain farmers and exporters to the EU regarding the EU’s sanitary and phytosanitary standards. Kafeero says the government must find solutions to the mushrooming agro-chemical dealers on the market.

“In every trading centre, you will not miss finding an agro-chemical shop and the person operating that agro-chemical shop presents himself as an expert when they actually are not.”

The activists want the Agricultural Chemicals Control Board under the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries to quickly profile the various agrochemicals, acaricides and inputs and their various sources that are available on the market in Uganda and ban the highly hazardous ones.

They also want the Department of Crop Inspection and Certification at the agriculture ministry to strengthen the regulation, management, use, handling, storage and trade of agrochemicals in the country.

They also want the government and other stakeholders to purposively plan and budget for education and awareness on the management, use, handling, storage and trade of agrochemicals in Uganda.

Prof. Ogenga Latigo disagrees

The activists were infact responding to Morris Ogenga Latigo, a Ugandan professor of entomology (study of insects) who had written an opinion on December 31, 2024, downplaying civil society’s concerns about hazardous pesticide and insecticide use in Uganda.

Prof. Ogenga Latigo in his article said the issue of agro-chemical use on farm pests and weeds and households was being exaggerated by civil society. He said the targeted agro-chemical inputs (pesticides, insecticides and herbicides) were being used in other countries.

The acrimonious debate has since sucked in the agricuture ministry. Stephen Byantware, the Director in charge of Crop Protection at the agriculture ministry told the media in Kampala recently that Uganda has an Agriculture Police Force and a Department of Inspection and Certification of agriculture inputs that “ensure that only nationally and globally approved agro-chemicals enter the Ugandan market.”

“The chemicals allowed into the country are those that have been approved,” he said, “There are no banned products on sale in Uganda. You cannot find DDT or Endosulfan in Uganda.”

Agrochemicals spraying equipment on display at a dealership in Kampala. INDEPENDENT/ALFRED OCHWO.

But David Kabanda, the Executive Director of the Centre for Food and Adequate Living Rights, a Kampala-based non-profit, says Ugandans should know that hazardous pesticides have become one of the “loudest killers” and yet Ugandan smallholder farmers continue to associate with these chemicals on the farms, in the food stores, and in the homes.

“It’s only in Uganda where we don’t have a farmgate policy and yet we have scientific reports that have pointed out that the food we buy in markets in Kampala is contaminated.” “Don’t we see tomatoes and broccoli full of Mancozeb fungicide yet this chemical has been banned everywhere including the EU?”

“Pesticides are silent killers of humans, of nature, of our soils that are getting barren, of our water, of our agri-food system. I don’t imagine an agri-food system in Uganda without bees, without butterflies, and above all, without grasshoppers,” said Agnes Kirabo, the Executive Director of Food Rights Alliance (FRA).

Desperate smallholder farmers

According to the activists, Uganda’s agriculture system is by default largely organic but in recent years, pest and disease management has become one of the major production constraints for the country’s millions of subsistence farmers. And in recent years, farmers have turned to pesticides to control the pests.

According to the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations, the number of agricultural pesticides used in Uganda doubled in 12 years (2010 – 2022) from 2,990.23 tonnes to 6,009.78 tonnes.

PESTICIDE TABLE 1 (CLICK TO READ FULL LIST)

Pesticide Table 1 

Similarly, the monetary value of pesticides imported to Uganda more than doubled from US$ 32.57 million to US$75.87 million in 2022 with a peak import value of US$108.57 million reported in 2020. The lucrative agro-chemical business has attracted more than 40 registered pesticide importing companies in the country.

The activists say the increased use of pesticides is attributed to their use for weeding and the increased use of hybrid seeds and livestock. According to the CSOs, equally alarming is that many of these pesticides are “synthetic pesticides” which are persistent organic chemicals.

A study published last year by the Food Safety Coalition Uganda (FoSCU) titled: ‘‘Food Safety-Crop Protection Nexus: Insights from the Uganda’s agriculture sector,’’ noted that of the legally registered active ingredients, 47.8% (of the active ingredients) and 68.6% of the brands in Uganda qualified as “Highly Hazardous Pesticides.”

Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) are classified as “reproductive toxicants” meaning they potentially can negatively affect the human reproductive system and have adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes and reduced fertility.

The same study noted that 15.6% of the registered active ingredients and 19.2% of the registered brands in Uganda qualified as highly hazardous pesticides in accordance with the FAO/WHO-Joint Meeting on Pesticide Management (JMPM) criteria.

According to the activists, by July 2023, over 65% of the 55 flagged active ingredients registered for use in Uganda and yet considered as highly hazardous pesticides according to the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) criteria, were not approved for use in the European Union economic bloc.

The majority (49%) of these pesticides are highly toxic to bees, 20% are carcinogenic and reproductive toxicants while 18% are probable carcinogens, and 9% are highly persistent in water and soil and are highly toxic to aquatic organisms.

They say that, based on the Uganda agrochemical register at the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) and the National Drug Authority (NDA), the country had at least 115 active ingredients and 669 brands of synthetic pesticides legally registered for use in Uganda by the end of 2023.

“These are presenting in 459 brands, but all these active ingredients in the 459 brands, according to the PAN, are classified as highly hazardous,” said Bernard Bwambale, the head of programmes at the Global Consumer Centre, or CONSENT, who also coordinates the activities on food safety at the Food Safety Coalition of Uganda.

Agrochemicals status ( CLICK TO READ FULL LIST)

Pesticide Table 2

If it is hazardous in EU, it is hazardous in Uganda

Bwambale says his organisation has found that of the 55 active ingredients registered in Uganda, 65.5% of them cannot be used in their countries of origin. “Now, if a chemical, a highly hazardous chemical, is produced in a particular country and that country cannot use it, who are we to start thinking that we can use it? This is where our concern is.”

“So, whatever is not used in the EU, it means it’s not fit for use for human beings. The human beings in Uganda and the human beings in Europe are all human beings. And we are all sharing the same human rights.” He says some of the highly hazardous pesticides are mutagenic, meaning they can alter one’s DNA or genetic make-up.

“Literally, it would mean that when you consume food consisting of this kind of product, you stand a risk of your DNA or your genetic makeup being altered. And that is why some research is pointing to some of these chemicals being responsible for birth defects.” He says other chemicals are carcinogenic, meaning the chemical has the potential to cause cancer.

But Prof. Ogenga Latigo says some chemicals like Mancozeb the civil society claim are carcinogenic are not. He describes others as ‘probable carcinogens.’ A probable carcinogen is a substance that has a strong but not conclusive amount of evidence that it can cause cancer in humans.

But Bwambale says, “They don’t want people to keep confusing us with science.” He says other chemicals have been considered fatal when inhaled. “Imagine a farmer who doesn’t know these things and is spraying but is carrying a baby. So both the mother and the baby are inhaling this chemical,” he says, “We need to regulate these chemicals as much as we can.”

He says recent studies have indicated that some of these chemicals were found in human bodies –in sweat, urine and blood, in food and in water. “When the Europeans send us, for instance, these chemicals and we buy them, they also have regulations on which kind of food we can sell to them. We all know that.”

He says when farmers use these chemicals in the name of commercialising agriculture, they may produce very big tomatoes that do not rot, for example, but they cannot sell them beyond Uganda.

“You cannot put them on the EU market because they don’t meet the standard of the EU market. So they (agriculture products still remain with us,” he says.

Source: The independent

Continue Reading

FARM NEWS

Coffee Leaf Rust disease hits Mbale region farmers

Published

on

Mbale, Uganda | Coffee farmers from Bulambuli and Sironko districts are counting their losses after being attacked by coffee leaf rust disease. The disease, caused by the rust fungus Hemileia vastatrix, can reduce coffee production by between 30% to 50%.

The most affected sub-counties in Sironko include Buhugu, Masaba, Busulani, Bumasifwa, Bumalimba, and others. In Bulambuli, the hardest-hit areas are Lusha, Bulugeni Town Council, Buginyanya, and Kamu, among others.

In an exclusive interview with our reporter, Francis Nabugodi, the Sironko District Agricultural Officer, spoke about the devastating effects on farmers. “This disease has negatively impacted farmers in terms of production, and since it’s coffee season, they are going to make losses,” Nabugodi said.

He added that he had instructed extension workers to start massive sensitization campaigns in the six affected sub-counties about preventive measures, such as spraying, to curb the spread of the disease.

Nabugodi also urged the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Animal Husbandry to supply the district with chemicals so they can distribute them to farmers, as many cannot afford to buy them.

Julius Sagaiti, the LCIII Chairperson of Lusha Sub-County in Bulambuli District, stated that his sub-county is the worst affected, with over 100 farmers having all their gardens hit by the disease. He called for urgent action from Bulambuli district leaders, warning that the situation would have severe consequences for farmers.

Timothy Wegoye and Suzan Nanduga, both affected coffee farmers from Bukisa, the worst-affected sub-county, shared their concerns. “The majority of farmers are ignorant about preventive measures and do not know the chemicals for spraying,” they said, urging extension workers to use the media to sensitize them.

Original Source: URN Via The Independent

Continue Reading

FARM NEWS

Drought ruining Kasese farmers’ livelihoods

Published

on

Along Bwera-Mpondwe road, in Kasese district, farmers till the land, with every hoe raising more dust than dirt, a testament of how hard the sun has scorched the ground. Located at the slopes of the Rwenzori Mountains, the low altitude leads to high temperatures as the district also sits on the Equator. In January this year, the average temperatures were 25.1 °C

Gideon Bwambale walks through drying maize garden.

Today, the temperature is 28.6 °C. The most affected areas are low-lying sub-counties like Kahokya, Nyakatonzi and Muhokya.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter