Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

“Vacant Land” Narrative Fuels Dispossession and Ecological Crisis in Africa – New report.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Over the years, the African continent has been damaged by the notion that it has vast and vacant land that is unused or underutilised, waiting to be transformed into industrial farms or profitable carbon markets. This myth, typical of the colonial era ideologies, has justified land grabs, mass displacements, and environmental destruction in the name of development and modernisation.

A new report by the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA) titled “Land Availability and Land-Use Changes in Africa (2025)” dismisses this narrative as misleading. Drawing on satellite data, field research, and interviews with farmers across Africa, including Zambia, Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe, the study reveals that far from being empty, Africa’s landscapes are multifunctional systems that sustain millions of lives.

“Much of the land labelled as “underutilised” is, in fact, used for grazing, shifting cultivation, gathering wild foods, spiritual practices, or is part of ecologically significant systems such as forests, wetlands, or savannahs. These uses are often invisible in formal land registries or economic metrics but are essential for local livelihoods and biodiversity. Moreover, the land often carries layered customary claims and is far from being available for simple expropriation,” says the report.

“Africa has seen three waves of dispossession, and we are in the midst of the third. The first was the alienation of land through conquest and annexation in the colonial period. In some parts of the continent, there have been reversals as part of national liberation struggles and the early independence era. But state developmentalism through the post-colonial period also brought about a second wave of state-driven land dispossession.” This historical context is crucial to understanding the current state of land rights and development in Africa. Said Ruth Hall, a professor at the Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAS), at the University of the Western Cape in Cape Town, South Africa, during the official launch of the report.

The report further underestimates the assumption that smallholder farmers are unproductive and should be replaced with mechanised large-scale farming, leading to a loss of food sovereignty.

“The claim that small-scale farmers are incapable of feeding Africa is not supported by evidence. Africa has an estimated 33 million smallholder farmers, who manage 80% of the continent’s farmland and produce up to 80% of its food. Rather than being inefficient, small-scale agro-ecological farming offers numerous advantages: it is more labour-intensive, resilient to shocks, adaptable to local environments, and embedded in cultural and social life. Dismissing this sector in favour of large-scale, mechanised monocultures undermines food sovereignty, biodiversity, and rural employment.” Reads the Report.

The idea that industrial agriculture will lift millions out of poverty has not materialised. Instead, large-scale agribusiness projects have often concentrated land and wealth in the hands of elites and foreign investors. Job creation has been minimal, as modern farms rely heavily on machinery rather than human labour. Moreover, export-oriented agriculture prioritises global markets over local food security, leaving communities vulnerable to price fluctuations and shortages.

“The promise that agro-industrial expansion will create millions of decent jobs is historically and economically questionable. Agro-industrial models tend to displace labour through mechanisation and concentrate benefits in the hands of large companies. Most industrial agriculture jobs are seasonal, poorly paid, and insecure. In contrast, smallholder farming remains the primary source of employment across Africa, particularly for young people and women. The idea that technology-intensive farming will be a panacea for unemployment ignores the structural realities of African economies and the failures of previous industrialisation efforts.”

Additionally, the assumption that increasing yields and expanding markets will automatically improve food access overlooks the structural causes of food insecurity. People’s ability, particularly that of the poor and marginalised, to access nutritious food depends on land rights, income distribution, gender equity, and the functioning of political systems. In many countries, high agricultural productivity coexists with hunger and malnutrition because food systems are oriented towards export and profit rather than equitable distribution and local nourishment. It highlights the urgent need for equitable food distribution, making the audience more empathetic and aware of the issue.

Furthermore, technological fixes such as improved seeds, synthetic fertilizers, and irrigation are being promoted as solutions to Africa’s food insecurity, but evidence suggests otherwise. The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) spent over a decade pushing such technologies with little success; hunger actually increased in its target countries.

These high-input models overlook local ecological realities and structural inequalities, while increasing dependence on costly external inputs. As a result, smallholders often fall into debt and lose control over their own seeds and farming systems. It underscores the importance of understanding and respecting local ecological realities, making the audience feel more connected and responsible.

Africa is already experiencing an increased and accelerating squeeze on land due to competing demands including rapid population growth and urbanisation, Expansion of mining operations, especially for critical minerals like cobalt, lithium, and rare-earth elements, which are central to the global green transition, The proliferation of carbon-offset projects, often requiring vast tracts of land for afforestation or reforestation schemes that displace existing land users, Rising global demand for timber, which is increasing deforestation and land competition as well as Agricultural expansion for commodity crops, including large-scale plantations of palm oil, sugarcane, tobacco, and rubber.

“In East Africa, we see mass evictions, like the Maasai of Burunguru, forced from their ancestral territories in the name of conservation and tourism. In Central Africa, forests are cleared for mining of transitional minerals, destroying ecosystems and livelihoods. Women, a backbone of Africa’s food production, remain the most affected, and least consulted in decisions over land and resources and things that affect them.” Said Mariam Bassi Olsen from Friends of the Earth Nigeria, and a representative of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa.

The report urges a shift away from Africa’s high-tech, market-driven, land-intensive development model toward a just, sustainable, and locally grounded vision by promoting agroecology for food sovereignty, ecological renewal, and rural livelihoods, while reducing the need for land expansion through improved productivity, equitable food distribution, and reduced waste.

Additionally, a call is made for responsible urban planning, sustainable timber management, and reduced mineral demand through circular economies, as well as the legal recognition of customary land rights, especially for women and Indigenous peoples, and adherence to the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) for all land investments.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African court dismisses appeal against EACOP project

Published

on

The Appellate Division of the East African Court of Justice (EACJ) has dismissed a high-profile appeal filed by civil society organisations (CSOs) that sought to challenge the human rights, environmental, and climate risks associated with the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project.

In a ruling delivered on Wednesday at the EACJ headquarters in Arusha, Tanzania, the Appellate Division upheld the First Instance Division’s 2023 decision, concluding that the case was filed outside the time limit set under East African Community (EAC) laws, which generally mandate cases be heard within a 60-day window.

The panel of judges, led by EACJ Appellate Division president Nestor Kayobera, alongside vice president Anita Mugeni and Kathurima M’Inot, agreed that the EACJ did not have the jurisdiction to hear the main case.

Original petition

The original suit was filed in November 2020 by four CSOs: Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO), Centre for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT) from Uganda, Natural Justice (NJ) from Kenya, and the Centre for Strategic Litigation (CSL) from Tanzania.

The CSOs sought a permanent injunction to halt the construction of the pipeline in protected areas in Uganda and Tanzania, compensation for all project-affected persons (PAPs) for losses incurred due to land use restrictions.

The First Instance Division dismissed the case in November 2023, prompting the CSOs to immediately file an appeal in December 2023. This appeal was subsequently heard in Arusha and Kigali, Rwanda, in November 2024 and February 2025, respectively.

EACOP project

Costs overturned 

Crucially, while the Appellate Division upheld the dismissal, it overturned the order issued by the First Instance Division that had awarded costs to the governments of Uganda and Tanzania and the Secretary General of the EAC.

The judges directed that each party must bear its own costs, stating: “Taking into account the public interest involved in the appeal and the appellants’ public-spirited endeavor to ensure compliance with the treaty, we direct that each party shall bear their own costs in this court and in the trial.”

CSOs decry ‘disappointing decision’

The CSOs described the Wednesday ruling as a “disappointing decision,” arguing that the judges failed to consider when affected communities and CSOs actually became aware of the project’s impacts and the existence of the EACOP-related agreements, such as the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) and Host Government Agreement (HGA), which were made public years after they were signed.

Dickens Kamugisha, CEO of AFIEGO, called the decision a “setback for regional justice” and protection of vulnerable communities.

“The decision has left over 331 million East Africans at the mercy of greedy corporations,” he stated, adding, “The ruling is a travesty, but we remain determined to use all available strategies to protect people and nature.”

Elizabeth Kariuki from Natural Justice emphasized the impact on the PAPs, saying, “This ruling is devastating for the very people whose lives have been upended by EACOP – the families that lost their land and livelihoods, and the communities watching their ecosystems disappear. Today, the court has closed its doors to them. But we will not give up. We will continue to fight alongside communities to ensure that their suffering is not ignored.”

MCosmas Yiga, a PAP from Uganda, expressed profound disappointment, saying, “We, the PAPs, have been oppressed, and we don’t expect any gain from the oil industry… Today is a sad day,” citing his refusal of a $2 million compensation offer for 58 mango trees.

The courtroom was packed with CSOs, PAPs, media, and a lawyer representing the Ugandan government, state attorney Ojambo Bichachi, who welcomed the decision. The CSOs noted that the Appellate Court of the EACJ is the final court and plan to consult with EACOP-affected people before announcing their next steps.

Source: The Observer

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

EALA members renew push for unified sub-regional Agroecology Law during Mukono meeting.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team.

The East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) has renewed its call for a unified regional agroecology policy and law, following a high-level capacity-building meeting held in Nakisunga Village, Mukono District, Uganda.

The gathering brought together more than 50 EALA members, over 100 participants, including civil society organizations (CSOs) representatives, agroecology experts, and officials from Mukono Local government, to discuss the gaps in existing regional frameworks and the urgent need for coherent legislation to support sustainable and climate-resilient farming systems.

The field tour of Nansubuga CEFROHT Agroecology Training Farm showcased successful organic farming practices, illustrating the benefits of agroecology firsthand to lawmakers and stakeholders.

“I’m amazed at how a local female farmer can transform non-fertile land into a productive farm,” said Hon. Fatuma Ndangiza of the EALA delegation from Rwanda. “Agroecology is about access, safe food, resilient and equitable food systems, and environmental friendliness. What we see here is the right path for our small-scale farmers.”

The proposed regional agroecology law aims to protect smallholder farmers like Nansubuga by safeguarding their seeds, reducing reliance on costly chemical inputs, and shielding them from land grabs, thereby directly enhancing their resilience and livelihoods.

Representing EALA Speaker Rt. Hon. Joseph Ntakirutimana, Hon. Gideon Gatpan Thoar, Chair of the EALA Committee on Agriculture, Tourism and Natural Resources, emphasized the urgency to put the Agroecology policy and law in place:

“There is no law protecting agroecology farmers like Nansubuga. Their seeds are not protected, and they face intense competition from corporate-backed industrial systems. This deserves urgent attention.”

He added that lawmakers’ mandate requires them to legislate in the interest of East Africans, most of whom are smallholder farmers, and that firsthand field experience will strengthen the upcoming model law.

“So now, with this experience, we can push for a regional policy that empowers agroecology farmers and fosters resilient agriculture. Supporting them can lead to a brighter future for East African farming,” He added.

Hon. Fatuma Ndangiza revealed that the agroecology bill could be ready within a year, pending adequate funding, offering hope that smallholder farmers will have access to supportive legislation.

“East Africa cannot build resilient food systems without a unified agroecology policy and law. This meeting is a big step toward drafting a model law that reflects the needs of our farmers. At least by the end of our mandate in 2027, we want this bill in place,” she said. “Members of the agriculture committee have already been trained in agroecology, and thanks to CEFROHT and other partners, even more lawmakers now appreciate the importance of this legislation. It will move quickly.”

Experts at the meeting highlighted systemic biases that keep East African farmers impoverished. These include a longstanding emphasis on export-oriented industrial agriculture, corporate-controlled seeds, increasing pesticide and fertilizer use, and land grabs.

Dr. Million Belay, General Coordinator of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), warned that Africa is being pushed into an unsustainable corner.

“One of the legacies of colonialism is pushing us to export food instead of feeding our people. Chemicals, GMOs, and land grabs are increasing, and global actors now control food production.

A farm like this one shows the direction we should take.”

He went on to say that proper food security and environmental health depend on farmers’ control over their land, seeds, and output-what we call food sovereignty-empowering farmers to shape their future.

As part of the capacity-building process, EALA members visited the CEFROHT Agroecology Learning Center, where they witnessed demonstrations of intercropping and crop diversification, agroforestry systems, animal husbandry, water and pesticide trapping, among others.

Dr. David Kabanda, whose organization, the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), hosted the delegation, noted that farmers are already successfully practicing agroecology, demonstrating the tangible benefits of this approach.

“We are pleased to support lawmakers with evidence and field-level experiences. Agroecology is not theoretical; farmers are already practicing it successfully. It is what we advocate for, the production of good food as well as environmental conservation,” he added.

Looking ahead, EALA announced a series of concrete steps to advance the regional agroecology agenda. The assembly plans to complete the Agroecology Bill process within a year, then conduct public hearings across all eight EAC Partner States to gather stakeholder input. The bill will be fast-tracked for debate and approval in the EALA plenary, with civil society expected to help secure the Heads of State’s assent. Once adopted, the law will become the EAC Agroecology Act, guiding and harmonizing agroecology efforts across the region.

As climate shocks intensify and millions of families depend on smallholder farming, the Mukono meeting marks a turning point in East Africa’s pursuit of sustainable, resilient food systems. The push for a unified agroecology law signals a growing regional recognition that the future of East African agriculture must be farmer-centered, biodiversity-based, and rooted in local knowledge.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African lawmakers and CSO leaders are meeting in Uganda to draw up plans to promote Agroecology as an alternative to climate change mitigation.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Mukono, Uganda — the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) members and Civil society organizations (CSOs) leaders in Uganda are convening in Nakisunga, Mukono district today, 28th November, to discuss how to promote agroecology at the regional level and inspire a collective commitment to regional resilience.

Agroecology offers a robust, holistic approach to combating climate change by enhancing the resilience of food systems and reducing their environmental impact.

Spearheaded by the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), the event emphasizes integrating agroecology into regional climate resilience strategies, especially as the East African Community (EAC) faces rising food costs, climate shocks, and declining soil health.

During the meeting, EALA members, together with CSOs, will explore how principles like crop diversification, soil regeneration, and community seed saving can directly improve smallholder farmers’ resilience and livelihoods, complemented by a hands-on field visit to the CEFROHT Agroecology Learning Center in Mukono.

The event has also occurred at a time when EALA is reviewing the East African Seed and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, which is being criticized for undermining the role of smallholder farmers in seed saving, conservation, and the management of seed systems to promote healthy foods.

Players from CSOs include: Participatory Ecological Land Use Management (PELUM Uganda), Eastern and Southern Africa Small-scale Farmers’ Forum (ESAFF), Seed Savers Network Kenya, TABIO Tanzania, the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), Slow Food Uganda, SEATINI, FIAN Uganda, and the Mukono District Local Government, among others.

The meeting will lay the groundwork for East Africa’s first Policy and Model Law on Agroecology, a long-awaited step toward sustainable and equitable agri-food systems that empower regional stakeholders to shape the future.

The event will be broadcast live on Witness Radio.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter