Connect with us

NGO WORK

Police fails to protect ugandans says hurinet report

Published

on

By Witnessradio.org Team

The Latest human rights report poked holes in the police force exposing its failure to handle crimes.

The report is a product of a survey in eight districts of Uganda namely; Masaka, Kampala, Wakiso, Mukono, Kayunga,Luweero, Jjinja and Mpigi and assesses police work for the past five years.

According to the survey, there were varied perceptions on levels of crime with 42% of the respondents indicating that crime levels increased compared to the previous ratings.

Burglary and house break-ins continue to be the most common crime committed related followed by theft, murder, arson and sexual related crimes. The increase in crime was attributed to a number of factors including; lenient sentences by courts of law, corruption in police, weak local government structures and breakdown of community social structures as well as poor community policing.

According to one of the lead researchers Patrick Tumwine, the last five years have witnessed an increase in police administrative units and personnel in communities across the eight districts covered by the survey.

However, rural-based districts such as Masaka, Kayunga, Luwero reported more self–initiated contacts with police than Kampala, Mukono, Jinja and Wakiso.

Tumwine says that in many areas they went to especially in the rural districts, the state of police stations was wanting in all aspects and falls short of the established international standards. 68% of the respondents considered police stations in their districts inadequate, detached from communities they serve, have dilapidated structures and at the same time police detention facilities do not meet the required minimum standards.

On Democratic policing, respondents were dissatisfied with the level at which Uganda Police was moving towards meeting tenets of democratic policing. This was attributed to the low levels of responsiveness to community concerns, increased militarization of UPF, lack of neutrality, abuse of human rights, lack of accountability by officers who commit human rights violations, poor handling of investigations and case files as well as existence of draconian laws that police has persistently applied selectively.

Reacting to the released report, DP president Norbert Mao attributed police’s failure to do be democratic to orders from higher authorities. He says many trained police officers do know the law and endeavor to be professional but are ever diverted by impromptu order from the top leaders.

“The problem here is above…this above can reset the system, oh he even reboots when he deems it fit”. Mao said. He also proposed that for things to change, there is need to also improve the living standards of the officers including disbanding police barracks to allow them live among the community and also form a police retention fund to deal away with the corruption as the officers strive to make ends meet.

Butambala MP who is also shadow internal affairs minister, Muwanga Kivumbi said that the major problem has been prioritization with much of the money going into dispersing meetings by the opposition and ignoring the actual police work.

“Currently Shs 22 bn have been budgeted to be spent only on quelling 22 riots according to the police budget 2017-2018 yet only Shs 7 bn goes into investigations…that’s why cases are not thoroughly investigated”. Muwanga observed.

Responding to the findings in the report, Deputy inspector general of police, Edward Ochom said the police had some shortcomings but had made tremendous improvements in handling crime.

Key note speaker at the dialogue to discuss the report, David Pulkol said that the root-cause of all problems is the tag on police force verses service. He says the police force is like a tree whose roots, branches and all sectors matter.“When I was the director general of internal security, I got the same problem, calls that would divert from the system…the interference in police’s work is evident…bringing military into the police is militarization of the force which is

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NGO WORK

UN Experts Put Tanzanian Government on Notice – “Ensure Transparency and Respect for Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Ngorongoro”

Published

on

April 17, 2026 press release from the offices of eight UN Special Rapporteurs1 calls for the Tanzanian government to immediately publish the findings of two presidential commissions amid growing concerns over its eviction plans.
The communication echoes the Oakland Institute’s warning that these sham Presidential Commissions are being used to rubber-stamp eviction plans without the consent of the Indigenous community.
The strongly-worded communication from the UN Special Rapporteurs states that “these reports are of profound public interest and must be made available to the public without delay…Decisions affecting tens of thousands of Indigenous Peoples cannot be taken behind closed doors.” The experts furthermore urge “the Government to halt any actions that could lead to forced displacement, and engage in meaningful dialogue with affected communities,” while issuing a clear reminder that “Indigenous Peoples have a right to remain on their traditional lands if they so choose…Conservation efforts must not come at the expense of human rights.”
Impacted Maasai communities welcome this intervention from the UN Special Rapporteurs and reaffirm their commitment to defend their rights to remain on their ancestral lands.
To learn more about the struggle against Fortress Conservation, watch the interview: The Dark Side of “Conservation”
On Fox 5 DC Weekend Live, Julie Donaldson interviews Andy Currier, Oakland Institute’s Policy Analyst. Watch the discussion on fortress conservation and the human cost of climate solutions that displace Indigenous communities who best protect our biodiversity.

Watch the video

Source: oaklandinstitute.org

Continue Reading

NGO WORK

Two dead as Siaya protests against gold mining firm turn tragic

Published

on

Ikolomani residents protesting against eviction plan to pave space for British mining company Shanta Gold on November 12, 2025. Two people died in similar protests in Gem, Siaya County.  Isaac Wale | Nation Media Group

Two people were shot dead on Monday in Gem–Ramula, Siaya County, after villagers staged a protest over an alleged eviction they linked to Shanta Gold Kenya Limited.

Area police boss Charles Wafula confirmed the incident, stating that the victims were among a group alleged to have attacked a police post after the officers moved in to disperse the demonstrators.

According to Mr Wafula, the demonstrators, angered by what they described as an illegal resettlement by the company, stormed the station during the protest, prompting officers to intervene.

“The individuals had organised a demonstration but they did not notify the police. Our officers moved in to contain the situation, but the group began attacking both officers and Ramula Police Post, damaging several items, including vehicles,” Mr Wafula said.

However, a local rights organisation has sharply contested the police account, portraying the killings as unlawful and unprovoked.

In a statement, the Community Initiative Action Group Kenya said the two victims identified as Henry Otieno and Jack Omenda were part of a peaceful protest against what they termed a forced eviction from their ancestral land.

“The community had gathered peacefully to demonstrate against Shanta Gold Limited’s attempt to relocate them without their consent,” said the lobby’s Executive Director Chris Owalla.

The group further alleged that police officers opened fire without warning following a confrontation with residents at Ramula Market.

“Witnesses state there was an exchange between the community and police after which officers opened fire, killing Henry and Jack on the spot,” Mr Owalla said.

The rights group also accused senior police officers including Mr Wafula and Charles Emodo of Directorate of Criminal Investigation, of disregarding a court order that had halted evictions and mining operations in the area.

According to Mr Owalla, the Environment and Land Court in Siaya had, on February 5, 2026, issued conservatory orders barring any involuntary resettlement of residents in Ramula and its environs, pending the hearing of a petition.

The organisation is now calling for investigations by the Independent Policing Oversight Authority and the the Director of Public Prosecutions, alongside an independent autopsy on the victims.

Fear of evictions

The unrest is rooted in long-standing tensions over planned gold mining operations by Shanta Gold in the region. The company is seeking to establish a large-scale extraction project – one that residents fear could uproot communities and erode livelihoods carefully built over generations.

Similar scenes of unrest were reported in November 2025 in Ikolomani, where locals protested against possible relocations linked to the same company.

Shanta Gold has previously signalled its intention to invest in a multi-billion-shilling project in western Kenya, targeting high-grade gold deposits expected to yield significant output over several years.

Source: nation.africa

Continue Reading

NGO WORK

Tanzania: Commissions call for mass eviction of Indigenous Maasai from world-famous tourist destinations.

Published

on

Two presidential commissions have recommended the mass eviction of Maasai people from some of East Africa’s most iconic conservation areas and tourist destinations.

The commissions were established by Tanzania’s President Samia Suluhu Hassan following previous evictions of Maasai pastoralists from parts of the world-famous Serengeti ecosystem, and large-scale protests in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area in 2024.

Now, despite a global outcry at the earlier evictions, the two Commissions have:

  • Backed the previous evictions and called for them to continue, including in the UNESCO World Heritage Sites of Ngorongoro and neighboring Lake Natron.
  • Described the long-standing Maasai presence in the area as an “environmental pressure” that needs to be reduced.
  • Threatened local NGOs that support the Maasai, accusing them of “spreading misinformation or propaganda” because they “conflict with government interests.”
  • Called for the “relocation” of all “non-conservation activities” [in other words, Maasai occupancy of the land] outside the conservation areas.
  • Called for existing recognition of the Maasai people’s right to live in the Ngorongoro area to be removed.

An anonymous Maasai spokesperson said today: “We are blamed for environmental degradation while the unchecked expansion of tourism is ignored. Forced relocation, disguised as policy, has deprived our people of basic rights and dignity. We reject any continuation of these measures and condemn the Commission’s failure to reflect the voices, realities, and rights of our people.”

Still from a video showing the Maasai protesting the violent evictions from their ancestral lands, 2022.

The authorities maintain that these are “voluntary relocations.” However, the Maasai have overwhelmingly rejected being moved.

The Ngorongoro Conservation Area is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. When it was established, the ancestral right of the Maasai to live there with their cattle was explicitly acknowledged. But UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee has backed the so-called “voluntary relocations”, and UNESCO endorses the “fortress conservation” model that underpins Tanzania’s approach.

Survival International Director Caroline Pearce said today, “These commissions were a sham, a gimmick designed to give Tanzania’s violent persecution of the Maasai a veneer of respectability. It was widely predicted that they’d back further evictions: the whole saga just confirms that colonial-style fortress conservation is alive and well in Tanzania today, and enthusiastically endorsed by UNESCO.

“These recommendations give the green light to more evictions, in Ngorongoro and beyond. And while the Maasai are robbed of their lands and livelihood, the government, tour operators and so-called conservationists will enrich themselves from a landscape emptied of its original owners.”

Source: survivalinternational.org

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter