MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Three-quarters of Earth’s land became permanently drier in last three decades: UN
Published
2 years agoon

-
Aridity: The ‘existential crisis’ redefining life on Earth
-
Five billion people could be affected by 2100
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia – Even as dramatic water-related disasters such as floods and storms intensified in some parts of the world, more than three-quarters of Earth’s land became permanently drier in recent decades, UN scientists warned today in a stark new analysis.
Some 77.6% of Earth’s land experienced drier conditions during the three decades leading up to 2020 compared to the previous 30-year period, according to the landmark report from the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).
Over the same period, drylands expanded by about 4.3 million km2 – an area nearly a third larger than India, the world’s 7th largest country – and now cover 40.6% of all land on Earth (excluding Antarctica).
In recent decades some 7.6% of global lands – an area larger than Canada – were pushed across aridity thresholds (i.e. from non-drylands to drylands, or from less arid dryland classes to more arid classes).
Most of these areas have transitioned from humid landscapes to drylands, with dire implications for agriculture, ecosystems, and the people living there.
And the research warns that, if the world fails to curb greenhouse gas emissions, another 3% of the world’s humid areas will become drylands by the end of this century.
In high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, expanding drylands are forecast across the Midwestern United States, central Mexico, northern Venezuela, north-eastern Brazil, south-eastern Argentina, the entire Mediterranean Region, the Black Sea coast, large parts of southern Africa, and southern Australia.
The report, The Global Threat of Drying Lands: Regional and global aridity trends and future projections, was launched at the 16th conference of UNCCD’s nearly 200 Parties in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (COP16), the largest UN land conference to date, and the first UNCCD COP to be held in the Middle East, a region profoundly affected by impacts from aridity.
“This analysis finally dispels an uncertainty that has long surrounded global drying trends,” says Ibrahim Thiaw, UNCCD Executive Secretary. “For the first time, the aridity crisis has been documented with scientific clarity, revealing an existential threat affecting billions around the globe.”
“Unlike droughts—temporary periods of low rainfall—aridity represents a permanent, unrelenting transformation,” he adds. “Droughts end. When an area’s climate becomes drier, however, the ability to return to previous conditions is lost. The drier climates now affecting vast lands across the globe will not return to how they were and this change is redefining life on Earth.”
The report by UNCCD Science-Policy Interface (SPI) — the UN body for assessing the science of land degradation and drought — points to human-caused climate change as the primary driver of this shift. Greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation, transport, industry and land use changes warm the planet and other human activities warm the planet and affect rainfall, evaporation and plant life, creating the conditions that increase aridity.
Global aridity index (AI) data track these conditions and reveal widespread change over the decades.
Aridification hotspots
Areas particularly hard-hit by the drying trend include almost all of Europe (95.9% of its land), parts of the western United States, Brazil, parts of Asia (notably eastern Asia), and central Africa.
-
Parts of the Western United States and Brazil: Significant drying trends, with water scarcity and wildfires becoming perennial hazards.
-
Mediterranean and Southern Europe: Once considered agricultural breadbaskets, these areas face a stark future as semi-arid conditions expand.
-
Central Africa and parts of Asia: Biologically megadiverse areas are experiencing ecosystem degradation and desertification, endangering countless species.
By contrast, less than a quarter of the planet’s land (22.4%) experienced wetter conditions, with areas in the central United States, Angola’s Atlantic coast, and parts of Southeast Asia showing some gains in moisture.
The overarching trend, however, is clear: drylands are expanding, pushing ecosystems and societies to suffer from aridity’s life-threatening impacts.
The report names South Sudan and Tanzania as nations with the largest percentage of land transitioning to drylands, and China as the country experiencing the largest total area shifting from non-drylands into drylands.
For the 2.3 billion people – well over 25% of the world’s population – living in the expanding drylands, this new normal requires lasting, adaptive solutions. Aridity-related land degradation, known as desertification, represents a dire threat to human well-being and ecological stability.
And as the planet continues to warm, report projections in the worst-case scenario suggest up to 5 billion people could live in drylands by the century’s end, grappling with depleted soils, dwindling water resources, and the diminishment or collapse of once-thriving ecosystems.
Forced migration is one of aridity’s most visible consequences. As land becomes uninhabitable, families and entire communities facing water scarcity and agricultural collapse often have no choice but to abandon their homes, leading to social and political challenges worldwide. From the Middle East to Africa and South Asia, millions are already on the move—a trend set to intensify in coming decades.
Aridity’s devastating impact
The effects of rising aridity are cascading and multifaceted, touching nearly every aspect of life and society, the report says.
It warns that one fifth of all land could experience abrupt ecosystem transformations from rising aridity by the end of the century, causing dramatic shifts (such as forests becoming grasslands and other changes) and leading to extinctions among many of the world’s plants, animals and other life.
-
Aridity is considered the world’s largest single driver behind the degradation of agricultural systems, affecting 40% of Earth’s arable lands
-
Rising aridity has been blamed for a 12% decline in gross domestic product (GDP) recorded for African countries between 1990–2015
-
More than two thirds of all land on the planet (excluding Greenland and Antarctica) is projected to store less water by the end of the century, if greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise even modestly
-
Aridity is considered one of the world’s five most important causes of land degradation (along with land erosion, salinization, organic carbon loss and vegetation degradation)
-
Rising aridity in the Middle East has been linked to the region’s more frequent and larger sand and dust storms
-
Increasing aridity is expected to play a role in larger and more intense wildfires in the climate-altered future—not least because of its impacts on tree deaths in semi-arid forests and the consequent growing availability of dry biomass for burning
-
Rising aridity’s impacts on poverty, water scarcity, land degradation and insufficient food production have been linked to increasing rates of sickness and death globally —especially among children and women
-
Rising aridity and drought play a key role in increasing human migration around the world—particularly in the hyper-arid and arid areas of southern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa and southern Asia.
Report marks a turning point
For years, documenting the rise of aridity proved a challenge, the report states. Its long-term nature and the intricate interplay of factors such as rainfall, evaporation, and plant transpiration made analysis difficult. Early studies produced conflicting results, often muddied by scientific caution.
The new report marks a turning point, leveraging advanced climate models and standardized methodologies to deliver a definitive assessment of global drying trends, confirming the inexorable rise of aridity, while providing critical insights into its underlying drivers and potential future trajectory.
Recommendations
The report offers a comprehensive roadmap for tackling aridity, emphasizing both mitigation and adaptation. Among its recommendations:
-
Strengthen aridity monitoring
Integrate aridity metrics into existing drought monitoring systems. This approach would enable early detection of changes and help guide interventions before conditions worsen. Platforms like the new Aridity Visual Information Tool provide policymakers and researchers with valuable data, allowing for early warnings and timely interventions. Standardized assessments can enhance global cooperation and inform local adaptation strategies. -
Improve land use practices
Incentivizing sustainable land use systems can mitigate the impacts of rising aridity, particularly in vulnerable regions. Innovative, holistic, sustainable approaches to land management are the focus of another new UNCCD SPI report, Sustainable Land Use Systems: The path to collectively achieving Land Degradation Neutrality, available at https://bit.ly/3ZwkLZ3. It considers how land-use at one location affect others elsewhere, makes resilience to climate change or other shocks a priority, and encourages participation and buy-in by Indigenous and local communities as well as all levels of government. Projects like the Great Green Wall—a land restoration initiative spanning Africa—demonstrate the potential for large-scale, holistic efforts to combat aridity and restore ecosystems, while creating jobs and stabilizing economies. -
Invest in water efficiency
Technologies such as rainwater harvesting, drip irrigation, and wastewater recycling offer practical solutions for managing scarce water resources in dry regions. -
Build resilience in vulnerable communities
Local knowledge, capacity building, social justice and holistic thinking are vital to resilience. Sustainable land use systems encourage decision makers to apply responsible governance, protect human rights (including secure land access) and ensure accountability and transparency. Capacity-building programmes, financial support, education programmes, climate information services and community-driven initiatives empower those most affected by aridity to adapt to changing conditions. Farmers switching to drought-resistant crops or pastoralists adopting more arid-tolerant livestock exemplify incremental adaptation. -
Develop international frameworks and cooperation
The UNCCD’s Land Degradation Neutrality framework provides a model for aligning national policies with international goals, ensuring a unified response to the crisis. National Adaptation Plans must incorporate aridity alongside drought planning to create cohesive strategies that address water and land management challenges. Cross-sectoral collaboration at the global level, facilitated by frameworks like the UNCCD, is essential for scaling solutions.
Comments
“For decades, the world’s scientists have signalled that our growing greenhouse gas emissions are behind global warming. Now, for the first time, a UN scientific body is warning that burning fossil fuels is causing permanent drying across much of the world, too—with potentially catastrophic impacts affecting access to water that could push people and nature even closer to disastrous tipping points. As large tracts of the world’s land become more arid, the consequences of inaction grow increasingly dire and adaptation is no longer optional—it is imperative.” – UNCCD Chief Scientist Barron Orr
“Without concerted efforts, billions face a future marked by hunger, displacement, and economic decline. Yet, by embracing innovative solutions and fostering global solidarity, humanity can rise to meet this challenge. The question is not whether we have the tools to respond—it is whether we have the will to act.” – Nichole Barger, Chair, UNCCD Science-Policy Interface
“The report’s clarity is a wake-up call for policymakers: tackling aridity demands more than just science—it requires a diversity of perspectives and knowledge systems. By weaving Indigenous and local knowledge with cutting-edge data, we can craft stronger, smarter strategies to slow aridity’s advance, mitigate its impacts and thrive in a drying world.” – Sergio Vicente-Serrano, co-lead author of the report and an aridity expert with Spain’s Pyrenean Institute of Ecology
“This report underscores the critical need to address aridity as a defining global challenge of our time. By uniting diverse expertise and leveraging breakthrough technologies, we are not just measuring change—we are crafting a roadmap for resilience. Tackling aridity demands a collaborative vision that integrates innovation, adaptive solutions, and a commitment to securing a sustainable future for all.” – Narcisa Pricope, co-lead author, professor of geosciences and associate vice president for research at Mississippi State University, USA.
“The timeliness of this report cannot be overstated. Rising aridity will reshape the global landscape, challenging traditional ways of life and forcing societies to reimagine their relationship with land and water. As with climate change and biodiversity loss, addressing aridity requires coordinated international action and an unwavering commitment to sustainable development.” – Andrea Toreti, co-lead author and senior scientist, European Commission’s Joint Research Centre
By the Numbers:
Key global trends / projections
-
77.6%: Proportion of Earth’s land that experienced drier climates from 1990–2020 compared to the previous 30 years.
-
40.6%: Global land mass (excluding Antarctica) classified as drylands, up from 37.5% over the last 30 years.
-
4.3 million km²: Humid lands transformed into drylands in the last three decades, an area one-third larger than India
-
40%: Global arable land affected by aridity—the leading driver of agricultural degradation.
-
30.9%: Global population living in drylands in 2020, up from 22.5% in 1990
-
2.3 billion: People living in drylands in 2020, a doubling from 1990, projected to more than double again by 2100 under a worst-case climate change scenario.
-
1.35 billion: Dryland inhabitants in Asia—more than half the global total.
-
620 million: Dryland inhabitants in Africa—nearly half of the continent’s population.
-
9.1%: Portion of Earth’s land classified as hyperarid, including the Atacama (Chile), Sahara (Africa), Namib (Africa), and Gobi (China/Mongolia) deserts.
-
23%: Increase in global land at “moderate” to “very high” desertification risk by 2100 under the worst-case emissions scenario
-
+8% at “very high” risk
-
+5% at “high” risk
-
+10% at “moderate” risk
-
Environmental degradation
-
5: Key drivers of land degradation: Rising aridity, land erosion, salinization, organic carbon loss, and vegetation degradation
-
20%: Global land at risk of abrupt ecosystem transformations by 2100 due to rising aridity
-
55%: Species (mammals, reptiles, fish, amphibians, and birds) at risk of habitat loss from aridity. Hotspots: (Arid regions): West Africa, Western Australia, Iberian Peninsula; (Humid regions): Southern Mexico, northern Amazon rainforest
Economics
-
12%: African GDP decline attributed to aridity, 1990–2015
-
16% / 6.7%: Projected GDP losses in Africa / Asia by 2079 under a moderate emissions scenario
-
20M tons maize, 21M tons wheat, 19M tons rice: Expected losses in global crop yields by 2040 due to expanding aridity
-
50%: Projected drop in maize yields in Kenya by 2050 under a high emissions scenario
Water
-
90%: Rainfall in drylands that evaporates back into the atmosphere, leaving 10% for plant growth
-
67%: Global land expected to store less water by 2100, even under moderate emission scenarios
-
75%: Decline in water availability in the Middle East and North Africa since the 1950s
-
40%: Predicted Andean runoff decline by 2100 under a high emissions scenario, threatening water supplies in South America
Health
-
55%: Increase in severe child stunting in sub-Saharan Africa under a medium emissions scenario due to combined effects of aridity and climate warming
-
Up to 12.5%: Estimated rise in mortality risks during sand and dust storms in China, 2013–2018
-
57% / 38%: Increases in fine and coarse atmospheric dust levels, respectively, in the southwestern U.S. by 2100 under worst case climate scenarios
-
220%: Projected increase in premature deaths due to airborne dust in the southwestern United States by 2100 under the high-emissions scenario
-
160%: Expected rise in hospitalizations linked to airborne dust in the same region
Wildfires and forests
-
74%: Expected increase in wildfire-burned areas in California by 2100 under high emission scenarios
-
40: Additional annual high fire danger days in Greece by 2100 compared to late 20th century levels
Notes to editors:
Aridity versus drought
Highly arid regions are places in which a persistent, long-term climatic condition lacks available moisture to support most forms of life and atmospheric evaporative demand significantly exceeds rainfall.
Drought, on the other hand, is an anomalous, shorter-term period of water shortage affecting ecosystems and people and often attributed to low precipitation, high temperatures, low air humidity and/or anomalies in wind.
While drought is part of natural climate variability and can occur in almost any climatic regime, aridity is a stable condition for which changes occur over extremely long-time scales under significant forcing.
Media contacts: press@unccd.int
Fragkiska Megaloudi, +30 6945547877 (WhatsApp) fmegaloudi@unccd.int
Gloria Pallares, +34 606 93 1460 gpallares@unccd.int
Terry Collins, +1-416-878-8712 tc@tca.tc
Authors and other experts are available for advance interviews.
The full report, The Global Threat of Drying Lands: Regional and global aridity trends and future projections, is available for media preview at https://www.unccd.int/resources/reports/global-threat-drying-lands-regional-and-global-aridity-trends-and-future
Original Source: unccd.int
Related posts:

UNCCD COP16: NGOs issue a stark warning and call for urgent actions to deal with the escalating threats of desertification, land degradation, and drought.
Restoring Our Land: Tackling Degradation for Climate Resilience, Food Security, and Sustainable Development at COP16
Climate change will see East Africa get wetter say scientists
Breaking: West and Central African women meet in Senegal over the climate crisis.
You may like
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
African faith leaders are raising their voices for reparations as AGRA’s 20-year legacy faces intense scrutiny.
Published
1 day agoon
October 30, 2026
By the Witness Radio team.
Africa grapples with some of the world’s most severe food security challenges. Today, 309 million people go hungry—outnumbering even Asia’s 292 million. The continent pours between US$70 billion and US$100 billion annually into food imports.
Despite decades of effort by governments, development partners, and countless organizations to improve agriculture and uplift smallholder farmers, these challenges remain. A flagship initiative, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), launched in 2006 with backing from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, now marks two decades of striving to transform African agriculture.
In a statement marking its 20th anniversary this year, the organization described the milestone as an opportunity to reflect on two decades of working with governments, farmers, research institutions, the private sector and development partners to strengthen Africa’s food systems.
Yet African faith leaders argue the initiative has fallen short of its promise to reduce hunger and improve food security. They are now demanding that the Gates Foundation be held accountable for the consequences of the agricultural model it has championed.
On Thursday, October 29, 2026, faith leaders from more than 20 African countries held an online press conference after delivering an open letter to the Gates Foundation on October 28.
The letter, titled African Faith Leaders Demand Reparations from the Gates Foundation and signed by 625 faith leaders with backing from 360 organizations and partners, urges the Foundation to provide reparations and shift its funding toward smallholder farmers, indigenous seeds, healthy soils, and agroecological farming systems.
The leaders contend that AGRA’s Green Revolution approach has failed to tackle hunger and, worse, has eroded food sovereignty and weakened communities’ control over their own food systems.
They add that AGRA has received more than US$1.5 billion since its establishment, with approximately two-thirds of the funding coming from the Gates Foundation.
“The Green Revolution promised to halve hunger. Instead, 55 million more people in AGRA’s focus countries are going hungry today than when it began,” said Ms. Francesca de Gasparis, Executive Director of the Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute (SAFCEI).
“When a strategy fails this badly, for this long, continuing to fund it perpetuates harm. We are calling on the Gates Foundation to take the independent research seriously and change its approach,” Ms. de Gasparis added.
The leaders’ concerns are informed by research from Tufts University and the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), which found that the number of undernourished people in AGRA’s 13 focus countries increased by 58% between 2004–2006 and 2022–2024.
AGRA has pushed back against these findings, challenging both the research and its methodology. This debate has reignited doubts about whether two decades of investment have truly improved livelihoods and food security for Africa’s smallholder farmers.
In the online discussions that followed the letter’s launch, faith leaders urged the Gates Foundation, AGRA, African governments, and development partners to place the sovereignty and well-being of African people at the heart of all agricultural investments.
“African people must be the architects of their own agricultural future. The church does not oppose science but demands science that saves lives,” said Rev. Dr. Tolbert Thomas Jallah, a faith leader from Liberia.
Rev. Dr. Jallah said science must serve humanity, innovation must serve the public good, and technology should strengthen communities’ ability to feed themselves.
The faith leaders said they had previously raised similar concerns with the Gates Foundation. In 2021, they wrote to the Foundation asking it to stop funding Green Revolution programs. SAFCEI said it later met with Foundation representatives, but those engagements did not result in a meaningful response to their concerns.
The press conference brought together representatives from Liberia, Kenya, Botswana, Namibia, Malawi, Zimbabwe and South Africa, while the letter’s signatories came from more than 20 countries across West, East and Southern Africa.
The faith leaders also voiced concerns about how corporate-driven agriculture affects women, who are the backbone of food production and household food security throughout Africa.
Ms. Josephina Ngishoono, representing the Namibia Council of Churches, emphasized that women shoulder much of the burden when agricultural systems put commercial interests ahead of the needs of farming communities.
She pointed out that while women are major contributors to food production, they still face unequal access to land, resources, agricultural knowledge, and decision-making power.
“Corporate-led agriculture that prioritizes patented seeds, chemical inputs, as well as monoculture, risks undermining the women’s traditional knowledge systems, the agroecological practices that have been passed down from generations,” Ms. Ngishoono said.
She warned that when women lose control over seeds and farming decisions, their financial independence and their power to choose what and how to grow food for their families are put at risk.
She called for women to be recognized as agricultural leaders in their own right, not just as passive beneficiaries of development programs.
She further urged the Gates Foundation to champion community seed banks, indigenous seeds, community-managed seed systems, composting, soil restoration, and research led by local communities in agroecology.
“There is a need to protect farmers’ rights and their seed sovereignty and to prioritize public health, environmental health, and long-term food security,” she said.
Ms. Gorata Ramokgothwane of the Botswana Council of Churches highlighted how climate change relentlessly undermines food sovereignty and food security throughout sub-Saharan Africa.
She voiced alarm over the push for farming systems that rely heavily on chemical inputs, cautioning that these methods could damage fragile ecosystems and erode traditional farming practices.
Speaking for women faith leaders, Ms. Ramokgothwane called for a powerful regional movement to advance community-led agroecology throughout Southern Africa.
“As councils of churches in the region, we must identify and intensify our efforts in resource mobilization towards grassroots solidarity in advancing indigenous or traditional preservation,” she said.
She pointed to communities in Botswana that use leadwood ash to preserve seeds for beans, millet, and sorghum, showcasing these traditions as vital knowledge that can fortify local food systems.
“Some communities have resorted to seed banks dedicated to preserving native staples, such as millet, sorghum, beans, and some traditional vegetables,” she added.
Ms. Ramokgothwane said these methods could empower communities to break free from costly agricultural inputs, safeguard indigenous foods, and sustain ecological balance.
She also cautioned that women smallholder farmers are especially at risk when input prices soar or harvests fall short of covering costs. She added that restrictive seed laws can further limit farmers’ ability to save and share traditional seeds.
“As women of faith and leaders in our communities, we know that the Gates Foundation has the moral obligation to independently analyze the needs of smallholder farmers and support the seed-saving practices in irrigation for smallholder farmers,” she said.
Muslim faith leaders in Africa were also represented at the discussions by Dr Sheik Hassan Kenyamari, Chairman of Muslim Provinces in Africa.
Dr Kenyamari voiced unease about the direction, priorities, and lasting consequences of agricultural innovations backed by the Gates Foundation, especially through its partnership with AGRA.
He insisted that Africa’s agricultural transformation must put farmers, communities, ecological integrity, and the right to food above narrow productivity goals and commercial interests.
AGRA, however, rejects claims that its agricultural model has failed, arguing that its progress over the past 20 years should be assessed against the broader challenges facing African food systems.
In its August 2026 Impact, Learning and Foresight Report, the organization says agricultural output across Africa has roughly doubled in real terms since 2005, while cereal yields have increased by about 40%.
It also points to the growth of local seed companies, agricultural input distribution networks and community extension services as evidence of progress.
Related posts:

Failed Green Revolution: African Leaders Demand Reparations from Gates Foundation.
African Food Systems Summit 2024: Do not use it to promote failed agricultural models – African Faith Leaders.
A coalition of 625 African faith leaders will gather, united in their call for reparations in response to what they describe as the failure of a Gates-backed agricultural model.
AGRA’s Silent Takeover: The Hidden Impact on Africa’s Agricultural Policies.
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
149 CSOs and groups demand answers from banks over $3.7bn in EACOP financing
Published
2 days agoon
October 30, 2026
StopEACOP demands accountability after undisclosed bank loans revealed
…149 civil society organisations demand full disclosure from regional lenders tied to the $3.7B in EACOP financing, as Uganda pushes for commercial production by June 2027.
THE StopEACOP coalition today sent an open letter to eight African and Middle East financial institutions, urging them to fully disclose their involvement in the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP).
The letter, signed by 149 organisations including groups from EACOP affected communities, follows new analysis that revealed previously undisclosed lending to the EACOP project.
Reclaim Finance identified roughly US$3.7 billion in project lending between 2025 and 2026, with Afreximbank, KCB Group and KCB Bank Uganda, the Islamic Development Bank Group and the Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector, NMB Bank Tanzania, Qatar National Bank, Standard Bank Group and Stanbic Bank Uganda, and Uganda Development Bank linked to deals.
At African Energy Week (October 12–16), Uganda National Oil Company officials said they now aimed for commercial oil production by June 2027, a further delay after previous first-oil target dates were set for 2025, then June 2026 and July 2026. Tanzania’s state petroleum company separately stated crude should reach Tanga by February 2027, with the first tanker loading in March.
After more than 40 banks and 30 insurers refused to back EACOP or adopted policies against it, African and Gulf lenders largely covered the remaining debt. Only a first portion, from Afreximbank, Standard Bank, Stanbic Bank Uganda, KCB Bank Uganda, and ICD, was ever publicly confirmed by EACOP Ltd, and without amounts. The terms and exposure of the larger group, including NMB Bank, Qatar National Bank, and Uganda Development Bank, remain undisclosed.
What the coalition wants:
The letter demands each institution:
- Disclose the full scope, structure, and terms of its support to EACOP, including exposure through bonds, guarantees, or réhaadvisory roles.
- Commit to no further funding for EACOP expansion or related oil development in the Albertine Graben or elsewhere.
- Fund remedy for harm to affected communities, through an independent, community-led mechanism providing compensation, livelihood restoration, and environmental cleanup, paid by EACOP Ltd and its backers proportional to their role.
Why does it matter now?
“First oil does not mark an end to the harm caused by EACOP. It escalates and entrenches it,” said Zaki Mamdoo, StopEACOP Campaign Coordinator. “The institutions who have poured billions into EACOP must now answer publicly for what they have financed and must take responsibility for repairing the destruction brought by their investment decisions.”
For people whose land and livelihoods have been affected by the pipeline, the consequences of these financing decisions are already part of daily life.
“When they took our land, we lost more than the land itself. We lost the means to support our families. Compensation was supposed to help us rebuild our lives, but for some of us, that has not happened. Now we hear about the banks financing this pipeline, and we want to know: do they understand what has happened to the people whose land made this project possible?”, said Rachael Tugume, EACOP-Project Affected Person.
“Dozens of banks and insurers have rightly refused to support TotalEnergies’ EACOP project due its massive impacts on climate, local biodiversity, communities’ livelihoods and human rights. The 8 banks that have accepted to finance the project will be held accountable by civil society organisations for these impacts. They must get ready to contribute to reparative justice for communities and commit to exclude any new financing to oil and gas expansion in Uganda and the rest of the world.” said Antoine Bouhey, Defund TotalEnergies’ campaign coordinator at Reclaim Finance.
The coalition warns that the risks it has documented – including land acquisition and compensation failures, lost livelihoods, militarization, and environmental damage along the route and at the Chongoleani terminal in Tanga – won’t end when oil flows. They will get worse.
In the letter, the financial institutions are asked to clarify their position by 16 November. The coalition will publish all responses and non-responses after the deadline.
Notes to editors
- The open letter, signatory list link
- Spokespeople are available in Uganda, Tanzania and from our internal experts.
###
For media inquiries, contact:
Abiud Onyach
Communications & Digital Lead
StopEACOP Campaign
info@stopeacop.net | +254700593687
About the StopEACOP Campaign
The StopEACOP Coalition is an alliance of local groups, communities, and African and global organizations. The #StopEACOP Coalition has been calling for a halt to the proposed pipeline and associated oil fields at Tilenga and Kingfisher. The StopEACOP campaign is gaining momentum, building pressure on the remaining supporters and financiers of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. To date, 43 banks and 30 (re)insurers have already ruled out support for EACOP.
Source: realnewsmagazine.net
Related posts:

StopEACOP Coalition demands disclosure of US$3.7 billion in pipeline financing
The latest: Another group of anti-EACOP activists has been arrested for protesting Stanbic Bank’s financing of the EACOP Project.
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Government Seeks Shs8 tn for Land Acquisition Under NDP IV
Published
2 days agoon
October 30, 2026
Government says rising land prices and compensation disputes are delaying public infrastructure projects, with a proposed national policy seeking to harmonise valuation, improve resettlement and protect communities affected by land acquisition.
The Draft National Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy 2026 is in its final stages before submission to Cabinet, marking a step towards reforming how government acquires land, compensates owners and resettles communities affected by public infrastructure projects.
The proposed policy seeks to establish a harmonised framework for land acquisition while strengthening safeguards for project-affected people, improving compensation processes and restoring livelihoods for displaced communities.
Speaking at a stakeholders’ validation workshop at Hotel Africana in Kampala, Henry Harrison Irumba, the Assistant Commissioner for Policy Analysis at the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development, said the existing legal framework was outdated and fragmented, with the principal Land Acquisition Act dating back to 1965.
“The existing system has resulted in inconsistencies in land valuation, compensation and community consultations, often contributing to delays in implementing public infrastructure projects,” he said.
Irumba said the proposed policy shifts the focus beyond monetary compensation by introducing measures for resettlement, livelihood restoration and stronger protection for affected communities.
It proposes harmonised valuation standards across government institutions, greater public participation, stronger safeguards for vulnerable groups and more effective mechanisms for resolving compensation disputes.
The draft also provides for consultations involving not only household heads but other affected family members, particularly women, to ensure their interests are considered during compensation and resettlement.
In addition, it proposes safeguards for voluntary land donations and negotiated land transfers, particularly in communities where land is offered for public projects without formal documentation.
According to Irumba, the policy review began in 2017 with a regulatory impact assessment to identify weaknesses in the existing framework.
Consultants were engaged in 2019 with support from the World Bank, followed by nationwide consultations and further reviews to align the policy with emerging land acquisition challenges and national development priorities.
Meanwhile, the Minister of Lands, Housing and Urban Development, Judith Nabakooba, said government requires an estimated Shs8 trillion to acquire land for infrastructure projects under the Fourth National Development Plan (NDP IV).
She warned that rising land prices and compensation disputes had become major obstacles to infrastructure delivery, with government reviews indicating that nearly 90 per cent of public projects are delayed by land acquisition challenges.
“This indeed is unsustainable because in some instances, the cost of acquiring land has exceeded the cost of constructing the projects themselves,” she said.
Nabakooba called for innovative approaches to land acquisition and valuation, including consideration of a betterment levy — a one-time charge on property owners whose land values increase because of public infrastructure investments.
She said the final policy should provide a transparent and practical framework that enables government to acquire land for national development while protecting the rights, livelihoods and dignity of affected communities.
The World Bank welcomed progress on the policy, describing it as a significant milestone in efforts to improve Uganda’s land acquisition system.
Fadzai Mukonoweshuro, the World Bank’s Senior Operations Officer, said an effective and predictable land acquisition framework was essential to Uganda’s infrastructure and economic development ambitions.
“Successful implementation of the policy will require adequate financing, strong institutional capacity and clear accountability mechanisms to ensure land acquisition is carried out in a timely, transparent and equitable manner,” she said.
Mukonoweshuro reaffirmed the World Bank’s commitment to supporting Uganda in strengthening its environmental and social risk management systems as the country advances major infrastructure projects.
Source: nilepost.co.ug
Related posts:

Govt resurrects emotive Land Acquisition Bill.
StopEACOP Campaign challenges TotalEnergies assessment of Uganda land acquisition programme
The joint final review of the National Land Policy 2013, a significant and collaborative effort between the government and Civil society organizations, is underway.
EACOP Partners With Surveyors Body as Pipeline Land Acquisition Nears Completion.
African faith leaders are raising their voices for reparations as AGRA’s 20-year legacy faces intense scrutiny.
149 CSOs and groups demand answers from banks over $3.7bn in EACOP financing
Government Seeks Shs8 tn for Land Acquisition Under NDP IV
Standard Bank faces complaint over sustainability claims linked to East African Oil Pipeline
Tanzanian Government Abducts Maasai Villagers in an Unconscionable Attack on Indigenous Land Defenders
Environmental and human rights advocates are urging the world to hold global investors accountable for their actions.
World Food Day 2026: Building healthy diets means reimagining how we grow, share, and enjoy our food.
Sweeping investments are fueling widespread land grabbing and deepening rights violations across Uganda – Report.
Innovative Finance from Canada projects positive impact on local communities.
Over 5000 Indigenous Communities evicted in Kiryandongo District
Petition To Land Inquiry Commission Over Human Rights In Kiryandongo District
Invisible victims of Uganda Land Grabs
Resource Center
- CAN AFRICAN FOOD SYSTEMS THRIVE WITHOUT CHEMICAL FERTILISERS
- Land And Environment Rights In Uganda Experiences From Karamoja And Mid Western Sub Regions
- REPARATORY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE MUST BE AT THE CORE OF COP30, SAY GLOBAL LEADERS AND MOVEMENTS
- LAND GRABS AT GUNPOINT REPORT IN KIRYANDONGO DISTRICT
- THOSE OIL LIARS! THEY DESTROYED MY BUSINESS!
- RESEARCH BRIEF -TOURISM POTENTIAL OF GREATER MASAKA -MARCH 2025
- The Mouila Declaration of the Informal Alliance against the Expansion of Industrial Monocultures
- FORCED LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA TRENDS RIGHTS OF DEFENDERS IMPACT AND CALL FOR ACTION
Legal Framework
READ BY CATEGORY
Newsletter
Trending
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoEnvironmental and human rights advocates are urging the world to hold global investors accountable for their actions.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoWhy are secure land rights key to Africa’s climate resilience and the protection of its natural treasures?
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK5 days agoA coalition of 625 African faith leaders will gather, united in their call for reparations in response to what they describe as the failure of a Gates-backed agricultural model.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK6 days agoHigh land title costs, bureaucracy, and distance leave women struggling to secure land rights in Africa.
-
FARM NEWS2 weeks agoUganda Leads Africa in Certified Organic Farmland Ahead of First Organic, Nature Expo
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoBiodiversity Goals: The world has no time to meet its 2030 goals.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK5 days agoFrom grassroots action to policy transformation: How local environmental solutions spark enduring change.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK2 weeks agoLands Ministry tightens rules for replacing lost titles, gives landowners 30 days to object
