Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

The South African High Court concludes hearing a landmark case challenging TotalEnergies’ Deep-Water Drilling project and offers to deliver its ruling on notice.

Published

on

The South Durban Community Environmental Alliance (SDCEA) stand in solidarity with small‑scale coastal fishing communities on the West Coast as they challenge TotalEnergies SA’s Deep‑Water Orange Basin drilling approval in the Cape Town High Court.

By the Witness Radio team.

Cape Town, South Africa- The Western Cape High Court has concluded a two-day hearing in a landmark environmental justice case challenging the approval of ultra-deep-water oil and gas exploration by TotalEnergies in the Deep Western Orange Basin (DWOB), off South Africa’s West Coast.

The case, brought by environmental organizations including The Green Connection and Natural Justice, alongside the Aukotowa Primary Fishing Co-operative, challenges the legality of the environmental authorization granted by the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources.

The applicants argue that the decision was unlawful, irrational, and inconsistent with South Africa’s constitution and environmental laws, particularly in its evaluation of the environmental, climate, and socio-economic risks of the proposed exploration.

The Director General, Department of Mineral & Petroleum Resources, the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries & the Environment, and Total Energies EP South Africa S.A.S are the respondents in the case, which has sparked debate on environmental concerns likely to be caused by the project.

Neville van Rooy, the outreach ambassador for The Green Connection, told the Court that the project introduces unprecedented risks.

“The DWOB presents conditions unlike anything South Africa has ever faced – both in water depth and technical complexity. Neville van Rooy emphasized that the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) did not adequately address these unprecedented risks, which could have serious environmental consequences.”

The case dates back to 23 October 2023, when the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources granted environmental authorization, and appeals were dismissed on 24 April 2024, highlighting the ongoing legal process.

In October 2024, the applicants filed a case in the Western Cape High Court challenging the environmental authorization. They are also seeking to have both the Director-General’s decision and the Minister’s dismissal of their appeal reviewed and set aside.

The nearly 100 small-scale fishers and community members protested outside the Western Cape High Court, voicing concerns about marine ecosystems and the threat to local livelihoods posed by the project.

The demonstrators highlighted threats to marine ecosystems, declining fish stocks, and the livelihoods of coastal communities already facing the growing impacts of climate change.

“The State failed to meaningfully assess how this project will affect our livelihoods, food security, cultural heritage, and constitutional rights – effectively prioritising corporate interests over vulnerable fishing communities. We have the right to be heard and the right to a healthy environment. But the approval process ignored our lived realities and the warnings we have repeatedly raised.”  Walter Steenkamp, the chairperson of Aukotowa Fisheries, a small-scale fishing cooperative in Port Nolloth, revealed.

The applicants argued that the government failed to assess the project’s need and desirability properly, downplayed the risks of ultra-deep drilling, ignored the socio-economic impacts on coastal communities, and overlooked obligations under the Integrated Coastal Management Act. They also maintain that the project conflicts with South Africa’s net-zero commitments and that the narrative of gas as a ‘bridge fuel’ is unsupported by science.

“Decision-makers disregarded key environmental laws, particularly the Integrated Coastal Management Act (ICMA). The public trustee duty requires the State to safeguard coastal public property for current and future generations. Both the Director-General and the Minister failed to apply mandatory criteria on coastal public property, public interest, and intergenerational justice, rendering their decisions unlawful.” Melissa Groenink-Groves, Programme Manager of the Defending Rights Programme at Natural Justice, emphasized.

Further, Steenkamp criticized the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for downplaying the risks associated with drilling at depths greater than 2,000 metres below sea level.

“Without robust, site-specific scientific evidence and a Blow-out Contingency Plan tested in South African waters, approving this project violates the precautionary principle, which requires decision-makers to act with heightened caution where activities pose the risk of serious or irreversible harm.”

In response, the government of South Africa and TotalEnergies defended the approval, arguing that the process complied with national laws, including the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA).

On the issue of “need and desirability,” the respondents submitted that the project’s value lies in the knowledge to be gained through exploration, which is critical for informing future energy planning and resource management. They insisted that it would be premature and legally inappropriate to assess the impacts of production at this stage.

Addressing concerns about oil spill risks and socio-economic impacts, the respondents pointed to several technical studies—including the Oil Spill Modelling Report, Fisheries Impact Assessment, and Socio-Economic Impact Assessment respondents argued that the decision-makers relied on credible global datasets to assess the socio-economic impacts on small-scale fishers in the final ESIA, which presented a full evaluation of the potential consequences in a range of scenarios, including the socio-economic impact of an oil spill on small-scale fishers.

Regarding compliance with coastal protection laws, government lawyers argued that the principles outlined in the Integrated Coastal Management Act were substantively addressed within the broader ESIA process.

The respondents further argued that the applicants had failed to establish sufficient legal grounds to challenge the decisions, urging the Court to dismiss the case and order the applicants to cover legal costs.

This case is part of a broader wave of resistance by communities opposing projects they say threaten their survival and ecosystems. Large oil corporations have faced mounting criticism for financing projects associated with environmental destruction and, in some cases, for fueling conflict and social disruption.

In Uganda, for example, TotalEnergies has faced criticism over its involvement in major oil developments, including the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. These projects have been linked to widespread displacement, livelihood losses, and social disruption affecting more than 100,000 people.

For South African Communities and civil society groups, projects like DWOB threaten marine biodiversity, traditional livelihoods, and South Africa’s climate commitments.

“Decisions made in Cape Town about TotalEnergies and Shell will have a major impact on the future of our fishing industry. For generations, our families have relied on traditional fishing to put food on the table. Oil exploration threatens our ability to provide for our children and support our communities.” Ernest Titus from Lambert’s Bay added.

The Court is expected to announce the judgment soon, a decision that could have significant implications for South Africa’s fishing communities, marine ecosystems, and future offshore oil exploration.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African women unite and meet in Nairobi to develop strategies to protect communal tenure systems and collectively resist false climate solutions.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

Women in East Africa are on the front lines of land and climate struggles against harmful extractive investments, land grabs, and land giveaways that have not only damaged their livelihoods but also continued to harm the environment.

In Tanzania’s Manyara and Arusha regions, Maasai pastoralists face environmental disasters and land conflicts driven by encroachment and land degradation.

Paulina Peter, a Community Development Officer with the KINNAPA Development Program in Kiteto District, Tanzania, has witnessed these changes firsthand.

“Deforestation for agriculture is a major challenge. Some pastoralists are diversifying into crop farming, which affects environmental conservation. At the same time, population growth and land degradation are driving migration into pastoralist areas.” She explains, in an interview with Witness Radio

These pressures are not only ecological, but they are also fueling conflict. According to Paulina, disputes have emerged between local communities and incoming agriculturalists seeking access to community lands, sometimes escalating into legal battles.

To address these challenges, KINNAPA is supporting pastoralist communities through land rights awareness, environmental education, and the development of village land use plans. These initiatives, particularly the formalization of shared rangelands, have helped reduce conflict and promote more sustainable land use.

While Tanzanian communities struggle with gradual encroachment, the story of the Mosopisyek of Benet Indigenous community in Eastern Uganda reflects a more abrupt and violent history of land loss, which has had an overwhelming impact on thousands of local communities for decades.

The Benet Indigenous community in Uganda lost its ancestral land in 1993 when it was designated as a national park, causing decades of displacement and hardship.

“In 1993, the government evicted hundreds of people without compensation. During the initial giveaway of our land, we were not consulted to give consent,” Chelangat Scovia, a women’s leader of the Mosopisyek of Benet Indigenous community, told Witness Radio, recalling the trauma of forced evictions from their ancestral lands on Mount Elgon.

The government has promised to resettle them, but the affected communities in Sebei still await justice after more than 30 years, underscoring their resilience.

Following the 1993 evictions, thousands were left in temporary settlements without adequate land or support. In 2008, again, the government further displaced more than 170 families and destroyed homes in a violent eviction.

Today, many Benet remain landless, surviving through casual labor or relying on aid, while continuing to face harassment when they attempt to access their ancestral lands for grazing or cultural practices.

Despite these challenges affecting their communities, women like Paulina and Chelangat are not only victims but also inspiring leaders driving efforts to defend and reclaim the commons.

Both are attending the East Africa Women’s Land and Climate Justice Convergence in Nairobi, where grassroots women leaders, activists, and organizations from Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania have gathered from April 26 to May 1 to confront land dispossession, extractivism, and false climate solutions.

The convergence comes at a critical moment when Africa’s commons—land, forests, water, and cultural systems—are under growing threat. Most land on the continent is held under communal tenure systems that sustain rural populations. However, weak legal protections continue to expose these systems to state control, corporate exploitation, and large-scale land grabs.

While communal systems are vital, they are also shaped by deeply entrenched patriarchal norms. Women, despite being the backbone of food production, often access land through male relatives. This leaves them particularly vulnerable during moments of crisis such as widowhood, divorce, or family disputes.

The convergence seeks to challenge this model by advancing a different vision, one that strengthens, rather than dismantles, the commons while centering women’s leadership.

The convergence aims to build collective strategies to protect communal lands and resist extractive industries and false climate solutions, empowering communities to act together.

“The convergence will also explore the new threats to the commons in the form of mega ‘green’ energy and mining projects, and the false solutions to the climate crisis, such as carbon capture and storage, as well as REDD+, typically involving the capturing and privatization of land, forests, and water bodies. We will also explore the question of climate debt and how it is deeply interlinked with the continued commodification of the commons,” Says Womin in its press release.

Bringing together 35 to 45 participants, primarily women living under communal tenure systems, the convergence includes farmers, fisherfolk, pastoralists, indigenous women, and activists resisting extractive projects. Organized by Womin in partnership with allied organizations, the gathering runs until May 1.

Witness Radio will continue to provide updates on all developments from the convergence.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

African women push for reparations and environmental accountability after landmark Climate Justice Day.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team

Women’s community organizations and grassroots movements across Africa are intensifying calls for climate reparations and environmental accountability following the inaugural African Women’s Climate Justice Day, marked on April 15.

Organized by the West and Central African Women’s Climate Assembly (WCA) under the theme “Our Lands, Our Voices: African Women United for Reparations and Climate Justice,” the convergence took place across multiple parts of the continent, highlighting how women in regions like West and Central Africa face unique climate impacts such as droughts and land degradation, demanding tailored solutions.

The WCA provides a powerful space to analyze the intersecting crises affecting their communities collectively and to develop strategies of resistance rooted in climate justice, food sovereignty, and the Right to Say NO to destructive extractivist and mega-development projects that displace communities, erode ancestral ways of life, and destroy ecological futures.

Since 2022, women from across Central and West Africa have gathered annually through the Women’s Climate Assembly (WCA) — a growing Pan-African, grassroots-led platform that brings together over 120 activists, ecofeminist leaders, and community organizers to collectively build strategies for climate justice, strengthen solidarity across movements, and advance community-led resistance against harmful, destructive projects while amplifying women’s voices.

On the 15th, the Women’s Alliance on Natural Resources Governance (WANRG) led nationwide actions across four districts in Sierra Leone, bringing climate justice conversations directly to communities most affected by environmental degradation. In the West African country, Climate change has had a significant impact on agriculture, exacerbating the existing challenges of low productivity and food insecurity.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), women make up almost 70% of Sierra Leone’s agricultural workforce, and FAO’s support aims to empower women to adapt to climate shocks that threaten food production and household incomes.

These impacts, including unpredictable rainfall patterns, prolonged droughts, and increasing occurrences of extreme weather events such as floods and storms, are disrupting farming activities and resulting in declining crop yields. Further, environmental concerns caused by extractive projects are adding salt to the injury.

In the eastern districts of Kono and Kenema, outreach efforts focused on women working on the front lines of natural resource management, highlighting how extractive activities and climate change are eroding livelihoods.

“Climate justice is a women’s rights issue! Across four districts, we took bold action to ensure women’s voices are at the heart of environmental protection,” the organization’s statement read.

The alliance brought together local leaders and policymakers in Bo District for a stakeholder dialogue to develop and implement gender-sensitive climate policies, with commitments to integrate women’s voices into national climate strategies and to demonstrate tangible policy support for climate justice.

“When women lead, the planet wins. We are not just victims of climate change; we are the leaders, the innovators, and the defenders of our land,” The organization’s statement highlighted. This should inspire the audience with pride and confidence in women’s vital role in climate justice.

Across the continent, similar demands were echoed. In Liberia, the Natural Resource Women Platform (NRWP) described the moment as critical, warning that climate change continues to disproportionately affect women in rural, coastal, and resource-dependent communities.

“Across Liberia and the wider region, women are experiencing the harsh impacts of environmental degradation, land dispossession, and the growing burden of sustaining livelihoods amid the climate crisis,” the organization said in a statement from Monrovia.

The group pointed to worsening coastal erosion in Buchanan, increasing urban pollution, and challenges for women farmers due to erratic rainfall and soil decline. These realities should evoke empathy and a sense of urgency in your audience to support community-led solutions.

Central to the demands raised during the day of action are calls for reparations for communities affected by historical and ongoing environmental exploitation, an end to destructive extractive practices, and greater accountability from governments and corporations driving climate harm.

These calls were reinforced by regional movements such as the Global Convergence of Struggles for Land, Water, Seeds, Forests, Savannas, and the Sea in Central Africa, which framed the climate crisis as part of a broader system of dispossession.

“Land, water, forests, and the sea are fundamental rights, not commodities,” the coalition declared, calling for the dismantling of extractivist systems and for communities to be placed at the center of decisions affecting their territories.

In Central Africa, women’s organizations are already moving from declarations to strategy. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Indigenous Women and Local Communities for Sustainable and Participatory Development (FACID) brought together civil society groups to develop joint action plans and strengthen advocacy for climate justice.

“These are our struggles, and African women across the region have come together to reflect on climate change issues. There is drought, water pollution, air pollution, and soil pollution, as well as deforestation. All these scourges of climate change are affecting the African continent.  Since we cannot work in isolation, we have established the Constituent Assembly of African Women on Climate Justice to fight for climate justice through actions that bring about solutions that serve everyone,” said Marie Dorothée Lisenga, a coordinator with FACID, adding that women are at the forefront of the fight against climate change, and their leadership must shape the response.

As momentum builds beyond the April 15 mobilizations, organizations say the focus is now on sustaining pressure through advocacy, alliance-building, and grassroots action to ensure that climate justice is not reduced to rhetoric.

“We commend the growing movement of African women rising in unity to demand systemic and transformative change. Their call for reparations is not only for compensation; it is for dignity, justice, and the restoration of lives, lands, and livelihoods,” The group emphasized. This framing should foster respect and moral support among your readers.

The African Women’s Climate Justice Day was organized by NGO partners, civil society, and community-based organizations, and allies across Africa, including Women and Development (Nigeria), WoMin African Alliance, SynDev (Senegal), Green Development Advocates, and RADD (Cameroon), among others, who hosted solidarity actions and activities.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Nigerian Banks under fire over ESG failures as a new report exposes Weak Climate and Human Rights Compliance.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

A new policy assessment has raised serious questions about the environmental and social conduct of Nigeria’s banking sector, revealing that major financial institutions are significantly underperforming on global sustainability standards while continuing to finance high-risk industries with limited transparency. 

The report, produced by Fair Finance Nigeria (FFNG) Coalition, comprising BudgIT, Oxfam, Policy Alert, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), Connected Development (CODE), and Sustainable Transformation and Empowerment Programme (STEPS) assessed four Nigerian major banks including Access Bank, UBA, Zenith Bank, and Standard Chartered Bank against international Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) benchmarks. 

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) is a framework for understanding how a company behaves, not just in terms of profit, but also in terms of its impact on people and the planet. 

The environmental side looks at how responsibly a company treats the natural world. This includes how it uses resources, manages waste, reduces pollution, and responds to climate change. The social side focuses on how a company relates to people. That means how it treats its employees, works with suppliers, serves customers, and engages with the communities where it operates, while the governance side is about how the company is run and ensures accountability. 

The assessment was based on the updated 2025 methodology of Fair Finance International, which uses 19 thematic indicators grouped into environmental, social, and governance categories. The evaluation relied solely on publicly available policy documents, sustainability reports, and annual disclosures. 

Acknowledging that Nigerian banks scored an average of 1.7 out of 10 across key sustainability indicators highlights the urgent need for banks and regulators to take responsibility for improving ESG standards, inspiring a sense of duty in stakeholders.

The report identified significant weaknesses in external accountability, particularly in how banks manage the environmental and social risks of the companies they finance, underscoring the need for stronger regulations. 

Despite years of sustainability reporting and regulatory guidance, the report concludes that Nigerian banks remain far from aligning with global ESG expectations.

“It is not only about how banks assess their internal operations—such as limiting discrimination in recruitment or increasing the representation of women in senior leadership positions. They must also examine how these standards are applied across their entire business and supply chains. This includes the companies they invest in, those they lend to, and those they actively finance or support.

Banks should ensure that these companies also comply with international standards. This approach does not only apply to financial institutions themselves; it also plays a critical role in mitigating financial, reputational, and operational risks across their investment portfolios.” Dr. Augustine O’Keary, the lead researcher and research officer of Connected Development, mentioned during the presentation of the research findings.

The report highlights a concerning climate-related disclosure score of 0.9 out of 10, exposing critical gaps in how banks communicate climate risks to stakeholders.

Researchers found limited evidence of credible transition plans aligned with global temperature targets, despite Nigeria’s increasing exposure to climate-related risks. 

By continuing to finance carbon-intensive sectors without publicly disclosing portfolio-level transition strategies, banks risk eroding trust, underscoring the need for greater transparency to civil society and advocacy groups.

“We see continued financing of high-emission sectors without clear commitments to reduce exposure or align with a 1.5°C pathway,” the report noted. 

Environmental analysts warn that this disconnect exposes Nigeria’s financial system to long-term systemic risk as global markets tighten climate regulations.

The Fair Finance Nigeria Coalition is calling for stronger regulatory alignment with global ESG standards, particularly through updates to Nigeria’s sustainability banking principles.

Stakeholders argue that existing frameworks remain outdated and insufficiently aligned with international best practices, especially in climate finance and corporate accountability.

Strong calls for improved engagement between banks, regulators, and civil society organizations aim to foster collaboration, making stakeholders feel involved and motivated to enhance policy frameworks and disclosure standards.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter