Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

NEMA hindering environment restoration in Wakiso – leaders

Published

on

The leaders say assessments done by the district environment staff are sometimes ignored by NEMA

Leaders in Wakiso District have accused the National Environment Management Authority (Nema) of frustrating their efforts to restore the environment.

However, Nema has refuted the accusations, saying while they cannot reach every corner of the country, local authorities can.

Mr Alfred Malinga, the Wakiso District Chief Administrative Officer, said assessments done by the district environment staff are sometimes ignored by Nema.

“When Nema sends environmental impact assessments to our staff at the district for review, at times where they say no, Nema goes ahead to issue permits to investors and developers who want to occupy wetlands,” Mr Malinga said during an action planning meeting for environment and natural resources in Nansana Municipality on Wednesday.

He said that this lack of environmental conscience is likely to undermine all efforts aimed at restoring wetlands.

“My challenge is why they keep pointing fingers at us yet they have the supreme powers over wetlands and other ecosystems. This will never help the country to restore the degraded fragile eco-systems,” he added.

Mr Malinga cited the degrading of the Lake Victoria shores at Kaazi in Busabala which the district environment team stopped but Nema went ahead to sanction.

“A person applied for a license to use that area and we said no, but the magnitude of degradation now is worrying because they have already done backfilling,” he said

Mr Esau Mpoza, the Wakiso District environment officer, said the district cannot handle restoration exercises alone because they lack an enforcement team.

“We don’t have environmental police. Ours is to make alerts and seek help,” he said.

Mr Francis Ogwal, a senior manager at Nema, however, said Nema cannot reach every corner of the country but local authorities can.

“The National Environment Act 2019 is very clear because it indicates the responsibility of each lead agency and also empowers local governments to manage wetlands in their areas of jurisdiction,” Mr Ogwal said.

Authorities have in the past decade been evicting encroachers from various wetlands, but some defiant encroachers keep reconstructing new houses and makeshift structures in such areas.

In late May, Nema started fresh forceful evictions in the Lubigi wetland where hundreds of people saw their houses demolished and many are currently sleeping in the cold.

The law

Section 36 of the National Environment Act 2019 provides for the protection of wetlands and prohibits reclamation, and erection of illegal structures and empowers authorities to demolish any structure that is fixed in, on, under, or above any wetland.

The Act also empowers districts to manage wetlands within their jurisdictions and ensure that their boundaries are demarcated so that even as water levels and wetland vegetation recede, the communities are clear on where the boundaries lie.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Buvuma residents drove off surveyors as they resisted the surveying of their land targeted for palm oil tree planting.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

In Buvuma District, a group of Bibanja holders drove away surveyors and protested what they regarded as land-grabbing for palm oil cultivation. Residents state they have lawfully occupied the land for over seven decades. In Uganda, a Kibanja holder is a tenant who uses land without an official, registered title.

Under the 1995 Constitution of Uganda and the Land Act (Cap 227), Kibanja holders are legally recognized as lawful or bona fide occupants. This grants them significant security of tenure and protects them from arbitrary or illegal evictions.

According to sources, surveyors reportedly supported by the Resident District Commissioner (RDC) attempted land demarcation, mapping, and surveying without following due process. The RDC represents the president’s office at the district level.

The land is being claimed by Mutamba Berna, Bagagga Ali, and Nalugo Swabulah, who, according to residents, began forcibly opening boundaries in May.

More than 30 Bibanja holders report that individuals described as land grabbers are using the Resident District Commissioner’s office to conduct surveys and demarcate land without their consent.

“We have lived on this land all our lives, and now people we have never known are appearing and using the office of the RDC as a cover. They have started forceful land measurements,” Ambrose told Witness Radio.

Residents say over 45 hectares in Kigobero Village, Bukinarwa Parish, Buwooya Sub-county are threatened.

Ambrose Wazaabwe, 76, who was born and raised on the disputed land, never expected strangers to challenge the ownership his family has depended on for generations.

“I only heard rumors that landlords would take our land. Later, they started boundary surveys without our consent,” he said.

Ambrose, a farmer, relies on his five-acre plot for his family’s survival and says he is unsure how they will survive if evicted.

“I mainly farm cassava, bananas, and sweet potatoes. I also keep animals and use the income to support my family of seven,” he added.

Ambrose is among more than 30 Bibanja holders facing threats of a land eviction by a group of individuals identified as Mutamba Berna, Bagagga Ali, and Nalugo Swabulah, who have recently surfaced and are claiming ownership of the land.

Witness Radio investigations reveal that the disputed land is registered under mailo, one of Uganda’s tenure systems. Originally, Plot 1, Block 34, was registered in the name of Mulinya Yokaana (deceased), who acquired it in 1936. Since then, the land has changed hands several times, with recent claimants appearing after a 2016 transfer.

Land documents seen by Witness Radio show that in 2016, Nalugo, Lugoloobi Ibrahim, Bagagga Ali, and Babirye Aidah acquired the land, reportedly without informing Bibanja holders. In 2024, the title changed and is now under Mutamba Berna, Bagaga Ali, and Nalugo Swabulah. Witness Radio cannot verify the authenticity of these documents or whether proper notification or procedures were followed during the transfers.

When contacted, Nalugo Swabulah, one of the landlords, asserted that they are the late Yokaana’s grandchildren and rightful landowners.

The individuals allegedly sought the RDC’s help to claim the land earlier.

Isaac Kizito, another affected resident, first met the alleged landlords at the RDC’s office.

“The RDC called us to meet alleged landowners. We’d never seen them, and they didn’t seem to know each other. Next, boundaries were marked,” he said.

Ambrose says the alleged grabbers never provide documents authorizing them to survey.

“They act illegally and bring no orders. Sometimes they come at night. If right, why hide? Worst, government offices support them,” he added.

Mr. Aisu Charles, former Buwooya chairperson, doubts Swabulah’s group owns the land and suggests their documents may be forged.

“During my term, some claimed to be Yokaana’s grandchildren. When Swabulah’s group came, we found their claims lacking detail and consistency. We asked for more proof, which they never gave,” he said.

Witness Radio contacted RDC Hawah Namugenyi, who is alleged to support the claimed landlords; she declined to comment.

Per President Museveni’s directives, no evictions occur without a District Security Committee meeting led by the RDC and with the Ministry of Lands.

Nalugo Swabulah maintained that she has ownership rights over the land, insisting she holds a valid land title registered in her name and those of her relatives.

“It is not true that I am an absentee landlord. I have documents that prove our ownership of the land. Let those who claim ownership also present their documents,” she said.

Musagala Atanansi, land rights defender and Buwooya Sub-county chairperson, said Buvuma has long faced illegal land evictions by absent landlords.

“Some land grabbers seize land fraudulently. I have never seen Nalugo and her group as locals. They now market the land for sale. We, as leaders, ask—what’s the rush?” he said.

 

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

World Environment Day 2026: Environmental Advocates warn of rising ecological costs arising from Uganda’s land-based investments.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team

As Uganda faces mounting environmental pressures, environmental advocates warn that the country’s rapid surge in land-based investments is driving ecological destruction and increasing rural communities’ vulnerability.

Among the most controversial of these investments is the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), which environmentalists, human rights defenders, and affected communities say is intensifying ecological risks while triggering a wave of repression against those who oppose it.

The $5 billion EACOP project, led by TotalEnergies and partners, spans 1,444 kilometers from Hoima to Tanga. It passes through diverse ecosystems and has affected thousands through land acquisition. Experts warn that the pipeline threatens sensitive environments and may increase carbon emissions.

There has been a price to pay for opposing the project. More than 150 environmental and human rights activists have reportedly been arrested and charged in Uganda for protesting EACOP and related oil developments for their negative impacts. Michel Forst, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Environmental Defenders, last year criticizedcriticized TotalEnergies for “continually failing to protect environmental defenders adequately” and expressed concern about the project.

For many advocates, EACOP is more than just a controversial oil pipeline. This represents a new development model in Uganda in which large-scale land investments are being prioritized over environmental protection, community rights, and long-term climate resilience.

As Uganda joins the rest of the world to mark World Environment Day 2026, organizations such as Witness Radio Uganda warn that poorly planned and poorly regulated land-based investments threaten to worsen the country’s ongoing ecological crisis.

From commercial agriculture and industrial tree plantations to carbon offset projects, mining operations, and large-scale infrastructure developments, forests, wetlands, and customary lands are being transformed into investment zones at unprecedented rates. While these projects are often promoted as engines of economic growth or climate solutions, environmental defenders argue that they are accelerating deforestation, biodiversity loss, land dispossession, and climate vulnerability.

According to the Land Matrix Initiative, more than 370,000 hectares of land in Uganda have been acquired through large-scale land deals in recent years, reflecting a broader trend of intensifying pressure on land and natural resources. Although these investments are often framed as pathways to modernization, critics argue that they are reshaping land use in ways that undermine ecological stability and local food systems.

The organization cited several examples of investments whose activities raise environmental concerns. In districts such as Mubende, the Namwasa Forest Reserve has been converted into industrial tree plantations dominated by eucalyptus and pine species. Communities and environmental researchers warn that such monoculture plantations reduce biodiversity, alter water cycles, and degrade soil quality over time.

Similar patterns are emerging in other parts of the country. In Kiryandongo District, for instance, commercial agriculture has expanded into previously forested and communal lands, accelerating land degradation and restricting community access to resources on which many households depend for survival.

At the same time, carbon offset and so-called “climate-smart” agriculture projects have proliferated in Uganda in recent years. They are often promoted as the solution to climate change. However, critics say they are changing land use from food production to monoculture plantations or to carbon markets controlled from outside. Smallholder farmers often sign contracts without understanding the long-term implications, sparking concerns about land control, benefit sharing, and food sovereignty.

Witness Radio Uganda warns that unless urgent action is taken, the country risks locking itself into a development pathway that deepens both ecological breakdown and social inequality.

“Uganda is facing a silent but accelerating ecological emergency,” says Jeff Wokulira Ssebaggala, Executive Director of Witness Radio Uganda, adding that “What is being promoted as development is too often the systematic conversion of forests, wetlands, and community lands into investment zones that weaken both people and nature. If we continue on this path, we are not just losing biodiversity but also undermining the very foundation of rural survival and climate resilience.”

On World Environment Day 2026, Witness Radio is calling for urgent structural reforms, including an immediate halt to the allocation of forests, wetlands, and ecologically sensitive ecosystems to private investors; stronger independent environmental governance; recognition and enforcement of customary land rights; full implementation of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC); and an end to the criminalization of environmental and land rights defenders.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

EU delegation praises Uganda’s oil and gas progress amid mounting land and human rights challenges in the Albertine Region.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio Team

Hoima, Uganda — On May 7, the European Union marked 50 years of partnership with the Government of Uganda during the Europe Day 2026 celebrations in Kampala, attended by EU members, Ugandan officials, development partners, and diplomats.

It’s reported that over the past five decades, the EU has invested EUR 5 billion in development support, alongside a similar amount of European private investment. This partnership progressed to engagements in trade, investment, energy, climate action, education, health, and humanitarian support.

Focusing on sustainable growth of the EU’s support, part of the celebrations involved a visit to the Albertine oil graben by the EU delegation, with several ambassadors from EU countries, to reflect on the ongoing transformations in oil and gas projects in the Albertine region and on the EU’s commitments to its development ambitions.

During the visit on May 19 2026, the EU delegation engaged selected Land and Environmental Defenders (LEDs) from Uganda’s oil-rich Albertine region who are beneficiaries of the Monitoring, Documentation and Advocacy for Human Rights in Uganda (MDA-HRU) project. The project is being implemented by Witness Radio Uganda and the National Coalition of Human Rights Defenders Uganda (NCHRD-U), in partnership with DanChurchAid and funded by the European Union. Besides, the Delegation visited several oil and gas projects and surrounding communities.

The visit concluded on May 20 2026, with a dinner at Hoima City Stadium, attended by Several EU country ambassadors, Hoima Local Government authorities, Hoima City officials, development partners, and Civil society organizations. Addressing the guests, H.E. Jan Sadek, European Union Ambassador to Uganda, noted the large-scale and importance of the oil and gas developments in the mid-western region of Uganda, but also acknowledged the complex social, environmental, and human rights issues that come with such investments.

“The future is already unfolding quickly. Today we were in Buliisa with TotalEnergies and its partners, learning more about one of the largest industrial energy projects in East Africa,” Sadek said.

He thanked TotalEnergies, its General Manager Philippe Groueix, and the company’s staff, praising what he described as their openness and hospitality during the visit.

“What we saw was very impressive in scale and ambition. We visited the Tilenga Central Processing Facility and oil rigs both inside and outside Murchison Falls National Park, and saw efforts to reduce the project’s footprint in the area. These developments are very significant for Hoima and Buliisa, and for Uganda and the wider region.” He added.

Sadek also pointed to Europe’s growing economic ties with Uganda, noting that European firms remain among the country’s largest foreign investors.

“TotalEnergies is not just a major investment in Uganda, but also part of the broader economic relationship between Europe and Uganda. The European Union remains one of Uganda’s biggest export markets outside the region and a long-standing development partner,” he further said.

Challenges amidst oil and gas developments

However, alongside the praise for the sector’s economic potential, land and environmental defenders raised concerns over escalating land pressure, delayed compensation, environmental degradation, and shrinking civic space linked to large-scale oil investments.

The concerns were raised during a European Union feedback and engagement meeting held on May 19 at Miika Eco Resort Hotel in Hoima District. The session brought together land and environmental rights defenders, project partners including Witness Radio Uganda, and European Union representatives to review project progress and assess emerging human rights concerns.

Defenders told the EU delegation that oil-related developments have intensified land pressure in the Albertine region through projects associated with Uganda’s petroleum sector, including the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), Tilenga, and Kingfisher projects.

Participants reported prolonged delays in compensation for households whose land has been acquired or earmarked for oil-related projects, leaving many families facing prolonged uncertainty and livelihood insecurity.

“People are being affected by delayed compensation processes. Some have even rejected the compensation, saying it is too low, even though their land has already been taken. When people raise complaints, they face intimidation,” Gloria Mugonzebwa, one of the defenders, told the Delegation.

Beyond land concerns, defenders raised alarm over increasing human-wildlife conflict, which they linked to ongoing oil exploration and infrastructure development in and around protected ecosystems, including national parks.

They said disturbances associated with construction activities, industrial lighting, forest encroachment, and vibrations have contributed to wildlife displacement into neighboring communities.

Environmental organizations such as the Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO) have previously raised similar concerns, warning that oil activities, climate change, and poaching are reshaping ecosystems in Murchison Falls National Park.

In its 2024 report, How Oil Activities, Climate Change, and Poaching Are Negatively Reshaping Murchison Park, AFIEGO documented that between 2023 and 2024, more than five people were killed in elephant-related incidents, highlighting growing human-wildlife tensions around the park.

Participants also raised concerns over environmental degradation linked to oil development, including deforestation, forest encroachment, and alleged risks of water contamination in affected communities.

“These developments are changing the natural balance. Communities are now living with increased risks from displaced wildlife and environmental disruption,” Nyakato Hellen said.

Uganda has also witnessed the shrinking of civic space for community land and environmental defenders, particularly those questioning the impacts of mega-development projects.

Defenders who attended the meeting said it has become increasingly difficult to document and raise concerns about land and environmental abuses linked to oil investments.

“As activists, the biggest issue has been intimidation, and some defenders have been arrested in the course of their work,” Mr. Biira Kiwanuka Nassa revealed.

Global Witness reported in 2024 that more than 96 arrests linked to environmental activism against oil development activities in Uganda were recorded within only nine months, illustrating the scale of restrictions faced by activists.

“We used to be arrested when we spoke about violations. We had to demonstrate for companies to listen,” one defender said.

Need for sustained dialogue.

In response, the European Union delegation emphasized the importance of sustained dialogue among governments, companies, civil society, and affected communities.

The Delegation acknowledged that large-scale projects, such as oil development, inevitably raise complex questions regarding land rights, compensation, environmental protection, biodiversity, and human rights.

“These issues deserve serious attention and continued dialogue,” the Delegation said.

The Delegation further stressed that inclusive development depends on communities being informed, respected, and meaningfully involved in decisions that affect them.

“Development works best when communities feel included, respected, and heard. That is why our program has included not only meetings with authorities and investors, but also discussions with civil society, community representatives, and local stakeholders,” the Delegation added.

About the MDA-HRU project

DanChurchAid coordinates the project in partnership with Witness Radio. It was designed to promote the protection and respect of human rights and strengthen access to remedy in Uganda’s Mid-Western and Karamoja sub-regions, where private sector actors are increasingly involved in land-based investments.

Speaking at the meeting, Mr. Christopher Kiwanuka, Director of Programs at Witness Radio, welcomed the EU delegation’s assessment mission, noting that it reflects growing recognition of the documentation work undertaken under the MDA-HRU project.

He said the project has strengthened the capacity of land and environmental defenders to document violations and engage duty bearers more effectively.

Uganda’s Mid-Western region remains among the areas most affected by land conflicts linked to large-scale investments, particularly oil development.

Since the discovery of oil in 2006, the sector has generated expectations of economic transformation alongside persistent concerns over displacement, environmental degradation, and unresolved human rights impacts in affected communities.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter