Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Oil palm tree growing in Uganda: The National Oil Palm Project is threatening to evict hundreds of smallholder farmers to expand its operations.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team

Hundreds of residents in Bulima and Bukayo villages, Bulima Sub-county, Buvuma Island District, are on the verge of eviction from the land they have lived and cultivated for generations to pave the way for the expansion of oil palm growing.

Palm oil in Buvuma is a partnership between Oil Palm Buvuma Limited (OPBL), the Ugandan government through the National Oil Palm Project (NOPP), and smallholder farmers who are organized into the Buvuma Oil Palm Out Growers Cooperative Society. OPBL, a subsidiary of Bidco Uganda Limited, manages the project’s nucleus estate.

Palm oil projects worldwide have faced widespread criticism from host communities for being linked to land grabbing and the criminalization of residents who resist their expansion. They are also accused of causing severe environmental degradation due to monoculture planting, massive deforestation, and the destruction of local ecosystems.

In Uganda, where the oil palm project first began in Kalangala District, the scars left on affected communities have never healed. Despite unresolved grievances, unaddressed environmental damage, and injustices, the project has expanded into other districts, including Buvuma, bringing with it similar negative impacts that far outweigh the promised benefits.

According to Witness Radio investigations, more than 300 families in Bulima and Bukayo villages, occupying approximately 356 acres of land, are facing forced eviction. Tensions escalated on the 5th and 6th of September when officials from the National Oil Palm Project (NOPP) arrived on community land with a tractor, allegedly to clear residents’ gardens for palm oil plantation expansion.

Eyewitnesses told Witness Radio that community members resisted the intrusion, stopping the tractors and demanding to know why their land was forcefully being taken without consent or compensation. The confrontation resulted in chaos as residents sought to protect their livelihoods.

Many of the affected residents, who have lived on the land for decades, are left questioning the injustice of their situation. Mr. Adam Kiyonga, one of the affected community members from Bulima Village, revealed that the company claimed to have compensated a one Aloziyo Nakibondwe, the alleged landlord for the same land in 2008. This action has left him and other residents puzzled as to why they are also being displaced without any form of compensation, a stark example of the injustice they are facing.

“The palm oil company had come to raze our gardens to create room for planting oil palm trees. We were told that the company claimed to have bought the land from our ‘landlord’, Aloziyo Nakibondwe. However, we also learned that the company allegedly asked him to compensate the affected tenants, something he never did.

We are surprised that the company now wants to take our land for free. We have heard of other communities whose land was taken without any compensation, and it seems the government wants to do the same to us. We are living in fear because we are likely to lose our only source of livelihood to the oil palm project,” said Adam Kiyonga in an interview with Witness Radio.

Mr. Kiyonga further revealed that the angry residents confronted and chased away the company officials, warning them not to proceed with the eviction without compensation.

“We chased them away because this is our land. “If they hadn’t left, people were ready to burn their tractor,” Kiyonga revealed

According to Kiyonga, people have been paying ground rent, which recognizes their interests in the land being grabbed. “We are bibanja owners, not squatters. We have been paying ground rent, which recognizes our occupancy rights. Why should we be evicted? You can’t just take people’s land because a government backs you up”. He angrily added.

In Uganda, a Kibanja is a form of land holding or tenancy that is subject to the customs and traditions of the Baganda, characterized by user rights and ownership of developments on land in perpetuity, subject to payment of an annual rent (busuulu) and correct social behavior, distinct and separate from ownership of the land on which the developments are made and in respect of which the user and occupancy rights exist.

The contested land is not only home to hundreds of families but also hosts Bukayo Health Center III, several churches, and a mosque. If the evictions go ahead, the community fears losing essential health and worship spaces, as well as their primary means of survival.

“If they take this land, we will have nowhere to go and nothing to live on. The government should either compensate us or leave our land,” Kiyonga added.

For Mr. Dan Wasswa, a 47-year-old father of 13 from Bulima, this is not the first time he has faced eviction linked to the oil palm project. He told Witness Radio that his land, measuring 11.5 acres, was first taken by the company in 2016 for palm oil cultivation.

“In 2014, they told us our landlord, Pascal Kibondwe, had sold the land to NOPP and that we tenants would be compensated on a willing buyer–willing seller basis. When they surveyed my land, they claimed I had 7 acres, but my own survey revealed 11.5 acres. But they compensated me for only 7 acres and at a very low rate.” Wasswa recalled.

He added that in 2021, the company destroyed his remaining 4.5 acres, which had not been compensated for, and planted palm oil trees, which are now at the harvesting stage.

“The other 4.5 acres were taken without any compensation, and the company has already planted on them. Even for the 7 acres they claim to have compensated me for, the money I received was very little. Now, they are targeting another piece of my land in Budima. We are wondering what we can do because this company is acting with total impunity, and no one seems willing to address this problem,” Wasswa added.

Across Buvuma Island District, communities face similar struggles with land loss and displacement due to oil palm expansion.

Wasswa reveals that many communities have lost their land in the process and have been pushed into an uncertain state. “People are being told to vacate their land for the oil palm project, which is described as a public good. They are always promised that compensation will be given to them later, but many have waited in vain and grown tired of demanding what is rightfully theirs. Some communities have now spent more than a decade waiting for compensation,” Wasswa said.

The oil palm project in Buvuma district, which began in sub-counties such as Busamuzi sub-county, to Nairambi Sub-county, has expanded into several areas, including Majjo and Bukula villages, where Witness Radio earlier documented cases of forced evictions, destruction of property, and the criminalization of community members resisting the land grabs.

Despite widespread complaints and protests, residents say the project’s expansion into Bulima and Bukayo continues unchecked.

“If they want our land, they should come, survey it, value it, and compensate us. But we cannot give it away for free. Many people before us were promised compensation that never came. We fear the same fate.” Mr. Kiyonga concluded.

Witness Radio attempted to contact the National Oil Palm Project (NOPP) for comment, but calls to their known contacts went unanswered.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Ugandan farmers take TotalEnergies’ pipeline to UK court

Published

on

Police apprehend a Ugandan activist during a protest against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) plans in Kampala, Uganda, on 15 September, 2023. © Reuters

Four Ugandan farmers filed a case against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) at the UK’s High Court on Tuesday, seeking to have Ugandan constitutional, environmental and climate law applied to EACOP Ltd, the UK-registered company financing the project

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Lawyers Move to Court to Stop New Luxury Tourism Projects in Maasai Mara

Published

on

A coalition of regional legal and environmental organisations has moved to court seeking to halt the approval and development of new luxury tourism facilities in the Maasai Mara National Reserve, arguing that the projects threaten one of the world’s most important wildlife ecosystems.

The petition, filed before the Environment and Land Court, seeks orders stopping further construction of high-end tourist accommodation within the reserve pending the determination of the case.

Those behind the petition include East Africa Law Society, Natural Justice, JustAct and Africa Centre for Peace and Human Rights, who have sued several government agencies and private investors involved in the developments.

Among the respondents are Marriott International, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, Minor Hotels, National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) and the Narok County Government.

Narok Governor Patrick Ole Ntutu and the Maasai Mara National Reserve date in Narok County.
Photo| County Government of Narok / Maasai Mara National Reserve.

The petitioners contend that approvals granted for the tourism developments violated constitutional and environmental safeguards, arguing that the projects were allowed within ecologically sensitive areas meant primarily for wildlife conservation.

Court documents further claim that the developments sit close to critical wildlife habitats and migration routes linking the Maasai Mara ecosystem with Serengeti National Park.

This, according to them, potentially disrupts the annual wildebeest migration that attracts thousands of tourists every year.

They have asked the court to certify the matter as one raising substantial constitutional questions and refer it to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a five-judge bench to hear the case.

The latest legal challenge comes months after the planned opening of the luxury Ritz-Carlton safari camp sparked public debate, with conservationists raising concerns that the facility could interfere with wildlife movement near the Sand River.

At the time, the Kenya Wildlife Service dismissed claims circulating online that the camp had blocked the wildebeest migration, describing videos shared on social media as misleading.

“The Ritz-Carlton safari camp is situated within a designated tourism investment low-use zone, as provided for in the Maasai Mara National Reserve Management Plan, 2023-2032,” KWS said at the time.

The agency also maintained that camps established along the Mara, Sand and Talek rivers have historically coexisted with wildlife movements without obstructing migration.

Source: kenyans.co.ke

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

More than 17,000 people in the Philippines face eviction from their ancestral land for a multimillion-dollar energy project.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team,

In the Visayas and Mindanao regions, in the Iloilo municipality on Panay Island in the central Philippines, thousands of Indigenous Tumandok people face forced displacement as a major energy project advances through their ancestral territories.

The Jalaur River Multi-Purpose Project, a state-backed dam and hydropower initiative, has triggered fears of forced evictions affecting more than 17,000 people and has already submerged ancestral land belonging to Indigenous communities.

The Tumandok have relied on the river basin as burial grounds, fishing sites supporting their livelihoods, and sacred landscapes preserved through oral history and cultural tradition for decades.

In 2012, the Korean Export-Import Bank provided a USD 260 million loan to the Philippine government for a multi-purpose project on the Jalaur River. Authorities present the project as a long-term solution for irrigation, flood control, and hydropower generation, designed to benefit agricultural production across thousands of hectares of farmland. However, host communities say the development has come at a high human cost.

The dam project, which began in the 1960s, entered a new construction phase in 2012, triggering new waves of human rights violations, from attacks and killings to arrests, and is expected to reach full completion in 2027.

As construction progresses, Indigenous ancestral domains within the project-affected watershed—covering approximately 16,780 hectares in the Calinog component—are being impacted by the Jalaur River Multi-Purpose Project Stage II. Community leaders say this is displacing Indigenous families from their homes amid concerns over inadequate consultation and potential violations of Indigenous land rights and free, prior, and informed consent standards.

Article 19 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples requires states to consult and cooperate in good faith with the Indigenous peoples concerned, through their own representative institutions, to obtain their free, prior, and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.

Article 32(b) of the same declaration urges states to make consent the objective of consultation before any projects that affect Indigenous peoples’ rights to land, territory, and resources, including mining and other uses or exploitations of resources.

John Ian Alecianga, coordinator of the Jalaur River People’s Movement, says opposition to the project has drawn allegations of intimidation, killings, arrests, and a heavy security presence in affected communities.

“Mobilizing these indigenous communities to fight for their rights has come at a cost. Indigenous leaders and activists have been subjected to surveillance, harassment, and red-tagging due to their resistance to the dam,” John said in an exclusive interview with our team.

According to John, tensions escalated in December 2020 when a police attack in Tumandok communities killed at least nine Indigenous leaders and elders and led to the arrest of 16 others.

“The military was deployed, human rights were violated, many elders were killed, and others were arrested, escalating into what we call a massacre. A fake search warrant was used in a staged operation to enter the houses of the Tumandok leaders. This is how much the government has ignored the rights of the indigenous peoples from the project conception until the project implementation,” he said. “The event remains one of the most traumatic moments in the ongoing conflict around the project,” John added.

Despite pressure, Indigenous communities continue to resist eviction through local and international advocacy networks, calling for justice for those killed in 2020, recognition of their land rights, and immediate protection from further displacement.

“The people are resisting because land is their life. Without it, there will be no community. There will be no identity,” he said.

The Jalaur River People’s Movement also seeks accountability through international mechanisms, including engagement with South Korean institutions linked to project financing.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates