Connect with us

NGO WORK

Diplomatic Community “Disturbed” By The Narrowing Civic Space

Published

on

In what started as an innocent wave of break-ins into the office premises of non-governmental organizations-especially those working to protect civil and political rights by unknown people over the past six years ago, Uganda’s security apparatus makes a broad-day raid on two NGOs’ offices.

NGOs raided on September 20th include; Action Aid, an anti-poverty international NGO and Great Lakes Initiative for Strategic Studies (GLISS) which have been critical of the move to scrap the presidential age limit.

Article 29 of the constitution of the Uganda’s constitution guarantees the protection of freedom of expression, movement and assembly. Clause 1) of article 29 states that “every person shall have the right to;” (a) freedom of speech and expression which shall include freedom of the press and other media and (d) guarantees freedom to assemble and to demonstrate together with others peacefully and unarmed and to petition.

A police search warrant said the raids were linked to “illicit transfers of funds to support unlawful activities.”

However, Government practice didn’t go down with diplomatic community in Uganda. The US embassy has issued a statement to express its “concern” with the trend.

“The United States is deeply concerned that the recent arrests and raids stifle Ugandan people’s rights to free expression and tarnish Uganda’s global image,” US ambassador to Uganda Deborah R. Malac wrote on September 21, 2017.

Uganda is at a critical stage as regime supporters are pushing for scrapping off of the 75-year age limit of any sitting president as enshrined in the 1995 Constitution of Republic of Uganda under Article 102 (b).

Museveni who has ruled Uganda for over 31years will be 77-years come 2021 when the country would go to polls to elect a new government. As of today the September 21st, 2017, major streets in the capital Kampala are experiencing heavy deployment of security personnel including military police.

In her 51-word statement, Malac added that; “we are disturbed by reports of raids on NGOs. Infringements on protected rights under the Uganda’s Constitution will impede the country’s development.”

She thus conclude that “we call on the Government of Uganda to guarantee all its citizens freedom of speech, expression, and assembly, without fear of intimidation.”

Pattern of Shrinking Civic Rights in Uganda:

The Uganda government has gradually, but seriously focused its energies on enacting oppressive laws all aimed at curtailing civic space, freedom of speech, expression and assembly in the ascending order.

In 2013, Government sponsored the Public Order Management act which made it mandatory for three or more people with interest to gather publically to discuss political issues, to seek approval from police.

The act, gave police discretionary powers to veto gatherings of as few as three people in a public place to discuss political issues. Police can also break-up meetings of three or more people discussing political issues in their own homes.

Police must receive written notice of public meetings seven days in advance and they may only take place between 7am to 6pm.

Targeting NGOs; in 2015, government passed the NGO act. The law gave the Internal Affairs Minister and National NGO board powers to supervise, approve, inspect and dissolve NGOs for what they termed as “for public interest.”

Operating without a permit, according to the NGO act could result in fine, prosecution and jail sentence of up to eight years for organization directors upon conviction.

Engaging in “any activity contrary to the dignity of the people of Uganda,” clause worried rights groups who still contend that it is open to wide interpretation.

Online civic space is not spared neither. In the run-up to the debate on whether or not to lift presidential age limit, the Executive Director of Uganda Communications Commission (UCC) Godfrey Mutabazi, issued a warning letter to Ugandans against what he termed as “irresponsible use of social and electronic media platforms.”  He said, he would arrest and prosecute anyone ‘misusing’ the platforms.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NGO WORK

UN Experts Put Tanzanian Government on Notice – “Ensure Transparency and Respect for Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Ngorongoro”

Published

on

April 17, 2026 press release from the offices of eight UN Special Rapporteurs1 calls for the Tanzanian government to immediately publish the findings of two presidential commissions amid growing concerns over its eviction plans.
The communication echoes the Oakland Institute’s warning that these sham Presidential Commissions are being used to rubber-stamp eviction plans without the consent of the Indigenous community.
The strongly-worded communication from the UN Special Rapporteurs states that “these reports are of profound public interest and must be made available to the public without delay…Decisions affecting tens of thousands of Indigenous Peoples cannot be taken behind closed doors.” The experts furthermore urge “the Government to halt any actions that could lead to forced displacement, and engage in meaningful dialogue with affected communities,” while issuing a clear reminder that “Indigenous Peoples have a right to remain on their traditional lands if they so choose…Conservation efforts must not come at the expense of human rights.”
Impacted Maasai communities welcome this intervention from the UN Special Rapporteurs and reaffirm their commitment to defend their rights to remain on their ancestral lands.
To learn more about the struggle against Fortress Conservation, watch the interview: The Dark Side of “Conservation”
On Fox 5 DC Weekend Live, Julie Donaldson interviews Andy Currier, Oakland Institute’s Policy Analyst. Watch the discussion on fortress conservation and the human cost of climate solutions that displace Indigenous communities who best protect our biodiversity.

Watch the video

Source: oaklandinstitute.org

Continue Reading

NGO WORK

Two dead as Siaya protests against gold mining firm turn tragic

Published

on

Ikolomani residents protesting against eviction plan to pave space for British mining company Shanta Gold on November 12, 2025. Two people died in similar protests in Gem, Siaya County.  Isaac Wale | Nation Media Group

Two people were shot dead on Monday in Gem–Ramula, Siaya County, after villagers staged a protest over an alleged eviction they linked to Shanta Gold Kenya Limited.

Area police boss Charles Wafula confirmed the incident, stating that the victims were among a group alleged to have attacked a police post after the officers moved in to disperse the demonstrators.

According to Mr Wafula, the demonstrators, angered by what they described as an illegal resettlement by the company, stormed the station during the protest, prompting officers to intervene.

“The individuals had organised a demonstration but they did not notify the police. Our officers moved in to contain the situation, but the group began attacking both officers and Ramula Police Post, damaging several items, including vehicles,” Mr Wafula said.

However, a local rights organisation has sharply contested the police account, portraying the killings as unlawful and unprovoked.

In a statement, the Community Initiative Action Group Kenya said the two victims identified as Henry Otieno and Jack Omenda were part of a peaceful protest against what they termed a forced eviction from their ancestral land.

“The community had gathered peacefully to demonstrate against Shanta Gold Limited’s attempt to relocate them without their consent,” said the lobby’s Executive Director Chris Owalla.

The group further alleged that police officers opened fire without warning following a confrontation with residents at Ramula Market.

“Witnesses state there was an exchange between the community and police after which officers opened fire, killing Henry and Jack on the spot,” Mr Owalla said.

The rights group also accused senior police officers including Mr Wafula and Charles Emodo of Directorate of Criminal Investigation, of disregarding a court order that had halted evictions and mining operations in the area.

According to Mr Owalla, the Environment and Land Court in Siaya had, on February 5, 2026, issued conservatory orders barring any involuntary resettlement of residents in Ramula and its environs, pending the hearing of a petition.

The organisation is now calling for investigations by the Independent Policing Oversight Authority and the the Director of Public Prosecutions, alongside an independent autopsy on the victims.

Fear of evictions

The unrest is rooted in long-standing tensions over planned gold mining operations by Shanta Gold in the region. The company is seeking to establish a large-scale extraction project – one that residents fear could uproot communities and erode livelihoods carefully built over generations.

Similar scenes of unrest were reported in November 2025 in Ikolomani, where locals protested against possible relocations linked to the same company.

Shanta Gold has previously signalled its intention to invest in a multi-billion-shilling project in western Kenya, targeting high-grade gold deposits expected to yield significant output over several years.

Source: nation.africa

Continue Reading

NGO WORK

Tanzania: Commissions call for mass eviction of Indigenous Maasai from world-famous tourist destinations.

Published

on

Two presidential commissions have recommended the mass eviction of Maasai people from some of East Africa’s most iconic conservation areas and tourist destinations.

The commissions were established by Tanzania’s President Samia Suluhu Hassan following previous evictions of Maasai pastoralists from parts of the world-famous Serengeti ecosystem, and large-scale protests in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area in 2024.

Now, despite a global outcry at the earlier evictions, the two Commissions have:

  • Backed the previous evictions and called for them to continue, including in the UNESCO World Heritage Sites of Ngorongoro and neighboring Lake Natron.
  • Described the long-standing Maasai presence in the area as an “environmental pressure” that needs to be reduced.
  • Threatened local NGOs that support the Maasai, accusing them of “spreading misinformation or propaganda” because they “conflict with government interests.”
  • Called for the “relocation” of all “non-conservation activities” [in other words, Maasai occupancy of the land] outside the conservation areas.
  • Called for existing recognition of the Maasai people’s right to live in the Ngorongoro area to be removed.

An anonymous Maasai spokesperson said today: “We are blamed for environmental degradation while the unchecked expansion of tourism is ignored. Forced relocation, disguised as policy, has deprived our people of basic rights and dignity. We reject any continuation of these measures and condemn the Commission’s failure to reflect the voices, realities, and rights of our people.”

Still from a video showing the Maasai protesting the violent evictions from their ancestral lands, 2022.

The authorities maintain that these are “voluntary relocations.” However, the Maasai have overwhelmingly rejected being moved.

The Ngorongoro Conservation Area is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. When it was established, the ancestral right of the Maasai to live there with their cattle was explicitly acknowledged. But UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee has backed the so-called “voluntary relocations”, and UNESCO endorses the “fortress conservation” model that underpins Tanzania’s approach.

Survival International Director Caroline Pearce said today, “These commissions were a sham, a gimmick designed to give Tanzania’s violent persecution of the Maasai a veneer of respectability. It was widely predicted that they’d back further evictions: the whole saga just confirms that colonial-style fortress conservation is alive and well in Tanzania today, and enthusiastically endorsed by UNESCO.

“These recommendations give the green light to more evictions, in Ngorongoro and beyond. And while the Maasai are robbed of their lands and livelihood, the government, tour operators and so-called conservationists will enrich themselves from a landscape emptied of its original owners.”

Source: survivalinternational.org

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter