Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Communities file second complaint against World Bank-funded project over failed redress in Tanzania.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team

In southern Tanzania, a conservation project supported by one of the world’s most powerful financial institutions has caused violence, fear, and ruined livelihoods. The project, intended to boost tourism, protect biodiversity, and increase access to alternative work for specific communities, has become a clear example of how development financing can lead to human rights abuses and evade accountability.

Tanzania’s Resilient Natural Resource Management for Tourism and Growth project (REGROW), funded by a $150 million credit from the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank, was approved in September 2017. Its goal was to develop Ruaha National Park (RUNAPA). With the Bank’s financing, the government doubled the park’s size to turn it into a premier safari destination and boost economic growth. However, for tens of thousands of people living on that land, the outcome has been quite different.

From the beginning, communities say they were left out of decisions that would drastically change their lives. Villages that had long been legally recognized suddenly found themselves within a conservation zone they had no role in creating.

“The community living on that land was not consulted, and neither did it give prior informed consent to the decision to expand the park from one million to two million hectares. To enable this expansion, TANAPA rangers carried out violent campaigns, including killings of villagers, forced disappearances, and the destruction of livelihoods,” Anuradha Mittal, Executive Director of the Oakland Institute, told a Witness Radio journalist. This US think tank has been helping the affected communities to access justice.

According to testimonies from affected residents and subsequent findings confirmed by the World Bank’s own Inspection Panel, the park expansion was enforced through violence.

“People living here are suffering greatly at the hands of the national park authority, TANAPA, and armed rangers. They treat us cruelly, including killings, and we have no proper reason for this. The rangers have taken the land from farmers and pastoralists, seized cattle, and forced us off our ancestral land. The government and project financiers have done nothing to address this harm,” an affected resident revealed.

More than 84,000 people from over 28 villages have reportedly been affected by the project.

“Apart from other violations, including violent beatings and assaults, over a dozen villagers have been killed by rangers funded by the Bank. There are newspaper reports documenting these killings and the violence,” Mittal added.  

Acknowledged Harm, No Justice.

On behalf of the affected communities, the Oakland Institute filed a complaint with the World Bank’s Inspection Panel regarding human rights violations associated with the multi-million-dollar project.

“We first approached the World Bank on behalf of the communities in 2023 to explain the harms caused by its financing. When the Bank did nothing, we filed a complaint at the Inspection Panel about how devastating this financing has been for communities living on legally recognized land, who are now facing forced resettlement,” Mittal explained.  

“The World Bank’s Inspection Panel confirmed that the project violated its own policies and international human rights standards, underscoring the need for accountability and justice.”

“The Bank announced a plan for redress, including a multi-million-dollar fund and specific measures such as community consultations, land restitution, and independent monitoring to address the harms.” However, little has changed in practice.  

In its investigation report, the Bank acknowledged issues in the project’s planning and oversight that led to serious harm. The report included suggestions to address the harm and proposed a $2.8 million initiative to support alternative livelihoods for communities inside and around the park.

“Despite promises, the Oakland Institute reports that similar initiatives in other projects have led to tangible improvements, yet here, restrictions persist, and communities remain in hardship, highlighting the need for more effective accountability.”

“The two new projects meant to support communities affected by REGROW have both failed to provide enough redress. The $110 million ‘Scaling-up Locally Led Climate Action Program’ (SCALE)—national in scope and focused on building government capacity—does not specifically target impacted communities. The separate $2.8 million ‘Promoting Community-Led Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in the Usangu Catchment’ project reaches only a small fraction of those affected,” a statement reads.

A Second complaint and a warning.

With concerns growing about the World Bank Group’s failure to implement recommendations from its own Inspection Panel, affected communities backed by the Oakland Institute have now

filed a second complaint through the Bank’s internal grievance system.

This step shows mounting frustration among residents and advocates, who believe the Bank has not acted on its own findings or ensured that real remedies are implemented on the ground.

“The communities are using every available option to hold the Bank’s accountable,” Mittal said in an interview with Witness Radio.

The new complaint comes amid ongoing reports of restricted livelihoods, insecurity, and pressure on communities to leave their land, despite the cancellation of the REGROW project.

“Despite the cancellation and a plan to address the damage caused by the World Bank, affected villagers still cannot live on their land, farm, or graze their cattle without risking death at the hands of park rangers. The plan, at best, undermines the Bank’s so-called commitment to remedy the harms caused by its financing. Communities deserve justice, and the Bank must be held accountable,” Mittal added.

Through this new complaint, Mittal points out that the communities have exhausted every avenue within the Bank’s accountability system in their quest for justice. “It is time for the Bank to meet its obligations, fulfill its legal responsibilities under international law, and uphold its own promises regarding accountability. As Tanzania’s largest donor, it has both the means and the influence to stop this harm and fix the damage it has caused. As an institution meant to fight poverty, it cannot remain idle while it has driven tens of thousands into hardship,” she concluded.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Ugandan farmers take TotalEnergies’ pipeline to UK court

Published

on

Police apprehend a Ugandan activist during a protest against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) plans in Kampala, Uganda, on 15 September, 2023. © Reuters

Four Ugandan farmers filed a case against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) at the UK’s High Court on Tuesday, seeking to have Ugandan constitutional, environmental and climate law applied to EACOP Ltd, the UK-registered company financing the project

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Lawyers Move to Court to Stop New Luxury Tourism Projects in Maasai Mara

Published

on

A coalition of regional legal and environmental organisations has moved to court seeking to halt the approval and development of new luxury tourism facilities in the Maasai Mara National Reserve, arguing that the projects threaten one of the world’s most important wildlife ecosystems.

The petition, filed before the Environment and Land Court, seeks orders stopping further construction of high-end tourist accommodation within the reserve pending the determination of the case.

Those behind the petition include East Africa Law Society, Natural Justice, JustAct and Africa Centre for Peace and Human Rights, who have sued several government agencies and private investors involved in the developments.

Among the respondents are Marriott International, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, Minor Hotels, National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) and the Narok County Government.

Narok Governor Patrick Ole Ntutu and the Maasai Mara National Reserve date in Narok County.
Photo| County Government of Narok / Maasai Mara National Reserve.

The petitioners contend that approvals granted for the tourism developments violated constitutional and environmental safeguards, arguing that the projects were allowed within ecologically sensitive areas meant primarily for wildlife conservation.

Court documents further claim that the developments sit close to critical wildlife habitats and migration routes linking the Maasai Mara ecosystem with Serengeti National Park.

This, according to them, potentially disrupts the annual wildebeest migration that attracts thousands of tourists every year.

They have asked the court to certify the matter as one raising substantial constitutional questions and refer it to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a five-judge bench to hear the case.

The latest legal challenge comes months after the planned opening of the luxury Ritz-Carlton safari camp sparked public debate, with conservationists raising concerns that the facility could interfere with wildlife movement near the Sand River.

At the time, the Kenya Wildlife Service dismissed claims circulating online that the camp had blocked the wildebeest migration, describing videos shared on social media as misleading.

“The Ritz-Carlton safari camp is situated within a designated tourism investment low-use zone, as provided for in the Maasai Mara National Reserve Management Plan, 2023-2032,” KWS said at the time.

The agency also maintained that camps established along the Mara, Sand and Talek rivers have historically coexisted with wildlife movements without obstructing migration.

Source: kenyans.co.ke

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

More than 17,000 people in the Philippines face eviction from their ancestral land for a multimillion-dollar energy project.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team,

In the Visayas and Mindanao regions, in the Iloilo municipality on Panay Island in the central Philippines, thousands of Indigenous Tumandok people face forced displacement as a major energy project advances through their ancestral territories.

The Jalaur River Multi-Purpose Project, a state-backed dam and hydropower initiative, has triggered fears of forced evictions affecting more than 17,000 people and has already submerged ancestral land belonging to Indigenous communities.

The Tumandok have relied on the river basin as burial grounds, fishing sites supporting their livelihoods, and sacred landscapes preserved through oral history and cultural tradition for decades.

In 2012, the Korean Export-Import Bank provided a USD 260 million loan to the Philippine government for a multi-purpose project on the Jalaur River. Authorities present the project as a long-term solution for irrigation, flood control, and hydropower generation, designed to benefit agricultural production across thousands of hectares of farmland. However, host communities say the development has come at a high human cost.

The dam project, which began in the 1960s, entered a new construction phase in 2012, triggering new waves of human rights violations, from attacks and killings to arrests, and is expected to reach full completion in 2027.

As construction progresses, Indigenous ancestral domains within the project-affected watershed—covering approximately 16,780 hectares in the Calinog component—are being impacted by the Jalaur River Multi-Purpose Project Stage II. Community leaders say this is displacing Indigenous families from their homes amid concerns over inadequate consultation and potential violations of Indigenous land rights and free, prior, and informed consent standards.

Article 19 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples requires states to consult and cooperate in good faith with the Indigenous peoples concerned, through their own representative institutions, to obtain their free, prior, and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.

Article 32(b) of the same declaration urges states to make consent the objective of consultation before any projects that affect Indigenous peoples’ rights to land, territory, and resources, including mining and other uses or exploitations of resources.

John Ian Alecianga, coordinator of the Jalaur River People’s Movement, says opposition to the project has drawn allegations of intimidation, killings, arrests, and a heavy security presence in affected communities.

“Mobilizing these indigenous communities to fight for their rights has come at a cost. Indigenous leaders and activists have been subjected to surveillance, harassment, and red-tagging due to their resistance to the dam,” John said in an exclusive interview with our team.

According to John, tensions escalated in December 2020 when a police attack in Tumandok communities killed at least nine Indigenous leaders and elders and led to the arrest of 16 others.

“The military was deployed, human rights were violated, many elders were killed, and others were arrested, escalating into what we call a massacre. A fake search warrant was used in a staged operation to enter the houses of the Tumandok leaders. This is how much the government has ignored the rights of the indigenous peoples from the project conception until the project implementation,” he said. “The event remains one of the most traumatic moments in the ongoing conflict around the project,” John added.

Despite pressure, Indigenous communities continue to resist eviction through local and international advocacy networks, calling for justice for those killed in 2020, recognition of their land rights, and immediate protection from further displacement.

“The people are resisting because land is their life. Without it, there will be no community. There will be no identity,” he said.

The Jalaur River People’s Movement also seeks accountability through international mechanisms, including engagement with South Korean institutions linked to project financing.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's news and report updates