MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
A German Bank is under intense scrutiny for its irresponsible banking practices, which have been directly linked to displacement and human rights abuses.
Published
1 year agoon

By Witness Radio Team.
Germany’s state-owned development bank, KfW, is facing heavy criticism after a new report exposed how its financing is linked to land grabs, community repression, and human rights violations across the Global South. This injustice is being perpetrated against community members and human rights defenders who, in the face of such adversity, continue to oppose projects linked to KfW bravely.
The report, titled Irresponsible Banking and produced by the Coalition for Human Rights in Development, is not just a crucial revelation but a significant milestone in the fight for justice. It uncovers that while KfW projects are branded as sustainable and pro-development, their impacts tell a darker story of dispossession and violence.
KfW, which operates through its subsidiaries KfW Development Bank, DEG, and IPEX-Bank, is one of the World’s most prominent development financiers. It is backed entirely by the German state. The German government, as the sole shareholder of KfW, has a direct responsibility to ensure that the bank’s operations align with international human rights standards, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and Germany’s own Supply Chain Due Diligence Act. On paper, the bank promises to uphold strict environmental and social safeguards, respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, and protect communities from harm. In practice, however, the report finds that these promises remain an empty rhetoric.
According to the findings, several sources interviewed for this analysis, as well as reports by other human rights organizations, denounce the adverse human rights impacts of KfW-funded development projects. In particular, there are numerous cases of threats and attacks against HRDs and community members who oppose KfW-funded projects.
Communities affected by these projects are rarely given adequate information, and when consultations take place, they are frequently rushed, manipulated, or conducted in languages people cannot understand. Far from protecting Indigenous rights, the bank’s operations often sideline them altogether, leaving communities vulnerable to loss of land, culture, and livelihoods.
KfW is funded with public money and is meant to serve the public good. Instead, its negligence has left a trail of suffering. By allowing projects to proceed without proper safeguards, the bank is complicit in dispossession, violence, and environmental destruction.
“KfW calls it ‘responsible banking’, but it’s using German taxpayers’ money to bankroll projects that displace Indigenous Peoples, destroy ecosystems, and endanger human rights defenders. If KfW wants to demonstrate real responsibility, it needs to listen to local communities and ensure their voices are not silenced”, says Dalile Antunez, the report’s author and researcher at the Coalition for Human Rights in Development.
The consequences are visible in case after case. On Indonesia’s Flores Island, the Ulumbu Geothermal Plant expansion, financed with KfW support, is tearing through Indigenous Poco Leok land. Sacred sites and ancestral graves have been desecrated—local activists who resist report surveillance, intimidation, and even physical attacks. Mr. Jimmy Ginting and his fellow activists are fighting against the planned expansion of the Ulumbu Geothermal Power Plant in Poco Leok, which is being implemented by Indonesian state-owned utility company PLN Limited Liability and financed by a KfW loan. The project, which is being implemented without the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent of the Indigenous community, is a clear violation of their rights.
“By not stopping their financing of the project, KfW is actually complicit in human rights violations in Poco Leok,” says Jimmy Ginting, a local human rights defender who has been supporting the struggle of the Indigenous community in Poco Leok.
In Mexico, KfW financing has supported the Topolobampo Ammonia Plant, a project threatening critical wetlands and the livelihoods of fishing communities. Fisherfolk warn that their waters are being poisoned, their future stripped away. Yet the bank’s money continues to flow.
In Sinaloa state in Topolobampo, Mexico, KfW is working together with the company Gas y Petroquímica de Occidente S.A., by financing the construction of their ammonia plant that produces fertilizer. Ms. Claudia Susana Quintero, who founded the collective ¡Aquí no! that is opposing the Mexican project, reported on their experiences and described the project impacts and reprisals they face.
“The ecological damage brought by the project is immense and irreversible. We are told that a loss of over 60 % of local species can be observed, not to speak of the health risks, caused by the poisonous steam from the ammonia plant and the destruction of the residential fishing site that 4000 families depend on.” She revealed during the report launch webinar, which was also aired live on Witness Radio airwaves.
KfW’s investment is now further dividing our communities. From divisionism to criminalization, reports Ms Quintero, who has been fighting for the rights of the indigenous population and nature for 11 years.
“The ecological effects are immense, but the effects on the community cannot be quantified as well. The company did not offer comprehensive information about the impacts beforehand. It had already entered and divided the community before we could organize ourselves and insist on our right of inclusion. Opposing members of the community are confronted with death threats, physical violence, and criminalisation. We were free before that, but now my family and I live in fear of retaliation. Our lives don’t mean anything to them. I go to sleep every day, thinking that one day my children and I will not wake up again.”Quintero added.
In Tanzania’s Mahenge district, the Epanko Graphite Mine, backed by DEG, another KfW subsidiary, has raised alarm over forced displacement, land loss, and reprisals. Local voices critical of the mine speak of harassment and intimidation, echoing the same pattern of neglect and abuse found in Indonesia and Mexico.
What ties these cases together is not only the harm caused but also the silence of a bank that should be protecting people, not exposing them to danger. The report highlights how KfW has no robust policy to deal with reprisals against activists. Human rights defenders who speak against destructive projects face threats, beatings, and lawsuits, while the bank looks the other way. Its lack of transparency exacerbates the problem, as affected communities often cannot access critical information about the projects that are reshaping their lives.
In a video message during the online launch of the report, Dr. Pichamon Yeophantong, a member of the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights, underlined the special obligations of development banks (DFIs), like KfW. As official agents and an essential part of international development cooperation, they are obligated to act responsibly and fulfill specific moral standards in alignment with the United Nations’ guiding principles on business and human rights.
The Coalition for Human Rights in Development is calling on KfW to take urgent action. The report recommends that the bank adopt a strong and enforceable anti-reprisals policy that includes systematic risk assessments and immediate protection measures when threats emerge.
It urges KfW to guarantee genuine Free, Prior and Informed Consent for Indigenous Peoples, ensuring that they have the right not just to be consulted but to say no to harmful projects. Transparency must be drastically improved, with all project information disclosed in local languages and in accessible formats.
Monitoring must become independent, and accountability mechanisms must be strengthened to provide real remedies when rights are violated. Finally, the report stresses that when harm persists, KfW must be prepared to suspend or withdraw financing rather than continue enabling abuses.
Related posts:

Indonesia: 46 companies linked to allegations of human rights and environmental abuses associated with 2nd largest palm oil producer; incl. cos. responses and non-responses
Development financiers fuel human rights abuses – New Report
Campaign Victory: World Bank Suspends Funding for REGROW, a Conservation Project Responsible for Evictions & Human Rights Abuses in Tanzania
Uganda: the number of community environmental and land rights defenders targeted for challenging irresponsible business practices has reached more than 1500 victims as of June 31st, 2023.
You may like
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Lands Ministry tightens rules for replacing lost titles, gives landowners 30 days to object
Published
22 hours agoon
October 21, 2026
KAMPALA — The Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development has introduced stricter procedures for replacing lost, destroyed or damaged land titles, requiring public notices, physical inspections and stronger verification to curb fraud and protect legitimate landowners.
Under new guidelines presented by Lands Minister Judith Nabakooba on Tuesday, applications for Special Certificates of Title will be subjected to a mandatory notice period of at least 30 days, during which people claiming an interest in the land can raise objections before a replacement title is issued.
The measures seek to close loopholes that have enabled fraudulent land transactions, impersonation, double sales and disputes over ownership by strengthening checks before the government issues replacement documents.
The guidelines require the ministry to publish notices in the Uganda Gazette for at least 30 days, display them on the relevant land and at sub-county and Local Council I notice boards, and publish monthly lists of applications in a newspaper of wide circulation.
The ministry will also publish details of the affected land parcels and applicants on its website for the same period, allowing potential claimants and other interested parties to scrutinise applications.
Any person alleging fraud, competing ownership claims, double sale, impersonation, unlawful retention or another material irregularity will be allowed to lodge a formal objection with the Registrar of Titles within the applicable notice period.
Where an objection is received, the registrar must summon the parties for a hearing and make a ruling, giving those who may be affected an opportunity to be heard before a decision is made.
The guidelines are anchored in the Registration of Titles Act and other applicable laws, including the Constitution and the Land Act. They provide for the issuance of Special Certificates where duplicate certificates have been lost, destroyed or become so damaged that they are unusable, as well as cases where a court orders their issuance.
Beyond paperwork and public notices, the ministry will require physical inspections and, where necessary, boundary-opening exercises to establish the status of land before approving applications.
The exercises must be conducted by a government surveyor together with a registrar of titles or land officer, in the presence of the Local Council I committee, which must have a quorum of five members.
Inspection reports will document the proceedings, people present, developments on the land, occupancy and current use. The requirement is intended to provide additional evidence about the property and help identify competing claims that may not be apparent from the documents submitted.
Applicants seeking replacement titles for lost documents must submit a statutory declaration, proof of payment of the required fees, a national identity document, passport-size photographs, a police form reporting the loss, an LC I committee report and an inspection or boundary-opening report.
They must also provide evidence of publication through a Gazette notice and newspaper advertisement, alongside a local notice.
For titles that have been obliterated, applicants must surrender the damaged duplicate certificate and provide supporting documents, including a statutory declaration, identification and inspection reports.
The guidelines also introduce specific requirements for administrators and executors seeking Special Certificates of Title on behalf of deceased persons’ estates.
In addition to the general application documents, they must provide an inventory, letters of probate or administration, and a copy of the petition for probate or letters of administration.
The additional requirements are intended to establish that applicants have the legal authority to act for the deceased person’s estate before a replacement title is issued.
For court-directed applications, the person seeking implementation of the order must submit a formal letter and a certified copy of the court order. The Registrar of Titles must independently verify the order with the court that issued it before proceeding.
Under the new framework, a replacement title cannot be approved merely because an applicant reports that the original document is missing.
The registrar must establish that the original certificate was genuine, the applicant has been properly identified and is legally authorised to apply, and the loss, destruction or damage has been sufficiently demonstrated.
The registrar must also confirm that the transaction is genuine, relevant dealings and encumbrances have been identified, recognised pending transactions have been completed, and no unresolved legal matter prevents issuance.
The proposed Special Certificate must accurately reflect the particulars contained in the Register Book, which serves as the official record of registered land interests.
Every decision to approve, defer, reject or suspend an application must be documented with reasons. The ministry will also require material steps in the process to be recorded and stored in both physical and electronic formats to improve accountability and traceability.
Once issued, the Special Certificate must contain the relevant register particulars, endorsements and the reason for its issuance. The Register Book must also be updated with the issuance date, application number, reference to the previous certificate and relevant Gazette notice or court order, where applicable.
The guidelines are intended to strengthen the integrity of Uganda’s land registration system while providing an avenue for people with legitimate interests to challenge questionable applications before replacement titles are issued.
They also reinforce the principle that land registration procedures must be conducted in accordance with the law and with due regard to the rights of lawful and bona fide occupants protected under Article 237 of the Constitution.
Source: pmldaily.com
Related posts:

Lands ministry rejects call to save over 300 Masaka residents facing eviction
An early bird: oil-affected communities have launched a petition to the Lands Ministry, seeking protection of their rights in the face of forced acquisitions.
Uganda’s top Lands Ministry official has been arrested and charged with Corruption and Abuse of Office, a significant event that will have far-reaching implications for land governance in the country.
Mubende land grabs: Two land titles covering over 6800 hectares of land in Kiganda sub-County, Mubende district have been cancelled
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
World Food Day 2026: Building healthy diets means reimagining how we grow, share, and enjoy our food.
Published
6 days agoon
October 16, 2026
By the Witness Radio team.
In 2024, hunger affected an estimated 673 million people worldwide, the 2025 State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report reveals, underscoring the urgent need to ensure everyone can access enough nutritious food.
Africa bears a heavy share of this crisis. Hunger affects about 307 million people, more than one in five on the continent. If nothing changes, experts warn that by 2030, as many as 512 million people could face chronic undernourishment, with nearly 60 percent living in Africa.
These numbers make it clear: we must transform our food systems now. It is not just about growing more food; it’s about ensuring everyone can enjoy diets that are diverse, safe, nourishing, and rooted in culture.
On World Food Day 2026, celebrated under the banner “Innovate Today, Nourish Tomorrow,” leaders urged the world to invest boldly in healthy eating, indigenous food traditions and agricultural breakthroughs that truly serve people’s needs.
Italy’s Minister for Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forestry, Francesco Lollobrigida, called for greater attention to healthy, balanced and sustainable diets, linking food consumption to human health, cultural heritage and environmental protection.
“To nourish tomorrow, it isn’t enough to invest in innovation and research and in waste reduction. We must also promote dietary habits that are healthy, balanced and sustainable, capitalizing on the deep link between food, health, culture and territory,” Lollobrigida said.
He highlighted Italy’s food culture as a living example of how what we eat can weave together nutrition, environmental care, and the fabric of social life.
“Food isn’t just nutrition; it’s a way of spending time together defending and protecting our environment and our health,” he said.
The minister also urged everyone to unite to tackle food waste, a challenge that stretches from farm fields to family tables. He stressed that governments, businesses, researchers and consumers must join forces through smart policies, new technologies and better food education to end waste.
While Italy’s minister focused on eating habits, King Letsie III of Lesotho, David Mohato Bereng Seeiso, called on African nations to embrace their indigenous foods, crops and traditional wisdom to boost nutrition.
The King noted Africa’s rich tapestry of traditional foods, livestock and aquatic resources, many perfectly suited to local environments and packed with nutrition. Yet he observed researchers, markets and public campaigns too often overlook these treasures.
“Countries must be assisted to promote indigenous traditional and underutilized foods as part of healthier diets, biodiversity conservation, climate adaptation and local economic development,” he said.
He added that building value chains around locally adapted foods could open doors for smallholder farmers, women and young entrepreneurs, all while helping communities safeguard their food heritage.
“While restoring pride in Africa’s food heritage, innovation does not mean abandoning tradition; it means combining the best of modern science with the knowledge and experience of our communities. Nourishing tomorrow should also begin with investing in children today,” King Letsie III added.
His words highlight the need to help farmers preserve locally adapted crops and seeds while harnessing science to boost harvests and nutrition.
FAO Director-General Qu Dongyu said scientific innovation should be judged by its contribution to people’s lives rather than by technological advances alone.
“Innovation is not only about the technology, but it’s also about people. It is about enabling people to turn knowledge into opportunity, science into solutions and hope into action,” he said.
He cited satellite monitoring, early-warning systems, improved irrigation, and digital technologies as tools that can help farmers protect harvests, manage resources, and access markets and financial services.
Today, science provides farmers with tools previous generations could hardly have imagined. Satellites monitor crops from space, helping detect threats before harvests are lost. Early warning systems give farming families time to prepare for droughts, floods and other risks. Smarter irrigation lets farmers produce more food while using less water. Digital technologies connect rural communities to markets, financial services, and networks once out of reach, especially for smallholder farmers. These innovations can strengthen food security, stabilize incomes and create better opportunities for future generations.
Yet innovation alone is not enough. Its true value lies in reaching those who need it most and ensuring successful solutions can be shared and scaled up. The most effective innovations are those developed with farmers and rural communities, considering their needs, knowledge and local conditions, he said.
King Letsie III said transforming food systems requires political leadership, stronger institutions, and adequate nutrition financing.
“Our parOur parliamentarians approve budgets, enact laws, oversee government action and represent citizens’ priorities. I therefore welcome FAO’s engagement with the Pan-African Parliament and national and sub-regional parliamentary alliances on food security and nutrition. Through parliamentary capacity development, FAO is helping legislators create stronger enabling environments. Parliamentarians can and should champion adequate financing for nutrition, protect school meal budgets, promote healthy food environments, improve food safety laws, support women and youth and hold institutions accountable for the commitments made to our people.” He said.
He highlighted school feeding programs as one way to improve children’s diets while creating markets for locally produced food.
Nutritious school meals are a strategic investment that can improve diets, attendance, and learning; strengthen social protection; and create steady demand for locally produced food. Homegrown school meals connect agriculture, nutrition, education and local economic development. School meals should do more than relieve short-term hunger. They should support physical and cognitive development, encourage lifelong healthy habits, strengthen local economies and provide practical learning on nutrition, food safety, hygiene, biodiversity and respect for food. Safe water, sanitation and hygiene are also essential to ensure every meal advances health, dignity and learning, he added.
These leaders’ voices send a clear message: we must bridge the gap between what is grown in fields and what nourishes people’s bodies and lives.
Africa needs stronger links among farmers, researchers, universities, policymakers, entrepreneurs and investors. Solutions that show promise must move beyond pilots and laboratories, be adapted to local realities and scaled through effective institutions and sustainable financing,” the King said.
He emphasized that young people must be at the heart of this movement, with skills, funding, land, digital tools, mentors, and access to markets.
Related posts:

Global hunger falls, but millions in Africa still go without food, says UN
While hunger continues to grip the world, a new report highlights forests and forest foods as a hidden treasure trove of nourishment.
Agroecological Entrepreneurship: African farmers are redefining agriculture by building agroecological businesses that challenge industrial models.
Wars are disrupting food systems, and ending world hunger requires urgent global action, experts say.
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
International Day of Rural Women : Rural women farmers deserve not only equal rights and access to resources, but also the strength and voice to safeguard Mother Nature.
Published
6 days agoon
October 16, 2026
By the Witness Radio Team.
As the world marks the International Day of Rural Women on 15 October 2026, with the theme “Rural Women Farmers Caring for Mother Nature,” the spotlight shines on women whose tireless efforts nourish food systems, shield biodiversity, and safeguard the natural resources that sustain entire communities.
This year’s celebration carries special weight as the United Nations declares 2026 the International Year of the Woman Farmer, spotlighting women’s vital roles across agri-food systems, from planting seeds to driving trade. This recognition opens the door to challenge the persistent inequalities that threaten women’s livelihoods and silence their voices in decisions about agriculture, land, and the environment.
In its statement marking the day, UN Women called for rural women’s rights, resources and decision-making power to match their contributions to food systems and environmental protection.
“On this day, we celebrate their knowledge and leadership in building a more resilient future. Yet their rights, resources and decision-making power too often fall short of their contributions,” UN Women said.
The agency called on governments and other groups to ensure women have enforceable rights to land, water, and natural resources. It also asked for better access to finance, markets, technology, and agricultural services, as well as decent work, social protection, and strong infrastructure. The agency highlighted the need to recognize, reduce, and share women’s unpaid care work.
These calls to action highlight the stark inequalities rural women endure. They are the backbone of community nourishment and environmental stewardship, yet too often they lack the resources and influence needed to improve their lives and shape the future.
Ambassador Ada Francisca de Asis Hernández Rivera, the Permanent Representative of the Dominican Republic to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the World Food Program (WFP), underscored rural women’s importance in eradicating poverty, ending hunger and transforming agri-food systems into more inclusive, resilient and sustainable systems.
She noted that women contribute to food production, biodiversity conservation, sustainable ecosystem management and the resilience of families and communities. Yet many still face barriers to accessing land, financial services, technology, information, markets, and technical assistance, as well as opportunities to participate in decision-making.
“These inequalities, of course, will reduce their opportunities and limit the potential of family farming to contribute completely to sustainable development,” she said.
Karina David, a representative of the Intercontinental Network of Organic Farmers Organizations (INFO) and the Rural Women in Action Network, also highlighted the gap between recognizing women’s contributions and addressing the inequalities they face.
David cited findings indicating that 75 percent of agricultural policy documents across 68 countries recognize women’s roles and challenges, but only 19 percent contain clear gender equality goals.
She argued that closing this gap is not only a matter of equality but also essential to improving food security, household incomes, resilience and rural development.
“Gender inequality has a real cost, and if I were to close the gap between women and men in the agri-food system, it could add almost $1 trillion to the global economy and reduce food insecurity for 45 million people,” she said.
The findings make it clear: governments must move beyond words and turn promises into real policies, funding, and programs that break down the barriers holding women farmers back.
The scale of women’s participation in agri-food systems further underscores why empowering them must be a priority. Tako Ndiaye, a team leader on gender issues in FAO’s Division for Rural Transformation and Gender Equality, cited findings from a report on the status of women in agri-food systems showing that 41 percent of working women globally are employed in these systems.
She noted that agri-food systems are particularly important sources of livelihoods for women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia, where 70 percent of working women in each region are employed in the sector.
Ndiaye also emphasized the importance of empowering women farmers, their organizations, and networks to participate effectively in family farming policymaking. She called for stronger roles for gender experts and women’s organizations in monitoring the implementation of policy commitments.
Women farmers do more than feed rural economies; they champion environmental sustainability. They conserve seeds, nurture biodiversity, manage precious water, and heal degraded land, using wisdom and practices that keep ecosystems thriving and help communities withstand the challenges of climate change.
Yet their ability to continue this vital work depends on access to land, financial support, modern technologies, and other resources that let them farm sustainably and adapt to a changing environment.
UN Women has called on governments, financial institutions, businesses, and development partners to invest directly in rural women and remove barriers that limit their economic independence and environmental leadership.
The agency also stressed that rural women must have a meaningful role in shaping agricultural policies and decisions on funding allocation for climate action, biodiversity conservation, and land restoration.
Related posts:

How unequal access to land by women endangers Uganda’s food security
Women’s groups demand equality in land tenure security to boost food production.
Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI) launched a new report looking at 80 legal frameworks
Smallholder Farmers Can Now Access Agricultural Credit Facility Without Collateral
Lands Ministry tightens rules for replacing lost titles, gives landowners 30 days to object
Uganda Leads Africa in Certified Organic Farmland Ahead of First Organic, Nature Expo
World Food Day 2026: Building healthy diets means reimagining how we grow, share, and enjoy our food.
International Day of Rural Women : Rural women farmers deserve not only equal rights and access to resources, but also the strength and voice to safeguard Mother Nature.
Lango ex-combatants count losses after dry spell destroys maize harvest
Five years after Uganda’s National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights, are local communities hosting land-based investment projects seeing change?
The global race for clean energy minerals is leaving communities grappling with conflicts and human rights abuses, a new report reveals.
Alert: Land degradation is emerging as a pressing threat to global security.
Innovative Finance from Canada projects positive impact on local communities.
Over 5000 Indigenous Communities evicted in Kiryandongo District
Petition To Land Inquiry Commission Over Human Rights In Kiryandongo District
Invisible victims of Uganda Land Grabs
Resource Center
- CAN AFRICAN FOOD SYSTEMS THRIVE WITHOUT CHEMICAL FERTILISERS
- Land And Environment Rights In Uganda Experiences From Karamoja And Mid Western Sub Regions
- REPARATORY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE MUST BE AT THE CORE OF COP30, SAY GLOBAL LEADERS AND MOVEMENTS
- LAND GRABS AT GUNPOINT REPORT IN KIRYANDONGO DISTRICT
- THOSE OIL LIARS! THEY DESTROYED MY BUSINESS!
- RESEARCH BRIEF -TOURISM POTENTIAL OF GREATER MASAKA -MARCH 2025
- The Mouila Declaration of the Informal Alliance against the Expansion of Industrial Monocultures
- FORCED LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA TRENDS RIGHTS OF DEFENDERS IMPACT AND CALL FOR ACTION
Legal Framework
READ BY CATEGORY
Newsletter
Trending
-
NGO WORK1 week agoTanzanian Government Abducts Maasai Villagers in an Unconscionable Attack on Indigenous Land Defenders
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK6 days agoWorld Food Day 2026: Building healthy diets means reimagining how we grow, share, and enjoy our food.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoCourt remands 10 anti-oil activists as suspect collapses in dock
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoAs waves of investment sweep across Uganda, countless women rise to defend their land, safeguard their traditions, and claim their right to be heard.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoDefending ancestral land comes at a steep price as Maasai communities in Tanzania face relentless, mounting pressure.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK6 days agoInternational Day of Rural Women : Rural women farmers deserve not only equal rights and access to resources, but also the strength and voice to safeguard Mother Nature.
-
NGO WORK7 days agoAs World Bank Holds Annual Meetings, 84,000 Tanzanians Call for Justice
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoIn Nepal, women seek ownership rights to the lands they tend
