Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

The EAC Seed & Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, is a potential threat to smallholder farmers, as it aims to disengage them from the agriculture business, according to experts.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Agriculture, a cornerstone of livelihoods and economies throughout the East African Community (EAC), is now at a crossroads. The laws about seeds, once straightforward, have evolved into a complex web that now decides who controls food systems, how fair they are, and whether biodiversity and farmers’ rights are protected.

The draft Bill, as seen by Witness Radio, aims to provide for the coordination of evaluation, release, and registration of plant varieties among Partner States; to establish standard processes for seed certification and the protection of plant varieties within the Community; and to provide for related matters. According to its promoters, the Bill, based on Article 106 of the East African Community Treaty, aims to provide for seed certification, testing, and marketing, thereby facilitating and creating an enabling environment for private sector seed multiplication and distribution.

Advocates view it as a step toward regional integration, improved food security, and increased trade —a potential boon for the region. However, experts, civil society organizations (CSOs), and smallholder farmers believe the Bill contains many problems that could harm the very people who feed the majority of East Africans.

While the Bill may seem like a technical regulation, experts argue that it actually concerns control over food systems, farmers’ rights, and agricultural diversity. At a recent discussion hosted by civil society organizations and farmer groups in East Africa, panelists participated in a two-hour dialogue titled “The EAC Seed and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025: What is at Stake for Smallholder Farmers?” The event, organized by a Kenyan Seed Savers Network and its partners, highlighted concerns that the Bill favors commercial seed systems while neglecting those managed by farmers.

One of the most criticized aspects of the Bill is its reliance on the Distinct, Uniform, and Stable (DUS) criteria for seed release. Experts say these standards benefit uniform commercial seed varieties but often exclude diverse and adaptable indigenous or farmer-managed seeds. For instance, Tanzania’s Quality Declared Seed (QDS) system allows farmers to produce seeds without facing costly testing requirements. Dr. Peter Munyi, an advocate and agricultural legal expert, warns that if the EAC Bill is approved as it stands, such flexible systems could be compromised.

“It’s very dismissive of small-scale farmers and farmer seed systems because it has a very typical approach to the seed law of its variety release system, its certification system. The variety release requires seed to be consistent with DUS requirements, which are very expensive. Only commercial seed breeders or well-funded research institutions can really afford these tests.”

According to Dr. Munyi, this is a deliberate move to disengage smallholder farmers from the agricultural sector, despite their significant contribution to producing most of the World’s food. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)’s 2021 research, smallholder farmers account for more than 80 percent of the World’s food.

“The law is crafted in such a way that it locks smallholder farmers out of the seed system. When you require laboratory testing and multi-location trials, you’re effectively saying only big companies and donors can participate.”

The Seeds and Plant Varieties Bill closely mirrors a 2018 USAID-backed draft, which also faced criticism for advancing commercial interests at the expense of traditional systems.

“Both the 2018 Bill and the current Bill are discriminatory and inequitable in their approach because they don’t treat all farmers and all seed in the same way,” said Mariam Mayet, Executive Director of the African Center for Biodiversity.

She explained that the bias is intentional as the Bill aims to support commercial seed systems and create markets for multinational seed companies.

“It is not designed to strengthen food security or protect the rights of farmers who feed most of the population.” Mayet warned, adding that, “Once this Bill is passed, farmer-managed seed systems will be further criminalized and marginalized. This Bill takes that repression to a regional level.”

The Bill also introduces uncertainty around plant breeders’ rights. According to Dr. Kabanda David of the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), the draft law is vague on the scope of these rights. It does not explicitly guarantee farmers’ long-standing ability to save, reuse, exchange, or sell protected seeds. Without such exceptions, smallholder farmers could be criminalized for traditional practices.

The Seeds and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, may appear to be a step toward regional integration, but experts warn that it is dangerously skewed toward corporate seed systems. Left unchanged, it could deepen inequality, erode biodiversity, and undermine food sovereignty for millions of East Africans.

Experts, CSOs, and farmer groups insist that if the Bill is to proceed, it must provide explicit protections for farmers’ rights, including saving, exchanging, and selling seed, recognize and strengthen farmer-managed seed systems through a parallel legal framework or supportive policies, and guarantee meaningful participation of farmers and local communities in shaping seed regulations.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African lawmakers and CSO leaders are meeting in Uganda to draw up plans to promote Agroecology as an alternative to climate change mitigation.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Mukono, Uganda — the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) members and Civil society organizations (CSOs) leaders in Uganda are convening in Nakisunga, Mukono district today, 28th November, to discuss how to promote agroecology at the regional level and inspire a collective commitment to regional resilience.

Agroecology offers a robust, holistic approach to combating climate change by enhancing the resilience of food systems and reducing their environmental impact.

Spearheaded by the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), the event emphasizes integrating agroecology into regional climate resilience strategies, especially as the East African Community (EAC) faces rising food costs, climate shocks, and declining soil health.

During the meeting, EALA members, together with CSOs, will explore how principles like crop diversification, soil regeneration, and community seed saving can directly improve smallholder farmers’ resilience and livelihoods, complemented by a hands-on field visit to the CEFROHT Agroecology Learning Center in Mukono.

The event has also occurred at a time when EALA is reviewing the East African Seed and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, which is being criticized for undermining the role of smallholder farmers in seed saving, conservation, and the management of seed systems to promote healthy foods.

Players from CSOs include: Participatory Ecological Land Use Management (PELUM Uganda), Eastern and Southern Africa Small-scale Farmers’ Forum (ESAFF), Seed Savers Network Kenya, TABIO Tanzania, the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), Slow Food Uganda, SEATINI, FIAN Uganda, and the Mukono District Local Government, among others.

The meeting will lay the groundwork for East Africa’s first Policy and Model Law on Agroecology, a long-awaited step toward sustainable and equitable agri-food systems that empower regional stakeholders to shape the future.

The event will be broadcast live on Witness Radio.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Kenyan farmers secure right to share local seeds in court ruling

Published

on

A small-scale farmer works at his maize farm where he plants indigenous seeds at Kyeleni village of Machakos, Kenya December 13, 2022. REUTERS/Monicah Mwangi Purchase Licensing Rights

NAIROBI, Nov 27 (Reuters) – Small-scale farmers in Kenya sang and celebrated on Thursday after a court ruling secured their right to carry on the traditional practice of sharing local seeds.

Kenya’s High Court said that part of a law banning the practice was unconstitutional, a ruling that farmer Samuel Kioko called a “great victory”.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

“It will be a relief for us farmers because we will be planting seeds that are familiar to us. We know where they come from, they are drought resistant and they have been in our lineage all along for many years,” he said in Kenya’s capital Nairobi after watching the court give the verdict online.

Under the 2012 “Seed and Plant Varieties Act”, anyone who saved uncertified seeds from their crops, then sold or shared them, could face fines or jail. The state-run Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Service argues on its website the legislation was meant to guarantee seed quality and maximise yields.

A group of smallholder farmers from across Kenya petitioned the High Court in 2022 asking it to declare that the parts of the law imposing those penalties were unconstitutional.

A lawyer representing the farmers said the court in Machakos town, about 60 km (40 miles) southeast of the capital, had ruled the law did not treat farmers and commercial seed producers equally.

Parts of the law “granted extensive proprietary rights to plant breeders and there was no corresponding right that was given to the farmers. So, it favoured big commercial and corporate interests over the rights of farmers,” Wambugu Wanjohi from the Law Society of Kenya said.

Campaign group Greenpeace called the ruling a victory for “food sovereignty”.

The verdict, it said, affirmed that “the ancient right of farmers to save and share seeds supersedes commercial interests, reshaping the legal balance of power between communities and agribusiness worldwide.”

Karoly Bus is the inventor behind the waste-based concrete.

Source: reuters.com

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Land for over 1000 families claimed to be a forest reserve and grabbed by NFA is now used for cattle keeping under heavy Army guardship – Witness Radio.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

In 2014, the NFA used force to evict thousands from what it claimed was a forest reserve, and 11 years later, the land is now privately used for cattle and crops, highlighting ongoing land injustice.  

The land-grab victims were residents of Buwaya and Nairambi sub-counties, and of Buvuma Town Council in Buvuma District. Buvuma is an island district in Uganda’s Central Region, comprising 52 islands on Lake Victoria.

The NFA claimed that the land was part of Kakonwa Central Forest Reserve.

Victims revealed that between 15th and 18th July 2014, security agencies’ personnel and NFA workers stormed their homes, fired tear gas, burned houses, looted valuable properties, and destroyed crops and other property, claiming they had unlawfully occupied forest reserve land.

Testimonies reveal families were displaced without consultation or compensation, leaving them devastated and struggling to rebuild their lives, urging urgent attention.

Many residents confirm that as soon as their land was grabbed, UPDF soldiers established a detachment to guard it and turned it into private property for some individuals.

“They said we were illegally occupying a forest reserve. Why is it that today the same land is used for grazing and by private farmers? We don’t know who benefits from this, but there is an Army detachment on the land guarding it, and we also see some rich farmers and cattle keepers using the same land. Why should other people benefit while we, the former owners, continue suffering?” Said Bwire Martin.

Bwire 42, one of the victims formerly of Mpolwe village, says he had lived and cultivated his land for many years before his home was demolished. “We were reduced to laborers from landlords, with the majority of my fellow victims now working on other people’s plantations, especially oil palm growers, just to survive.

The affected families say they have made numerous attempts to seek redress from various government offices, including the Ministry of Lands, but without success.

“We have tried all offices to get justice, but nothing is possible,” Wandera added. “People are suffering. Many are now staying in informal settlements, living as refugees because they were robbed of their livelihood.”

Residents insist that they will continue to demand what they believe is rightfully theirs. When contacted, NFA spokesperson Mr. Aldon Walukamba dismissed the renewed demands, describing the former residents as “illegal encroachers” allegedly being influenced by politicians and “self-seekers.”

He insisted that the contested area is part of the Kakwona Central Forest Reserve and denied the evictees’ claims of legitimate ownership of the land. Asked about residents’ claims of having land ownership documents, Walukamba responded, “If people can own land titles in wetlands or lakes, why can’t these also get such documents?”

Mr. Walukamba, however, requested Witness Radio to speak to the Permanent secretary, Ministry of Water and Environment, Mr. Alfred Okot Okidi for more information about the case. However, despite multiple attempts to speak to Mr. Okidi, his known contacts remained un answered by the time of publication of the article.

Mr. Wandera Alphonse, now living in Kiteredde village, is one of the thousands who lost their livelihoods during the evictions. He says he and his family had settled on the land in 2008 and were living on six acres when the eviction occurred.

“Police and soldiers destroyed my permanent house, and all my crops. I now rent in Kiteredde, so my family of eight can have somewhere to live. We were never consulted, compensated, or resettled. They call us illegal settlers, but this has been our home for years.” Wandera said in an interview with the Witness Radio team

Before the eviction, Wandera and his family were thriving well in Bukinarwa parish, using the land for agricultural purposes. “I was a farmer who depended a lot on seasonal harvests to support my family’s livelihood. I used to cultivate beans, rice, and bananas, and I earned more than a million (1,000,000/= Uganda Shillings), which was enough to take care of everything. But now, the NFA has rendered me hopeless,” he said.

Similarly, Nakagoro Hajira, who settled on the land with her husband in 2000, says her family was left devastated.

“This has been our home for years. We never settled in a forest reserve,” she said. “After the eviction, our ten children stopped going to school because we lost our only source of income. We now rent and survive by laboring on other people’s plantations.”

Victims have renewed their call for the return of their land, insisting they were unjustly displaced and need support to rebuild their lives.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter