Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Kaweeri Coffee evictees to wait again for justice as Mubende High court adjourns the retrial of their case.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Mubende -Uganda. When Nanyanzi Eva learned that the retrial of the case they had filed against Kaweri Coffee Company and the government of Uganda was finally scheduled for hearing, she thought a new dawn had come.

For years, Eva and her family had lived with the pain of losing land, which served as their sole source of livelihood. The court date was supposed to be a chance for her and others to reclaim not only what was taken from them but also the justice they had been denied for more than two decades.

“I am here to attend all the hearings because I hope this time round we can get justice after a long time of suffering,” she told the Witness Radio team on the first day of the session. Instead, the week ended in heartbreak. After listening to only nine witnesses over three days, the presiding judge adjourned the hearing to October 27 and 28, 2025. This delay was due to the complexity of the case and the need for thorough examination of each witness’s testimony. For the families who have waited 24 years for justice, it was yet another painful reminder of how slow and frustrating the legal process has become. The emotional toll of this delay on Eva and her family is immeasurable.

Despite the overwhelming odds, Eva, now 54, is one of hundreds who were violently evicted in August 2001 when bulldozers, escorted by armed soldiers and police, descended on four villages, including Kitemba, Luwunga, Kijunga, and Kiryamakobe in Mubende District. Yet, she remains resilient.

Her 10 acres of farmland, a foundation of her life, was flattened. Crops, property, and homes were destroyed on the fateful day.

“That land had been given to me by my late grandfather Ssentamu in the 1980s. Before the eviction, I was able to provide for my family and live a dignified life. But all that was taken in a single day,” she recalls, a sense of injustice palpable in her voice, evoking empathy from the audience.

Today, she lives on a small 100×25 ft plot in Kilawula village, which she toiled to buy after being evicted from her previous home. She is a widow, the caretaker of more than a dozen relatives, and survives by working on other people’s farms.

“It is not good to wish suffering on anyone, but whoever championed our eviction deserves to taste what we have endured. At my age, I am still struggling to keep my family afloat. We work in other people’s fields to survive,” she added.

Even attending court is a struggle. The High court sits more than 15 kilometers away from her home, and to raise transport money, she labors in neighboring plantations for as little as two euros and fifty cents a day. This means she has to toil for several days to save five euros, enough to cover transport to attend a one-day court session. The financial strain of this process is yet another injustice Eva and her family have to endure.

“The eviction crippled me, robbed me of everything. Obtaining money for court is another painful process. Imagine you lose everything and then have to sweat again to demand justice,” Eva said bitterly.

She was accompanied by her younger sister, Regina, who also testified as the ninth witness during the session on Wednesday. Like Eva, she is an evictee. Together, they walked out of court feeling betrayed not just by the government and the investor, but also by the justice system itself, their emotional burden heavier than ever.

“This case has caused suffering to many of us,” Regina said. “The investor is fully enjoying our land while we are left to beg. Why should we be silenced when we try to explain the background of our land ownership? The court should guide and listen, not mislead or cut us short. Too often, we are denied the time to tell the truth in full.” She added. The prolonged legal battle has not only caused financial strain but also emotional distress, as the families continue to fight for their rights and dignity. The emotional toll of this battle is significant, and the families are in desperate need of closure and justice.

The Kaweeri case is one of Uganda’s most infamous land disputes. It began in 2002, when over 2,000 residents sued the government of Uganda and Kaweeri Coffee Plantation Ltd, a subsidiary of the German coffee giant Neumann Kaffee Gruppe (NKG), over the brutal evictions.

In 2013, the High court ruled in favor of the communities, declaring the evictions unlawful and awarding them UGX 37 billion in compensation. But in 2015, the court of Appeal overturned the ruling and ordered a retrial.

That decision pushed the displaced families back into a prolonged legal battle. By 2019, the case was before Justice Henry Kaweesa, who recommended mediation. The government offered UGX 1.9 billion, an amount many considered a pittance compared to their losses. More than half of the evictees accepted the compensation offer because they were tired of waiting for it to be finalized. One hundred forty-three families refused, citing unfair compensation and lack of transparency. This disparity in compensation further highlights the injustice these families are facing.

It is these 143 families who remain in court today.

Initially, the case was filed as a representative suit, with five individuals serving as spokespeople for the entire group. But during the retrial, government and company attorneys objected, arguing that the five could not represent everyone. As a result, the court directed each of the 143 families to testify individually, an arrangement that has further delayed the case.

From August 25 to 27, 2025, the court heard testimony from eight witnesses, in addition to one who had previously testified before the court. The total number of witnesses became nine. But much of the testimonies, however, repeated what others had already said: stories of mistreatment, burning down houses, violent eviction, lost property, and unfair compensation.

Justice Tadeo Asiimwe expressed concern about the lengthy proceedings. The judge advised the parties to sit together and agree on how to handle the remaining witnesses, noting that the court had already reviewed the evidence and found it broadly similar across the different plaintiffs.

“Just sit together and tell me how you want to deal with the remaining witnesses. We have already sampled your evidence, and it is not different from that of the other claimants. The only difference is in the figures; one is claiming 1 million, another 400, and another 2 million. It is only the amounts that vary,” the judge said.

The judge further warned that the case could drag on for years if each individual’s testimony were heard in full. He further encouraged the parties to consider negotiations, stressing that those who are willing to accept the government’s compensation could do so through their lawyers or by finding a way to consolidate the remaining testimonies.

“The plaintiffs are free to continue with negotiations. Your lawyers are here; you can talk and make your own decisions. I will wait for you. Because it is excruciating to receive a judgment, and it makes you drop what you already have. You may be holding something, but then a judgment comes and says, Drop it. That is very painful,” the judge cautioned, urging parties to think carefully about their options, either taking the compensation given now or waiting for a court outcome, which may not be fair to the plaintiffs.

Compensation that has lost value.

Eva explains that in March 2002, her land and property were valued at only UGX 2 million. The valuation, carried out with the support of the former Mubende Resident District Commissioner (RDC) Perez Katamba and local leaders, left many feeling cheated.

“I was not even part of the valuation process. I just heard from my neighbors that they had been assessed. Later, officials came with papers and forced me to sign them. That was not fair participation,” she said, adding that, “One thing we want is for the money to be increased. Maybe 20 years ago it would have meant something, but not now. The cost of living is high, and money has lost value. We have not been equally treated as plaintiffs,” Eva insisted.

As the case drags into its third decade, frustration among the displaced families continues to grow. While Kaweri Coffee enjoys profits from its former lands, the original owners remain trapped in poverty, fighting for recognition in a justice system that seems designed to wear them down.

“We have waited patiently for 24 years,” Eva said. “All we ask is meaningful compensation, so that we too can live dignified lives, just like the investor who took over our land.”

The case was adjourned to October 27 and 28, leaving hundreds of families still waiting. Eva hopes the court will finally deliver a fair and meaningful decision, one that recognizes their decades-long suffering.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

The 4th African Forum on Business and Human Rights: The rapidly escalating investment in Africa is urgently eroding environmental conservation and disregarding the dignity, the land, and human rights of the African people.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team,

Lusaka, Zambia: The 4th African Forum on Business and Human Rights has commenced with a call to promote inclusive economic development that will bring about holistic change across the continent.

This year’s event, themed ‘From Commitment to Action: Advancing Remedy, Reparations, and Responsible Business Conduct in Africa,’ underscores the crucial transition from mere pledges to tangible actions. This marks the fourth consecutive sitting after the first in Accra, Ghana, the second in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and the third in Nairobi, Kenya, in 2024, demonstrating the Forum’s unwavering commitment to the cause.

Representing the President of the Republic of Zambia, H.E. Hakainde Hichilema, Zambian Justice Minister Princess Kasune stated that Africa is presently at a crossroads due to increased investment in agribusiness, the extractive industry, and infrastructural development, which compromises human dignity, environmental conservation, and respect for the land and human rights of the African people.

“We are meeting here in Lusaka in 2025 at a time when local communities in Africa are experiencing displacement, mineral extraction is contaminating waterbodies on which communities survive on, rights denied at the expense of economic development” this has to stop, she noted that there’s a wide gap of what the African communities are experiencing and with what anchored in corporate responsibility frameworks.

She said Africa has a wealth of minerals, arable land, and other natural resources that must be protected and not exploited at the expense of the dignity and rights of African communities, or at the cost of degrading the environment and the ecosystem.

Kasune criticized officials from African governments who attend negotiation tables with investors as if they were beggars and fail to secure better deals that benefit the African people. She emphasized the need for stronger negotiation power, which would ultimately prevent these unfavorable deals from displacing communities from their ancestral lands.

“We cannot come to the business tables as if we are begging. We are co-partners and must negotiate effectively on behalf of the citizens of the African continent, strengthening their voices to demand accountability when things are not going well. We have so many resources to offer, which are needed by the so-called big nations that can take the entire African continent to a middle-class income status, where our citizens can enjoy a decent standard of living,” said Kasune.

The African continent has documented many cases where African citizens are ordered to vacate their lands in the days before consultation or without proper resettlement and fair compensation.

Kasune reported that on the continent, some cultural chiefs connive with investors and sell communities’ lands at a cost regarded as a handout/ keep pocket change rate (very low), and revealed that Zambia is in the process of finalizing the development of the first National Action Plan on Business and human rights to promote responsible business conduct in the country, a step towards a more equitable future.

Zambia is joining a list of several countries on the continent, such as Uganda, Kenya, Nigeria, and Liberia, that have adopted and now implement National Action Plans (NAPs) on Business and Human Rights. Others, such as Ghana, Ethiopia, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe, are in various stages of developing their NAPs.

The overall goal of a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAP) is to implement the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights by outlining a government’s strategy to ensure that businesses respect human rights and that effective remedies are available when abuses occur.

The Forum, scheduled to run from October 7th to 9th, 2025, aims to strengthen access to remedies, advance reparations, and develop effective strategies to prevent irresponsible investments such as land grabbing and environmental degradation on the continent, among other objectives.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Use COP30 in Belém, Brazil, to fix the historical injustices meted out against Afro-descendant and Indigenous Peoples – CSOs demand.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team.

A global coalition, comprising more than 140 organizations and 110 public figures, including national ministries, major human rights organizations, grassroots movements, and prominent intellectuals, is calling for the 30th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) Summit to focus on reparatory and climate justice for both Indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples. This coalition represents a diverse range of stakeholders, all united in their commitment to addressing the historical injustices that have been faced by these communities.

Time is of the essence as afro-descendants and Indigenous people worldwide continue to face ongoing challenges in environmental justice and evictions due to historical marginalization and discrimination. The urgency of these issues cannot be overstated; immediate action is necessary to prevent further harm.

These groups frequently have their land rights ignored, deal with forced evictions, and face environmental dangers like toxic waste. They also struggle with not having enough political representation, insufficient legal protection, and violence against those defending their territories.

This November, the 30th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) will convene in Belém, Brazil, bringing together world leaders, policymakers, civil society organizations, scientists, and corporations to negotiate collective action against the climate crisis.

The United Nations Conference of the Parties (COP) is the supreme decision-making body for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), held annually. It is a crucial platform where global leaders, policymakers, civil society organizations, scientists, and corporations come together to negotiate collective action against the climate crisis.

But before this year’s annual sitting, a global coalition argues that the COP30 gathering in Brazil addresses the interconnected crises of colonial histories and climate breakdown that have consistently affected these marginalized groups.

The petitioners link today’s climate emergency to centuries of greenhouse emissions, extraction, dispossession, and racial violence rooted in slavery, colonialism, and imperialist systems that have enriched the Global North while leaving Afro-descendant, Indigenous, and local communities in developing nations bearing the heaviest burdens of environmental destruction.

This appeal is presented through an open letter launched by the Instituto Luiz Gama (Brazil), the Global Afro-descendant Climate Collaboration for Climate Justice, and Resilient40 (Uganda), among others. The letter is being addressed to the Brazilian presidency and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) secretariat.

Among other signatories to this global cause are national ministries, major human rights organizations, grassroots movements, and prominent intellectuals, including Colombia’s Ministry of Environment, Amnesty International USA, among others.

The petitioners stress that genuine climate justice cannot exist without reparatory justice. Mariama Williams, a Senior Strategic Advisor at the Global Afro-descendant Climate Justice Collaborative, notes that climate talks often treat justice as a rhetorical flourish rather than a necessary obligation based in history and law.

“By centering the legacies of enslavement, colonialism, and extractivism, this global call highlights the structural roots of climate vulnerability and makes clear that effective solutions must dismantle the economic and political asymmetries that continue to shape our world.” She added.

Accordingly, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has acknowledged that colonialism is a driver of climate vulnerability. The open letter builds on this recognition, emphasizing that addressing the climate crisis necessitates confronting the structural injustices inherent in the global economy.

COP30 is to be held in Belém, near the Amazon rainforest. This location, with its symbolic significance and immediate importance, is not only crucial for the planet’s survival but also home to communities whose experiences with colonization and marginalization have significantly impacted their vulnerability. We must act to protect vital ecosystems, such as the Amazon, and the people who call them home.

Renato Aparecido Gomes, President of Instituto Luiz Gama, stressed that Afro-descendant and Indigenous communities in the Amazon offer low-carbon, equitable models of development rooted in ancestral land care, and that the climate crisis cannot be solved without centering their demands for reparatory and restorative justice.

Civil society groups insist that COP30 must be a turning point, where climate negotiations stop sidelining justice and reparation for victims of historical injustices becomes a central focus. For them, the fight against climate change and the struggle for reparations are inseparable.

They further claim that the resistance and sustainability practices of Afro-descendant and Indigenous peoples present a unique opportunity for the global community to learn and reshape climate governance around equity, rights, and historical accountability. Their resilience and wisdom can guide us towards a more just and sustainable future.

As the letter concludes, “Climate action cannot be considered independently of global justice. Their leadership, knowledge, and rights are not optional extras, but essential for building a just and livable future.”

COP30 will take place from November 10 to 21, 2025, in Belém, Brazil. It remains to be seen whether global leaders will heed this call for justice.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Land actors warn of looming violent conflicts due to escalating land grabbing in Sebei and Bugisu sub-regions.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

During the 9th National Land Awareness Week, a campaign aimed at educating communities on their land rights and promoting sustainable land use in Eastern Uganda, Land actors unveiled shocking realities. Local communities revealed that the issue of escalating land grabbing in Sebei and Bugisu was a potential trigger for violent conflict if left unresolved.

The 5-day-long activity, held under the theme “Promoting Land Rights and Sustainable Land Use for Inclusive and Sustainable Development,” created opportunities for engagement with farming communities, local governments, and customary landowners. However, the stories that emerged were filled with tales of dispossession, impunity, and betrayal, with influential individuals and state agencies involved in serious violations and abuses that have continued to fuel conflict, insecurity, and suffering in rural areas.

Lwanga Deborah Marie, who works with ActionAid International Uganda and is one of the experts who participated in the campaign, noted that it has become alarmingly easy for politically connected individuals to take land from impoverished communities.

“Many community members, the have-nots, are the majority. The haves are the minority. But there have been a lot of stories, a lot of testimonies coming in from the community regarding people with power, people with money, people with connections, coming in to displace the vast majority of the communities and go ahead to get titles, land titles to land on which community members are staying.”

In Kween district, sub-counties such as Ngenge, Ngiriki, and Chepsukunya were cited as hotspots. Experts warned that this unchecked pattern of elite-driven land grabbing could spark instability. “It is a ticking time bomb. If it is not addressed, there are fears it could cause bloodshed,” Deborah cautioned.

The experts also uncovered allegations of violent evictions by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), which has displaced ancestral communities in the name of conservation. Reports gathered during the campaign pointed to killings, injuries, destruction of crops, and illegal detentions carried out during UWA’s operations.

“We received reports of people shot at and killed, and those shot and injured. We actually met individuals with their stories and medical records regarding these UWA violations and the destruction of food crops,” Deborah recounted.

Such behavior is deemed inhumane and violates people’s human rights, as Deborah explained.

“And this violates not only the right to food but also the right to life. It violates the right to be free from cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. The situation is unacceptable. There have been reports of illegal detentions by UWA. These have been one of the troubling revelations during our interactions with community members,” she said.

One community in Kapkwata, commonly referred to as Rwanda village, was forced off its ancestral land to create space for the Kapkwata forest reserve. Since eviction, the residents have been living in what experts likened to an internally displaced persons’ camp—without toilets, health facilities, or farmland. Their demand, as experts relayed, is not charity but justice: an alternative land to rebuild their lives.

The activity also revealed a disturbing pattern of gender discrimination in land ownership. According to these experts, they noted that even when women contribute money toward purchasing land, they are not recognized as co-owners but merely as “witnesses.”

“The bigger picture of their rights being violated is their land rights,” Deborah explained. “We heard testimonies of women contributing money towards land purchases, but they didn’t appear as co-owners. They only appeared as witnesses.” Experts warned that these practices not only deny women economic security but also perpetuate cycles of marginalization across generations.

Byantalo Hassan Abdallah, an officer from the Ministry of Lands, acknowledged government shortcomings. He admitted that communities evicted by UWA have been waiting in vain for resettlement for years, despite repeated promises of assistance. “The government has promised several times to resettle them, but this has not come to pass,” he said.

While some displaced families have been moved to Bulambuli district under interventions by the Office of the Prime Minister, communities like Rwanda remain in limbo. But Byantalo says the government and the Ministry are working hard to resettle this community.

“During the discussions that we had on the ground, especially with the communities in Rwanda, they clearly stated to us that officials from the Ministry of Land and Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) came and visited them and told them they were trying to secure some piece of land on which these people are yet to be resettled. So, the government is not seated, the Ministry of Land is working with other government agencies and ministries.” Byantalo expressed

Other structural challenges were identified, including land registration costs, which continue to prevent people from accessing formal protection. The experts also pointed to dysfunctional Area Land Committees, many of whose members confessed ignorance of their roles, thereby worsening disputes instead of resolving them.

Experts involved in the campaign called for significant reforms and follow-ups. They urged the government to prioritize resettling displaced communities fairly and with dignity, making land registration more affordable and transparent, providing widespread education to dispel myths about customary titles, and training Area Land Committees to perform their roles effectively.

They also emphasized the need to protect women’s land rights and close gender gaps in ownership, while holding state agencies, such as UWA, accountable for human rights abuses.

Christine Nabunya, a lawyer and land rights advocate, summed up the call: “We need more empowerment and sensitization of communities. Most people believe they don’t have the right to land, especially women. That is really absurd.”

As the Awareness Week concluded with a roundtable discussion, the experts unanimously agreed: the land grabbing in Sebei and Bugisu is not just a matter of property; it’s a matter of justice, survival, and peace. The stark injustice of these land issues should stir a sense of moral outrage, compelling us to work towards a fair and equitable resolution.

If the escalating land grabbing, compounded by violent state-backed evictions, is not addressed, the region could be plunged into deeper conflict. For farming communities, land is not just an asset but the foundation of food security and livelihoods. Losing it, experts warn, means losing the future. This potential for deeper conflict should underscore the gravity of the situation.

“The communities are crying out not for aid, but for justice,” Deborah said. “If we fail to act, we risk a crisis that will be far costlier to solve.” The resilience of these communities in the face of such adversity is truly inspiring.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter