Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

African countries forced to extract fossil fuels to service external debt: Report

Published

on

These countries are trapped in an “economic architecture” designed to drain wealth and resources from the continent, shows report
  • African governments are expanding fossil fuel production to service mounting external debt.
  • This leads to compromising public services like health and education.
  • The debt-driven extraction exacerbates gender injustices and environmental degradation, with women bearing the brunt.
  • The report calls for a Fossil Fuel Treaty to support a just transition to renewable energy and alleviate the debt burden.

African governments are being forced to expand fossil fuel production at the expense of critical public services, including health and education, and with far-reaching consequences on food security, health and water. The governments are spending revenues earned from the fossil fuel on servicing debts, with external borrowing doubling since 2020 to over $1 trillion and interest on debt more than doubling over the last 15 years to an estimated $163 billion.

Due to the debt burden, the countries are also unable to invest in public goods such as infrastructure and social protection systems, all of which could benefit women and the marginalised enhance general wellbeing of the people.

The lack of expenditure on improving basic social services, makes the international community accomplices in violating the human rights of African people particularly women, “who subsidise social services through their unpaid labour”, according to a report by campaign groups-African Forum and Network on Debt and Development (AFRODAD) and the Fossil Fuel Treaty.

In part to blame for the crisis is the international infrastructure, including structural adjustment programmes, trade liberalisation and International Monetary Fund (IMF)-imposed austerity measures, that have forced African governments to prioritise debt repayments.

The report showed that the countries are trapped in an “economic architecture” designed to drain wealth and resources from the continent to the Global North, and are finding themselves adopting austerity measures and resource extraction.

“Climate change’s biggest drivers — fossil fuels — continue to enjoy investment under a narrative that they are necessary for Africa’s energy security and development. Yet, the evidence is emerging that coal, oil and gas extraction are not only contributing to the debt-based structural entrapment of Africa,” it warned.

Africa, the report noted, is paying for a climate crisis it did not create — first by being on the ‘frontlines’ of the devastating impacts of extreme weather, displacement, loss and damage, and secondly, through solutions to climate change that drive more debt, extract more than they restore and weakening countries’ economic resilience.

“For countries with the least historical responsibility and the greatest structural constraints, the proposed Fossil Fuel Treaty offers a pathway to pursue a planned and just transition away from fossil fuels in ways that strengthen economic sovereignty, public legitimacy, and socio-economic and environmental justice, it added.

The report Gender, Debt and Fossil Fuels: A Mapping of Key Insights from the African Continent asserted that climate change, fossil fuel extraction and debt all reinforce gender injustices on their own. As a result, Africa is at the frontlines of the global climate, fossil fuels and debt ‘polycrisis’ that is largely based on unjust systems perpetuating extraction of resources to the Global North.

The crisis, according to the authors of the report, was particularly disadvantageous to women and girls, wth the gender experiencing the worst impacts.

“Africa is being pushed to drill its way out of debt under a global economic model that treats debt service as sacrosanct. When governments cut health, education and social protection to reassure creditors, the strain does not disappear; it is displaced into women’s unpaid labour, dispossession and the violence through which fossil fuel extraction is enforced,” according to a statement by authors Bemnet Agata and Amiera Sawas on behalf of the organisations.

The document asserted that fossil fuel extraction imposes a “spectrum of violence” against communities, and women and girls are the most vulnerable.

“Whether in Mozambique, Nigeria, Uganda or Tanzania, women and girls are more at risk to the impacts of land dispossession and displacement by oil and gas projects. Militarisation aimed at securing extraction projects drive repression, persecution and sexual violence by corporate and state security forces,” the researchers wrote in the report.

“Africa is being pushed to drill its way out of debt under a global economic model that treats debt service as sacrosanct. When governments cut health, education and social protection to reassure creditors, the strain does not disappear; it is displaced — into women’s unpaid labour, dispossession and the violence through which fossil fuel extraction is enforced,” it noted.

Fossil fuels also cause environmental destruction that is linked to health and social crises due to pollution, food insecurity, land degradation and water contamination, all of which disproportionately peril women. This compels movements of women and Indigenous civil society to come to the frontlines of environmental defense, inevitably exposing them to state violence.

It is critical to explore how fossil fuels are intricately tied in with gendered identities and patriarchy and its expressions of violence through what it calls ‘petromasculinity’.

Scientists define petromasculinity as the fusion of authoritarian masculine identities with militarism, corporate fossil fuel interests, underpinning state violence, where “fossil fuel use can function as a violent compensatory practice in reaction to gender and climate trouble”.

The concept escalates gender-based violence and the social, economic and political exclusion of women, girls and gender minorities. “Despite the risk, women and Indigenous leaders have been at the forefront of calling for a just energy and economic transition rooted in feminist and principles of fairness, where all people, societies and nations have equal opportunities to lead and benefit,” said Amiera Sawas, co-author of the report and director of research for the Fossil Fuel Treaty Initiative.

“African feminists have long been calling our attention to the myriad ways that debt, fossil fuel extraction and climate change are impacting women’s and girls’ rights. It’s time the international community listened,” he added.
He called for international cooperation and solidarity via a Fossil Fuel Treaty to support nations to cancel and renegotiate debt repayments and to access fairer finance for renewable energy systems.

For the reason, any serious conversation about a just transition must begin by recognising the reality of the fossil industry in Africa, and its consequences on the wellbeing of the people.

It recommends that African countries can benefit from participating in an international treaty that supports a fair phase-out of fossil fuels, one in which the wealthiest and most responsible nations act first. and fastest, while enabling a financed, justice-based transition to a renewable energy future.

Nations participating in such a treaty could create a platform for renegotiating and cancelling some external debt to create space for an equitable transition.

Such a transition should move communities away from fossil fuels towards decentralised, accessible renewable energy for all, and phase out of oil, gas and coal while building diverse, resilient and “gender-just” economies.
Overall, the paper calls for new approaches to tackling the triple challenge of debt crises, fossil fuelled entrapment and gendered violence, warning that past proposals have failed to address the root of the problem.

Source: downtoearth.org.in

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African women unite and meet in Nairobi to develop strategies to protect communal tenure systems and collectively resist false climate solutions.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

Women in East Africa are on the front lines of land and climate struggles against harmful extractive investments, land grabs, and land giveaways that have not only damaged their livelihoods but also continued to harm the environment.

In Tanzania’s Manyara and Arusha regions, Maasai pastoralists face environmental disasters and land conflicts driven by encroachment and land degradation.

Paulina Peter, a Community Development Officer with the KINNAPA Development Program in Kiteto District, Tanzania, has witnessed these changes firsthand.

“Deforestation for agriculture is a major challenge. Some pastoralists are diversifying into crop farming, which affects environmental conservation. At the same time, population growth and land degradation are driving migration into pastoralist areas.” She explains, in an interview with Witness Radio

These pressures are not only ecological, but they are also fueling conflict. According to Paulina, disputes have emerged between local communities and incoming agriculturalists seeking access to community lands, sometimes escalating into legal battles.

To address these challenges, KINNAPA is supporting pastoralist communities through land rights awareness, environmental education, and the development of village land use plans. These initiatives, particularly the formalization of shared rangelands, have helped reduce conflict and promote more sustainable land use.

While Tanzanian communities struggle with gradual encroachment, the story of the Mosopisyek of Benet Indigenous community in Eastern Uganda reflects a more abrupt and violent history of land loss, which has had an overwhelming impact on thousands of local communities for decades.

The Benet Indigenous community in Uganda lost its ancestral land in 1993 when it was designated as a national park, causing decades of displacement and hardship.

“In 1993, the government evicted hundreds of people without compensation. During the initial giveaway of our land, we were not consulted to give consent,” Chelangat Scovia, a women’s leader of the Mosopisyek of Benet Indigenous community, told Witness Radio, recalling the trauma of forced evictions from their ancestral lands on Mount Elgon.

The government has promised to resettle them, but the affected communities in Sebei still await justice after more than 30 years, underscoring their resilience.

Following the 1993 evictions, thousands were left in temporary settlements without adequate land or support. In 2008, again, the government further displaced more than 170 families and destroyed homes in a violent eviction.

Today, many Benet remain landless, surviving through casual labor or relying on aid, while continuing to face harassment when they attempt to access their ancestral lands for grazing or cultural practices.

Despite these challenges affecting their communities, women like Paulina and Chelangat are not only victims but also inspiring leaders driving efforts to defend and reclaim the commons.

Both are attending the East Africa Women’s Land and Climate Justice Convergence in Nairobi, where grassroots women leaders, activists, and organizations from Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania have gathered from April 26 to May 1 to confront land dispossession, extractivism, and false climate solutions.

The convergence comes at a critical moment when Africa’s commons—land, forests, water, and cultural systems—are under growing threat. Most land on the continent is held under communal tenure systems that sustain rural populations. However, weak legal protections continue to expose these systems to state control, corporate exploitation, and large-scale land grabs.

While communal systems are vital, they are also shaped by deeply entrenched patriarchal norms. Women, despite being the backbone of food production, often access land through male relatives. This leaves them particularly vulnerable during moments of crisis such as widowhood, divorce, or family disputes.

The convergence seeks to challenge this model by advancing a different vision, one that strengthens, rather than dismantles, the commons while centering women’s leadership.

The convergence aims to build collective strategies to protect communal lands and resist extractive industries and false climate solutions, empowering communities to act together.

“The convergence will also explore the new threats to the commons in the form of mega ‘green’ energy and mining projects, and the false solutions to the climate crisis, such as carbon capture and storage, as well as REDD+, typically involving the capturing and privatization of land, forests, and water bodies. We will also explore the question of climate debt and how it is deeply interlinked with the continued commodification of the commons,” Says Womin in its press release.

Bringing together 35 to 45 participants, primarily women living under communal tenure systems, the convergence includes farmers, fisherfolk, pastoralists, indigenous women, and activists resisting extractive projects. Organized by Womin in partnership with allied organizations, the gathering runs until May 1.

Witness Radio will continue to provide updates on all developments from the convergence.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

African women push for reparations and environmental accountability after landmark Climate Justice Day.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team

Women’s community organizations and grassroots movements across Africa are intensifying calls for climate reparations and environmental accountability following the inaugural African Women’s Climate Justice Day, marked on April 15.

Organized by the West and Central African Women’s Climate Assembly (WCA) under the theme “Our Lands, Our Voices: African Women United for Reparations and Climate Justice,” the convergence took place across multiple parts of the continent, highlighting how women in regions like West and Central Africa face unique climate impacts such as droughts and land degradation, demanding tailored solutions.

The WCA provides a powerful space to analyze the intersecting crises affecting their communities collectively and to develop strategies of resistance rooted in climate justice, food sovereignty, and the Right to Say NO to destructive extractivist and mega-development projects that displace communities, erode ancestral ways of life, and destroy ecological futures.

Since 2022, women from across Central and West Africa have gathered annually through the Women’s Climate Assembly (WCA) — a growing Pan-African, grassroots-led platform that brings together over 120 activists, ecofeminist leaders, and community organizers to collectively build strategies for climate justice, strengthen solidarity across movements, and advance community-led resistance against harmful, destructive projects while amplifying women’s voices.

On the 15th, the Women’s Alliance on Natural Resources Governance (WANRG) led nationwide actions across four districts in Sierra Leone, bringing climate justice conversations directly to communities most affected by environmental degradation. In the West African country, Climate change has had a significant impact on agriculture, exacerbating the existing challenges of low productivity and food insecurity.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), women make up almost 70% of Sierra Leone’s agricultural workforce, and FAO’s support aims to empower women to adapt to climate shocks that threaten food production and household incomes.

These impacts, including unpredictable rainfall patterns, prolonged droughts, and increasing occurrences of extreme weather events such as floods and storms, are disrupting farming activities and resulting in declining crop yields. Further, environmental concerns caused by extractive projects are adding salt to the injury.

In the eastern districts of Kono and Kenema, outreach efforts focused on women working on the front lines of natural resource management, highlighting how extractive activities and climate change are eroding livelihoods.

“Climate justice is a women’s rights issue! Across four districts, we took bold action to ensure women’s voices are at the heart of environmental protection,” the organization’s statement read.

The alliance brought together local leaders and policymakers in Bo District for a stakeholder dialogue to develop and implement gender-sensitive climate policies, with commitments to integrate women’s voices into national climate strategies and to demonstrate tangible policy support for climate justice.

“When women lead, the planet wins. We are not just victims of climate change; we are the leaders, the innovators, and the defenders of our land,” The organization’s statement highlighted. This should inspire the audience with pride and confidence in women’s vital role in climate justice.

Across the continent, similar demands were echoed. In Liberia, the Natural Resource Women Platform (NRWP) described the moment as critical, warning that climate change continues to disproportionately affect women in rural, coastal, and resource-dependent communities.

“Across Liberia and the wider region, women are experiencing the harsh impacts of environmental degradation, land dispossession, and the growing burden of sustaining livelihoods amid the climate crisis,” the organization said in a statement from Monrovia.

The group pointed to worsening coastal erosion in Buchanan, increasing urban pollution, and challenges for women farmers due to erratic rainfall and soil decline. These realities should evoke empathy and a sense of urgency in your audience to support community-led solutions.

Central to the demands raised during the day of action are calls for reparations for communities affected by historical and ongoing environmental exploitation, an end to destructive extractive practices, and greater accountability from governments and corporations driving climate harm.

These calls were reinforced by regional movements such as the Global Convergence of Struggles for Land, Water, Seeds, Forests, Savannas, and the Sea in Central Africa, which framed the climate crisis as part of a broader system of dispossession.

“Land, water, forests, and the sea are fundamental rights, not commodities,” the coalition declared, calling for the dismantling of extractivist systems and for communities to be placed at the center of decisions affecting their territories.

In Central Africa, women’s organizations are already moving from declarations to strategy. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Indigenous Women and Local Communities for Sustainable and Participatory Development (FACID) brought together civil society groups to develop joint action plans and strengthen advocacy for climate justice.

“These are our struggles, and African women across the region have come together to reflect on climate change issues. There is drought, water pollution, air pollution, and soil pollution, as well as deforestation. All these scourges of climate change are affecting the African continent.  Since we cannot work in isolation, we have established the Constituent Assembly of African Women on Climate Justice to fight for climate justice through actions that bring about solutions that serve everyone,” said Marie Dorothée Lisenga, a coordinator with FACID, adding that women are at the forefront of the fight against climate change, and their leadership must shape the response.

As momentum builds beyond the April 15 mobilizations, organizations say the focus is now on sustaining pressure through advocacy, alliance-building, and grassroots action to ensure that climate justice is not reduced to rhetoric.

“We commend the growing movement of African women rising in unity to demand systemic and transformative change. Their call for reparations is not only for compensation; it is for dignity, justice, and the restoration of lives, lands, and livelihoods,” The group emphasized. This framing should foster respect and moral support among your readers.

The African Women’s Climate Justice Day was organized by NGO partners, civil society, and community-based organizations, and allies across Africa, including Women and Development (Nigeria), WoMin African Alliance, SynDev (Senegal), Green Development Advocates, and RADD (Cameroon), among others, who hosted solidarity actions and activities.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Nigerian Banks under fire over ESG failures as a new report exposes Weak Climate and Human Rights Compliance.

Published

on

By the Witness Radio team.

A new policy assessment has raised serious questions about the environmental and social conduct of Nigeria’s banking sector, revealing that major financial institutions are significantly underperforming on global sustainability standards while continuing to finance high-risk industries with limited transparency. 

The report, produced by Fair Finance Nigeria (FFNG) Coalition, comprising BudgIT, Oxfam, Policy Alert, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), Connected Development (CODE), and Sustainable Transformation and Empowerment Programme (STEPS) assessed four Nigerian major banks including Access Bank, UBA, Zenith Bank, and Standard Chartered Bank against international Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) benchmarks. 

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) is a framework for understanding how a company behaves, not just in terms of profit, but also in terms of its impact on people and the planet. 

The environmental side looks at how responsibly a company treats the natural world. This includes how it uses resources, manages waste, reduces pollution, and responds to climate change. The social side focuses on how a company relates to people. That means how it treats its employees, works with suppliers, serves customers, and engages with the communities where it operates, while the governance side is about how the company is run and ensures accountability. 

The assessment was based on the updated 2025 methodology of Fair Finance International, which uses 19 thematic indicators grouped into environmental, social, and governance categories. The evaluation relied solely on publicly available policy documents, sustainability reports, and annual disclosures. 

Acknowledging that Nigerian banks scored an average of 1.7 out of 10 across key sustainability indicators highlights the urgent need for banks and regulators to take responsibility for improving ESG standards, inspiring a sense of duty in stakeholders.

The report identified significant weaknesses in external accountability, particularly in how banks manage the environmental and social risks of the companies they finance, underscoring the need for stronger regulations. 

Despite years of sustainability reporting and regulatory guidance, the report concludes that Nigerian banks remain far from aligning with global ESG expectations.

“It is not only about how banks assess their internal operations—such as limiting discrimination in recruitment or increasing the representation of women in senior leadership positions. They must also examine how these standards are applied across their entire business and supply chains. This includes the companies they invest in, those they lend to, and those they actively finance or support.

Banks should ensure that these companies also comply with international standards. This approach does not only apply to financial institutions themselves; it also plays a critical role in mitigating financial, reputational, and operational risks across their investment portfolios.” Dr. Augustine O’Keary, the lead researcher and research officer of Connected Development, mentioned during the presentation of the research findings.

The report highlights a concerning climate-related disclosure score of 0.9 out of 10, exposing critical gaps in how banks communicate climate risks to stakeholders.

Researchers found limited evidence of credible transition plans aligned with global temperature targets, despite Nigeria’s increasing exposure to climate-related risks. 

By continuing to finance carbon-intensive sectors without publicly disclosing portfolio-level transition strategies, banks risk eroding trust, underscoring the need for greater transparency to civil society and advocacy groups.

“We see continued financing of high-emission sectors without clear commitments to reduce exposure or align with a 1.5°C pathway,” the report noted. 

Environmental analysts warn that this disconnect exposes Nigeria’s financial system to long-term systemic risk as global markets tighten climate regulations.

The Fair Finance Nigeria Coalition is calling for stronger regulatory alignment with global ESG standards, particularly through updates to Nigeria’s sustainability banking principles.

Stakeholders argue that existing frameworks remain outdated and insufficiently aligned with international best practices, especially in climate finance and corporate accountability.

Strong calls for improved engagement between banks, regulators, and civil society organizations aim to foster collaboration, making stakeholders feel involved and motivated to enhance policy frameworks and disclosure standards.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter