Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

Public development banks are a disaster to the Global Development Agendas – activists and CSOs.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

September is traditionally a busy time in Uganda’s farming calendar. Farmers are busy weeding their plantations, and cattle keepers rejoice as their grasslands thrive, providing abundant feed for their livestock.

A photo of a burnt grass-thatched house belonging to a community defender in Kiryandongo District.

However, this is different for the community land rights defender Kaliisa Joseph. Instead of enjoying the fruits of his labor, he is now in distress. On September 5th, 2024, Kaliisa’s home was set ablaze, and household items worth more than 1.5 million Ugandan shillings were destroyed. His kraal, which housed over 60 cattle, was also demolished by workers from Agilis Partners, a U.S.-based multinational grain development company in Kiryandongo District.

Joseph Kaliisa, a community land rights in the Kiryandongo district, has been actively engaged in mobilizing his community of more than 3000 residents to push back Agilis Company’s illegal land eviction in the Kiryandondongo district. His home has been repeatedly raided, his crops destroyed, and his animals impounded by the multinational company, which accuses Kaliisa and the people he defends of occupying the land illegally. However, information from Witness Radio indicates that the communities have legal rights to the land.

According to eyewitnesses, these events occurred on Thursday, September 5th, 2024, while Kalisa and his family were away grazing their cattle. Kalisa, who should have been reaping the benefits of his land, now finds himself unable to cultivate or graze freely.

“I can’t use my land as I used to,” Kalisa said. “Whenever I take my cows for grazing, they are seized by the company, and I have to pay 50,000 Ugandan shillings for each cow seized to get it back. Last week, they came and destroyed everything.”

Agilis Partners Limited is receiving multiple financing from different public development banks (PDBs). It has used these funds to displace local communities.

However, whenever the company receives these funds, there is usually a sharp increase in violent land evictions and cattle seizures in Kiryandongo, alongside widespread human rights violations/abuses.

Agilis Partners, owned by U.S. twin brothers Phillip and Benjamin Prinz, has continued to benefit from other funding sources, including the Dutch Oak Tree Foundation, DOB Equity, the United Nations Common Fund for Commodities, the U.K.’s DFID-funded Food Trade Programme, and Vested World.

Kalisa is just one of the millions affected by these public development banks’ (PDBs) funding for companies like Agilis. These communities face illegal evictions, escalating violence, and environmental degradation, all supported by PDBs.

A recent report titled Demystifying Development Finance by 100 Global South activists and civil society experts reveals how PDBs fuel human rights violations, environmental destruction, inequality, and debt in the name of development.

The 52-page report highlights how PDBs, including the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the Inter-American Development Bank, are driving projects that harm people and the planet and are said to be holding a massive amount of countries’ debt based on a series of eye-opening case studies, data, and critical trend analyses.

According to the report, the available official statistics show that the most significant percentage of PDB financing currently goes to financial services, public administration, trade, energy, transportation, and infrastructure. A significantly lower but significant percentage goes to investment in social sectors such as health, education, housing, water and sanitation, and agriculture.

While some PDBs offer grant-based assistance, most financing comes through loans, often at high interest rates. Like Chinese PDBs, these loans sometimes come with shorter repayment periods. Even institutions like the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA), which offers concessional loans to the lowest-income countries, are criticized for contributing to debt crises in the Global South.

In 2023, during the Finance in Common Summit (FICS), over 35 civil society activists from more than 20 countries came together to challenge the claims of the world’s largest development banks. These banks present themselves as champions in the fight against climate change and poverty, but activists argue that their projects often exacerbate the problems they claim to solve.

“Development banks are advocating for a bigger role in the global economy,” said Ivahanna Larrosa, Regional Coordinator for Latin America at the Coalition for Human Rights in Development. “But are they truly fit for this purpose? Unfortunately, the stories of communities worldwide show us that development banks are failing to address the root causes of the problems they claim to solve. We need to hold them accountable for this.”

The IFC’s involvement in projects like the Sal de Vida lithium mine in Argentina further demonstrates the problem. In the name of renewable energy, the project is displacing Indigenous communities and destroying fragile ecosystems. At the same time, local authorities, including the police and officials, align with the company to silence dissent by threatening and criminalizing local community leaders and the families living near the construction site.

The negative impacts of PDBs extend across the globe. In Kenya, PDBs have pushed for increased health sector privatization, leading to a divide between those who can afford care and those who cannot. Out-of-pocket healthcare spending in Kenya rose by 53% per capita between 2013 and 2018, deepening inequalities and hampering the country’s progress toward universal health coverage.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African court dismisses appeal against EACOP project

Published

on

The Appellate Division of the East African Court of Justice (EACJ) has dismissed a high-profile appeal filed by civil society organisations (CSOs) that sought to challenge the human rights, environmental, and climate risks associated with the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project.

In a ruling delivered on Wednesday at the EACJ headquarters in Arusha, Tanzania, the Appellate Division upheld the First Instance Division’s 2023 decision, concluding that the case was filed outside the time limit set under East African Community (EAC) laws, which generally mandate cases be heard within a 60-day window.

The panel of judges, led by EACJ Appellate Division president Nestor Kayobera, alongside vice president Anita Mugeni and Kathurima M’Inot, agreed that the EACJ did not have the jurisdiction to hear the main case.

Original petition

The original suit was filed in November 2020 by four CSOs: Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO), Centre for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT) from Uganda, Natural Justice (NJ) from Kenya, and the Centre for Strategic Litigation (CSL) from Tanzania.

The CSOs sought a permanent injunction to halt the construction of the pipeline in protected areas in Uganda and Tanzania, compensation for all project-affected persons (PAPs) for losses incurred due to land use restrictions.

The First Instance Division dismissed the case in November 2023, prompting the CSOs to immediately file an appeal in December 2023. This appeal was subsequently heard in Arusha and Kigali, Rwanda, in November 2024 and February 2025, respectively.

EACOP project

Costs overturned 

Crucially, while the Appellate Division upheld the dismissal, it overturned the order issued by the First Instance Division that had awarded costs to the governments of Uganda and Tanzania and the Secretary General of the EAC.

The judges directed that each party must bear its own costs, stating: “Taking into account the public interest involved in the appeal and the appellants’ public-spirited endeavor to ensure compliance with the treaty, we direct that each party shall bear their own costs in this court and in the trial.”

CSOs decry ‘disappointing decision’

The CSOs described the Wednesday ruling as a “disappointing decision,” arguing that the judges failed to consider when affected communities and CSOs actually became aware of the project’s impacts and the existence of the EACOP-related agreements, such as the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) and Host Government Agreement (HGA), which were made public years after they were signed.

Dickens Kamugisha, CEO of AFIEGO, called the decision a “setback for regional justice” and protection of vulnerable communities.

“The decision has left over 331 million East Africans at the mercy of greedy corporations,” he stated, adding, “The ruling is a travesty, but we remain determined to use all available strategies to protect people and nature.”

Elizabeth Kariuki from Natural Justice emphasized the impact on the PAPs, saying, “This ruling is devastating for the very people whose lives have been upended by EACOP – the families that lost their land and livelihoods, and the communities watching their ecosystems disappear. Today, the court has closed its doors to them. But we will not give up. We will continue to fight alongside communities to ensure that their suffering is not ignored.”

MCosmas Yiga, a PAP from Uganda, expressed profound disappointment, saying, “We, the PAPs, have been oppressed, and we don’t expect any gain from the oil industry… Today is a sad day,” citing his refusal of a $2 million compensation offer for 58 mango trees.

The courtroom was packed with CSOs, PAPs, media, and a lawyer representing the Ugandan government, state attorney Ojambo Bichachi, who welcomed the decision. The CSOs noted that the Appellate Court of the EACJ is the final court and plan to consult with EACOP-affected people before announcing their next steps.

Source: The Observer

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

EALA members renew push for unified sub-regional Agroecology Law during Mukono meeting.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team.

The East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) has renewed its call for a unified regional agroecology policy and law, following a high-level capacity-building meeting held in Nakisunga Village, Mukono District, Uganda.

The gathering brought together more than 50 EALA members, over 100 participants, including civil society organizations (CSOs) representatives, agroecology experts, and officials from Mukono Local government, to discuss the gaps in existing regional frameworks and the urgent need for coherent legislation to support sustainable and climate-resilient farming systems.

The field tour of Nansubuga CEFROHT Agroecology Training Farm showcased successful organic farming practices, illustrating the benefits of agroecology firsthand to lawmakers and stakeholders.

“I’m amazed at how a local female farmer can transform non-fertile land into a productive farm,” said Hon. Fatuma Ndangiza of the EALA delegation from Rwanda. “Agroecology is about access, safe food, resilient and equitable food systems, and environmental friendliness. What we see here is the right path for our small-scale farmers.”

The proposed regional agroecology law aims to protect smallholder farmers like Nansubuga by safeguarding their seeds, reducing reliance on costly chemical inputs, and shielding them from land grabs, thereby directly enhancing their resilience and livelihoods.

Representing EALA Speaker Rt. Hon. Joseph Ntakirutimana, Hon. Gideon Gatpan Thoar, Chair of the EALA Committee on Agriculture, Tourism and Natural Resources, emphasized the urgency to put the Agroecology policy and law in place:

“There is no law protecting agroecology farmers like Nansubuga. Their seeds are not protected, and they face intense competition from corporate-backed industrial systems. This deserves urgent attention.”

He added that lawmakers’ mandate requires them to legislate in the interest of East Africans, most of whom are smallholder farmers, and that firsthand field experience will strengthen the upcoming model law.

“So now, with this experience, we can push for a regional policy that empowers agroecology farmers and fosters resilient agriculture. Supporting them can lead to a brighter future for East African farming,” He added.

Hon. Fatuma Ndangiza revealed that the agroecology bill could be ready within a year, pending adequate funding, offering hope that smallholder farmers will have access to supportive legislation.

“East Africa cannot build resilient food systems without a unified agroecology policy and law. This meeting is a big step toward drafting a model law that reflects the needs of our farmers. At least by the end of our mandate in 2027, we want this bill in place,” she said. “Members of the agriculture committee have already been trained in agroecology, and thanks to CEFROHT and other partners, even more lawmakers now appreciate the importance of this legislation. It will move quickly.”

Experts at the meeting highlighted systemic biases that keep East African farmers impoverished. These include a longstanding emphasis on export-oriented industrial agriculture, corporate-controlled seeds, increasing pesticide and fertilizer use, and land grabs.

Dr. Million Belay, General Coordinator of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), warned that Africa is being pushed into an unsustainable corner.

“One of the legacies of colonialism is pushing us to export food instead of feeding our people. Chemicals, GMOs, and land grabs are increasing, and global actors now control food production.

A farm like this one shows the direction we should take.”

He went on to say that proper food security and environmental health depend on farmers’ control over their land, seeds, and output-what we call food sovereignty-empowering farmers to shape their future.

As part of the capacity-building process, EALA members visited the CEFROHT Agroecology Learning Center, where they witnessed demonstrations of intercropping and crop diversification, agroforestry systems, animal husbandry, water and pesticide trapping, among others.

Dr. David Kabanda, whose organization, the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), hosted the delegation, noted that farmers are already successfully practicing agroecology, demonstrating the tangible benefits of this approach.

“We are pleased to support lawmakers with evidence and field-level experiences. Agroecology is not theoretical; farmers are already practicing it successfully. It is what we advocate for, the production of good food as well as environmental conservation,” he added.

Looking ahead, EALA announced a series of concrete steps to advance the regional agroecology agenda. The assembly plans to complete the Agroecology Bill process within a year, then conduct public hearings across all eight EAC Partner States to gather stakeholder input. The bill will be fast-tracked for debate and approval in the EALA plenary, with civil society expected to help secure the Heads of State’s assent. Once adopted, the law will become the EAC Agroecology Act, guiding and harmonizing agroecology efforts across the region.

As climate shocks intensify and millions of families depend on smallholder farming, the Mukono meeting marks a turning point in East Africa’s pursuit of sustainable, resilient food systems. The push for a unified agroecology law signals a growing regional recognition that the future of East African agriculture must be farmer-centered, biodiversity-based, and rooted in local knowledge.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African lawmakers and CSO leaders are meeting in Uganda to draw up plans to promote Agroecology as an alternative to climate change mitigation.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Mukono, Uganda — the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) members and Civil society organizations (CSOs) leaders in Uganda are convening in Nakisunga, Mukono district today, 28th November, to discuss how to promote agroecology at the regional level and inspire a collective commitment to regional resilience.

Agroecology offers a robust, holistic approach to combating climate change by enhancing the resilience of food systems and reducing their environmental impact.

Spearheaded by the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), the event emphasizes integrating agroecology into regional climate resilience strategies, especially as the East African Community (EAC) faces rising food costs, climate shocks, and declining soil health.

During the meeting, EALA members, together with CSOs, will explore how principles like crop diversification, soil regeneration, and community seed saving can directly improve smallholder farmers’ resilience and livelihoods, complemented by a hands-on field visit to the CEFROHT Agroecology Learning Center in Mukono.

The event has also occurred at a time when EALA is reviewing the East African Seed and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, which is being criticized for undermining the role of smallholder farmers in seed saving, conservation, and the management of seed systems to promote healthy foods.

Players from CSOs include: Participatory Ecological Land Use Management (PELUM Uganda), Eastern and Southern Africa Small-scale Farmers’ Forum (ESAFF), Seed Savers Network Kenya, TABIO Tanzania, the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), Slow Food Uganda, SEATINI, FIAN Uganda, and the Mukono District Local Government, among others.

The meeting will lay the groundwork for East Africa’s first Policy and Model Law on Agroecology, a long-awaited step toward sustainable and equitable agri-food systems that empower regional stakeholders to shape the future.

The event will be broadcast live on Witness Radio.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter