MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Restoring Our Land: Tackling Degradation for Climate Resilience, Food Security, and Sustainable Development at COP16
Published
12 months agoon

United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
Land degradation is not just an environmental problem. It increases risks to human health and the spread of new diseases. It is a driver of forced migration and conflicts over scarce resources. It is a leading contributor to climate change, biodiversity loss, poverty, and food insecurity. In other words, it is at the core of sustainable development.

Restoring degraded land and soil, and investing in drought resilience, are some of the most cost-effective actions countries can take to reduce the high human, social and economic impacts of drought—simultaneously increasing food, water and energy security while reducing displacement and conflict drivers. Thirty years ago, with the adoption of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), countries agreed to walk together down this path.
What Drives Land Degradation and Desertification?
Land degradation is the long-term decline in the quality of land that leads to the reduction or loss of the biological or economic productivity of land. In the drylands, land degradation is known as desertification. According to the Global Land Outlook, drylands cover more than 45% of the Earth’s land surface, provide 44% of the world’s agriculture, support 50% of the world’s livestock, and are home to one in three people worldwide. Experts estimate that, if not reversed, land degradation will drive 700 million people out of their homes by 2050 because they will no longer be able to feed themselves or have access to sufficient water.
The dominant drivers of land degradation include agriculture and related land-use changes, unsustainable management or over-exploitation of resources, natural vegetation clearance, nutrient depletion, overgrazing, inappropriate irrigation, excessive use of agrochemicals, urban sprawl, pollution, mining and quarrying, among others.
Deforestation is one of the most significant causes of land degradation. Tree roots help bind soil particles, thus maintaining their quality. When trees are cut down, the soil particles tend to disperse, negatively impacting the quality of the soil.
Another driver of land degradation is a lack of land tenure security. When people own their land, they are more likely to make the long-term investments needed to sustainably manage land, such as practicing crop diversity and agroforestry. Even though land constitutes the main asset from which the rural poor derive their livelihoods, millions of farmers, especially women, do not own their land. In many countries, the laws or customs hinder women’s ownership of land. In more than 100 countries, women are dispossessed from their land when they lose their husbands. This is a key issue to global land restoration since women are more likely to invest in diverse food systems, which boost soil health, while men focus primarily on cash crops and monoculture.
What is the UN Convention to Combat Desertification?
In 1991, African environment ministers decided to prioritize their proposal for the negotiation of a new convention to combat desertification as one of the concrete recommendations to be adopted at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED or Earth Summit) to be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in June 1992. They hoped a convention would help them gain access to additional funding to combat desertification, land degradation, and drought.
Leading into the final days In Rio, delegates had reached agreement on much of the desertification chapter of Agenda 21, the UNCED outcome, including the definition of desertification: “Land degradation in arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas resulting from various factors, including climate variations and human activities.” However, there was still opposition to a convention. Many developing countries resisted the idea of a special convention for Africa, since they also faced land degradation. Industrialized countries maintained that desertification was a local problem and did not warrant a treaty. It wasn’t until the final hours of the Earth Summit that a deal was finally struck and the call for a convention was included in Chapter 12 of Agenda 21.
Negotiations on the Convention began in May 1993 and were completed in five meetings over fifteen months. At the first session in Nairobi, Kenya, the International Negotiating Committee held a one-week seminar to inform negotiators of the substantive issues related to desertification and drought, demonstrating that land degradation affected people around the world. This led to a serious discussion on how to create a global convention that still gave priority to Africa. When Committee Chair Bo Kjellén suggested including a special annex for Africa under the Convention, other regions insisted on annexes for their regions.
At the second meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, in September 1993, governments agreed to negotiate four annexes simultaneously, while giving special attention to Africa. In the end, the Convention includes regional implementation annexes for Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia, and the Northern Mediterranean. A fifth annex, for Central and Eastern Europe, was adopted in 2000.
Differences over financial resources nearly caused the negotiations to collapse. Developing countries called for a special fund as the centerpiece of the new convention. Industrialized countries rejected binding obligations to increase financial assistance to affected countries, insisting that existing resources could be used more effectively. The deadlock was broken only after the United States proposed establishing a “Global Mechanism” to improve monitoring and assessment of existing aid flows and increase donor coordination. Many developing countries were not happy, but believed they had to accept the Global Mechanism on the final night because if there was no agreement on finance, there would be no convention. On 17 June 1994, delegates adopted the UNCCD, four regional implementation annexes, and a resolution calling for urgent action for Africa.
The Convention recognizes the physical, biological, and socio-economic aspects of desertification and the importance of redirecting technology transfer so that it is demand-driven. The core of the convention is the development of national, subregional and regional action programmes by national governments in cooperation with donors, local populations, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). In fact, the Convention was the first to call for the effective participation of local populations and organizations in the preparation of national action programmes. This innovation led the first “sustainable development” convention to also be referred to as a “bottom-up” convention.
The UNCCD was opened for signature in October 1994 and entered into force on 26 December 1996. Today, there are 197 parties, representing universal ratification.

Promoting Land Degradation Neutrality
In 2008, a group of scientists was asked by the UNCCD Executive Secretary to examine if the Convention could use the offsetting principle already practiced by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and applied to deforestation at one site by planting trees elsewhere. The idea was to use this offsetting principle to lead to zero-net land degradation and expand the reach of the Convention to address land degradation globally, not just in the drylands.
The Secretariat and like-minded countries then advocated for endorsement of this concept of land degradation neutrality (LDN) by the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in June 2012 and its inclusion as one of the targets under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This would enable LDN to gain traction and effectively link land degradation as a driver of poverty, climate change and biodiversity loss, and demonstrate the relevance of productive land to global sustainability. The Rio+20 outcome, The Future We Want, highlights the need for urgent action to reverse land degradation and achieve a land-degradation neutral world.
After Rio+20, the UNCCD pushed forward with LDN on a variety of fronts. First, in 2013, the 11th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) established a working group to develop a science-based definition of LDN (Decision 8/COP.11). In late 2014, the Secretariat set up the LDN pilot project, through which 14 affected countries worked to translate LDN into national targets.
Meanwhile, in New York, the UNCCD and its supporters successfully lobbied for including a target on LDN in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). When the 17 SDGs and 169 targets were adopted by the UN General Assembly in September 2015, they included target 15.3: “By 2030, combat desertification, restore degraded land and soil, including land affected by desertification, drought and floods, and strive to achieve a land degradation-neutral world.” For the first time, the UNCCD had successfully placed an item at the forefront of the international agenda.

The following month, UNCCD COP12 convened in Ankara, Turkey, and endorsed the science-based definition of LDN submitted by the working group:
“Land degradation neutrality is a state whereby the amount and quality of land resources necessary to support ecosystem functions and services and enhance food security remain stable or increase within specified temporary and spatial scales and ecosystems” (decision 3/COP.12).
And, in what some viewed as a ‘game changing’ accomplishment, COP12 agreed that striving to achieve SDG target 15.3 is a “strong vehicle for driving implementation of the UNCCD,” and invited countries to set voluntary targets to achieve LDN. The Global Mechanism and the UNCCD Secretariat established the LDN Target Setting Programme to assist countries in setting national baselines and creating voluntary national LDN targets and associated measures. Since then, 131 countries committed to setting LDN targets and more than 100 have already set their targets.
In 2017, the Convention’s Science-Policy Interface (SPI) published the Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality, which provides a scientific foundation for understanding, implementing and monitoring LDN. It was designed as a bridge between the vision and the practical implementation of LDN by defining LDN in operational terms. The SPI developed three indicators, which created a clear pathway for monitoring LDN—both for the Convention and SDG 15.3:
- trends in land cover;
- trends in land productivity or functioning of the land; and
- trends in carbon stocks above and below ground.
But there were concerns. Some countries and members of civil society at COP12 were worried about the focus on LDN as a central UNCCD target. Some likened it to opening a door to land grabs and greenwashing. So while the UNCCD COP called for the restoration of 1.5 billion hectares of land by 2030 to achieve a land-degradation neutral world, it was also essential to acknowledge land rights and inclusive land governance arrangements at the national and sub-national levels. The land tenure decision at COP14 did just that.
Already countries have pledged to restore 1 billion hectares of land, but there is still more work to be done to make these pledges a reality.
2018-2030 Strategic Framework
In 2017, COP13 in Ordos, China, adopted the UNCCD 2018−2030 Strategic Framework, which has three main components: a vision, strategic objectives and an implementation framework.
The vision commits parties to “A future that avoids, minimizes, and reverses desertification/land degradation and mitigates the effects of drought in affected areas at all levels and strive to achieve a land degradation neutral world consistent with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, within the scope of the Convention.”
The Framework’s five strategic objectives are designed to guide the actions of all UNCCD stakeholders and parties until 2030:
- To improve the condition of affected ecosystems, combat desertification/land degradation, promote sustainable land management and contribute to land degradation neutrality
- To improve the living conditions of affected populations
- To mitigate, adapt to, and manage the effects of drought in order to enhance resilience of vulnerable populations and ecosystems
- To generate global environmental benefits through effective implementation of the UNCCD
- To mobilize substantial and additional financial and nonfinancial resources to support the implementation of the Convention by building effective partnerships at global and national level
The implementation framework defines the roles and responsibilities of parties, UNCCD institutions, partners and stakeholders in meeting the strategic objectives.
In Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, in 2022, COP15 launched a midterm evaluation of the Strategic Plan. The results of this evaluation, overseen by an intergovernmental working group, will be discussed at COP16, which is expected to adopt a decision on enhancing the implementation of the Strategic Framework for its final five years and restoring the necessary hectares of land to achieve a land degradation neutral world.
What’s Next?
UNCCD COP16 convenes in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2-13 December 2024, under the theme “Our Land. Our Future.” The COP will commemorate the 30th anniversary of the UNCCD and a special segment will bring together leaders and high-level officials to commit to accelerate action to combat land degradation and desertification and improve drought resilience.

In addition to the midterm evaluation of the Strategic Plan and adopting the UNCCD’s biennial budget, COP16 is expected to negotiate and adopt decisions aimed at:
- accelerating restoration of degraded land between now and 2030;
- boosting drought preparedness, response and resilience;
- ensuring land continues to provide climate and biodiversity solutions;
- boosting resilience to sand and dust storms;
- scaling up nature-positive food production by protecting and restoring grasslands and rangelands;
- enhancing ongoing efforts to address desertification/land degradation and drought as one of the drivers that causes migration;
- strengthening women’s right to land tenure to advance land restoration; and
- promoting youth engagement, including decent land-based jobs for youth.
COP16 is also expected to catalyze new initiatives on land restoration and drought resilience that build on the G20 Global Land Initiative.
For the first time, the COP will include an Action Agenda, which will highlight voluntary commitments and actions and include thematic days:
- Land Day on 4 December will focus on the importance of healthy land for combating climate change, creating jobs and alleviating poverty, with an emphasis on nature-based solutions, land restoration, and private sector engagement.
- Agri-food System Day on 5 December will highlight sustainable farming practices for resilient crops and healthy soils while protecting ecosystems.
- Governance Day on 6 December will address inclusive land governance.
- People’s Day on 7 December will focus on the role of youth, women and civil society in decision-making.
- Science, Technology and Innovation Day on 9 December aims to accelerate scientific solutions for land health and resilience.
- Resilience Day on 10 December will focus on policies and technologies to build societal and planetary resilience in the face of climate change.
- Finance Day on 11 December will engage financial stakeholders to showcase innovative funding mechanisms and partnerships for land and drought resilience initiatives.
COP16 will also build upon the COPs of the CBD in October 2024 and the UNFCCC in November 2024, improving synergies between the three “Rio Conventions” and promoting the implementation of the SDGs.
As UNCCD Executive Secretary Ibrahim Thiaw said in his foreword to the second edition of the Global Land Outlook report, “Governments and stakeholders cannot stop the climate crisis today, biodiversity loss tomorrow, and land degradation the day after.” The international community needs to tackle all these issues together. Achieving climate, biodiversity and sustainable development goals is impossible without healthy land.
In 1994 the adoption of the UNCCD started the world down the path to reversing land degradation, desertification and drought. COP16 is expected to reaffirm this global commitment for present and future generations.
Pamela Chasek, Ph.D., is the Co-founder and Executive Editor of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
Original Source: Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB)
Related posts:

Protect family farming land to guarantee global food sovereignty and Climate change adaptation and mitigation – Global conference on Family Farming.
‘Her land, her rights’ a remedy for climate crisis
African Women forge bold actions for climate justice at the 2024 Women’s Climate Assembly in Senegal.
63 million people food insecure in Horn of Africa: report
You may like
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Happening shortly! Kenya’s upcoming court ruling on the Seed Law could have a significant impact on farmers’ rights, food sovereignty, and the country’s food system.
Published
2 hours agoon
November 27, 2025
By Witness Radio Team.
Machakos, Kenya — Kenya’s High Court in Machakos will deliver a landmark ruling today, Thursday, November 27, 2025, at 9 EAT, in a case that could redefine seed rights, food sovereignty, and the survival of millions of smallholder farmers who depend on indigenous seed systems in Kenya.
The ruling comes after 15 smallholder farmers from the Seed Savers Network filed a constitutional petition in 2022, claiming that the Seeds and Plant Varieties Act (SPVA) and the Seeds and Plant Varieties (Seeds) Regulations, 2016, have restrictive provisions that violate fundamental rights protected by Kenya’s Constitution.
The ruling could determine whether smallholder farmers can save, trade, and sell indigenous seeds, directly affecting their livelihoods and cultural food practices, which should resonate with the audience’s sense of justice and support for farmers.
The petitioners claim that sharing or selling farm-saved seed that is not registered or certified by the Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Service (KEPHIS) puts smallholder farmers, who provide the majority of Kenya’s food, at risk of being criminalized.
They claim that existing legislation compels farmers to use a costly, exclusive, and incompatible formal seed system, conflicting with the varied, adaptable, and culturally significant varieties protected under farmer-managed seed systems (FMSS).
The petitioners claimed that the SPVA and related regulations violate Article 11(3)(b) of the Kenyan constitution by failing to acknowledge and safeguard indigenous seed systems and cultural heritage, Article 2(6) by violating international treaties on the protection of genetic resources that Kenya has ratified, Article 43(1)(c) by violating the right to sufficient food and freedom from hunger, and Article 27 by discriminating against smallholder farmers by favoring corporate seed breeders.
The SPVA was first passed in 1972, but significant revisions in 2012 and 2016 brought Kenya’s legal system into compliance with the UPOV 1991 convention, enhancing commercial breeders’ intellectual property rights and extending KEPHIS’s regulatory requirements.
All seeds, whether native or not, must be certified before being sold or traded under these reforms. The petitioners contend that these prices farmers out of the seed system and render traditional seed practices unlawful.
The case comes amid rising concern about seed laws, particularly in East Africa. Recently, the EAC Seed and Plant Varieties draft Bill, 2025, which was formally introduced to the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) for its consideration in June 2025 and aims to harmonize seed regulations across the East African Community, has been criticized for favoring commercial seed companies.
The draft Bill, according to its supporters, intends to establish standard procedures for seed certification and the protection of plant varieties within the Community; to provide for related matters; and to coordinate the evaluation, release, and registration of plant varieties among Partner States.
Such bills aim to commercialize seeds, which is likely to disenfranchise smallholder farmers, and the local farmers claim that the standards are difficult to meet.
Despite the push toward commercial seed regulation, smallholder farmers produce over 70% of Kenya’s food and more than 80% of the World’s food, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Experts warn that laws restricting FMSS will erode agrobiodiversity, increase dependence on commercial seed corporations, and diminish community resilience in the face of climate change.
Farmers, lawyers, and civil society organizations believe that the outcome of this court case is crucial because it will protect indigenous seeds, support food sovereignty, and ensure farmers can save, share, and sell seeds, safeguarding their future and rights.
The ruling is expected to be delivered at 9 EAT. Witness Radio will keep you posted on the case update.
Related posts:

The EAC Seed & Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, is a potential threat to smallholder farmers, as it aims to disengage them from the agriculture business, according to experts.
CSOs and Smallholder farmers are urgently convening to scrutinize the EAC Seed & Plant Varieties Bill, 2025.
The EAC Seed and Plant Varieties Bill 2025 targets organic seeds, aiming to replace them with modified seeds, say smallholder farmers.
Seed Boot Camp: A struggle to conserve local and indigenous seeds from extinction.
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Activists storm TotalEnergies’ office ahead of G20 Summit, demand end to fossil fuel expansion in Africa
Published
6 days agoon
November 21, 2025
By Witness Radio team.
South Africa – As South Africa prepares to host the G20 Leaders’ Summit on the 22nd and 23rd, another gathering has already made its voice heard. Activists, including climate activist groups and affected communities, stormed the Johannesburg offices of TotalEnergies on Thursday to express their disappointment over the company’s continued investments in fossil fuels, which they say have resulted in gross human rights violations.
The action, they said, is part of a broader fight to “End a Century of Exploitation, Greenwashing, and Fossil Fuel Expansion in Africa.”
A coalition of 29 organizations marched to the company’s offices in Johannesburg, delivering a petition alongside banners reading “Africa Is Not for Sale,” “Stop EACOP,” and “100,000 Displaced.” They called on the France-based corporation to halt all new oil and gas exploration and development in Africa, including the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), the Mozambique gas project, and offshore drilling in South Africa.
They also demanded that TotalEnergies acknowledge and compensate communities whose land, livelihoods, and ecosystems have been harmed by its operations.
The demonstration was organised by Fossil Ad Ban, StopEACOP, Green Connection, Earthlife Africa, Power Shift Africa, and others. It coincides with the G20 Leaders’ Summit, which begins in Johannesburg on Saturday, the 22nd of November, 2025.
“We are marching shortly before the G20 Summit to draw world leaders’ attention to our calls,” said Lazola Kati, the campaign coordinator for Fossil Ad Ban.
The G20, composed of 20 countries, the European Union (EU), and the African Union (AU), addresses global economic issues, including climate change mitigation, international financial stability, and sustainable development. This year marks the first G20 Summit to be held on African soil, under the theme “solidarity, equality and sustainability.”
Activists say the Summit offers a critical moment to expose injustices committed by Global North countries and corporations that claim to promote development in the Global South, while instead profiting from these projects that leave affected communities in misery.
Their central message targets TotalEnergies. Activists accuse the company, now marking 101 years of existence, of causing environmental destruction, land dispossession, and human rights violations across the continent.
“From the Niger Delta to Cabo Delgado, from EACOP’s route through Uganda and Tanzania to the expanding offshore oil blocks along South Africa’s coast, TotalEnergies has built profit on the suffering of people and the degradation of ecosystems,” reads part of the coalition’s letter addressed to TotalEnergies South Africa.
They argue that while the company brands itself as a “green” and “responsible” energy leader, it continues to pour billions of dollars into new oil and gas projects, while spending millions on advertising and sponsorships to present itself as climate-friendly, an act they describe as corporate greenwashing that obstructs real climate action.
Patrick Edema of StopEACOP noted that the pipeline will pass through 178 villages in Uganda and 231 in Tanzania, causing massive physical and economic displacement. “Our message is clear: TotalEnergies’ century of harm ends now. We will not allow you to mortgage our future for your fossil fuel profits. We will #StopEACOP,” he said.
An estimated 100,000 people in Uganda and Tanzania have already lost, or will lose, land used for farming or livestock due to the project.
In Mozambique, TotalEnergies’ fossil gas project in Cabo Delgado has also caused widespread displacement. The company and its partners are constructing a gas processing plant on a 7,000-hectare site allocated by the government, a move that required the relocation of 557 households, many of whom say promised compensation and replacement land never materialised.
“Africa does not need another century of fossil fuel colonialism,” the coalition stated in its letter. “We need a future powered by justice, renewable energy, and community-led solutions.” They called on TotalEnergies to align with the demands expected to be raised at the G20 and COP30 conferences: to end fossil fuel subsidies and to stop all new oil and gas development.
Lisa Makaula, advocacy officer at The Green Connection, emphasized the urgency for communities to speak out. “The world is at a tipping point, and as developing nations, we cannot afford to invest in fossil fuel projects that will worsen the impacts of climate change. Fisher livelihoods are already being destroyed in West Africa due to oil and gas exploration. We need committed leaders who will ensure that oceans are protected and that communities are not left behind as we transition to a low-carbon economy, with equity and fairness at the forefront.”
In their letter, the coalition further demands that TotalEnergies commit to a just and equitable transition that prioritizes renewable energy, distributive justice, and African ownership of the energy transition.
Related posts:

Banks have given almost $7tn to fossil fuel firms since Paris deal, report reveals
New billion-dollar loans to fossil fuel companies from SEB, Nordea and Danske Bank.
Financial Institutions from Africa have made a monumental commitment of $100 billion to Africa’s green industrialization, a decision of immense significance that has the potential to shape Africa’s future.
Well connected: The resistance against the fossil industry in East Africa.
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK
Environmentalists reject TFFF, warning it will deepen forest destruction.
Published
1 week agoon
November 20, 2025
By Witness Radio team
The Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF), unveiled with great fanfare on November 6th, 2025, as a pre-event ahead of the 30th UN Climate Conference in Belém, is already facing a storm of criticism from civil society and environmentalists.
More than 200 civil society organizations, Indigenous networks, and environmental justice groups from every corner of the globe are demanding an immediate halt to the initiative, calling it “a false solution that will deepen forest destruction rather than stop it.”
The Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) is a proposed global financing mechanism intended to support the long-term protection of tropical forests. Its goal, according to those behind it, is to offer stable, ongoing funding to countries that preserve or expand their forest cover, using investment-generated returns to reward practical conservation efforts.
But activists warn that the facility is being promoted as a bold new funding model for forest conservation. Yet, in reality, it is built on a financial structure that they say will benefit wealthy investors while burdening tropical forest nations with more debt, potentially leading to their further exploitation.
While in Belém, Brazil, on November 6th, global leaders officially launched the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF), with a collective investment of USD $5.5 billion following an initial US$1 billion committed by Brazil in September this year.
COP30 is the United Nations Climate Change Conference taking place in Belém, Brazil, from November 10th to 21st, 2025. UN Climate Change Conferences (or COPs) take place every year, and are the World’s only multilateral decision-making forum on climate change that brings together almost every country.
According to the Fund promoters, the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) emerges as an innovative, essential, and strategic financing solution designed to permanently protect tropical forests, the biological and climatic pillars of our planet, through addressing the climate crisis, combating biodiversity loss, and recognizing Indigenous Peoples and traditional Communities in climate justice.
The TFFF’s governance is split into two parts: The Tropical Forest Investment Fund (TFIF), run by the World Bank under its own governance system, responsible for managing investments and deciding how much money is available for forest payments, and the TFFF Secretariat, which oversees monitoring, reporting, and the distribution of those payments to participating countries.
But environmentalists argue that this financial model reveals a more profound, more troubling logic. They say the initiative is a colonial plan by Northern elites, for Northern elites, and designed by wealthy investors who get paid first. At the same time, forest peoples receive only “what is left.”
“TFFF is yet another trap that will not stop deforestation. TFFF is a colonial plan of Northern elites, by Northern elites, and for Northern elites that will make the rich richer by extracting wealth from the global South. Initiatives like this one end up reinforcing a capitalist, racist, colonialist, and patriarchal vision of the world that only deepens the current injustices and manifold crises,” they wrote in a petition calling individuals to join efforts to stop the initiative.
The TFFF claims to be a “new hope” for tropical forests worldwide. However, it’s not designed to address the drivers of deforestation, but to benefit investors in financial markets that are actually driving deforestation.
Far from protecting forests and their communities, this new market-based initiative will actually reinforce a capitalist, racist, colonialist, and patriarchal worldview that only deepens current manifold crises and injustices. It could lead to the displacement of indigenous communities and the loss of their traditional lands, a direct violation of their rights, and a significant social injustice.
The World Bank is set to host the TFIF and influence daily fund management. Activists argue that this Bank has a long record of financing projects that violate community rights, promote industrial plantations, and deepen debt crises in the global South. For instance, the Bank’s support for large-scale infrastructure projects has often led to the displacement of local communities and environmental degradation.
For critics, this is proof that the TFFF is yet another top-down, Northern-led mechanism destined to repeat past failures. Similar initiatives in the past have often failed to address the root causes of deforestation, instead focusing on market-based solutions that benefit investors more than local communities.
It is high time to address the root causes of deforestation: unjust economic relations and trade, land grabbing by agribusiness, and expansion of mining and other extractive industries. These are the systemic issues that perpetuate deforestation and environmental degradation. Our commitment is to resist struggles against large-scale projects that destroy forests and fuel climate chaos. TFFF will undermine solidarity among communities protecting their territories.
Related posts:

How forest policies and agencies promote sustainable destruction
Environmentalists raise red flags over plan to expand oil palm fields in Kalangala
Uganda: Court of Appeal starts hearing an appeal case challenging the High Court’s decision of not canceling the ESIA certificate that allowed the cutting down of Bugoma Forest.
UNCCD COP16: NGOs issue a stark warning and call for urgent actions to deal with the escalating threats of desertification, land degradation, and drought.
Happening shortly! Kenya’s upcoming court ruling on the Seed Law could have a significant impact on farmers’ rights, food sovereignty, and the country’s food system.
Joint Statement Response by Advisers of PAPs to the DRS Follow-Up Report on the Uganda KIIDP-2 Case
Activists storm TotalEnergies’ office ahead of G20 Summit, demand end to fossil fuel expansion in Africa
Environmentalists reject TFFF, warning it will deepen forest destruction.
Seed Boot Camp: A struggle to conserve local and indigenous seeds from extinction.
“Vacant Land” Narrative Fuels Dispossession and Ecological Crisis in Africa – New report.
Report reveals ongoing Human Rights Abuses and environmental destruction by the Chinese oil company CNOOC
Activists storm TotalEnergies’ office ahead of G20 Summit, demand end to fossil fuel expansion in Africa
Innovative Finance from Canada projects positive impact on local communities.
Over 5000 Indigenous Communities evicted in Kiryandongo District
Petition To Land Inquiry Commission Over Human Rights In Kiryandongo District
Invisible victims of Uganda Land Grabs
Resource Center
- REPARATORY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE MUST BE AT THE CORE OF COP30, SAY GLOBAL LEADERS AND MOVEMENTS
- LAND GRABS AT GUNPOINT REPORT IN KIRYANDONGO DISTRICT
- THOSE OIL LIARS! THEY DESTROYED MY BUSINESS!
- RESEARCH BRIEF -TOURISM POTENTIAL OF GREATER MASAKA -MARCH 2025
- The Mouila Declaration of the Informal Alliance against the Expansion of Industrial Monocultures
- FORCED LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA TRENDS RIGHTS OF DEFENDERS IMPACT AND CALL FOR ACTION
- 12 KEY DEMANDS FROM CSOS TO WORLD LEADERS AT THE OPENING OF COP16 IN SAUDI ARABIA
- PRESENDIANTIAL DIRECTIVE BANNING ALL LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA
Legal Framework
READ BY CATEGORY
Newsletter
Trending
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK2 weeks ago“Vacant Land” Narrative Fuels Dispossession and Ecological Crisis in Africa – New report.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK6 days agoActivists storm TotalEnergies’ office ahead of G20 Summit, demand end to fossil fuel expansion in Africa
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK1 week agoEnvironmentalists reject TFFF, warning it will deepen forest destruction.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK2 weeks agoUganda’s Army is on the spot for forcibly grabbing land for families in Pangero Chiefdom in Nebbi district.
-
NGO WORK2 weeks agoAfrica’s Land Is Not Empty: New Report Debunks the Myth of “Unused Land” and Calls for a Just Future for the Continent’s Farmland
-
NGO WORK2 weeks agoClimate wash: The World Bank’s Fresh Offensive on Land Rights
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK2 hours agoHappening shortly! Kenya’s upcoming court ruling on the Seed Law could have a significant impact on farmers’ rights, food sovereignty, and the country’s food system.
-
STATEMENTS2 days agoJoint Statement Response by Advisers of PAPs to the DRS Follow-Up Report on the Uganda KIIDP-2 Case
