Connect with us

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

World Bank announces multimillion-dollar redress fund after killings and abuse claims at Tanzanian project

Published

on

A pastoralist indicates the border of Ruaha national park after the expansion. People allege they have faced violent evictions, disappearances and had cattle seized. Photograph: Michael Goima/The Guardian

Communities in Ruaha national park reject response to alleged assault and evictions of herders during tourism scheme funded by the bank.

The World Bank is embarking on a multimillion-dollar programme in response to alleged human rights abuses against Tanzanian herders during a flagship tourism project it funded for seven years.

Allegations made by pastoralist communities living in and around Ruaha national park include violent evictions, sexual assaults, killings, forced disappearances and large-scale cattle seizures from herders committed by rangers working for the Tanzanian national park authority (Tanapa).

The pastoralists say most of the incidents took place after the bank approved $150m (£116m) for the Resilient Natural Resource Management for Tourism and Growth (Regrow) project September in 2017, aimed at developing tourism in four protected areas in southern Tanzania in a bid to take pressure off heavily touristed northern areas such as Ngorongoro and the Serengeti.

In 2023, two individuals wrote to the bank accusing some Tanapa employees of “extreme cruelty” during cattle seizures and having engaged in “extrajudicial killings” and the “disappearance” of community members.

The Oakland Institute, a US-based thinktank that is advising the communities, and which alerted the World Bank to abuses in April 2023, says Ruaha doubled in size from 1m to more than 2m hectares (2.5m to 5m acres) during the project’s lifetime – a claim the bank denies. It says the expansion took place a decade earlier. Oakland claims 84,000 people from at least 28 villages were affected by the expansion plan.

This week, the bank published a 70-page report following its own investigation, which found “critical failures in the planning and supervision of this project and that these have resulted in serious harm”. The report, published on 2 April, notes that “the project should have recognised that enhancing Tanapa’s capacity to manage the park could potentially increase the likelihood of conflict with communities trying to access the park.”

Anna Bjerde, World Bank managing director of operations, said, “We regret that the Regrow project preparation and supervision did not sufficiently account for project risks, resulting in inadequate mitigation measures to address adverse impacts. This oversight led to the bank overlooking critical information during implementation.”

The report includes recommendations aimed at redressing harms done and details a $2.8m project that will support alternative livelihoods for communities inside and around the park. It will also help fund a Tanzanian NGO that provides legal advice to victims of crime who want to pursue justice through the courts.

A second, much bigger project, understood to be worth $110, will fund alternative livelihoods across the entire country, including Ruaha.

The total investment, thought to be the largest amount the bank has ever allocated to addressing breaches of its policies, is a reflection of the serious nature of the allegations.

A metal sign saying Ruaha national park
The project aimed to increase management of Ruaha national park and develop it as a tourist asset. Photograph: Michael Goima/The Guardian

The bank had already suspended Regrow funding in April 2024 after its own investigation found the Tanzanian government had violated the bank’s resettlement policy and failed to create a system to report violent incidents or claim redress. The project was cancelled altogether in November 2024. A spokesperson said the bank “remains deeply concerned about the serious nature of the reports of incidents of violence and continues to focus on the wellbeing of affected communities”.

By the time the project was suspended the bank had already disbursed $125m of the $150m allocated to Regrow.

The Oakland Institute estimates that economic damages for farmers and pastoralists affected by livelihood restrictions, run into tens of millions of dollars.

Anuradha Mittal, executive director of the Oakland Institute, said the “scathing” investigation “confirmed the bank’s grave wrongdoing which devastated the lives of communities. Pastoralists and farms who refused to be silenced amid widespread government repression, are now vindicated.”

She added that the bank’s response was “beyond shameful”.

“Suggesting that tens of thousands of people forced out of their land can survive with ‘alternative livelihoods’ such as clean cooking and microfinance is a slap in the face of the victims.”

Inspection panel chair Ibrahim Pam said critical lessons from the Regrow case will be applied to all conservation projects that require resettlement and restrict access to parks, especially those implemented by a law enforcement agency.

A herd of elephants crosses and dirt road next to a 4X4
A proportion of the new World Bank funding will go to support communities within Ruaha national park. Photograph: Tristram Kenton/The Guardian

Regrow was given the go ahead in 2017. The Oakland Institute described its cancellation by the government in 2024 as a landmark victory, but said communities “remain under siege – still facing evictions, crippling livelihood restrictions and human rights abuses”.

In one village near the southern border of Ruaha, the brother of a young man who was killed three years ago while herding cattle in an area adjacent to the park, said: “It feels like it was yesterday. He had a wife, a family. Now the wife has to look after the child by herself.” He did not want to give his name for fear of reprisal.

Another community member whose husband was allegedly killed by Tanapa staff said: “I feel bad whenever I remember what happened to my husband. We used to talk often. We were friends. I was pregnant with his child when he died. He never saw his daughter. Now I just live in fear of these [Tanapa-employed] people.”

A herd of cows grazing on dried grass
Cows grazing on harvested rice paddy fields in Ruaha national park, central Tanzania. Photograph: Michael Goima/The Guardian

The Oakland Institute said the affected communities reject the bank’s recommendations, and have delivered a list of demands that includes “reverting park boundaries to the 1998 borders they accepted, reparations for livelihood restrictions, the resumption of suspended basic services, and justice for victims of ranger abuse and violence.

“Villagers are determined to continue the struggle for their rights to land and life until the bank finally takes responsibility and remedies the harms it caused.”

The bank has said it has no authority to pay compensation directly.

Wildlife-based tourism is a major component of Tanzania’s economy, contributing more than one quarter of the country’s foreign exchange earnings in 2019. The bank has said any future community resettlement will be the government’s decision.

Source: The Guardian

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African court dismisses appeal against EACOP project

Published

on

The Appellate Division of the East African Court of Justice (EACJ) has dismissed a high-profile appeal filed by civil society organisations (CSOs) that sought to challenge the human rights, environmental, and climate risks associated with the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project.

In a ruling delivered on Wednesday at the EACJ headquarters in Arusha, Tanzania, the Appellate Division upheld the First Instance Division’s 2023 decision, concluding that the case was filed outside the time limit set under East African Community (EAC) laws, which generally mandate cases be heard within a 60-day window.

The panel of judges, led by EACJ Appellate Division president Nestor Kayobera, alongside vice president Anita Mugeni and Kathurima M’Inot, agreed that the EACJ did not have the jurisdiction to hear the main case.

Original petition

The original suit was filed in November 2020 by four CSOs: Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO), Centre for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT) from Uganda, Natural Justice (NJ) from Kenya, and the Centre for Strategic Litigation (CSL) from Tanzania.

The CSOs sought a permanent injunction to halt the construction of the pipeline in protected areas in Uganda and Tanzania, compensation for all project-affected persons (PAPs) for losses incurred due to land use restrictions.

The First Instance Division dismissed the case in November 2023, prompting the CSOs to immediately file an appeal in December 2023. This appeal was subsequently heard in Arusha and Kigali, Rwanda, in November 2024 and February 2025, respectively.

EACOP project

Costs overturned 

Crucially, while the Appellate Division upheld the dismissal, it overturned the order issued by the First Instance Division that had awarded costs to the governments of Uganda and Tanzania and the Secretary General of the EAC.

The judges directed that each party must bear its own costs, stating: “Taking into account the public interest involved in the appeal and the appellants’ public-spirited endeavor to ensure compliance with the treaty, we direct that each party shall bear their own costs in this court and in the trial.”

CSOs decry ‘disappointing decision’

The CSOs described the Wednesday ruling as a “disappointing decision,” arguing that the judges failed to consider when affected communities and CSOs actually became aware of the project’s impacts and the existence of the EACOP-related agreements, such as the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) and Host Government Agreement (HGA), which were made public years after they were signed.

Dickens Kamugisha, CEO of AFIEGO, called the decision a “setback for regional justice” and protection of vulnerable communities.

“The decision has left over 331 million East Africans at the mercy of greedy corporations,” he stated, adding, “The ruling is a travesty, but we remain determined to use all available strategies to protect people and nature.”

Elizabeth Kariuki from Natural Justice emphasized the impact on the PAPs, saying, “This ruling is devastating for the very people whose lives have been upended by EACOP – the families that lost their land and livelihoods, and the communities watching their ecosystems disappear. Today, the court has closed its doors to them. But we will not give up. We will continue to fight alongside communities to ensure that their suffering is not ignored.”

MCosmas Yiga, a PAP from Uganda, expressed profound disappointment, saying, “We, the PAPs, have been oppressed, and we don’t expect any gain from the oil industry… Today is a sad day,” citing his refusal of a $2 million compensation offer for 58 mango trees.

The courtroom was packed with CSOs, PAPs, media, and a lawyer representing the Ugandan government, state attorney Ojambo Bichachi, who welcomed the decision. The CSOs noted that the Appellate Court of the EACJ is the final court and plan to consult with EACOP-affected people before announcing their next steps.

Source: The Observer

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

EALA members renew push for unified sub-regional Agroecology Law during Mukono meeting.

Published

on

By Witness Radio Team.

The East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) has renewed its call for a unified regional agroecology policy and law, following a high-level capacity-building meeting held in Nakisunga Village, Mukono District, Uganda.

The gathering brought together more than 50 EALA members, over 100 participants, including civil society organizations (CSOs) representatives, agroecology experts, and officials from Mukono Local government, to discuss the gaps in existing regional frameworks and the urgent need for coherent legislation to support sustainable and climate-resilient farming systems.

The field tour of Nansubuga CEFROHT Agroecology Training Farm showcased successful organic farming practices, illustrating the benefits of agroecology firsthand to lawmakers and stakeholders.

“I’m amazed at how a local female farmer can transform non-fertile land into a productive farm,” said Hon. Fatuma Ndangiza of the EALA delegation from Rwanda. “Agroecology is about access, safe food, resilient and equitable food systems, and environmental friendliness. What we see here is the right path for our small-scale farmers.”

The proposed regional agroecology law aims to protect smallholder farmers like Nansubuga by safeguarding their seeds, reducing reliance on costly chemical inputs, and shielding them from land grabs, thereby directly enhancing their resilience and livelihoods.

Representing EALA Speaker Rt. Hon. Joseph Ntakirutimana, Hon. Gideon Gatpan Thoar, Chair of the EALA Committee on Agriculture, Tourism and Natural Resources, emphasized the urgency to put the Agroecology policy and law in place:

“There is no law protecting agroecology farmers like Nansubuga. Their seeds are not protected, and they face intense competition from corporate-backed industrial systems. This deserves urgent attention.”

He added that lawmakers’ mandate requires them to legislate in the interest of East Africans, most of whom are smallholder farmers, and that firsthand field experience will strengthen the upcoming model law.

“So now, with this experience, we can push for a regional policy that empowers agroecology farmers and fosters resilient agriculture. Supporting them can lead to a brighter future for East African farming,” He added.

Hon. Fatuma Ndangiza revealed that the agroecology bill could be ready within a year, pending adequate funding, offering hope that smallholder farmers will have access to supportive legislation.

“East Africa cannot build resilient food systems without a unified agroecology policy and law. This meeting is a big step toward drafting a model law that reflects the needs of our farmers. At least by the end of our mandate in 2027, we want this bill in place,” she said. “Members of the agriculture committee have already been trained in agroecology, and thanks to CEFROHT and other partners, even more lawmakers now appreciate the importance of this legislation. It will move quickly.”

Experts at the meeting highlighted systemic biases that keep East African farmers impoverished. These include a longstanding emphasis on export-oriented industrial agriculture, corporate-controlled seeds, increasing pesticide and fertilizer use, and land grabs.

Dr. Million Belay, General Coordinator of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), warned that Africa is being pushed into an unsustainable corner.

“One of the legacies of colonialism is pushing us to export food instead of feeding our people. Chemicals, GMOs, and land grabs are increasing, and global actors now control food production.

A farm like this one shows the direction we should take.”

He went on to say that proper food security and environmental health depend on farmers’ control over their land, seeds, and output-what we call food sovereignty-empowering farmers to shape their future.

As part of the capacity-building process, EALA members visited the CEFROHT Agroecology Learning Center, where they witnessed demonstrations of intercropping and crop diversification, agroforestry systems, animal husbandry, water and pesticide trapping, among others.

Dr. David Kabanda, whose organization, the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), hosted the delegation, noted that farmers are already successfully practicing agroecology, demonstrating the tangible benefits of this approach.

“We are pleased to support lawmakers with evidence and field-level experiences. Agroecology is not theoretical; farmers are already practicing it successfully. It is what we advocate for, the production of good food as well as environmental conservation,” he added.

Looking ahead, EALA announced a series of concrete steps to advance the regional agroecology agenda. The assembly plans to complete the Agroecology Bill process within a year, then conduct public hearings across all eight EAC Partner States to gather stakeholder input. The bill will be fast-tracked for debate and approval in the EALA plenary, with civil society expected to help secure the Heads of State’s assent. Once adopted, the law will become the EAC Agroecology Act, guiding and harmonizing agroecology efforts across the region.

As climate shocks intensify and millions of families depend on smallholder farming, the Mukono meeting marks a turning point in East Africa’s pursuit of sustainable, resilient food systems. The push for a unified agroecology law signals a growing regional recognition that the future of East African agriculture must be farmer-centered, biodiversity-based, and rooted in local knowledge.

Continue Reading

MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK

East African lawmakers and CSO leaders are meeting in Uganda to draw up plans to promote Agroecology as an alternative to climate change mitigation.

Published

on

By Witness Radio team.

Mukono, Uganda — the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) members and Civil society organizations (CSOs) leaders in Uganda are convening in Nakisunga, Mukono district today, 28th November, to discuss how to promote agroecology at the regional level and inspire a collective commitment to regional resilience.

Agroecology offers a robust, holistic approach to combating climate change by enhancing the resilience of food systems and reducing their environmental impact.

Spearheaded by the Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT), the event emphasizes integrating agroecology into regional climate resilience strategies, especially as the East African Community (EAC) faces rising food costs, climate shocks, and declining soil health.

During the meeting, EALA members, together with CSOs, will explore how principles like crop diversification, soil regeneration, and community seed saving can directly improve smallholder farmers’ resilience and livelihoods, complemented by a hands-on field visit to the CEFROHT Agroecology Learning Center in Mukono.

The event has also occurred at a time when EALA is reviewing the East African Seed and Plant Varieties Bill, 2025, which is being criticized for undermining the role of smallholder farmers in seed saving, conservation, and the management of seed systems to promote healthy foods.

Players from CSOs include: Participatory Ecological Land Use Management (PELUM Uganda), Eastern and Southern Africa Small-scale Farmers’ Forum (ESAFF), Seed Savers Network Kenya, TABIO Tanzania, the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA), Slow Food Uganda, SEATINI, FIAN Uganda, and the Mukono District Local Government, among others.

The meeting will lay the groundwork for East Africa’s first Policy and Model Law on Agroecology, a long-awaited step toward sustainable and equitable agri-food systems that empower regional stakeholders to shape the future.

The event will be broadcast live on Witness Radio.

Continue Reading

Resource Center

Legal Framework

READ BY CATEGORY

Facebook

Newsletter

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter



Trending

Subscribe to Witness Radio's newsletter