Defending Land And Environmental Rights
UN food summit will be ‘elitist’ and ‘pro-corporate’, says special rapporteur
A farmer harvesting cowpeas in Moyale, Kenya in July. Small-scale rural farmers produce a third of the world’s food.
Michael Fakhri says Thursday’s meeting will not be promised ‘people’s summit’ on tackling world’s nutrition crisis
The UN global food summit is “elitist and regressive” and has failed in its goal of being a “people’s summit”, according to the special rapporteur on food rights.
As world leaders prepare to attend the virtual event on Thursday, which aims to examine ways to transform global food systems to be more sustainable, Michael Fakhri said it risked leaving behind the very people critical for its success. In an interview with the Guardian, Fakhri said neither the worsening impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the right to food, nor fundamental questions of inequality, accountability and governance were being properly addressed by the meeting.
“The summit is being led by scientists and research institutes who are pro-corporate sector,” Fakhri said. “People say, let’s give them the benefit of the doubt, let’s see if it is the ‘people’s summit’ it is claiming to be.”
“But they have failed in what they had set out to do. It is not the people’s summit. It is elitist.
“In the day-to-day operations of the summit, corporations do not have a role,” said Fakhri. “But the leadership picked comes from organisations that believe corporations are part of the solution.”
Called by the UN secretary general, António Guterres, the meeting was welcomed for recognising that farming has been largely ignored in climate talks. But its progress has been mired in controversy, as arguments continue over the causes of growing hunger and diet-related disease and whether the event is biased in favour of hi-tech intensive farming.
Guterres’ choice of Agnes Kalibata, the former Rwandan minister for agriculture, to lead the summit was met with protests last year, given her role as president of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (Agra), which has been accused of promoting damaging, business-focused practices.
In March, the Civil Society and Indigenous Peoples’ Mechanism, a group of more than 500 civil society groups with at least 300 million members, said it would boycott the summit and set up a parallel meeting. In a separate initiative, 148 grassroots groups from 28 countries, which make up the People’s Coalition on Food Security, urged the UN to sever the “strategic partnership” with the World Economic Forum, the organisation that hosts the annual Davos economic summit for the global elite.
Kalibata responded to criticisms at the time saying: “The entire purpose of the summit is to embrace not only the shared interests of all stakeholders but also – importantly – the areas of divergence on how we go about addressing the harsh reality humanity faces. If we are to build more inclusive food systems, we must be prepared to have inclusive debate.”
Fakhri said: “They claim to be listening to people. They invited me to provide human rights advice. But I haven’t seen any substantive response to my criticism.
“What I witnessed was a summit that was called for before the pandemic and continued as if there was no pandemic. What we are going to see is a summit whose value is a snapshot of all the problems we had before the pandemic. But the problem has got worse.”
In 2020 the number of people without access to adequate food rose by 320 million to 2.4 billion – nearly a third of the world’s population, according to Fakhri’s interim report on the right to food. The increase is equivalent to the previous five years combined.
The boycott of the event by organisations representing millions of people highlighted how “regressive the summit is in terms of human rights”, he said. “This is the first regressive move in the summit’s 60-year history.”
Fakhri said the summit’s multilateral approach, which he claims is driven by the private sector, has not provided a meaningful space for communities and civil society to participate, with the risk of “leaving behind the very population critical for the summit’s success”.
He wrote to Kalibata in January, saying the global food crisis was “chronic, urgent and set to intensify” but that the summit appeared focused on science and technology, money and markets. It failed to address “fundamental questions of inequality, accountability and governance”, he said.
Fakhri said that “everyone is in agreement” that, with famine and food insecurity on the rise, food systems are not sustainable, but the summit is not dealing with the “power balance” many believe is responsible.
“The summit doesn’t want to answer those questions or deal with corporate power,” he said.
The most inclusive space, that of the UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS), has been “marginalised”, he said, along with human rights. The CFS was formed in 2009 to give farmers and communities an equal say with big businesses.
Farmers and others have been demanding a food system transformation rooted in food sovereignty and agroecology for a decade, Fakhri said, but it required a questioning of economic assumptions, protection of human rights and a rebalance of power.
“Food systems are being transformed in real time and people need solutions today, in reality, not this fantasy that has been going on.”
He believes nevertheless, that good things had emerged from the summit, including activating governments to devote their energy to national food policies.
“The second good thing is, despite its shortcomings and problems it has created new relationships. A lot of people committed to human rights were frustrated by the summit process but found new allies and opportunities for solidarity.”
He urged those who felt sidelined to take action and to “hold corporations accountable”. “People who are frustrated, don’t let the summit lead you to despair. Take your ideas, there will be a local food justice group or trade union, go join and participate there.”
In response to Fakhri’s comments, the spokesperson for the secretary general, Stéphane Dujarric, said: “Preparations for the UN food systems summit have been structured to ensure everyone around the world had the opportunity to participate through different platforms, in person and virtually. Several leaders from producers, farmers, women, Indigenous peoples, youth, and civil society engaged in the summit, representing millions of constituents from these groups. It is also important to note that the summit cannot achieve its objectives without engaging with the private sector.”
Dujarric said more than 100,000 people have engaged in summit dialogues and more than 2,000 ideas on transforming food systems emerged within six months of public engagement, of which 400 came from farmer and producer groups, Indigenous communities and civil society.
On Tuesday, a report by the UN’s International Fund for Agricultural Development showed profits for large food companies escalating, while people producing, processing and distributing food were trapped in poverty and hunger. It calls for a “revolution” to place small rural farmers, who produce a third of the planet’s food, at the centre of the world’s food systems.
Original source: THE GUARDIAN
Related posts:
UN Food Systems Summit: The Battle Over Global Food and Agriculture Governance
Why UN Food systems summit is irrelevant to Uganda’s smallholder farmers: A case of capitalism pushing the poor away from family land
CORPORATE AGRIBUSINESS GIANTS SWIM IN WEALTH AS MORE POOR PEOPLE GO HUNGRY AMID THE BITING COVID PANDEMIC.
OPINION: Land rights for small producers: a critical solution to the world’s food systems
Defending Land And Environmental Rights
Breaking: Mwanga II Court grants bail to two defenders and a Project Affected Person (PAP).
Related posts:
Court charges Kawaala community land rights defender with fraud and obtaining money by pretense and remands him to prison.
The World Bank project affected persons have petitioned the court seeking to halt an illegal eviction by capital authority
Witness Radio welcomes the World Bank’s intervention into Kawaala drainage channel project affected persons…
The Court charges another Community land rights defender from Kawaala and remands him to prison.
Defending Land And Environmental Rights
The ruling of bail applications for the two community defenders and a project-affected person of Kawaala zone is happening today.
Related posts:
The Court charges another Community land rights defender from Kawaala and remands him to prison.
Breaking: Mwanga II Court grants bail to two defenders and a Project Affected Person (PAP).
A Court in Kiryandongo releases two community land rights defenders and eight farmers on bail.
Breaking: bail applications for the two community land rights defenders and eight farmers kicks off this morning.
Defending Land And Environmental Rights
A Court in Kiryandongo releases two community land rights defenders and eight farmers on bail.
Related posts:
Breaking: bail applications for the two community land rights defenders and eight farmers kicks off this morning.
Court charges and remands two community land rights defenders and eight farmers to prison
The criminal trial of two community land rights defenders and eight farmers kicks off tomorrow.
Community land rights defenders that have been on trial since 2020; are set to return to court this January.
Joint CSO Statement Calls on IFC and MIGA to Strengthen its New Approach to Remedial Action Policy
Robusta coffee hits record high to trade at sh7,500 per kilo in Ibanda
Breaking; Lands Minister directs police chief to arrest armed mobs involved in forced and illegal land evictions.
Press Release – CICDHA: UN Human Rights Committee calls on China for mechanisms to investigate and punish harmful activities of its companies and banks abroad
The ruling of bail applications for the two community defenders and a project-affected person of Kawaala zone is happening today.
Minister orders for reinstatement of a local community back onto its land.
Breaking: Mwanga II Court grants bail to two defenders and a Project Affected Person (PAP).
A Court in Kiryandongo releases two community land rights defenders and eight farmers on bail.
Innovative Finance from Canada projects positive impact on local communities.
Over 5000 Indigenous Communities evicted in Kiryandongo District
Petition To Land Inquiry Commission Over Human Rights In Kiryandongo District
Invisible victims of Uganda Land Grabs
-
Defending Land And Environmental Rights1 week agoBreaking: Mwanga II Court grants bail to two defenders and a Project Affected Person (PAP).
-
Livelihood, Land And Investment2 weeks agoOver 500 Kapapi families in Hoima district remain stranded after the district security committee fails to resettle them back on their land as directed by the minister.
-
Accountable Development To Communities4 days agoStarvation is rooming in Kiryandongo district as families count losses after missing the seventh planting season consecutively to a multinational.
-
Livelihood, Land And Investment1 day agoBreaking; Lands Minister directs police chief to arrest armed mobs involved in forced and illegal land evictions.
-
NGO work2 days agoPress Release – CICDHA: UN Human Rights Committee calls on China for mechanisms to investigate and punish harmful activities of its companies and banks abroad
-
farm news14 hours agoRobusta coffee hits record high to trade at sh7,500 per kilo in Ibanda
-
NGO work9 hours agoJoint CSO Statement Calls on IFC and MIGA to Strengthen its New Approach to Remedial Action Policy