STATEMENTS
Joint statement: AfDB should open spaces for civil society and communities, during the Annual Meetings and beyond.
Published
3 years agoon

JOINT STATEMENT
Over 45 African and international organizations call on the AfDB to open spaces for civil society and communities during the Annual Meetings and beyond.
From May 22 to the 26, the Board of Directors and other key management staff of the African Development Bank (AfDB) will be gathering for the 58th Annual Meetings in Sharm El Sheikh (Egypt). Once again , though, civil society and communities directly affected by AfDB-funded activities will not have a chance to participate.
The AfDB, despite its mission to spur sustainable development and help the most marginalized across the African continent, remains an institution where decision-making processes tend to happen behind closed doors and with a top-down approach.
During the Annual Meetings, Bank Directors will be speaking among themselves and with some stakeholders from other institutions and the private sector. Those who should be the primary beneficiaries of AfDB projects – and who are most directly affected – will not have a seat at the table. Community members and civil society activists will not have the opportunity to have their say, to express their needs, and to raise their concerns around the negative impacts of some of the Bank’s activities.
While the recently updated AfDB’s Integrated Safeguards System (ISS) includes a commitment not to tolerate reprisals, the fact that the Bank decided to hold its Annual Meetings in Egypt sends a contradicting and worrisome message. Egypt is currently infamous for its closed civic space. Thousands of people – including human rights defenders and journalists – are still arbitrarily detained, simply for peacefully defending human rights or speaking truth to power. Because of the regime crackdown on any critical voice, citizens exercise self-censorship for fear of retaliation. Foreign activists are also a target: just recently, the Egyptian regime denied entry, without providing a reason, for an Italian human rights activist who had a valid visa and accreditation to participate in the COP27.
The Annual Meetings can be a crucial advocacy and lobbying platform for civil society organizations. Similarly to other development banks, the AfDB should reintegrate the Civil Society Forum as part of the programme of the Annual Meetings. It should also reform its design, to make the forum more inclusive, accessible, transparent, and open to a diverse range of civil society groups, without limiting the number and types of topics addressed in the agenda.
Unfortunately, the lack of opportunities for participation during the Annual Meetings is only the tip of the iceberg. Civil society organizations have long been advocating with the AfDB to open up spaces for participation.
Civil society groups have also repeatedly raised concerns about the shortcomings of the policy review processes , which tend to lack transparency and have limited opportunities for civil society participation, and about the actual implementation of the Bank’s safeguards.
For instance, the inclusion of language on reprisals in the new ISS – where the bank commits to ensure people can safely speak out in the context of its projects – is a welcome and long-awaited step. But it will remain nothing more than a piece of paper that can easily be ignored, if the AfDB doesn’t take concrete actions to change processes, incentives, and culture to adopt a human rights-based approach, to prevent reprisals before it is too late, and to react quickly when cases of reprisals are raised.
As we write this letter, there are dozens of human rights defenders facing threats and attacks simply for speaking out against the negative impacts of AfDB-funded projects and peacefully defending the rights of their communities. Their voices are crucial: the Bank should stand up to ensure they are not silenced.
This week, as the AfDB is holding its Annual Meetings, it must keep African communities at the forefront. Sustainable development is impossible without the voices of those most affected by development. The AfDB should be for the African People and not African Governments.
The signatories are calling on the AfDB to do the following:
- Ensure meaningful participatory processes in policies, programmes, and projects, including through reprisal-sensitive consultations and engagement;
- Open spaces for civil society and community engagement, including at the Annual Meetings, and consider the implications of holding AfDB events in contexts where civil society cannot freely operate;
- Engage with clients to emphasize the importance of independent civil society and open civic space in achieving sustainable and inclusive development;
- Prioritize community-led development and human rights-based approaches;
- Raise the bar on access to information, transparency and accountability;
- Take steps to assess reprisal risks, prevent reprisals, and adequately respond to them when they occur.
Signatories
- AbibiNsroma Foundation – Ghana
- Accountability Lab Liberia – Liberia
- Action For The Protection Of Endangered Species (ACES) – Cameroon
- African Law Foundation (AFRILAW) – Nigeria
- Appui aux Initiatives Communautaires de Conservation de l’Environnement et de Développement Durable (AICED) – Democratic Republic of Congo
- Association Burkinabè pour la Survie de l’Enfance (ABSE) – Burkina Faso
- Bank Information Center (BIC) – United States
- Both ENDS – The Netherlands
- Buliisa Initiative for Rural Development Organization (BIRUDO ) – Uganda
- Centre de Défense des Droits de l’Homme et Démocratie (CDHD) – Democratic Republic of Congo
- Coalition des OSC sur la transparence à la BAD – Mali (for Africa secretariat)
- Committee for Peace and Development Advocacy – Liberia
- COMPPART Foundation for Justice and Peacebuilding – Nigeria
- Foundation For Environmental Rights,Advocacy & Development (FENRAD) – Nigeria
- Gouvernement des Amis de Yadio et Assangbadji (ONG GAYA) – Côte d’Ivoire
- Green Advocates International – Liberia
- Green Development Advocates (GDA) – Cameroon
- Human Rights Movement “Bir Duino-Kyrgyzstan – Kyrgyzstan
- IBON Africa – Kenya
- IFI Sinergy Group – Cameroon
- International Accountability Project (IAP) – Global
- Jamaa Resource Initiatives – Kenya
- Le Monde Des Enfants – Guinea
- Lumière Synergie pour le Développement (LSD) – Senegal
- Network Movement for Justice and Development – Sierra Leone
- Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NAU) – Nigeria
- Observatoire d’Etudes et d’Appui à la Responsabilité Sociale et Environnementale (OEARSE) – Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Oil Workers’ Rights Protection Organization Public Union – Azerbaijan
- ONG Coeur d’or d’Afrique – Côte d’Ivoire
- ONG Environnement et Comportements Sains en Côte d’Ivoire (ECOSCI) – Côte d’Ivoire
- ONG-OPV (Ordre pour la Paix et la Vie) – Côte d’Ivoire
- Pain aux Indigents et Appui à l’auto Promotion (PIAP) – Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Peace Point Development Foundation (PPDF) – Nigeria
- Public Interest Law Center (PILC) – Chad
- Réseau Accès aux Médicaments Essentiels (RAME) – Burkina Faso
- Réseau des Organisations de la Société Civile pour le Développement du Tonkpi (ROSCIDET)pour le Développement – Côte d’Ivoire
- Sightsavers – Ghana
- SOS Jeunesse et Défis – Burkina Faso
- Sustainable Holistic Development Foundation (SUHODE) – Tanzania
- Uganda Consortium on Corporate Accountability (UCCA) – Uganda
- United Youth for Peace Education Transparency and Development in Liberia – Liberia
- Witness Radio – Uganda
- Women with Disability Self Reliance Foundation – Nigeria
- Women’s Health Development (FESADE) – Cameroon
- Youth for Promotion of Development – Cameroon
- Youth Transforming Africa Narrative (YOTAN) – Liberia
Source: Rightsindevelopment.org
Related posts:

30 civil society organizations have written to the World Bank Group demanding to publicly disclose the Africa Energy Approach paper.
Joint Statement on World Bank Accountability Mechanism’s Decision to Limit Application of Operating Procedures
Joint statement on the charges against Nicholas Opiyo.
Operations of civil society organizations will continue to be stifled until government understands their work – New Book.
You may like
STATEMENTS
Statement by Witness Radio- Legal Aid Clinic on International Women’s Day 2026; Scaling Up Investment to Accelerate Access to Justice for Women and Girls Defending Land and Environmental Rights
Published
1 month agoon
March 8, 2026
As the world commemorates International Women’s Day, Witness Radio Legal Aid Clinic joins voices across Uganda and globally in calling for urgent and transformative action to accelerate access to justice for women and girls, particularly in protecting land rights, advancing environmental justice, and safeguarding community livelihoods.
Across Uganda’s rural communities, women are the backbone of families and local economies. They cultivate the land, produce food, and sustain household livelihoods. Despite being the primary users and custodians of land and natural resources, women remain systematically excluded from ownership, control, and decision-making over the very land that sustains their families and communities. Through our legal aid work supporting communities affected by forced land evictions, large-scale land acquisitions, and environmental degradation, Witness Radio has consistently observed that women bear the greatest burden of land injustices as cultural norms and patriarchal systems in many communities continue to treat land as the domain of men. As a result, women are frequently excluded from community meetings, negotiations, mediations, and decision-making regarding land use, land acquisition, and compensation processes.
Additionally, the increasing wave of large-scale land investments and commercial agriculture across Uganda has further exposed and deepened long-standing inequalities that marginalize women from fair, prompt compensation, decision-making processes, land usage, and ownership rights. Compensation is often paid to male heads of households, while the rights, interests, and contributions of women are overlooked. Many women who depend on the land for farming, food production, and family survival are neither consulted nor recognized as rights holders.
In numerous cases, once compensation is paid to men, women are abandoned with children and left without land, resources, or economic security. This reality exposes the deep lack of justice and tenure security for women, particularly in customary land settings, where their rights are rarely documented or formally recognized. Women who speak out against land grabbing, forced land evictions, or environmental destruction often face intimidation, social backlash, and isolation. Yet despite these challenges, many women continue to stand as frontline defenders of land, environment, and community survival.
Unfortunately, access to justice for these women remains limited. Existing grievance redress structures, cultural institutions, and traditional justice systems often fail to recognize or include women in the justice process, and administrative frameworks and formal legal processes are exorbitantly expensive, lengthy, and inaccessible to rural communities. Social barriers such as cultural norms, poverty, and illiteracy also prevent women from seeking remedies or participating fully in justice mechanisms. Without intentional efforts to dismantle these barriers, the promise of equality under the law and access to justice remains out of reach and a rumor for many women and girls.
Accelerating access to justice for women and girls, therefore, requires transformative action. It requires strengthening community legal empowerment, ensuring women’s meaningful participation in land governance and administration, and guaranteeing that grievance and compensation mechanisms recognize women as legitimate rights holders. In addition, it requires government institutions, cultural leaders, development partners, and private investors to ensure that investments and development projects respect human rights and actively protect women’s land rights rather than undermine them. Responsible investment must include gender-responsive and inclusive land governance and administration practices in a bid to strengthen recognition and protect women’s land rights.
Investors and development actors must ensure that women are consulted, included in negotiations, and fairly compensated where compulsory land acquisition occurs. Development should empower communities, not deepen existing inequalities.
As Witness Radio Legal Aid Clinic, we remain committed to supporting women land and environmental defenders, strengthening community land rights awareness, and amplifying the voices of women who continue to resist dispossession and demand accountability. Through legal aid, documentation of human rights abuses, and advocacy for equitable land governance, we stand in solidarity with women who are courageously defending their rights and the future of their communities.
As we mark this International Women’s Day, we honor the resilience of women across Uganda who continue to speak out for justice, dignity, and equality. Their struggle is not only about land, but also about justice, survival, and the protection of future generations.
“The soil remembers, my child. Even when men steal, even when papers lie, the land never forgets who sang to it, who bled for it, who are buried beneath it.”
Truly,
Witness Radio Legal Aid Clinic
Related posts:

Know Your Land rights and environmental protection laws: a case of a refreshed radio program transferring legal knowledge to local and indigenous communities to protect their land and the environment at Witness Radio.
Bridging the access to justice gap: Witness Radio trains paralegals ahead of Uganda’s general election.
Upholding Women’s Land Rights in the implementation of development projects will accelerate progress.
In memory of land and investment women victims in Uganda on the International Women’s Day 2021
STATEMENTS
Joint Statement Response by Advisers of PAPs to the DRS Follow-Up Report on the Uganda KIIDP-2 Case
Published
5 months agoon
November 25, 2025

Joint Statement Response by Advisers of PAPs to the DRS Follow-Up Report on the Uganda KIIDP-2 Case
KAMPALA, 25th NOVEMBER 2025
Introduction
On 30th October 2025, the World Bank’s Dispute Resolution Service (DRS) published its final Follow-up Report on the Uganda KIIDP-2 case, a community-led complaint regarding forced evictions and project-related harms under the Kampala Infrastructure and Institutional Development Project. The case began in 2021 and closed in 2023.
We welcome the publication of the Follow-up Report as it provides important reflections on dispute resolution practice. We appreciate that feedback from stakeholders, including some of our own, was incorporated into the Report. However, the Report presents an overly positive narrative that fails to reflect critical issues experienced by community members negatively impacted by the KIIDP-2 project. These omissions not only distort the record but undermine the legitimacy and objective of the accountability process and learning.
Gaps in Report
Project harms continue: It is paramount to begin here. The affected community filed a complaint to the Inspection Panel of the World Bank in 2020 to complain about harm they were experiencing with the ongoing KIIDP II project. The project designers and implementers failed to engage meaningfully with people who would be impacted by the project, and as a result, there was inadequate compensation for negative impacts, health risks and other hazards were associated with mismanagement of the drainage channel, and people lost their livelihoods. Over five years later–and even after a mediation process–the issues persist. The project remains incomplete even after the project closeout date. Clogged passages with dirt, persistent flooding of peoples homes and farms with dirty water, lack of access to homes, and incomplete infrastructure remain unresolved. The posture of the Follow-up Report assumes implementation is complete and everything is well, but the reality couldn’t be further from that.
No livelihood restoration: Livelihood support was a core demand from community members and a central topic throughout the mediation. Although interim agreements were reached on this issue, they were not included in the final agreement, and no livelihood programs have since been implemented. The community’s health, safety, and economic conditions continue to deteriorate as a result.
Women’s issues ignored: Gender-specific harms raised in the complaint and during the case process were never addressed and are completely absent from the final report.
Retaliation, intimidation, and threats of eviction: The report fails to acknowledge threats, harassment, and attempted evictions faced by community members during the process.
The process felt coerced and rushed: The Follow-up Report fails to capture DRS’ own challenges in managing the timelines to ensure a successful outcome. Although the mediation process spanned 18 months, community members report that they felt pressured to sign the agreement on the final day. In part this is because there was confusion about whether the dispute resolution process had officially concluded, and representatives and advisors were not informed in advance that the signing would take place that day. The Follow-Up Report also fails to capture the serious concerns associated with the signing of the agreement that led the community to feel coerced to sign the agreement. For example, the presence of government security officials at the signing created an intimidating atmosphere, further contributing to the sense of coercion.
Undermined decision-making: In the final stages, the DRS changed the previously agreed community representation and decision-making structure, sidelining duly elected representatives and diminishing the voice of minority or dissenting perspectives. The DRS made a unilateral decision–on the day of signing of the agreement–that the representatives previously elected by impacted community members were no longer going to make decisions on behalf of the community, and that instead, every member of the community was required individually to sign the agreement if they wanted to benefit from its provisions. Furthermore, the DRS had earlier communicated that if the agreement was signed, no unresolved issues could be referred to the compliance process, effectively discouraging individuals from dissenting or withholding their signature.
Confidentiality limitations: Unreasonably strict confidentiality restrictions during the mediation process limited community representatives’ ability to consult with other community members, the media, and allies. This lack of openness undermined transparency, community-wide participation, and meaningful ownership of the process. Towards the end of the process and during the implementation phase, the DRS interpreted these confidentiality provisions in a way that denied advisors access to key documents, including the mediation agreement and drafts of the Follow-Up Report. This made it extremely difficult for the advisors to support the community with timely and informed guidance. The removal of the Implementation Committee on the day of signing the agreement, without mutual agreement or any formal communication, further isolated the advisors. As a result, they were unable to monitor implementation or receive feedback through project-affected people (PAPs), with DRS insisting that the agreement remained confidential. The continued denial of access under the guise of confidentiality infringed on the community’s right to adequate representation.
Exclusion from Inspection Panel referral: The report omits that requesters were excluded from bringing unresolved issues to the Inspection Panel for investigation. This shift contradicted earlier expectations and closed off a key accountability route. Read more here.
To support transparency and learning, we commissioned an independent consultant to gather community feedback on the process, outcomes, and roles of various actors. Once complete, this analysis will be shared with the DRS and the World Bank to inform future DRS processes and strengthen accountability for other communities.
Conclusion
We believe in the potential of dispute resolution to provide meaningful remedy, but to realize that potential, there must be bold, transparent, and inclusive implementation. The DRS must account for all aspects of the mediation process and its outcomes. Livelihoods, gender-specific harms, and reprisals are not peripheral issues; they are central to justice, and they are left unresolved.
We thank the DRS for its work and call for further dialogue to ensure the spirit of the agreement is honored, and the dignity of the Kawaala community upheld.
Witness Radio
Accountability Counsel
Statement: 19.11.25 Statement Re DRS Report
Related posts:

Joint Statement on World Bank Accountability Mechanism’s Decision to Limit Application of Operating Procedures
PAPs and advisors cry foul over the mismanagement of the remedy agreement with the Uganda Government facilitated by the World Bank’s IAM.
Acknowledging Community’s Agreement while Raising Concerns with World Bank’s Dispute Resolution Service
Joint statement: AfDB should open spaces for civil society and communities, during the Annual Meetings and beyond.
STATEMENTS
Witness Radio Statement on the International Human Rights Day 2024: A call to the government of Uganda to protect Land and Environmental Rights Defenders and Communities affected by irresponsible land-based investments in Uganda.
Published
1 year agoon
December 10, 2024
For immediate release
Statement on International Human Rights Day 2024:
Witness Radio calls out the government of Uganda to protect Land and Environmental Rights Defenders and Communities affected by irresponsible land-based investments in Uganda.
Wakiso: Uganda, December 10th, 2024; Anchored to the UN Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups, and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Witness Radio stands together with Land and Environmental Rights Defenders, communities affected by irresponsible land-based investments in Uganda, and Human Rights Defenders across the globe in urging Government of Uganda to uphold and fulfill their obligations to protect and respect human rights in the context of land-based business operations and to ensure access to an effective remedy for individuals and groups affected by such activities, specifically land and environmental rights defenders.
As the world commemorates International Human Rights Day on December 10th, 2024, under the theme;
Our rights, our future, right now, Witness Radio has, in a period of the first 6 months of the year 2024, documented over 360,000 people who faced forceful evictions from the lands that had fed them for generations. This has led to various unbearable environmental and social issues, including violations of community rights during forceful evictions and threats to water sources, the environment, and food security. For instance, the use of agrochemicals in the newly acquired lands has led to pollution, affecting the health of the local communities.
Communities whose rights and interests on land have been forcefully transferred to land-based investors in agribusiness, carbon-offset tree plantations, oil and gas extraction, mining, and infrastructural development projects highlight concerns over food shortages, livelihoods; inadequate compensation; restricted land access; and impacts on children’s education, safety, and welfare, including gender-based violence (GBV) and reproductive health issues.
A recent report by Witness Radio Uganda, released in November 2024, paints a dire picture. Between January and June 2024, more than 360,000 people faced violent evictions, with over 121,000 hectares of land under threat. Nearly four cases of land evictions were reported weekly, affecting approximately 15,126 people and threatening 5,060.12 hectares of land across the country. An estimated 2,160 Ugandans faced evictions daily to give way to investments, with 723 hectares of land at risk of being grabbed daily. This is a crisis that demands immediate attention.
The land grabs are happening on abandoned national ranches and forests, which have long since been settled and farmed by people who came to the area fleeing war and natural calamities in neighboring areas. Although compulsory land acquisition falls within government powers in Uganda, corporations interested in specific land and their agents have been left responsible for managing much of the process and setting compensation values. This has led to serious problems with how the land acquisition process is being conducted, resulting in severe impacts on affected communities, which have infringed on the rights to property, involuntary resettlement, housing, earning a livelihood, food, private and family life, and trading and disposing of natural wealth and resources.
Land and Environmental Rights Defenders are the unsung heroes in this battle for justice. They are often the only force between ordinary people and unbridled power. However, their efforts are frequently met with judicial harassment in the form of criminalization for offensive gatherings, criminal trespass, and strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) to discourage peaceful demonstrations against unlawful evictions, arbitrary detention, and defamation. Their importance cannot be overstated, and the injustices they face are a stark reminder of the need for change.
On this International Human Rights Day, it is crucial that duty-bearers recognize the gravity of the crisis in Uganda. The Government of Uganda should commit to and urgently implement universal respect, protection, and fulfillment of human rights for everyone and everywhere in the country. This is not just a call for action but a demand for justice and equality. We urge the government to act now, before more lives and livelihoods are lost.
Our Rights, Our Future, Right Now
Signed by;
Jeff Wokulira Ssebaggala.
For Witness Radio – Uganda
Related posts:

Witness Radio, private companies, CSOs and local government officials are meeting to discuss alternative remedies to salvage the appalling land and environmental rights situation in Kiryandongo district.
Uganda: Land-grab victim communities will join counterparts in commemorating the 2024 International Day of Struggle Against Industrial Plantations.
Land and environmental rights defenders, CSOs, scholars, and government to meet in Kampala to assess Uganda’s performance on the implementation of the UN Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights in Uganda.
Breaking: Witness Radio and Partners to Launch Human Rights Monitoring, Documentation, and Advocacy Project Tomorrow.
Agroecological farming: EAC Bill moves to Parliament to establish a regional legal framework to protect and promote sustainable farming and food systems.
African women are rising for climate justice and reparations on the inaugural continental day of action.
Africa is capturing just 2% of its carbon credit potential
Ugandan Farmers Sue EACOP in London in Last Minute Effort to Stop Crude Oil Pipeline
Oil-affected residents and civil society organizations reject TotalEnergies’ Tilenga Progress Report, citing unfairness in their operations.
The South African High Court concludes hearing a landmark case challenging TotalEnergies’ Deep-Water Drilling project and offers to deliver its ruling on notice.
U.S. Peace Efforts in the DRC: Protecting Communities or Minerals?
Sham Presidential Commissions Rubber Stamp Tanzanian Government’s Efforts to Evict Indigenous Maasai from Ngorongoro Conservation Area
Innovative Finance from Canada projects positive impact on local communities.
Over 5000 Indigenous Communities evicted in Kiryandongo District
Petition To Land Inquiry Commission Over Human Rights In Kiryandongo District
Invisible victims of Uganda Land Grabs
Resource Center
- Land And Environment Rights In Uganda Experiences From Karamoja And Mid Western Sub Regions
- REPARATORY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE MUST BE AT THE CORE OF COP30, SAY GLOBAL LEADERS AND MOVEMENTS
- LAND GRABS AT GUNPOINT REPORT IN KIRYANDONGO DISTRICT
- THOSE OIL LIARS! THEY DESTROYED MY BUSINESS!
- RESEARCH BRIEF -TOURISM POTENTIAL OF GREATER MASAKA -MARCH 2025
- The Mouila Declaration of the Informal Alliance against the Expansion of Industrial Monocultures
- FORCED LAND EVICTIONS IN UGANDA TRENDS RIGHTS OF DEFENDERS IMPACT AND CALL FOR ACTION
- 12 KEY DEMANDS FROM CSOS TO WORLD LEADERS AT THE OPENING OF COP16 IN SAUDI ARABIA
Legal Framework
READ BY CATEGORY
Newsletter
Trending
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK2 weeks agoGlobal Peasant Movement calls for action against escalating land grabs and repression.
-
NGO WORK1 week agoTwo dead as Siaya protests against gold mining firm turn tragic
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK6 days agoUgandan Farmers Sue EACOP in London in Last Minute Effort to Stop Crude Oil Pipeline
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK4 hours agoAfrican women are rising for climate justice and reparations on the inaugural continental day of action.
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK6 days agoMinister Cancels Contested 12-Square-Mile Land Title in Mubende
-
DEFENDING LAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS3 days agoAfrica is capturing just 2% of its carbon credit potential
-
MEDIA FOR CHANGE NETWORK3 hours agoAgroecological farming: EAC Bill moves to Parliament to establish a regional legal framework to protect and promote sustainable farming and food systems.

